Improving the IEA Approach Using Principles of Open Data Science

References

• Baumer, B., M. Cetinkaya-Rundel, A. Bray, L. Loi, and N. J. Horton. 2014. R Markdown: Integrating a reproducible analysis tool into introductory statistics. arXiv:1402.1894.
   Google Scholar
• Biedron, I. S., and B. A. Knuth. 2016. Toward shared understandings of ecosystem-based fisheries management among fishery management councils and stakeholders in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and New England regions. Marine Policy 70:40–48. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, N. A., M. F. Cronin, H. Freeland, and N. Mantua. 2015. Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters 42 (9):3414–20. 10.1002/2015GL063306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, S. J., B. Sojka, R. Barnea, X. Basurto, C. Carothers, S. Charnley, S. Coulthard, N. Dolšak, J. Donatuto, C. García-Quijano, et al. 2016. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management. Environmental Science & Policy 66:250–9. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacon, S., and B. Straub. 2014. Pro Git. Apress. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-0076-6..
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, V., and C. J. Walters. 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecological Modelling 172 (2–4):109–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., C. C. Krueger, R. A. Baer, Jr., B. A. Knuth, and M. E. Richmond. 1996. From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1 (1):70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Degnbol, P., and A. Jarre. 2004. Review of indicators in fisheries management – A development perspective. African Journal of Marine Science 26 (1):303–26. 10.2989/18142320409504063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethel, D. R., Lucey, S. M. A. M. Berger, S. K. Gaichas, M. A. Karp, P. D. Lynch, J. F. Walter, I. I. I. J. J. Deroba, S. Miller, and M. J. Wilberg. 2019. Closing the feedback loop: On stakeholder participation in management strategy evaluation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 76 (10):1895–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, B. S., C. Longo, D. Hardy, K. L. McLeod, J. F. Samhouri, S. K. Katona, K. Kleisner, S. E. Lester, J. O'Leary, M. Ranelletti, et al. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 76 (10):1895–913. doi: 10.1038/nature11397..
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, S. E., S. S. Anderson, S. C. Bagby, C. Gries, X. Han, E. M. Hart, M. B. Jones, W. C. Lenhardt, A. MacDonald, W. K. Michener, et al. 2015. The Tao of open science for ecology. Ecosphere 6 (7):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardison, S., and K. Bastille. 2018. Ecodata: Documentation of ecosystem indicator reporting. https://noaa-edab.github.io/ecodata/landing_page (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C. J., C. R. Kelble, and F. B. Schwing. 2017. Implementing ‘the IEA’: using integrated ecosystem assessment frameworks, programs, and applications in support of operationalizing ecosystem-based management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (1):398–405. 10.1093/icesjms/fsw201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, E. 2018. EcoCast. GitHub repository. GitHub. https://github.com/elhazen/EcoCast (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, M., K. Wilson, and M. Pavao-Zuckerman. 2003. Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7 (3). 10.5751/ES-00554-070308.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D. 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9 (3):90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, K. A. 2017. ecopath_matlab: A Matlab-based implementation of the Ecopath food web algorithm. Journal of Open Source Software 2 (9). 10.21105/joss.00064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kluyver, T., B. Ragan-Kelley, F. Pérez, B. E. Granger, M. Bussonnier, J. Frederic, K. Kelley, J. Hamrick, J. Grout, S. Corlay, et al. 2016. Jupyter Notebooks-A publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In ELPUB, 87–90.  https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Jupyter-Notebooks-a-publishing-format-for-workflows-Kluyver-Ragan-Kelley/e47868841d87efe261451a43b00d6c81cf7fb7a3.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, P. S., C. R. Kelble, R. L. Shuford, C. Ainsworth, Y. deReynier, R. Dunsmore, M. J. Fogarty, K. Holsman, E. A. Howell, M. E. Monaco, et al. 2014. Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: A US perspective. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (5):1198–204. 10.1093/icesjms/fst112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, P. S., M. J. Fogarty, S. A. Murawski, and D. Fluharty. 2009. Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biology 7 (1):e1000014. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, P. S., S. J. Breslow, C. J. Harvey, K. C. Norman, M. R. Poe, G. D. Williams, and M. L. Plummer. 2016. Conceptualization of social-ecological systems of the California current: An examination of interdisciplinary science supporting ecosystem-based management. Coastal Management 44 (5):397–408. 10.1080/08920753.2016.1208036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, P., M. Fogarty, G. Matlock, and M. Ernst. 2008. Integrated ecosystem assessments. NOOA NMFS-NWFSC-92. https://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/assets/25/796_07302008_144647_IEA_TM92Final.pdf (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Lewison, R., A. J. Hobday, S. Maxwell, E. Hazen, J. R. Hartog, D. C. Dunn, D. Briscoe, S. Fossette, C. E. O'Keefe, M. Barnes, et al. 2015. Dynamic ocean management: Identifying the critical ingredients of dynamic approaches to ocean resource management. BioScience 65 (5):486–98. 10.1093/biosci/biv018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, J. S. S., B. D. Best, C. Scarborough, J. C. Afflerbach, M. R. Frazier, C. C. O’Hara, N. Jiang, and B. S. Halpern. 2017. Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1 (6):0160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, J. S. S., E. J. Pacheco, B. D. Best, C. Scarborough, C. Longo, S. K. Katona, and B. S. Halpern. 2015. Best practices for assessing ocean health in multiple contexts using tailorable frameworks. PeerJ. 3:e1503. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucey, S. M., S. K. Gaichas, and K. Y. Aydin. 2020. Conducting reproducible ecosystem modeling using the open source mass balance model Rpath. Ecological Modelling 427:109057. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., P. Fox, C. Tilmes, K. Jacobs, and A. Waple. 2014. Capturing provenance of global change information. Nature Climate Change 4 (6):409–13. 10.1038/nclimate2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., S. E. Beaulieu, L. Fu, P. Fox, M. D. Stefano, and P. West. 2018. Documenting provenance for reproducible marine ecosystem assessment in open science. In Information Retrieval and Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 1051–77. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• McKiernan, E. C., P. E. Bourne, C. T. Brown, S. Buck, A. Kenall, J. Lin, D. McDougall, B. A. Nosek, K. Ram, C. K. Soderberg, et al. 2016. Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5:e16800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener, W. K., and M. B. Jones. 2012. Ecoinformatics: Supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27 (2):85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener, W. K., S. Allard, A. Budden, R. B. Cook, K. Douglass, M. Frame, S. Kelling, R. Koskela, C. Tenopir, and D. A. Vieglais. 2012. Participatory design of DataONE enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecological Informatics, Data Platforms in Integrative Biodiversity Research 11:5–15. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, K. 2017. Here: A simpler way to find your files. https://github.com/krlmr/here  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• National Marine Sanctuaries. 2019. Channel Islands National Marine sanctuary 2016 condition report. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic; Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/science/condition/cinms/welcome.html  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• NEFSC. 2012. Ecosystem status report for the northeast shelf large marine ecosystem-2011. In US Dept Commer, Northeast Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc.12-07, ed. Ecosystem Assessment Program. Woods Hole, MA: National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/.
   Google Scholar
• NEFSC. 2015. Ecosystem Assessment Program. Northeast Fisheries Science Center ecosystem considerations. NEFSC. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/ecosys/  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• NOAA-EDAB. 2020. Technical documentation, state of the ecosystem. doi:10.25923/4tdk-eg57 (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Northeast Fisheries Science Center. 2020a. State of the Ecosystem 2020: Mid-Atlantic. Northeast Fisheries Science Center. doi:10.25923/1f8j-d564  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Northeast Fisheries Science Center. 2020b. State of the Ecosystem 2020: New England. Northeast Fisheries Science Center. doi:10.25923/4tdk-eg57 (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2017. Annual State of the California Current Ecosystem. Accessed November 6, 2018. https://www.pcouncil.org/ecosystem-based-management/annual-state-of-the-california-current-ecosystem/.
   Google Scholar
• Pavao-Zuckerman, M. 2000. The conceptual utility of models in human ecology. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 4 (1):31–56. 10.5038/2162-4593.4.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, K. 2013. Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 8 (1):7. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-8-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samhouri, J. F., A. J. Haupt, P. S. Levin, J. S. Link, and R. Shuford. 2014. Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (5):1205–15. 10.1093/icesjms/fst141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samhouri, J. F., E. Ramanujam, J. J. Bizzarro, H. Carter, K. Sayce, and S. Shen. 2019. An ecosystem-based risk assessment for California fisheries co-developed by scientists, managers, and stakeholders. Biological Conservation 231:103–21.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seagraves, R. 2016. Mid-atlantic fishery management council. http://www.mafmc.org/s/EAFM_Guidance-Doc_2017-02-07.pdf  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Shampine, L. F., and M. W. Reichelt. 1997. The Matlab Ode suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 18 (1):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, K., and A. M. Duda. 1999. Large marine ecosystems: An emerging paradigm for fishery sustainability. Fisheries 24 (12):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. A. 2019. ERDDAP. Monterey, CA: NOAA/NMFS/SWFSC/ERD. https://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Weijerman, M., J. M. Gove, I. D. Williams, W. J. Walsh, D. Minton, and J. J. Polovina. 2018. Evaluating management strategies to optimise coral reef ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 55 (4):1823–33. 10.1111/1365-2664.13105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, H. 2018. GitHub Repository. GitHub. https://github.com/HeatherWelch/EcoCast_Operationalization  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R! New York: Springer International Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?id=RTMFswEACAAJ  (last accessed November 17, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., and G. Grolemund. 2016. R for data science: Import. Tidy, transform, visualize, and model data. 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. 2012. The grammar of graphics. In Springer handbooks of computational statistics, ed. J. E. Gentle, W. K. Härdle, and Y. Mori. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-21551-3_13.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. D., M. Dumontier, I. J. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos, P. E. Bourne, et al. 2016. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. 2006. Software carpentry: Getting scientists to write better code by making them more productive. Computing in Science & Engineering 8 (6):66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenni, G. M., E. M. Christensen, E. K. Bledsoe, S. R. Supp, R. M. Diaz, E. P. White, and S. K. M. Ernest. 2019. Developing a modern data workflow for regularly updated data. PLOS Biology 17 (1):e3000125. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zador, S. G., K. K. Holsman, K. Y. Aydin, and S. K. Gaichas. 2017. Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: The value of qualitative assessments. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (1):421–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar