Navigating Institutional Constraints in the Process of Computational Environmental Modeling

References

• Bernard, H. R. 2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th ed. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, K. M. B., Donald E. W., Thomas E. J., Lewis L., Zhi-Jun L., James R., Gary S., and Alexey A. V. 2013. Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the patuxent estuary1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49 (1):15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBP. 1983. “1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement.” Chesapeake Bay Program. Accessed July 28, 2018. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12512.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBP. 1987. “1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement.” Chesapeake Bay Program. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12510.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBP. 2000. “Chesapeake 2000.” Chesapeake Bay Program. Accessed July 28, 2018. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12081.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBP. 2013. “The Conowingo Dam and Chesapeake Bay Water Quality.” https://www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/Backgrounder_-_Conowingo_Dam_1_14_13_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBP. 2017. “Chesapeake Bay Facts & Figures.” Accessed July 28, 2018. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/discover/bay101/facts.
   Google Scholar
• CBP. n.d. “Modeling Workgroup.” Accessed May 24, 2017. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/groups/group/modeling_team
   Google Scholar
• CBP STAC. 2011. Review of the LimnoTech report, ‘Comparison of Load Estimates for Cultivated Cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.’ Edgewater, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Cerco, C. F. 2016. Conowingo reservoir sedimentation and Chesapeake Bay: State of the science. Journal of Environmental Quality 45 (3):882–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. 2010. A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, H. R. 2009. Fight for the Bay: Why a dark green environmental awakening is needed to save the Chesapeake Bay. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, E. J. B., H. H. Falk, C. Ginger, and A. Voinov. 2010. Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont. Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (11):1428–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. 1983. “Chesapeake Bay basin model - final report.” Rep., Northern Virginia Planning District Commission for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, R. M. 2012. Flux of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment from the Susquehanna River Basin to the Chesapeake Bay during Tropical Storm Lee, September 2011, as an indicator of the effects of reservoir sedimentation on water quality. US Geological Survey. Accessed May 24, 2017. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20125185.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2013. How climate models gain and exercise authority. In The social life of climate change models: Anticipating nature, eds. K. Hastrup and M. S. kydstrup, 1–29. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, W. M., W. R. Boynton, J. E. Adolf, D. F. Boesch, W. C. Boicourt, G. Brush, J. C. Cornwell, T. R. Fisher, P. M. Glibert, J. D. Hagy, et al. 2005. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: Historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, H. 2014. Footprints in the city: Models, materiality, and the cultural politics of climate change. Anthropological Quarterly 87 (2):405–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfmacher, K. S. 2001. The politics of participation in watershed modeling. Environmental Management 27 (2):161–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, C., S. J. Whatmore, and S. N. Lane. 2013. Learning through computer model improvisations. Science, Technology & Human Values 38 (5):678–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimnoTech. 2010. Comparison of draft load estimates for cultivated cropland in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Ann Arbor, MI: LimnoTech.
   Google Scholar
• Linker, L. C., R. M. Hirsch, W. P. Ball, J. Testa, K. Boomer, C. Cerco, L. Sanford, J. Cornwell, L. Currey, C. Friedrichs, et al. 2016. Conowingo reservoir infill and its influence on Chesapeake Bay water quality, 004–16. Annapolis MD: STAC. http://www.chesapeake.org/pubs/356_Linker2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linker, L. C., G. W. Shenk, P. Wang, K. J. Hopkins, and S. Pokharel. 2002. A short history of Chesapeake Bay modeling and the next generation of watershed and estuarine models. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2002 (2):569–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mancall, P. C. 1991. Valley of opportunity: Economic culture along the upper Susquehanna, 1700-1800, 1st ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. M. 2001. Living along the ‘Great Shellfish Bay’: The relationship between prehistoric peoples and the Chesapeake. In Discovering the Chesapeake: The history of an ecosystem, ed., P. D. Curtin, G. S. Brush, and G. W. Fisher, 109–26. Baltimore, MA: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, C. L. 1938. Oxygen-poor waters of the Chesapeake Bay. Oxygen-Poor Waters of the Chesapeake Bay 88 (2273):80–81.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2007. Models in environmental regulatory decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paolisso, M., and J. Trombley. 2017. Cognitive, material and technological considerations in participatory environmental modeling. In Environmental modeling with stakeholders, eds., S. Gray, M. Paolisso, R. Jordan, and S. Gray, 3–23. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paolisso, M., J. Trombley, R. R. Hood, and K. G. Sellner. 2015. Environmental models and public stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (Suppl 1): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9650-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackley, S. 2001. Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. In Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance, eds., C. A. Miller and P. N. Edwards, 107–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenk, G. W., and L. C. Linker. 2013. Development and application of the 2010 Chesapeake Bay watershed total maximum daily load model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49 (5):1042–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. 2009. The everyday world of simulation modeling the development of parameterizations in meteorology. Science, Technology & Human Values 34 (2): 162–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombley, J. 2018. Watershed encounters. Environmental Humanities 10 (1): 107–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2010. Chesapeake Bay TMDL. Reports and Assessments. Accessed July 28, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/chesapeake-bay-tmdl/chesapeake-bay-tmdl-document.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2015. USGS Fundamental Science Practices (FSP). Accessed July 28, 2018. https://www2.usgs.gov/fsp/default.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (11): 1268–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennersten, J. R. 2000. The Chesapeake: An environmental biography, 1st ed. Baltimore, MA: The Maryland Historical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, T. L. 2005. Basic classical ethnographic research methods. Ethnographically Informed Community and Cultural Assessment Research Systems. Accessed July 28, 2018. http://www.cusag.umd.edu/documents/workingpapers/classicalethnomethods.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., R. M. Hirsch, and W. P. Ball. 2016. Long-term changes in sediment and nutrient delivery from Conowingo Dam to Chesapeake Bay: Effects of reservoir sedimentation. Environmental Science & Technology 50 (4): 1877–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar