Anxiety as a Positive Epistemic Emotion in Politics

REFERENCES

• Achen, Christopher, and Larry Bartels. 2017. Democracy for Realists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albertson, Bethany, and Shana K. Gadarian. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, William. 2005. Beyond “Justification”: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, Solomon. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193(5): 31-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 687-701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, David H. 2001. Anxiety and Its Disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, Eytan, Solomon Messing, and Lada Adamic. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348(6239): 1130-32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ludy, and Jeffry A. Simpson. 2009. “The Power of the Situation: The Impact of Milgram’s Obedience Studies on Personality and Social Psychology.” American Psychologist 64(1): 12-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bou-Hamad, Imad, and Nadine Yehya. 2016. “Partisan Selective Exposure in TV Consumption Patterns.” Communication Research 47(1): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Michael S. 2018. “The Role of Emotion in Intellectual Virtue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Virtue Epistemology, ed. Heather Battaly. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caprara, Gran Vittorio, Shalom Schwartz, Cristina Capanna, Michele Vecchione, and Claudio Barbaranelli. 2006. “Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice.” Political Psychology 27(1): 1-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307-26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Man-pui, Christopher R. Jones, Kathleen H. Jamieson, and Dolores Albarracín. 2017. “Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.” Psychological Science 28(11):1531-46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, Tanya, and John A. Bargh. 1999. “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 893-910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis. 2013. “Degrees of Rationality in Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Leonie Huddy, David Sears, and Jack S. Levy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2010. “Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects Over Time.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 663-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5): 808–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, ed. Alam Hamlin and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Tim. 2001. Elements of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Brasi, Leandro. 2015. “Testimony and Value in the Theory of Knowledge.” Ideas y Valores. 64(159): 87-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brasi, Leandro. 2019. “Democratic Governance of Information Technologies: The Need for Citizen Competence.” IEEE Technology and Society 38(1): 51-57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brasi, Leandro, and Claudio Gutierrez. 2021. “Anonymity and Asynchronicity as Key Design Dimensions for the Reciprocity of Online Democratic Deliberation.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Deigh, John. 2009. “Concepts of Emotions in Modern Philosophy and Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, ed. Peter Goldie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, John M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 671-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, and Rose McDermott. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.” Political Behavior 30(3): 297-321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, Maeve, and Aaron Smith. 2016. The Political Environment on Social Media. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Kari, and Edward E. Smith. 1996. “A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 5-24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esau, Katharina, Dennis Friess, and Christiane Eilders. 2017. “Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms.” Policy and Internet 9(3): 321-42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Jonathan St. B.T. 2017. “Belief Bias in Deductive Reasoning.” In Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing Phenomena in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. Rüdiger Pohl. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, Michael W. 2000. “A Cognitive Approach to Trait Anxiety.” European Journal of Personality 14(5): 463-76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, Cynthia, Donald P. Green, Jennifer E. Green, David W. Nickerson, and Steven Shewfelt. 2009. “Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences?” Political Psychology 30: 615-47.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. 1998. “Deliberation as Discussion.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Jon Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S. 2018. Democracy When the People Are Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleeson, William. 2004. “Moving Personality Beyond the Person-Situation Debate: The Challenge and Opportunity of Within-Person Variability.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 83-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleeson, William, and Erik Noftle. 2008. “The End of the Person-Situation Debate: An Emerging Synthesis in the Answer to the Consistency Question.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2: 1667-84.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jeffrey. 2019. Power Without Knowledge. A Critique of Technocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funder, David C. 2006. “Towards a Resolution of the Personality Triad: Persons, Situations, and Behaviors.” Journal of Research in Personality 40: 21-34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, David C. 2009. “Persons, Behaviors, and Situations: An Agenda for Personality Psychology in the Postwar Era.” Journal of Research in Personality 43: 120-26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter M. Todd, and The ABC Research Group. 2000. Evolution and Cognition: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie, Peter. 2000. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie, Peter. 2008. “Misleading Emotions.” In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. George Brun, Ulvi Doguoglu, and Dominique Kuenzle. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, Sara E., and Jack M. Gorman. 2017. Denying to the Grave. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Jeffrey A., and Neil McNaughton. 1982. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groeber, Patrick, Jan Lorenz, and Frank Schweitzer. 2014. “Dissonance Minimization as a Microfoundation of Social Influence in Models of Opinion Formation.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 38(3): 147-74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafstad, Anne, and Leif Edvard Aarø. 1997. “Activating Interpersonal Influence Through Provocative Appeals: Evaluation of a Mass Media-Based Antismoking Campaign Targeting Adolescents.” Health Communication 9(3): 253–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, Gilbert. 1999. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 315-31.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Gilbert. 2000. “The Nonexistence of Character Traits.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100(1): 223-26.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Diana, and Paula McAvoy. 2014. The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, Miles, Mark Rubin, and Hazel Willis. 2002. “Intergroup Bias.” Annual Review of Psychology 53: 575-604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, Ulrich. 2017. “Overconfidence.” In Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing Phenomena in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. Rüdiger Pohl. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hookway, Christopher. 2000. Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hookway, Christopher. 2008. “Epistemic Immediacy, Doubt and Anxiety: On a Role for Affective States in Epistemic Evaluation.” In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. George Brun, Ulvi Doguoglu, and Dominique Kuenzle. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, Daniel J. 1986. “Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1141-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Joshua H., Dennis R. Sparta, Alice M. Stamatakis, Randall L. Ung, Kristen E. Pleil, Thomas L. Kash, and Garret D. Stuber. 2011. “Distinct Extended Amygdala Circuits for Divergent Motivational States.” Nature 496: 224-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Genevieve Fuji, Michael Morrell, and Laura Black. 2019. “Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Social Science Quarterly 100(6): 2168-87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslyn, Mark R., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2018. “The Direct and Moderating Effects of Mass Shooting Anxiety on Political and Policy Attitudes.” Research and Politics 5(3): 1- 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, John T. 2017. “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 38(2): 167-208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, John T., and Arie W. Kruglanski. 2002. “The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6: 168-87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M. 2016a. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M. 2016b. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 2: Unanswered Questions.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Sung-Yon, Avishek Adhikari, Soo Y. Lee, James H. Marshel, Christina K. Kim, Caitlin S. Mallory, Maisie Lo, Sally Pak, Joanna Mattis, Byung K. Lim, Robert C. Malenka, Melissa R. Warden, Rachael Neve, Kay M. Tye, and Karl Deisseroth. 2013. “Diverging Neural Pathways Assemble a Behavioural State from Separable Features in Anxiety.” Nature 496: 219-23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, Arie W., and Tallie Freund. 1983. “The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay-Inferences: Effects on Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19(5): 448-68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, Lisa, Dawn Norris, and Jonathan Flinchum. 2018. “Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media.” The Sociological Quarterly 59(1): 62–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühberger, Anton. 2017. “Framing”. In Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing Phenomena in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. Rüdiger F. Pohl. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, James H., and Paul J. Quirk. 2000. “Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics and Mass Opinion.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, ed. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480-98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951-71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Richard S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, Joseph E. 2015. Anxious: Using the Brain to Understand and Treat Fear and Anxiety. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Hoon, and Mo Jang. 2017. “Talking About What Provokes Us: Political Satire, Emotions, and Interpersonal Talk.” American Politics Research 45(1): 128-54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Jiyoung, and Yunjung Choi. 2018. “Expanding Affective Intelligence Theory Through Social Viewing: Focusing on South Korea’s 2017 Presidential Election.” Computers in Human Behavior 83: 119-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew, James N. Druckman, and Audrey McLain. 2016. “How Group Discussions Create Strong Attitudes and Strong Partisans.” Research and Politics 3(2): 1- 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, Marina, André Bächtiger, Kimmo Grönlund, Kaisa Herne, Maija Setälä, and Dominik Wyss. 2017. “What Drives Polarisation and Moderation of Opinions?” European Journal of Political Research 56: 23-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, Milton, and Charles Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Charles G., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(11): 2098-109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luminet, Olivier, Patrick Bouts, Frédérique Delie, Antony Manstead, and Bernard Rimé. 2000. “Social Sharing of Emotion Following Exposure to a Negatively Valenced Situation.” Cognition & Emotion 14(5): 661-88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luskin, Robert C., Ian O’Flynn, James S. Fishkin, and David Russell. 2014. “Deliberating Across Deep Divides.” Political Studies 62: 116-35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2019. Know-It-All-Society. London: Liveright Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacKuen, Michael, Jennifer Wolak, Luke Keele, and George E. Marcus. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 440-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E. 2008. “Different Situations, Different Responses: Threat, Partisanship, Risk, and Deliberation.” Critical Review 20: 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E., Nicolas A. Valentino, Pavlos Vasilopoulos, and Martial Foucault. 2019. “Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties.” Advances in Political Psychology 40(1): 109-39.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael B. MacKuen. 2017. “Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement.” Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 733-54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, Richard F. 2009. “Anxiety.” In Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences, ed. David Sander and Klaus Scherer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, Hugo. 2017. “Confirmation Bias-Myside Bias.” In Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing Phenomena in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. Rüdiger Pohl. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, Hugo, and Sperber, Dan. 2017. The Enigma of Reason. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Meylan, Anne. 2014. “Epistemic Emotions: A Natural Kind?” Philosophical Inquiries 2(1): 173- 90.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, Maria, and Cristiano Castelfranchi. 2005. “Anxiety as an ‘Epistemic’ Emotion: An Uncertainty Theory of Anxiety.” Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal 18(4): 291-319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Patrick, Piotr Bobkowski, Daniel Maliniak, and Ronald Rapoport. 2015. “Talking Politics on Facebook: Network Centrality and Political Discussion Practices in Social Media.” Political Research Quarterly 68: 377-91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, Adam. 2009. “Epistemic Emotions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, ed. Peter Goldie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Adam. 2014. “Shared Knowledge from Individual Vice: The Role of Unworthy Epistemic Emotions.” Philosophical Inquiries 2(1): 163-72.
   Google Scholar
• Nai, Alessandro, Yves Schemeil, and Jean-Louis Marie. 2017. “Anxiety, Sophistication, and Resistance to Persuasion: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Survey on Global Climate Change.” Political Psychology 38(1): 137-56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblo, Michael. 2015. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. Russell, George E. Marcus, and Michael B. Mackuen. 2018. “Hardwired for News: Affective Intelligence and Political Attention.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 62(4): 614-35.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andi, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, Raymond. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175-220.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32: 303-30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, Arne. 1993. “Fear and Anxiety: Overlaps and Dissociations.” In Handbook of Emotions, ed. Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, Elizabeth, and Donald P. Green. 2009. “Deference, Dissent and Dispute Resolution.” American Political Science Review 103(4): 622-44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, Eli. 2012. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Michael, and Linda Isbell. 2010. “How I Vote Depends on How I Feel: The Differential Impact of Anger and Fear on Political Information Processing.” Psychological Science 21(5): 548-50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perkins, Adam M., Sophie L. Inchley-Mort, Alan D. Pickering, Philip J. Corr, and Adrian Burgess. 2012. “A Facial Expression for Anxiety.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102(5): 910-24.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, Michael. 2007. “Who’s Afraid of Fear Appeals? Contingency, Courage, and Deliberation in Rhetorical Theory and Practice.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 40(2): 216-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Carolyn. 2005. Emotion. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, Emily, Jonah Berger, and Sarah Molouki. 2007. “Alone in a Crowd of Sheep: Asymmetric Perceptions of Conformity and Their Toots in an Introspection Illusion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 585-95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachman, Stanley. 1998. Anxiety. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahn, Wendy M. 2000. “Affect as Information: The Role of Public Mood in Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, ed. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics 64(4): 1021- 44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, David P., Andrew Civettini, and Karen M. Emmerson. 2010. “The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get It’?” Political Psychology 31: 563-93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, Ira J. 1984. “Cognitive Determinants of Emotions: A Structural Theory.” In Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotions, Relationships, and Health, ed. Phillip Shaver. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Lee, Mark R. Lepper, and Michael Hubbard. 1975. “Perseverance in Self-Perception and Social Perception: Biased Attribution Processes in the Debriefing Paradigm.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 880-92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, Klaus R., Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schkade, David, Cass R. Sunstein, and Reid Hastie. 2007. “What Happened on Deliberation Day?” California Law Review 95: 915-40.
   Google Scholar
• SEOprofiler. 2017. “Update: How Many Clicks Get the Results on Google’s First Results Page?” May 30.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Aaron, Laura Silver, Courtney Johnson, Kyle Taylor and Jingjing Jiang. 2019. “Publics in Emerging Economies Worry Social Media Sow Division, Even as They Offer New Chances for Political Engagement.” Washington D. C.: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, ed. Willem Saris and Paul Sniderman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa, Ronald. 2009. “Epistemic Feelings.” Mind & Matter 7(2): 139-61.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Matthew, Paul Henne, Brenda W. Yang, and Felipe De Brigard. 2019. “Resistance to Position Change, Motivated Reasoning, and Polarization.” Political Behavior: 1-24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Natalie. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure: A Polarized Developing Country Context.” Journal of Communication 60(3): 556-76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10: 175-95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2006. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Phillip E. 1983. “Accountability and Complexity of Thought.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 74-83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Phillip E., and Jae Il Kim. 1987. “Accountability and Judgment Processes in a Personality Prediction Task.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(4): 700- 709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens, Larissa Z., and Susan Linton. 2001. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(6): 973-88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(1): 453-58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, Antoine Banks, and Anne K. Davis. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29(2): 247-73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Antoine Banks, Vincent L. Hutchings, and Anne K. Davis. 2009. “Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction Between Anxiety and Information Utility.” Political Psychology 30(4): 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, George E. Marcus, Nicholas A. Valentino, and Martial Foucault. 2018. “Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks.” Political Psychology: 1-26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavova, Katia. 2016. “Irrelevant Influences.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96(1): 134-52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazard, Juliette. 2018. “Epistemic Anxiety, Adaptive Cognition, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.” Discipline Filosofiche 23(2): 137-58.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, Magdalena, Young Min Baek, and Michael Delli Carpini. 2010. “Deliberative and Participatory Democracy? Ideological Strength and the Processes Leading from Deliberation to Political Engagement.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(2): 154–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Thomas, and Ethan Porter. 2019. “The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Actual Adherence.” Political Behavior 41: 135-63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefits of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72(1): 17-35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar