Fisheries Governance Affecting Conservation Outcomes in the United States and European Union

References

• Anderson, L. G., and M. C. Holliday. 2007. The design and use of limited access privilege programs. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tm/tm86.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, R. 2005. Property rights in fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15 (3):243–264. doi: 10.1007/s11160-005-5139-6.
   Google Scholar
• Audits/Evaluations. 2013. Office of inspector general. http://www.oig.doc.gov/Pages/Audits-Evaluations.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Baland, J. M., and J. P. Platteau. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Rome: Food & Agriculture Org.
   Google Scholar
• Basurto, X., and E. Ostrom. 2009. Beyond the tragedy of the commons. Economia Delle Fonti Di Energia e Dell’ambiente 52:35–60. doi: 10.3280/EFE2009-001004. http://www.francoangeli.it/Riviste/Scheda_rivista.aspx?IDarticolo=37232.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, W., R. P. Kelly, A. Erickson, and R. Fujita. 2016. A comprehensive method for assessing marine resource governance: Case study in Kāne‘ohe Bay, HawaiI. Coastal Management 44 (4):295–332. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2016.1135277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5):1692–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B. J. McCay, and J. M. Acheson. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340 (6229):91–3. doi: 10.1038/340091a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonzon, K., K. McIlwain, K. Strauss, and T. V. Leuvan. 2013. Catch share design manual: A guide for managers and fishermen. Vol. 1, 2nd ed., New York: Environmental Defense Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B. M., J. A. Sayer, and B. Walker. 2010. Navigating trade-offs: Working for conservation and development outcomes. Ecology and Society 15 (2):16. doi: 10.5751/ES-03380-150216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner, J. E., X. Basurto, P. Fidelman, J. Kuange, R. Lahari, and A. Mukminin. 2012. Institutional designs of customary fisheries management arrangements in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Mexico. Marine Policy 36 (1):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Development Quota Program (CDQ). 2014. NOAA Fisheries, National marine fisheries service—Alaska regional office. http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/cdq/ (accessed June 9).
   Google Scholar
• Council Reports to Congress on Apportionment of Membership for Regional Fishery Management Councils. 2016. NOAA—National Oceanic and atmospheric administration. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/management/councils/report_congress/reports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors Special Report No. 7/2007, 2007/C 317/01, 2007. Notices from the European Union institutions and bodies. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors Special Report No. 12/2011. 2011. 12. Notices from the European Union Institutions and Bodies. Luxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-Based Natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15 (4):38. doi: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw, T., and T. Gray. 2005. Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: A study of failure in the European Union’s common fisheries policy. Marine Policy 29 (3):189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2004.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decision Making. 2013. CFP reform watch. http://cfp-reformwatch.eu/2009/12/decision-making/
   Google Scholar
• Design and use of catch shares under the Magnuson–Stevens Act: Considerations for rights-based management in the Pacific sardine fishery. 2012. April.
   Google Scholar
• Dewees, C. M. 1998. Effects of individual quota systems on New Zealand and British Columbia fisheries. Ecological Applications, Supplement: Ecosystem Management for Sustainable Marine Fisheries 8 (1):S133–S138. doi: 10.2307/2641371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. 2014. European commission: Regional policy. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K. 2014. The reformed common fisheries policy 2014. 14/49. SPICe Briefing. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe).
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, J., S. Newkirk, and B. H. Thompson. 2003. Taking stock of the regional fishery management councils. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essington, T. E. 2010. Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (2):754–759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907252107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Common organisation of the market: Fact sheet. (accessed June 6, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1983. Council Regulation (EEC) No 170/83 of 25 January 1983 Establishing a community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources. No L 24/1. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2002. Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 Establishing a community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending regulations (EC) No. 847/96, (EC) No. 2371/2002, (EC) No. 811/2004, (EC) No. 768/2005, (EC) No. 2115/2005, (EC) No. 2166/2005, (EC) No. 388/2006, (EC) No. 509/2007, (EC) No. 676/2007, (EC) No. 1098/2007, (EC) No. 1300/2008, (EC) No. 1342/2008 and Repealing Regulations (EEC) No. 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No. 1966/2006. Vol. 32009R1224. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32009R1224.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010a. Synthesis of the consultation on the reform of the common fisheries policy. Commission staff working document SEC(2010)428. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010b. A diagnosis of the common fisheries policy. CFP reform watch. http://cfp-reformwatch.eu/2010/05/voluminous-cfp-diagnosis-report-now-available-at-cfp-reformwatch-eu/
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 2009a. The common fisheries policy: A users guide. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 2009b. Reform of the common fisheries policy. Brussels, Belgium: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. 2013. Europa.EU. http://europa.eu/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-auditors/ (accessed June 10).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2013. Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy. Amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and Repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Boán, M., L. Fernández, and J. Freire. 2012. History and management strategies of the sea urchin paracentrotus lividus fishery in Galicia (NW Spain). Ocean & Coastal Management 69:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluharty, D. 2017. Personal communication with Dr. David Fluharty, Associate Professor Marine and EnvironmentalAffairs. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1):441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, R. M., K. T. Honey, A. Morris, J. R. Wilson, and H. Russell. 2010. Cooperative strategies in fisheries management: Integrating across scales. Bulletin of Marine Science 86 (2):251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, R., J. H. Moxley, H. DeBey, T. Van Leuvan, A. Leumer, K. Honey, S. Aguilera, and M. Foley. 2013. Managing for a resilient ocean. Marine Policy 38:538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2003. Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3):338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelcich, S., G. Edwards-Jones, M. J. Kaiser, and J. C. Castilla. 2006. Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems. Ecosystems 9 (6):951–966. doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0007-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., ed. 1998. The theory of institutional design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, N. L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social Capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470 (7334):386–389. doi: 10.1038/nature09689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, D., I. Barkhorn, D. Festa, K. Bonzon, J. Boomhower, V. Hovland, and J. Blau. 2012. Assessing catch shares’ effects evidence from federal United States and associated British Columbian fisheries. Marine Policy 36 (3):644–657. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, D. 2015. Reforming the common fisheries policy (CFP), 2014–20. Briefing Paper CBP-05957, London: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R., A. Erickson, L. Mease, W. Battista, J. Kittinger, and R. Fujita. 2014. Embracing thresholds for better environmental management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 370:20130276. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0276.
   Google Scholar
• Lutchman, I., C. Grieve, S. Des Clers, E. De Santo, K. Van den Bossche, and C. McCoy. 2009. Towards a reform of the common fisheries policy in 2012: A CFP health check. http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/232418.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Landing Obligation in Practice. 2017. Text. Fisheries – European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/landing-obligation-in-practice_en.
   Google Scholar
• Lebel, L., J. M. Anderies, B. Campbell, C. Folke, S. Hatfield-Dodds, T. P. Hughes, and J. Wilson. 2006. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Marine Sciences Faculty Scholarship. Paper 52. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/sms_facpub/52
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as Amended by the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act (P.L. 109–479). 2007. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/magact/
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson–Stevens Act Provisions: Annual Catch Limits; National Standard Guidelines – Final Rule. 2009. 50 CFR Part 600.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson–Stevens Act Provisions; National Standard Guidelines – Final Rule. 2016. Federal Register, Vol. 81, No. 201. Vol. 50 CFR Part 600.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as Amended by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Reauthorized. NOAA – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/msa2007/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Marine Fish Conservation Network 2007. A new course for America’s fish and fishermen: A review of the Magnuson–Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 and the challenges ahead. http://www.scribd.com/doc/6448411/Mfcn-New-Course-Report-07
   Google Scholar
• Marine Stewardship Council. 2017. MSC global impacts report 2017. London: Marine Stewardship Council.
   Google Scholar
• MEMO: Common Organization Markets (COM or CMO). 2011. Environmental Defense Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Moxley, J., A. Markham, and R. Fujita. 2011. Improving stewardship with fishery cooperatives. New York, NY: Environmental Defense Fund.
   Google Scholar
• National Standard Guidelines. 2014. NOAA Office of Sustainable Fisheries. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/laws_policies/national_standards/index.html (accessed June 9).
   Google Scholar
• NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act – EIS Filings. 2017. NEPA.Gov. https://ceq.doe.gov/get-involved/eis_filings.html (accessed March 17).
   Google Scholar
• NOAA Catch Share Policy. National Oceanic and atmospheric administration.
   Google Scholar
• NOAA Issues Final Guidance on Annual Catch Limits to End Overfishing. 2009. NOAA – National Oceanic and atmospheric administration. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/20090115_endoverfishing.html
   Google Scholar
• NOAA Fisheries Service. 2012. Design and use of catch shares under the Magnuson–Stevens Act: Considerations for rights-based management in the Pacific sardine fishery. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/pelagic/workshops/2012/denit-catch_shares_overview_cps_wrkshp_april2012-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Objectives and Strategy. 2013. European fisheries control agency. http://www.efca.europa.eu/pages/home/about_objectives.htm (accessed June 7).
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. B. 2003. Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean & Coastal Management 46 (3–4):347–361. doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00012-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34 (1):75–90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, J. Walker. 1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. Schlager. 1996. The formation of property rights. In Rights to nature: Ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment. ed. by S. Hanna, C. Folke, and K. G. Maler. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penas-Lado, E. 2017. Personal communication with Dr. Ernesto Peñas-Lado, Director of Policy Development and Coordination, DG Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Perez de Oliveira, L. 2013. Fishers as advocates of marine protected areas: A case study from Galicia (NW Spain). Marine Policy 41:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitcher, T. J., D. Kalikoski, K. Short, D. Varkey, and G. Pramod. 2009. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Marine Policy 33 (2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141 (10):2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reforming EU Fisheries Subsidies: A Joint NGO Discussion Paper and Technical Resource. 2011. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, A., S. Gelcich, L. García-Florez, J. L. Alcázar, and J. L. Acuña. 2014. Co-management in Europe: Insights from the gooseneck barnacle fishery in Asturias, Spain. Marine Policy 50:300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacht, K., H. McLachlan, L. Hill, and J. Landman. 2012. Sorting myth from fact: The truth about Europe’s common fisheries policy eds.T, Koeberich, A, Delafortrie, and D, McGlynn. Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-Rights Regimes and natural resources a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68 (3):249–262. doi: 10.2307/3146375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientists and Stakeholders. 2013. CFP reform watch. http://cfp-reformwatch.eu/2009/12/scientists-and-stakeholders/
   Google Scholar
• Sissenwine, M., and D. Symes. 2007. Reflections on the common fisheries policy: Report to the general directorate for fisheries and maritime affairs of the European Commission. Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Sivas, D. A., and M. R. Caldwell. 2008. A new vision for California ocean governance: Comprehensive ecosystem-based marine zoning. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 27:209.
   Google Scholar
• The Aarhus Convention. 2013. European Commission: Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/
   Google Scholar
• The Administrative Procedures Act. 1946. http://www.secretjustice.com/secretpdf/TITLE%20IV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Status of Marine Fish Stocks. 2015. Indicator Assessment: Data and maps. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Status of Stocks 2016. 2016. Annual report to Congress on the status of U.S. fisheries. National oceanic and atmospheric administration. Silver Spring, MD: National Marine Fisheries Service.
   Google Scholar
• The Status of U.S. Fisheries for 2010, 2011. 2010 Report to Congress. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service: Office of Sustainable Fisheries.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. 1988. The management of irrigation systems: How to evoke trust and avoid prisoner’s dilemma. World Development 16 (4):489–500. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(88)90199-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., D. Tarte, E. Hegerl, and K. Short. 2006. Ecosystem-Based Management of marine fisheries: Policy proposals and operational guidance for ecosystem-Based Management of marine capture fisheries. Gland: WWF International.
   Google Scholar
• Wielgus, J., S. Poon, E. C. del Río, D. Muñoz, D. Whittle, and R. Fujita. 2014. Fishery cooperatives in Cuba: Potential benefits, legal feasibility, and governance pre-Conditions. Marine Policy 45:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. C. 2009. The paradoxes of transparency: Science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenberg, E., B. Campbell, E. Dounias, P. Gunarso, M. Moeliono, and D. Sheil. (2008). Interactive land-use planning in Indonesian rainforest landscapes: reconnecting plans to practice. Ecology and Society 14 (1):35
   Google Scholar
• Yandle, T. 2006. Sharing natural resource management responsibility: Examining the New Zealand rock lobster co-Management Experience. Policy Sciences 39 (3):249–278. doi: 10.1007/s11077-006-9023-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yandle, T. 2007. Understanding the consequences of property rights mismatches: A case study of New Zealand’s marine resources. Ecology and Society 12 (2):27. doi: 10.5751/ES-02181-120227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeratunge, N., C. Béné, R. Siriwardane, A. Charles, D. Johnson, E. H. Allison, P. K. Nayak, and M. C. Badjeck. 2014. Small-Scale Fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish and Fisheries 15 (2):255–279. doi: 10.1111/faf.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar