Advancing Post-Structural Institutionalism: Discourses, Subjects, Power Asymmetries, and Institutional Change

REFERENCES

• Adler, Emmanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319-63. doi: 10.1177/1354066197003003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, Pertti. 2015. “The Discursive Side of New Institutionalism.” Cultural Sociology 9(2): 162-84. doi: 10.1177/1749975514561805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, Carol, and Susan Goodwin. 2016. Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, Carol and Malin Rönnblom. 2014. “Feminist Discursive Institutionalism – A Poststructural Alternative.” NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22(3): 170-86. doi: 10.1080/08038740.2013.864701
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, Carol Lee. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, Bernard Leca, and Eva Boxenbaum. 2009. “How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Academy of Management Annals 3(1): 65-107. doi: 10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., and J. J. Patterson. 2016. “Analysing Institutional Change in Environmental Governance: Exploring the Concept of ‘Institutional Work.’” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423.
   Google Scholar
• Bisschops, Saskia, and Raoul Beunen. 2018. “A New Role for Citizens’ Initiatives: The Difficulties in Co-creating Institutional Change in Urban Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1436532.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Tom R., Ewa Roszkowska, Nora Machado Des Johansson, and Ugo Corte. 2018. “Paradigm Shift in Game Theory: Sociological Re-Conceptualization of Human Agency, Social Structure, and Agents’ Cognitive-Normative Frameworks and Action Determination Modalities.” Social Sciences 7(3): 40. doi: 10.3390/socsci7030040
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Martin B. 2011. “Ideas Are Not as Stable as Political Scientists Want Them to Be: A Theory of Incremental Ideational Change.” Political Studies 59(3): 596-615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Martin B., and Vivien A. Schmidt. 2016. “Power Through, Over, and In Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 23(3): 318-37. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Martin B., and Vivien A. Schmidt. 2017. “Power and Changing Modes of Governance in the Euro Crisis.” Governance. DOI: 10.1111/gove.12318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, Louise, and Georgina Waylen. 2013. “Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions.” Public Administration 91(3): 599-615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagg, Jennifer, and Mark Haugaard. 2016. “The Performance of Subject Positions, Power, and Identity: A Case of Refugee Recognition.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 3(4): 392-425. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2016.1202524
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillet, Benoît. 2017. “What Is Poststructuralism?” Political Studies Review 15(4): 516-27. doi: 10.1177/1478929917712931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Charlotte. 2011. “Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 327-350. doi: 10.1177/1354066109350055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Josefina. 2017. Criminalising the Client: Institutional Change, Gendered Ideas and Feminist Strategies. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Josefina. 2018. “Institutions, Gendered Perceptions, and Frames of Meaning: Explaining Strategic Choices of Women MPs in Swedish Prostitution Policy.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. DOI: 10.1080/1554477X.2019.1536599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777-95. doi: 10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. I: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Ben. 2010. “Foucault and the Unfinished Human of Rights.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 6(3): 354-374. doi: 10.1177/1743872110374262
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Alyosha. 2018. “The Ground Not Given.” Social Text 135 36(2): 83-106. doi: 10.1215/01642472-4362373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth. 2016. The Politics of Airport Expansion in the United Kingdom: Hegemony, Policy and the Rhetoric of “Sustainable Aviation.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2002. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2006. “Constructivist Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, ed. R.A.W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder, and Bert A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Béland and Robert Henry Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2016. “Good in a Crisis: The Ontological Institutionalism of Social Constructivism.” New Political Economy 21(6): 520-35. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2016.1158800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2017. “The Interdependence of Intra- and Inter-Subjectivity in Constructivist Institutionalism.” Critical Review 29(2): 235-247. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2017.1366667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2009. “Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power.” Policy and Society 28(3): 173-184. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 2017. “One World or Many?” Critical Review 29(2): 170-188. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2017.1315920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendi, Ibram X. 2016. Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. New York: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Oscar. 2015a. The Governmentality of Meta-governance: Identifying Theoretical and Empirical Challenges of Network Governance in the Political Field of Security and Beyond. Ph.D. diss., Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Oscar L. 2015b. “Using Post-Structuralism to Explore The Full Impact of Ideas on Politics.” Critical Review 27(2): 174-97. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2015.1073883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Oscar L. 2017a. “Meta-Governance and Collaborative Crisis Management – Competing Rationalities in the Management of the Swedish Security Communications System.” Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy 8(4): 312-34. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Oscar L. 2017b. “A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Institutionalized Domination in Network Governance Arrangements.” Critical Policy Studies DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1393440.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, Mona, and Stellan Vinthagen. 2014. “Sovereign Power, Disciplinary Power and Biopower: Resisting What Power with What Resistance?” Journal of Political Power 7: 107-26. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2014.889403
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 1994. “Using Power/Fighting Power.” Constellations 1(1): 53-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, Tomas. 2015. Postfoundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, David S. 2013. “‘Tissue on the Bones’: Towards the Development of a Post-structuralist Institutionalism.” Politics 33(2): 112-23. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance: The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palier, Bruno, and Colin Hay. 2017. “The Reconfiguration of the Welfare State in Europe.” In Reconfiguring European States in Crisis, ed. Desmond King and Patrick Le Galès. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, Francisco, and Romina Miorelli. 2012. “Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory.” Political Studies 61(2): 301-318. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, Craig. 2016. “Ideas and Power: Four Intersections and How to Show Them.” Journal of European Public Policy 23(3): 446-63. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Nelson, Thomas B. Lawrence, and Cynthia Hardy. 2004. “Discourse and Institutions.” Academy of Management Review 29(4): 635-52. doi: 10.5465/amr.2004.14497617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. 2007. “‘Sobjectivism’: Toward a Constructivist Methodology.” International Studies Quarterly 51(2): 359-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Richard. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.” International Organization 52(3): 613-44. doi: 10.1162/002081898550671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rådestad, Carl, and Oscar Larsson. 2018. “Responsibilization in Contemporary Swedish Crisis Management: Expanding ‘Bare Life’ Biopolitics through Exceptionalism and Neoliberal Governmentality.” Critical Policy Studies. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1530604
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously.” European Political Science Review 2(1): 1-25. doi: 10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2011a. “Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Béland and Robert Henry Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2011b. “Speaking of Change: Why Discourse Is Key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation.” Critical Policy Studies 5(2): 106-26. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2017. “Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas.” Critical Review 29(2): 248-63. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2018. “Ideas and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Europe.” In The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism, ed. Damien Cahill, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings, and David Primrose. Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A., and Mark Thatcher. 2014. “Why Are Neoliberal Ideas So Resilient in Europe’s Political Economy?” Critical Policy Studies 8(3): 340-47. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.926826
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87(2): 334-47. doi: 10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1998. “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24: 101-117. doi: 10.1017/S0260210598001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” Democracy and Difference 31: 120-35.
   Google Scholar