Collaboration within the Puget Sound Marine and Nearshore Science Network

References

• Adler, P.S., and S. Kwon. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATLAS.ti. Version 7. 2012. Computer software. Scientific Software Development, Berlin. www.atlasti.com/index.html (accessed October 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Belaire, J.A., A.K. Dribin, D.P. Johnston, D.J. Lynch, and E.S. Minor. 2011. Mapping stewardship networks in urban ecosystems. Conservation Letters 4:464–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations, and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnholtz, J.P. 2007. When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (14): 2226–2239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., C. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2005. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11(2): r2.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33:599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. 2001. Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In Networks and markets: Contributions from economics and sociology, eds. A. Casella and J.E. Rauch, 30–74. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, P. 2011. Creating space for interdisciplinary marine and coastal research: Five dilemmas and suggested resolutions. Environmental Conservation 38 (2): 172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P.J., L.S. Evans, and M. Mills. 2012. Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conservation Letters 5:376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., S.P. Borgatti, and A. Parker. 2002. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review 44 (2): 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J.N., and S. Kiesler. 2005. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R.A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, . Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/)
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L., and D. Fazio. 2009. The social networks of collaborative process. Journal of High Technology Management Research 20:119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, C.H., T. Hels, and W.J. McLaughlin. 2004. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: A cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 6:15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J.S., and B.R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglaughlin, K.L., and D.H. Sonnenwald. 2005. Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, . ed. Ingwersen, P. and B. Larsen, 499–508. Stockholm: Karolinska University.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis, second edition. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Omenn, G.S. 2006. Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science 314:1696–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. 2001. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C. 2012. Social network analysis: History, theory, and methodology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 22 (6): 501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressey, R.L., and M.C. Bottrill. 2009. Approaches to landscape- and seascape-scale conservation planning: convergence, contrasts, and challenges. Oryx 43 (4): 464–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G., A. Fish, and J. Sydow. 2007. Interorganizational networks and the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 33 (3): 479–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puget Sound Partnership, Science Panel. 2012. Priority Science for Restoring and Protecting Puget Sound: A Biennial Science Work Plan for 2011–2013. http://www.psp.wa.gov/SP_biennium_work_plan_download.php (accessed January 8, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Puget Sound Partnership, Social Science Advisory Committee. 2011. The Human Dimensions of Puget Sound Ecosystem Recovery: Contribution of Social Sciences to the Puget Sound Partnership. http://www.mypugetsound.net (accessed January 8, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations theory, fourth edition. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckelshaus, M.H., and M. McClure, coordinators. 2007. Sound Science: Synthesizing Ecological and Socioeconomic Information about the Puget Sound Ecosystem. Prepared in cooperation with the Sound Science collaborative team. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NMFS), Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.P. 2000. Social network analysis: A handbook, second edition. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D.E. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tress, B., G. Tress, and G. Fry. 2005. Researchers’ experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environmental Management 36:792–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T.W. 2012. Network interventions. Science 337:49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance-Borland, K., and J. Holley. 2011. Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving. Conservation Letters 4:278–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E.P. 1998. Successful collaboration: Negotiating effective regulations. Environment 40 (9): 10–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E.P., T.M. Leschine, and J. Brock. 2010. Civic science and salmon recovery planning in Puget Sound. The Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 235–256.
   Google Scholar