REFERENCES
- Chartier, Gary. 2013. Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- De Cleyre, Voltairine, and Rosa Slobodinsky. 1891. “The Individualist and the Communist.” https://www.panarchy.org/voltairine/dialogue.html
- Friedman, Jeffrey. 2019. Power Without Knowledge: A Critique of Technocracy. New York: Oxford University Press
- Green, Donald P., Shang E. Ha, and John G. Bullock. 2010. “Enough Already about ‘Black Box’ Experiments: Studying Mediation Is More Difficult Than Most Scholars Suppose.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628(1): 200–208.
- Hayek, Friedrich A. 2007. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Huemer, Michael. 2013. The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- OECD. 2018. “The Role and Design of Net Wealth Taxes in the OECD.” OECD Tax Policy Studies, no. 26.
- Rorty, Richard. 1972. “The World Well Lost.” The Journal of Philosophy 69(19): 649–65.
- Rorty, Richard. 1982. “Keeping Philosophy Pure: An Essay on Wittgenstein.” In idem, Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Stringham, Edward. 2007. Anarchy and Law: The Political Economy of Choice. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
- Taylor, Robert S. 2017. Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Tucker, Benjamin. 1888. “State Socialism and Anarchism: How Far They Agree, and Wherein They Differ.” http://praxeology.net/BT-SSA.htm.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1972. On Certainty. New York: Harper & Row.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical investigations, rev. 4th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.