Student Engagement Level in an e-Learning Environment: Clustering Using K-means

References

• Alkilany, A., Ahmed, A., Said, H., & Bakar, A. A. (2014, Aug). Application of the k-means clustering algorithm to predict load shedding of the southern electrical grid of libya. In 4th international conference oninnovative computing technology (intech’14) (p. 244–247). doi: 10.1109/INTECH.2014.6927763
   Google Scholar
• Aqel, M. (2013). The effect of different interaction levels on instructional design learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1035–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2016, Jul). Early prediction of student profiles based on performance and gaming preferences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(3), 272–284. doi:10.1109/TLT.2016.2541664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., Barón-López, F. J., & Vega-Cuesta, M. (2013). The association between academic engage- ment and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 33. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96(Supplement C), 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. (2011). Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles (VAK). Available at: http://www.nwlink.com/donclark/hrd/styles/vakt.html
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Yu, X., & Lu, J. (2013, Aug). Application of k-means clustering algorithm in sina microblog. In IET international conference on smart and sustainable city (icssc’13) (p. 370–372). doi: 10.1049/cp.2013.2038
   Google Scholar
• Fei, T., Heng, W. J., Toh, K. C., & Qi, T. (2003, December). Question classification for e-learning by artificial neural network. In Proceedings of the joint conference of the 4th international con- ference on information, communications and signal processing and 4th pacific rim conference on multimedia (Vol. 3, pp. 1757–1761). doi: 10.1109/ICICS.2003.1292768
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R., & Soloman, B. (n.d.). Learning styles and strategies. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction. 43. Special Issue: Student engagement and learning: theoretical and methodological advances) Retrieved from, 1–4. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475216300159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., Li, Z., & Niu, K. (2016, May). Solutions for problems of existing E-commerce recommen- dation system. In IEEE international conference on consumer electronics-taiwan (icce-tw’16) (pp. 1–2). doi: 10.1109/ICCE-TW.2016.7520907
   Google Scholar
• Ghahramani, Z. (2004, September). Unsupervised learning. Retrieved from http://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/zoubin/papers/ul.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M., Briggs, W., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highley, M. (2014). E-learning: Challenges and solutions. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/e-learning-challenges-and-solutions
   Google Scholar
• Hoic-Bozic, N., Dlab, M. H., & Mornar, V. (2016, Feb). Recommender system and web 2.0 tools to enhance a blended learning model. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(1), 39–44. doi:10.1109/TE.2015.2427116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. M. U., Avci, B., Trajcevski, G., & Scheuermann, P. (2016, Jun). Incorporating weather updates for public transportation users of recommendation systems. In 17th IEEE international conference on mobile data management (mdm’16) (Vol. 1, pp. 333–336). doi: 10.1109/MDM.2016.57
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2015). MOOC Completion Rates: TheData. Available at: http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html
   Google Scholar
• Kamath, A., Biswas, A., & Balasubramanian, V. (2016, Mar.). A crowdsourced approach to student engagement recognition in e-learning environments. In IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (wacv’16) (p. 1–9). doi: 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477618
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kori, K., Pedaste, M., Altin, H., Tõnisson, E., & Palts, T. (2016, Nov). Factors that influence students motivation to start and to continue studying information technology in Estonia. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(4), 255–262. doi:10.1109/TE.2016.2528889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, A., Primo, T., Oliveira, A., & Koch, F. (2016, Jun.). Toward measuring student en- gagement: A data-driven approach. In 13th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (its’16) (pp. 60–68). Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foun- dations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20. doi:10.1002/ir.v2009:141
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. Retrieved from. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjoo, F. (2015). Udacity says it can teach tech skills to millions, and fast. New York Times.   Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/technology/udacity-says-it-can-teach-tech-skills-to-millions.html
   Google Scholar
• Manne, S., Yelisetti, S., Kakarla, M., & Fatima, S. (2014, Dec). Mining VRSEC student learning behaviour in moodle system using datamining techniques. In International conference on computer and communications technologies (iccct’14) (p. 1–7). doi: 10.1109/ICCCT2.2014.7066695
   Google Scholar
• Mayadas, F., Miller, G., & Sener, J. (2015). Definitions of e-learning courses and programs. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/updated-e-learning-definitions-2/
   Google Scholar
• Melville, P., & Sindhwani, V. (2009). Recommender systems. Retrieved from http://vikas.sindhwani.org/recommender.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moubayed, A., Injadat, M., Nassif, A. B., Lutfiyya, H., & Shami, A. (2018). E-learning: Challenges and research opportunities using machine learning & data analytics. in IEEE Access, 6, 39117–39138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriogun, P. K. (2003, Nov.). Towards understanding online learning levels of engagement using the SQUAD approach to CMC Discourse. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 371–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daumé, H., & Getoor, L. (2013). Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic. In Advances in neural information processing systems workshop on data driven education, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L. F. (n.d.). Redesigning a large lecture course for student engagement: Process and outcomes. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3, 2–39.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student en- gagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–109. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65. doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubens, N., Kaplan, D., & Okamoto, T. (2012). E-learning 3.0: Anyone, anywhere, anytime, and ai. In International conference on web-based learning (pp. 171–180). Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145–159. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawang, S., O’Connor, P., & Ali, M. (2017). IEngage: Using technology to enhance students’ engagement in a large classroom. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 11–19. doi:10.5204/jld.v9i3.292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlechty, P. C. (ed.). (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shailaja, J., & Sridaran, R. (2014, March). Taxonomy of e-learning challenges and an insight to blended learning. In International conference on intelligent computing applications (icica’14) (pp. 310–314). doi: 10.1109/ICICA.2014.70
   Google Scholar
• Sunar, A. S., White, S., Abdullah, N. A., & Davis, H. C. (2017, Oct). How learners’ interactions sustain engagement: A MOOC case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 475–487. doi:10.1109/TLT.2016.2633268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, L. J., Hong, L. Y., & Yan, H. (2016, July). The improvement and application of a k-means clustering algorithm. In Ieee international conference on cloud computing and big data analysis (icccbda’16) (p. 93–96). doi: 10.1109/ICCCBDA.2016.7529540
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14. Article number 1.
   Google Scholar
• Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Ochoa, X., Wolpers, M., Drachsler, H., Bosnic, I., & Duval, E. (2012, Oct). Context-aware recommender systems for learning: A survey and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(4), 318–335. doi:10.1109/TLT.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29. doi:10.1080/08923649409526852
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic en- gagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. The Journal of Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaojie, G., Liang, C., Hang, Z., & Jun, H. (2015, May). An improved k-means algorithm and its application in the evaluation of air quality levels. In 27th Chinese control and decision conference (ccdc’15) (pp. 3324–3329). doi: 10.1109/CCDC.2015.7162494
   Google Scholar