Systematic Review of Two Decades (1995 to 2014) of Research on Synchronous Online Learning

References

• Allen, M., J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, and E. Mabry. 2002. Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education 16 (2):83–97. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., E. Mabry, M. Mattrey, J. Bourhis, S. Titsworth, and N. Burrell. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. Journal of Communication 54 (3):402–20. doi:10.1111/jcom.2004.54.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., P. C. Abrami, E. Borokhovski, C. A. Wade, R. M. Tamin, M. A. Surkes, and E. C. Bethel. 2009. A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Education Research 79 (3):1243–89. doi:10.3102/0034654309333844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney, P. A. Wallet, M. Fiset, and B. Huang. 2004. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research 74 (3):379–439. doi:10.3102/00346543074003379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R. 2000. Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology 4 (1):120–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, J., D. Harris, and F. Mayadas. 2005. Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1):131–46. doi:10.1002/jee.2005.94.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M. 2011. Synchronous collaboration competencies in web‐conferencing environments: Their impact on the learning process. Distance Education 32 (1):63–83. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C. 2001. The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 7 (1):73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C., K. Gillan, J. Kromrey, M. Hess, and R. Blomeyer. 2004. The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/distance/index.html (accessed August 28, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N. S., H. C. Ko, Kinshuk, and T. Lin. 2005. A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 (2):181–94. doi:10.1080/14703290500062599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit. 2010. Digital economy rankings 2010: Beyond E-readiness. A report from the economist intelligence unit. Retrieved from http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/EIU_Digital_economy_rankings_2010_FINAL_WEB.pdf (accessed March 29, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., C. R. Graham, K. J. Spring, J. S. Drysdale, and C. R. Henrie. 2014. A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education 20:20–34. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. 2006. The relationship between adopting a synchronous medium and participation in online group work: An explorative study. Interactive Learning Environments 14 (2):137–52. doi:10.1080/10494820600800240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-C., H. N. J. Ho, -C.-C. Tsai, G.-J. Hwang, H.-C. Chu, C.-Y. Wang, and N.-S. Chen. 2012. Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society 15 (2):354–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas, S. 2008. Interaction in the Internet-based distance learning researches: Results of a trend analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 7 (2):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kear, K., F. Chetwynd, J. Williams, and H. Donelan. 2012. Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education 58 (3):953–63. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Z. Moore, L. Graham, and S. Lee. 2002. A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34 (3):250–73. doi:10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
   Google Scholar
• McIsaac, M. 1990. Problems affecting evaluation of distance education in developing countries. Research in Distance Education 37:12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online-learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., and T. Laferriére. 2007. Adopting tools for online synchronous communications: Issues and strategies. In Making the transition to E-learning: Strategies and issues, ed. M. Bullen and D. Janes, 313–34. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2014. Fostering relevant research on educational communications and technology. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop, 909–18. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., and C. J. Bonk. 2007. Is online life a breeze? A case study for promoting synchronous learning in a blended graduate course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 3 (3):307–23.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G., J. Seaman, and I. E. Allen. 2010. Educational transformation through online learning: To be or not to be. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 14 (4):17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington, R. M., and S. A. Walker. 2003. Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science 31 (1/2):41–63. doi:10.1023/A:1022556401959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potkonjak, V., M. Gardner, V. Callaghan, P. Mattila, C. Guetl, V. M. Petrović, and K. Jovanović. 2016. Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education 95:309–27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachar, M., and Y. Neumann. 2003. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytical approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education 4 (2):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K., J. A. Thomas, W. Y. Lan, S. Cooper, T. C. Ahern, S. M. Shaw, and X. Liu. 2006. Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research 76 (1):93–135. doi:10.3102/00346543076001093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, D. C. E., N. S. Chen, and T. Leo. 2012. Exploring students’ learning experience in an international online research seminar in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Computers & Education 58 (3):918–30. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. 2014. What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 3.0. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf (accessed January 21, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. 2003. Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information 3:241–80. doi:10.1080/14636310303143
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., E. M. Bäcker, and S. Vogt. 2009. Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10 (6):21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., J. Lei, B. Yan, C. Lai, and H. S. Tan. 2005. What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record 107 (8):1836–84. doi:10.1111/tcre.2005.107.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar