2,559
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

There Is no I in EAFM Adapting Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management

, , , &

References

  • Allaire, J. J., X. Yihui, J. McPherson, J. Luraschi, K. Ushey, A. Atkins, H. Wickham, J. Cheng, W. Chang, and R. Iannone. 2019. Rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rmarkdown.
  • Breslow, S. J., B. Sojka, R. Barnea, X. Basurto, C. Carothers, S. Charnley, S. Coulthard, N. Dolšak, J. Donatuto, C. García-Quijano, et al. 2016. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management. Environmental Science & Policy 66:250–9. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023.
  • Butterworth, D. S. 2007. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64 (4):613–7. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm003.
  • Clay, P. M., A. Kitts, and P. Pinto da Silva. 2014. Measuring the social and economic performance of catch share programs: Definition of metrics and application to the U.S. Northeast Region Groundfish Fishery. Marine Policy 44:27–36. 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.009.
  • Colburn, L. L., and M. Jepson. 2012. Social indicators of gentrification pressure in fishing communities: A context for social impact assessment. Coastal Management 40 (3):289–300. 10.1080/08920753.2012.677635.
  • Colburn, L. L., M. Jepson, C. Weng, T. Seara, J. Weiss, and J. A. Hare. 2016. Indicators of climate change and social vulnerability in fishing dependent communities along the Eastern and Gulf Coasts of the United States. Marine Policy 74:323–33. 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.030.
  • Dickey-Collas, M. 2014. Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (5):1174–82. 10.1093/icesjms/fsu027.
  • DePiper, G. S., S. K. Gaichas, S. M. Lucey, P. Pinto da Silva, M. R. Anderson, H. Breeze, A. Bundy, P. M. Clay, G. Fay, R. J. Gamble, et al. 2017. Operationalizing integrated ecosystem assessments within a multidisciplinary team: Lessons learned from a worked example. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (8):2076–86. 10.1093/icesjms/fsx038.
  • DePiper, G. S., S. K. Gaichas, B. Muffley, G. Ardini, J. Brust, J. Coakley, K. Dancy, G. W. Elliott, E. Gilbert, D. Lipton, et al. In review. Learning by doing: Collaborative conceptual modeling as a path forward in Ecosystem Based Management. ICES Journal of Marine Science.
  • Gaichas, S. K., G. S. DePiper, R. J. Seagraves, B. W. Muffley, M. Sabo, L. L. Colburn, and A. L. Loftus. 2018. Implementing ecosystem approaches to fishery management: Risk assessment in the US Mid-Atlantic. Frontiers in Marine Science 5(442):1–25. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00442.
  • Gaichas, S., R. Seagraves, J. Coakley, G. DePiper, V. Guida, J. Hare, P. Rago, and M. Wilberg. 2016. A framework for incorporating species, fleet, habitat, and climate interactions into fishery management. Frontiers in Marine Science 3 (105):1–17. 10.3389/fmars.2016.00105.
  • Harvey, C., T. Garfield, G. Williams, and N. Tolimieri, ed. 2020. California current integrated ecosystem assessment (CCIEA), California current ecosystem status report. A report to the Pacific Fishery Management Council. https://www.pcouncil.org/documents/2020/02/g-1-a-iea-team-report-1.pdf/.
  • Harvey, C. J., C. R. Kelble, and F. B. Schwing. 2017. Implementing “the IEA”: Using integrated ecosystem assessment frameworks, programs, and applications in support of operationalizing ecosystem-based management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (1):398–405. 10.1093/icesjms/fsw201.
  • Heemskerk, M., K. Wilson, and M. Pavao-Zuckerman. 2003. Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7 (3). 10.5751/ES-00554-070308.
  • Hobday, A. J., A. D. Smith, I. C. Stobutzki, C. Bulman, R. Daley, J. M. Dambacher, R. A. Deng, J. Dowdney, M. Fuller, D. Furlani, et al. 2011. Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing. Fisheries Research 108 (2-3):372–384. 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.013.
  • Jepson, M., and L. L. Colburn. 2013. Development of social indicators of fishing community vulnerability and resilience in the US Southeast and Northeast Regions. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-129 (US Dept Commerce, 2013). http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/management/councils/training/2014/r_h3_fishing_community_vulnerability.pdf.
  • Levin, P. S., S. J. Breslow, C. J. Harvey, K. C. Norman, M. R. Poe, G. D. Williams, and M. L. Plummer. 2016. Conceptualization of social-ecological systems of the California current: An examination of interdisciplinary science supporting ecosystem-based management. Coastal Management 44 (5):397–408. 10.1080/08920753.2016.1208036.
  • Levin, P. S., M. J. Fogarty, G. C. Matlock, and M. Ernst. 2008. Integrated ecosystem assessments. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-92, 20 p.
  • Levin, P. S., M. J. Fogarty, S. A. Murawski, and D. Fluharty. 2009. Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biology 7 (1):e1000014. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000014.
  • Levin, P. S., T. B. Francis, and N. G. Taylor. 2016. Thirty-two essential questions for understanding the social–ecological system of forage fish: The case of pacific herring. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2 (4):e01213. 10.1002/ehs2.1213.
  • Levin, P. S., C. R. Kelble, R. L. Shuford, C. Ainsworth, Y. deReynier, R. Dunsmore, M. J. Fogarty, K. Holsman, E. A. Howell, M. E. Monaco, et al. 2014. Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: A US perspective. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (5):1198–204. 10.1093/icesjms/fst112.
  • Link, J. S., and H. I. Browman. 2017. Operationalizing and implementing ecosystem-based management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (1):379–81. 10.1093/icesjms/fsw247.
  • Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC). 2006. Evolution towards an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NAO4NMF4410368. http://www.mafmc.org/s/Ecosystem_Report.pdf
  • Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC). 2016. Ecosystem approach to fisheries management guidance document. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/511cdc7fe4b00307a2628ac6/t/589a2b61d2b8575c64fe05ff/1486498674225/EAFM_Guidance+Doc_2017-02-07.pdf
  • Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). 2012. Ecosystem status report for the northeast shelf large marine ecosystem-2011. US Dept Commer, Northeast Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc.12-07. Edited by Ecosystem Assessment Program. Woods Hole, MA: National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/.
  • Pavao-Zuckerman, M. 2000. The conceptual utility of models in human ecology. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 4 (1):31–56. 10.5038/2162-4593.4.1.2.
  • Punt, A. E., T. A'mar, N. A. Bond, D. S. Butterworth, C. L. de Moor, J. A. A. De Oliveira, M. A. Haltuch, A. B. Hollowed, and C. Szuwalski. 2014. Fisheries management under climate and environmental uncertainty: Control rules and performance simulation. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (8):2208–20. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fst057.
  • Samhouri, J. F., A. J. Haupt, P. S. Levin, J. S. Link, and R. Shuford. 2014. Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (5):1205–15.
  • Seagraves, R. and K. Collins, ed. 2012. Fourth national meeting of the regional fishery management councils scientific and statistical committees. Report of a National SSC Workshop on Scientific Advice on Ecosystem and Social Considerations in US Federal Fisheries Management. Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Williamsburg, VA.
  • Smith, A. D., E. J. Fulton, A. J. Hobday, D. C. Smith, and P. Shoulder. 2007. Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64 (4):633–9. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm041.
  • Wickham, H. 2015. R packages. 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  • Zador, S. G., K. K. Holsman, K. Y. Aydin, and S. K. Gaichas. 2017. Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: The value of qualitative assessments. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (1):421–30. 10.1093/icesjms/fsw144.