Truth, the People, and Climate Change: Toward a Non-Ideal Approach to Democratic Legitimacy

REFERENCES

• Achen, Christopher, Larry Bartels, Christopher H. Achen, and Larry M. Bartels. 2017. Democracy for Realists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon Willard, Kenneth Clark, and Thomas Pettigrew. 1954. “The Nature of Prejudice.”
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 2018a. The Human Condition: Second Edition. Enlarged edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 2018b. The Freedom to Be Free: From Thinking Without a Banister. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 2006a. Between Past and Future. Annotated edition. New York: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 2006b. On Revolution. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong McKay, David I. et al. 2022. “Exceeding 1.5°C Global Warming Could Trigger Multiple Climate Tipping Points.” Science 377(6611): eabn7950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balibar, Étienne. 1992. Les frontières de la démocratie. Paris: la Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, Étienne. 2010. La proposition de l’égaliberté: essais politiques 1989-2009. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry. 2010. Unequal Democracy – The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark. 2010. “The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism.” Environmental Politics 19(2): 276–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason, and Hélène Landemore. 2021. Debating Democracy: Do We Need More or Less? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonnier, Pierre. 2021. Affluence and Freedom: An Environmental History of Political Ideas. 1st edition. Medford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97(1): 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCanio, Samuel. 2015. Democracy and the Origins of the American Regulatory State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsässer, Lea, Svenja Hense, and Armin Schäfer. 2021. “Not Just Money: Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies.” Journal of European Public Policy 28(12): 1890–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, David. 1998. “The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth.” Ethics 108(2): 252–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, David. 2009. Democratic Authority. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2009. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. 1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1956. “IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56(1): 167–98.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gines, Kathryn T. 2014. Hannah Arendt and the Negro Question. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16(4): 411–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Mathew. 2007. Ecological Politics and Democratic Theory: The Challenge to the Deliberative Ideal. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanpierre, Laurent, Dork Zabunya, and Jacques Rancière. 2012. La méthode de l’égalité: Entretiens avec Laurent Jeanpierre et Dork Zabunyan. Montrouge: Bayard Adulte.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, Hans. 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. 2017. “Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology 31(3): 277–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. 2020. Open Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Zoe, and Nathalie Giger. 2020. “Democracy or Oligarchy? Unequal Representation of Income Groups in European Institutions.” Politics and Governance 8(1): 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Illustrated edition. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane et al. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane et al. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, Simon. 2013. “Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?” Australian Journal of Politics & History 59(3): 429–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophuls, Patrick. 2011. Plato’s Revenge: Politics in the Age of Ecology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, Seth A. Green, and Donald P. Green. 2019. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3(2): 129–58.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Illustrated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranciere, Jacques. 2007. Hatred of Democracy. London: New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples: With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” Revised ed. edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 2011. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. Rousseau: “The Social Contract” and Other Later Political Writings. ed. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. Reprint edition. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Ian. 1999. “Enough of Deliberation: Politics Is About Interests and Power.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8(1): 3–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Graham. 2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. 2016. How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. 2018. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. Illustrated edition. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, Laura. 2012. “Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.” Philosophy Compass 7(9): 654–64.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, Dominique Bourg & Kerry. 2009. “For an Ecological Democracy.” Books & ideas. https://booksandideas.net/For-an-Ecological-Democracy (November 29, 2023).
   Google Scholar