336
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Research Productivity and the Citation of Open and Distance Learning Journals (2009-2018): A Citation Analysis

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmad, K., Sheikh, A., & Rafi, M. (2019). Scholarly research in library and information science: An analysis based on ISI Web of Science. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 21(1), 18–32. doi:10.1108/PMM-06-2019-0024
  • Baggaley, J. (2019). The Distance Education journal at 40: Crossroads and horizons. Distance Education, 40(4), 430–437. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1681891
  • Bergman, E. M. L. (2012). Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 370–379. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
  • Bozkurt, A. (2019). Intellectual roots of distance education: A progressive knowledge domain analysis. Distance Education, 40(4), 497–514. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1681894
  • Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., … Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330–363. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953
  • Çakıroğlu, Ü., Kokoç, M., Gökoğlu, S., Öztürk, M., & Erdoğdu, F. (2019). An Analysis of the journey of open and distance education: Major concepts and cutoff points in research trends. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 1–20. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3743
  • Davarpanah, M. R., & Aslekia, S. A. (2008). Scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21–39. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z
  • Erfanmanesh, A., Didegah, F., & Omidvar, S. (2010). Research productivity and impact of library and information science in the Web of Science. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 85–95.
  • Ezema, I. J., & Onyancha, O. B. (2016). A Bibliometric analysis of health and medical journals: Issues in medical scholarly communication in Africa. Serials Review, 42(2), 116–128. doi:10.1080/00987913.2016.1182881
  • Franchignoni, F., & Lasa, S. M. (2011). Bibliometric indicators and core journals in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(6), 471–476. doi:10.2340/16501977-0821
  • Ghosh, S., Nath, J., Agarwal, S., & Nath, A. (2012). Open and distance learning (ODL) education system: Past, present, and future – A systematic study of an alternative education system. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 3(4), 53–57. http://www.jgrcs.info/index.php/jgrcs/article/view/382/292
  • Giustini, D., & Boulos, M. N. K. (2013). Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Online Journal of Public Health Information, 5(2), 214. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623
  • Henrekson, M., & Waldenström, D. (2011). How should research performance be measured? A study of Swedish economists. The Manchester School, 79(6), 1139–1156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2010.02216.x
  • Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., & Jabeen, M. (2015). Research productivity of library scholars: Bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World, 116(7/8), 433–454. doi:10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0132
  • Jarvey, P., & Usher, A. (2012). Measuring academic research in Canada: Field-normalized university rankings 2012. Toronto, Canada: Higher Education Strategy Associates. http://higheredstrategy.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/rankings20121.pdf
  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366. doi:10.1162/154247603322752566
  • Kohn, K. C., & Gordon, L. (2014). Citation analysis as a tool for collection development and instruction. Collection Management, 39(4), 275–296. doi:10.1080/01462679.2014.935904
  • Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C. E., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Dušková, M., Guns, R., … Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116(1), 463–486. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0
  • Kundu, S. (2014). Open and distance learning education its scope and constraints in Indian scenario. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 01–05. (IOSR-JHSS): http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol19-issue4/Version-4/A016440105.pdf
  • Levine‐Clark, M., & Gil, E. (2009). A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools. Online Information Review, 33(5), 986–996. doi:10.1108/14684520911001954
  • Li, K., & Canelas, D. (2019). Learners’ perceptions and experiences of two chemistry MOOCs: Implications for teaching and design. The American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 245–261. doi:10.1080/08923647.2019.1639469
  • López-Illescas, C., De Moya-anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
  • McCain, K. W. (1991). Core journal networks and cocitation maps: New bibliometric tools for serials research and management. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 61(3), 311–336. doi:10.1086/602370
  • McGrath, B. (2016). A guide to ensuring wide dissemination and lasting impact for your research. The Atlantic philanthropies. Retrieved on 20/03/2020 from https://www.atlanticphilanthropies.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Research-Dissemination-Guide.pdf
  • Meho, L. I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 20(1), 32. doi:10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33
  • Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science, 89(12), 1990–1996.
  • Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2015). Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 1988–2002. doi:10.1002/asi.23314
  • Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59–66. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/46942/0
  • Ng, C. (2019). Shifting the focus from motivated learners to motivating distributed environments: A review of 40 years of published motivation research in distance education. Distance Education, 40(4), 469–496. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1681892
  • Oh, J., Chang, H., Kim, J. A., Choi, M., Park, Z., Cho, Y., & Lee, E. G. (2017). Citation analysis for biomedical and health sciences journals published in Korea. Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(3), 218–225. doi:10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.218
  • Olsen, A., Spring, K. J., Young, J., & West, R. E. (2013). International review of research in open and distance learning, 2002-2011. Educational Technology, 53(4), 43–47.
  • Onyancha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (2009). Assessing researchers’ performance in developing countries: Is Google Scholar an alternative? Mousaion, 27(1), 43–64.
  • Pislyakov, V. (2009). Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to journal citation reports and Scopus. Scientometrics, 79(3), 541–550. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2016-1
  • Raut, T. K., Sahu, S. B., & Ganguly, S. (2008). Strategic management journal: A citations study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 55(1), 69–75.
  • Reeves, B., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 119–136. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00007.x
  • Samzugi, A. S., & Mwinyimbegu, C. M. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of MBA dissertations submitted at the Open University of Tanzania library from 2008-2011. Huria: Journal of the Open University of Tanzania, 19(1), 63–74.
  • Smith, D. R. (2008). Citation analysis and impact factor trends of 5 core journals in occupational medicine, 1985-2006. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, 63(3), 114–122. doi:10.3200/AEOH.63.3.114-122
  • Stansbury, M. C. (2002). Problem statements in seven LIS journals: An application of the Hernon/Metoyer-Duran attributes. Library & Information Science Research, 24(2), 157–168. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00110-X
  • Walters, W. H. (2017). Citation-based journal rankings: Key questions, metrics, and data sources. IEEE Access, 5, 22036–22053. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761400
  • Weaver, N. E., & Barnard, E. (2015). A citation analysis of psychology students’ use of sources in online distance learning. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(4), 312–329. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2015.1127865
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2017). Review and content analysis of the international review of research in open and distance/distributed learning (2000-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 1–26. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2806
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (2011). The geography of distance education-bibliographic characteristics of a journal network. Distance Education, 32(3), 441–456. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.610287
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T., & Tuncay, N. (2010). The growing impact of open access distance education journals - A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 54–73.
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21–50. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - An explorative content analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., & Buntins, K. (2019). The position of distance education in a journal network. Distance Education, 40(4), 438–453. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1692766
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi:10.1177/1094428114562629

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.