Sense of Challenge, Threat, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation of Students Learning in Virtual and Blended Courses

References

• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. Retrieved April 3, 2004, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/pdf/v5n2_anderson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory or behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation or motivation and action through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37–61). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, H. J. (2013). Feedback in online writing forums: Effects on adolescent writers. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 5(1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Hughes, H., Keppell, M., Hard, N., & Smith, L. (2015). Stories from students in their first semester of distance learning. Research in Open and Distance Learning – IRRODL, 16, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36–40. Retrieved from http://acressped.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, E-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. Research in Open and Distance Learning – IRRODL, 15, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A., & Chukhlomin, V. (2017). What makes a good MOOC: A field study of factors impacting student motivation to learn. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(4), 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Pshchologist, 40, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., Perry, B., & Janzen, K. (2011). The making of an exemplary online educator. Distance Education, 32(1), 101–118. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2016). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359–369. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.766679
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, R., & Kanuke, H. (2004). blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Groen, J., & Li, Q. (2005). Achieving the benefits of blended learning within a fully online learning environment: A focus on synchronous communication. Educational Technology, 45(6), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). Training with ICT for ICT from the trainee’s perspective. A local ICT teacher training experience. Education and Information Technologies, 15, 3–17. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9079-3
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on coping. The American Psychologist, 55(6), 665–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International, 41(2), 163–173. doi:10.1080/09523980410001685784
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 307–314. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9028-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbati, L., & Minnaar, A. (2015). Guidelines towards the facilitation of interactive online learning programmes in higher education. Research in Open and Distance Learning, IRRODL, 16, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltiadou, M., & Savenye, W. C. (2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Educational Technology Review, 11, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, B. (2016). The impact of contact sessions and discussion forums on the academic performance of open distance learning students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Yun, H. (2018). The influence of motivational regulation strategies on online students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 43–56. doi:10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire(MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A. A., Besser, E. D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. M. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. Research in Open and Distance Learning, IRRODL, 16, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on selfefficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848–856. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1984). Enhancing self-efficacy and achievement through rewards and goals: Motivational and informational effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 78, 29–34. doi:10.1080/00220671.1984.10885568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173–208. doi:10.1007/BF01320134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. E. (2016). Using online discussion forums to support learning of paraphrasing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1239–1249. doi:10.1111/bjet.12491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, O., & Zilka, C. G. (2016). Feelings of challenge and threat among pre-service teachers studying in different learning environments – Virtual vs. Blended Courses. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 7–19. doi:10.26634/jet.13.1.6014
   Google Scholar
• Zilka, C. G., & Zeichner, O. (2017). Forums and critical factors involved in feelings of challenge and threat among preservice teachers studying virtual and blended courses. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 4.
   Google Scholar