Robust Deliberative Democracy

REFERENCES

• Arrow, Kenneth. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2012. “Political Liberty: Who Needs It?" Social Philosophy and Policy 29: 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0265052511000045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason, and Peter Jaworski. 2016. Markets without Limits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Geoffrey, and Loren Lomasky. 2006. “Against Reviving Republicanism.” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 5: 221–52. doi: 10.1177/1470594X06064224
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2006. “Capitalism, Freedom, and the Proletariat.” The Liberty Reader, ed. David Miller. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald. 2003. “Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Post-Socialist Critique of Market Society.” Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 59–91. doi: 10.1017/S0265052503201047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, Carol. 1988. Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics, Economy, and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, Alex. 2013. “Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work.” Political Theory 41: 591–617. doi: 10.1177/0090591713485370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, ed. W.W. Bartley III. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich. [1960] 2011. The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition, ed. Ronald Hamowy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Michael. 2008. The Quality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, Frank. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2006. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2011. Robust Political Economy. Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2010. “Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit.” Critical Review 22: 159–84. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2010.508632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1995. Political Liberalism: Revised Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, Christian. 2008. Deliberative Freedom: Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. “The Social Contract” and other Later Political Writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 1997. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1776] 1981. The Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Somin, Ilya. 2013. Democracy and Political Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Richard. 2013. “Market Freedom as Anti-Power.” American Political Science Review 107(3): 593–602. doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasi, John. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar