Community in the minimal stateFootnote¹

This essay borrows from, and importantly extends, arguments I made in “Individual Rights and Community Virtues,” Ethics 101, no. 3 (April 1991): 521–36.

Notes

• 1991 . “Individual Rights and Community Virtues” . Ethics , 101 ( 3 ) April : 521 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor , Charles . 1979 . “Atomism” . In Power, Possession and Freedom , Edited by: Kontos , Alkis . Toronto : University of Toronto Press .
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre , Alasdair . 1984 . After Virtue , Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sandel , Michael . 1982 . Liberalism and the Limits of Justice , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sandel . 1984 . “Introduction” . In Liberalism and Its Critics , Edited by: Sandel . New York : New York University Press .
   Google Scholar
• 1986 . Liberalism , 75 Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rawls , John . 1971 . A Theory of Justice , 3 Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sandel . Liberalism and the Limits of Justice , 30
   Google Scholar
• 1985 . “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism” . Philosophy & Public Affairs , 14 ( 3 ) : 311
   Google Scholar
• Hart , H.L.A. 1961 . The Concept of Law , 190 Oxford : Clarendon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin . “Adaptation” . Scientific American , 239 156 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• 1989 . “The Power Principle” . Criminal Justice Ethics , 14 ( 2 ) : 56 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , David . 1989 . Market, State and Community , 98 – 123 . Oxford : Clarendon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sandel . Liberalism and the Limits of Justice , 64
   Google Scholar
• This essay borrows from, and importantly extends, arguments I made in “Individual Rights and Community Virtues,” Ethics 101, no. 3 (April 1991): 521–36.
   Google Scholar