Democracy and Truth: A Contingent Defense of Epistemic Democracy

References

• Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi. 2014. “La normativité démocratique, entre vérite et procedures.” Raisons politiques 55(3): 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Edward. 1965. Matthew Arnold and John Stuart Mill. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3(1–2): 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2009. “Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-Instrumental Value.” In Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, ed. Thomas Christiano and John Christman. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Audard, Catherine. 2007. John Rawls. Stocksfield: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Baccarini, Elvio, and Victor Ivankovic. 2015. “Mill’s Case for Plural Voting and the Need for Balanced Public Decisions.” Prolegomena 14(2): 137–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergson, Henri. 1911. “Sur le pragmatisme de William James: Vérité et reálité.” In James, Le Pragmatisme, trans. E. Le Brun. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. 2012. “Representation in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brilhante, Atila Amaral. 2007. “The Centrality of Accountability in John Stuart Mill’s Liberal-Utilitarian Conception of Democracy.” Ph.D. diss., University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, Janice. 1999. “Mr. J. Stuart Mill, M. P., and the Character of the Working Classes.” In Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism, ed. Eldon Eisenach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. 2009. “Parties, Partisanship, and Democratic Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 7(3): 621–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, Wendy. 2016. “Mill on Individuality.” In A Companion to Mill, ed. Christopher Macleod and Dale Miller. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Graeme. 1977. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garforth, Francis William. 1980. Educative Democracy: John Stuart Mill on Education in Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlsbeck, Felix. 2016. “What is Democratic Reliability? Epistemic Theories of Democracy and the Problem of Reasonable Disagreement.” Critical Review of International Social and Philosophy: 1–24. doi 10.1080/13698230.2015.1129489
   Google Scholar
• Girard, Charles. 2014. “La règle de majorité en démocratie: équité ou vérité?” Raisons politiques 53(1): 107–37.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, Charles. 2015. “‘La lutte violente entre les parties de la vérité’: conflit des opinions et démocratie représentative chez John Stuart Mill.” Revue internationale de philosophie 272(2): 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy. 1980. Liberal Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2014. Mudança estrutural da esfera pública: Investigações sobre uma categoria da sociedade burguesa, trans. D. L. Werle. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Lisa. 2016. “Voting Turnout, Equality, Liberty and Representation: Epistemic Versus Procedural Democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Philosophy 19(3): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions & Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, Henrik. [1882] 1984. “Um inimigo do povo.” In idem, Seis dramas, trans. V. de Oliveira. Porto Alegre: Globo.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. [1907] 1987. “Pragmatism.” In William James: Writings 1902–1910. New York: Literary Classics of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kateb, George. 2003. “A Reading of On Liberty.” In On Liberty: John Stuart Mill, ed. David Bromwich and George Kateb. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinzer, Bruce. 2007. J. S. Mill Revisited. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Jack, Hélène Landemore, Nadia Urbinati, and Daniel Viehoff. 2016. “Roundtable on Epistemic Democracy and Its Critics.” Critical Review 28(2): 137–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. Forthcoming. “Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• López, Rosario. 2014. “‘The Collision of Adverse Opinions’: John Stuart Mill’s Views on Social and Political Antagonism.” In The Politics of Dissensus: Parliament in Debate, ed. Kari Palonen, José María Rosales, and Tapani Turkka. Santander: Cantabria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, Jeff, and Nick Malpas. 2012. “Truth.” In A Companion to Political Philosophy, ed. Antonella Besussi. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2006. “Conflict and Self-Interest in Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, ed. Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, José Luis. 2006a. La república deliberativa: Una teoría de la democracia. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, José Luis. 2006b. “The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended.” In Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, ed. Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, Luis Felipe. 2014. Democracia e representação. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. 1963–1991. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1988. The Logic of the Moral Sciences. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 2008. “On Liberty.” In idem, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. John Gray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. [1863] 2008. “Utilitarianism.” In idem, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. John Gray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, Russell. 2014. The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitzer, Maria. 2015. “Naturaleza y Límites del ‘Antagonismo Sistemático’ Propuesto por John Stuart Mill.” Τέλος Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas XX(2): 58–81.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1995. Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1997. “James’s Theory of Truth.” In The Cambridge Companion to William James, ed. Ruth Anna Putnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Frederick. 2012. “J. S. Mill on Truth, Liberty, and Democracy.” In Truth and Democracy, ed. Jeremy Elkins and Andrew Norris. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman, David, and Mónica Brito Vieira. 2008. Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shadd, Phillip. 2015. “Why the Facts Matter to Public Justification.” Critical Review 27(2): 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorupski, John. 1991. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talisse, Robert. 2005. Democracy after Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Dennis. 2007. “Mill in Parliament: When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, ed. Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Brendon. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Antagonistic Foundation of Liberal Politics.” Review of Politics 72(1): 25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. “Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation.” Political Theory 28(6): 758–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2012. “Democratic Politics and the Lovers of Truth.” In Truth and Democracy, ed. Jeremy Elkins and Andrew Norris. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2016a. “Postscript.” Critical Review of International Social and Philosophy 19(3): 376–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2016b. “Pragmatism and the Overcoming of Discrete Individualism.” Columbia University. Typescript.
   Google Scholar
• Vattimo, Gianni. 2014. A Farewell to Truth, trans. William McCuaig. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2000. Democracy against Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar