What Makes a Good MOOC: A Field Study of Factors Impacting Student Motivation to Learn

References

• Anderson, T., Poellhuber, B., & McKerlich, R. (2010). Self-paced learners meet social software: An exploration of learners’ attitudes, expectations and experience. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3).
   Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., & Dietz, J. (2011). Looking for validity or testing it? The perils of stepwise regression, extreme-scores analysis, heteroscedasticity, and measurement error. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 409–415. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Durham, NC: Duke University’s First MOOC.
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bures, E. M., Abrami, P. C., & Amundsen, C. (2000). Student motivation to learn via computer conferencing. Research in Higher Education, 41, 593–621. doi:10.1023/A:1007071415363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, L., & Parish, T. (2011). MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn, 2011, 8. doi:10.1145/2016016.2016017
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Benett, B., Woods, D., & Emmanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes Massive Open Online Courses and why? Universtity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Chukhlomin, V. (2016). How non-U.S. business students can overcome barriers and succeed in American virtual environments: Lessons from teaching a Coursera MOOC. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4, 669–676. doi:10.18178/joebm.2016.4.12.471
   Google Scholar
• Chukhlomin, V., & Deshpande, A. (2011). Developing bridging bilingual/bicultural (the 3B framework) courses to prepare international students for the American online classroom in an adult learning environment. In Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2011 (pp. 955–960). Melbourne, Australia: AACE (the Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education). Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Chukhlomin, V., Deshpande, A., & Chandra, B. (2013). Strategies for bridging cross-cultural barriers for international students’ success in American asynchronous online degree programs. The South African Journal of Higher Education, 27, 1477–1486.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56, 28–30. doi:10.1145/2408776.2408787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, A., & Glore, P. (2010). The impact of design and aesthetics on usability, credibility, and learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter134/david_glore134.html
   Google Scholar
• de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 218–231. doi:10.1111/jcal.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farag, M., & Shemy, N. (2011). Course delivery through the web: Effects of linear/nonlinear navigation and individual differences in online learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 10, 243–271.
   Google Scholar
• Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive online open course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 74–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, H., & Kop, R. (2015). MOOC learning experience design: Issues and challenges. International Journal on Elearning, 14, 289. Retrieved from http://library.esc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.library.esc.edu/docview/1697517292?accountid=8067
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ scale Conference (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, K. M. (2012). Barriers to the adoption of online learning systems. Educase Review, 47, 50–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. T., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. (2013). Open UToronto MOOC Initiative: Report on first year on activity. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, C., & Mustea, A. (2016). The Romanian Moodle MOOC development and the users feedback. The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, 3. doi:10.12753/2066-026X-16-188
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone, K. K., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. C., Lin, H., Ching, Y. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2009). The effects of web-based instruction navigation modes on undergraduates’ learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2004). The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education. Higher Education, 47, 411–435. doi:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000020868.39084.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrollment and completion of Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 133–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 229–239. doi:10.1080/1358165042000283084
   Google Scholar
• Kizilecec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lense to understand online learners: Toward data-driver design within the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Internactions, 22(2), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M., Lim, M., Ko, Y., Myers, R., & Schmitz Weiss, A. (2014). Understanding MOOCs as an emerging online learning tool: Perspectives from the students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 28, 147–159. doi:10.1080/08923647.2014.926145
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Kang, J., & McKelroy, E. (2015). Examining learners’ perspective of taking a MOOC: Reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness. Educational Media International, 52, 129–146. doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1053289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14, 202–227. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lushnikova, N., Chintakayala, P., & Rodante, A. (2013, November). Massive online open courses from ivy league universities: Benefits and challenges for students and educators. International Conference Providing Continuity in the Content of the System of Stepwise Graduate and Postgraduate Education, Rivne, Ukraine (Vol. 11).
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, H. H., Haywood, J., Woodgate, A., & Alkhatnai, M. (2015). Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 59, 56–63. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0821-y
   Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T. T., & Anderson, T. T. (2013). Interaction equivalency in an OER, MOOCS and informal learning era. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013, 1–15. doi:10.5334/2013-09
   Google Scholar
• Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26, 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz, H., Amin, M. A., & Tatla, I. A. (2015). Factors affecting students’ motivation level to learn English as a second language in the Pakistani university context. Journal of Research & Reflections in Education, 2, 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, B. A., Poole, D., & Nestor, M. A. (2016). Creating a sticky MOOC. Online Learning, 20, 1–16. doi:10.24059/olj.v20i1.731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioral patterns. Proceedings of EDULEARN 14 (pp. 5825–5834). Barcelona, Spain: IATED Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Perifanou, M. A. (2014). How to design and evaluate a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for language learning. Paper presented at the The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 4, pp. 283–290), Bucharest, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 262–268. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.603
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 157–171. doi:10.1080/08886504.1999.10782621
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., Gago, D., & Rodríguez, L. (2014). Success, activity and drop-outs in MOOCs: An exploratory study on the UNED COMA courses. In LAK ’14 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 98–102). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. (2014). Personal growth as a strong element in the motivation of Australian university students to learn German. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 145–160. doi:10.1075/aral.37.2.04sch
   Google Scholar
• Shrader, S., Wu, M., Owens-Nicholson, D., & Santa Ana, K. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Participant activity, demographics, and satisfaction. Online Learning, 20, 171–188. doi:10.24059/olj.v20i2.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer self-efficacy and motivation to learn in a self-directed online course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7, 99–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00207.x
   Google Scholar
• Skadberg, Y. X., & Kimmel, J. R. (2004). Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a web site: Its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 403–422. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillings, M. J., & Ferrell, R. (2000). Student-generated rubrics: Bringing students into the assessment process. Reading Teacher, 53, 452–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., Tsao, Y., Yu, L., Chan, C., & Lai, K. R. (2016). Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (pp. 21). Bolton, UK: Cetis.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, W., & Baker, R. B. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? Journal of OnLine Learning & Teaching, 11, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zaharias, P. (2006). A usability evaluation method for e-learning: Focus on motivation to Learn. In Extended Abstracts of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2006 (pp. 1571–1576). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 75–98. doi:10.1080/10447310802546716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn-Arnold, B., & Conaway, W. (2016). The keys to online learning for adults. Distance Learning Education, 13, 1–5.
   Google Scholar