Systematic Review (2000 to 2021) of Online Accessibility Research in Higher Education

References

• Adams, D., Simpson, K., Davies, L., Campbell, C., & Macdonald, L. (2019). Online learning for university students on the autism spectrum: a systematic review and questionnaire study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 111–131. doi:10.14742/ajet.5483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alahmadi, T., & Drew, S. (2017). Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1), 7–24. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.957118278379895
   Google Scholar
• Alamri, A., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2017). Factor affecting learners with disabilities – instructor interaction in online learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59–69. doi:10.1177/0162643416681497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson survey research group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580868
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M., Hasan, N., Lewis, L., Hasan, M., & Ray, P. (2017). A systematic literature review of the application of information communication technology for visually impaired people. International Journal of Disability Management, 11(6), 1–18. doi:10.1017/ism.2016.6.
   Google Scholar
• Baptista, A., Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F., & Rocha, T. (2016). Web accessibility challenges and perspectives: a systematic literature review. 2016 11th. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) in Las, Palmas, Spain, IEEE Explore.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, K., Sugar, A., Swenson, N., & Vargas, J. (2013). Programmatic, systematic, automatic: an online course accessibility support model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(3), 87–102. doi:10.24059/olj.v17i3.352.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, K. (2013). National perspective: Q&A with national federation of the blind & association of higher education and disability. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(3). doi:10.24059/olj.v17i3.379.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, K., Welsh, B., Pruitt, C., Hermann, K., Dietrich, G., Trevino, J. G., … Coombs, N. (2013b). Understanding disabilities & online student success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(3), 15–48. doi:10.24059/olj.v17i3.388.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, J. O. (2006). Assessing attainment of competency and program characteristics of a distance preparation program for teachers of students with visual impairments: one university’s experience RE:View:. Rehabilitation and Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment, 38(3), 99–113. doi:10.3200/REVU.38.3.99-113.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, K. (2008). Reading instruction for students with visual impairments: whose job is it?. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(4), 197–200. doi:10.1177/0145482X0810200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoverde Molina, M. A., Valverde, L., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2020). Empirical studies on web accessibility of educational websites: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 8, 91676–91700. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994288.
   Google Scholar
• Carvajal, C. M., Piqueras, R. F., & Mérida, J. F. C. (2018). Evaluation of web accessibility of higher education institutions in Chile. International Education Studies, 11(12), 140–148. doi:10.24059/olj.v17i3.352.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M., & Berge, Z. L. (2018). A review of accessibility in online higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(1). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring211/coleman_berge211.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2006). Making online learning accessible to disabled students: an institutional case study. ALT-J, 14(1), 103–115. doi:10.1080/09687760500479779.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, C. (2004). Providing access to students with disabilities in online distance education: legal and technical concerns for higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 51–62. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1801_5.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. J., & Larwin, K. H. (2016). The potential impact of online/distance education for students with disabilities in higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(1), 76–81. doi:10.11591/ijere.v5i1.4525.
   Google Scholar
• Glazatov, T. (2012). Inclusiveness in online programs: disability issues and implications for higher education administrators. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 2(1). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=ehh&AN=74697761&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Hollins, N., & Foley, A. R. (2013). The experiences of students with learning disabilities in a higher education virtual campus. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 607–624. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9302-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesto, F., McAndrew, P., Minocha, S., & Coughlan, T. (2016). Accessibility of MOOCs: understanding the provider perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 2016(1. doi:10.5334/jime.430.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. (2015). Disability and eLearning: Opportunities and barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1). doi:10.18061/dsq.v35i1.3815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent, M., Ellis, K., Latter, N., & Peaty, G. (2018). The case for captioned lectures in Australian higher education. TechTrends, 62(2), 158–165. doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0225-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, K. J. (2015). Universal design in online education: employing organization change. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 280–290. https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Kirkpatrick_0615.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kmetz, K., & Davis, C. J. (2014). Access to on-line learning: A SAD case. Information Systems Education Journal, 12(2), 10. http://www.isedj.org/2014-12/n2/ISEDJv12n2p10.html
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, A., Nihill, C., & Devli, M. (2014). Inclusive practices in academia and beyond. The Future of Learning and Teaching in the Next Generation Learning Space, 12, 147–171. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1479-362820140000012012/full/html
   Google Scholar
• LaSala, K. B., Polyakova-Norwood, V., & Starnes-Ott, K. (2020). Initiation of a nursing education curriculum with accessibility to all learners. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(2), 24–28. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., Humphrey, M., Conley, Q., Dunlap, J. C., Greear, K., Lowenthal, A., & Giacumo, L. A. (2020). Creating accessible and inclusive online learning: moving beyond compliance and broadening the discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(2), 1–82. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2494575422?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Elton, E., Osman, Z., & Nicolle, C. (2006). Design of a virtual learning environment for students with special needs. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 2(1), 119–153. doi:10.17011/ht/urn.2006162.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, R. L., Padgett, C., & Grieve, R. (2020). Accessibility and emotionality of online assessment feedback: using emoticons to enhance student perceptions of marker competence and warmth. Computers & Education, 143, 103654. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, L. (2004). Aprendendo a ensinar inglês para alunos cegos e com baixa visão: um estudo na perspectiva da teoria da atividade [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Distance learning. NCES. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
   Google Scholar
• Nieves, L. H., Crisol Moya, E., & Montes Soldado, R. (2019). A MOOC on universal design for learning designed based on the UDL paradigm. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 30–47. doi:10.14742/ajet.5532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini-Jones, M. (2009). Measures for inclusion: coping with the challenge of visual impairment and blindness in university undergraduate level language learning. NASEN, 24(1. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2009.01394.x.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., Roberts, K., & Delise, D. (2017). The effects of professional development on universal design for instruction on faculty perception and practice. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(2), 123–139. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153546.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, C. N., & Heiselt, A. K. (2014). Increasing accessibility: using universal design principles to address disability impairments in the online learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(3).
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, J. I., Meneses, J., & Melián, E. (2021). A systematic review of academic interventions for students with disabilities in online higher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/08856257.2021.1911525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2017). Academic attainment in students with autism spectrum disorders in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(1), 81–91. doi:10.1080/02680513.2016.1272446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, C., & Tabuenca, B. (2020). Learning ecologies in online students with disabilities. Comunicar, 28(62), 53–64. doi:10.3916/C62-2020-05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador-Ullauri, L., Acosta-Vargas, P., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2020). Web-based serious games and accessibility: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7859. doi:10.3390/app10217859.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnuolo, N., & Shanouda, F. (2017). Who counts and who is counted? Conversations around voting, access, and divisions in the disability community. Disability & Society, 32(5), 701–719. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1324765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman, N. H., & Ghazali, M. (2013). A systematic literature review of accessibility and usability framework for disabled users. International Journal of Innovative Computing, 3(2), 185–189. http://ipcsit.com/vol45/036-ICIKM2012-M0073.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, T. J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design for learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(3). http://mathcs.duq.edu/~tobin/cv/QRDE.UDL.Article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veal, W., Bray, M., & Flowers, C. (2005). Developing an online accessible science course for all learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3), 271–289. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20970/
   Google Scholar
• Winke, P., & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students’ computer access and literacy for CALL. Calico Journal, 25(3), 482–509. doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.482-509.
   Google Scholar
• Wolanin, T. R., & Steele, P. E. (2004). Higher education opportunities for students with disabilities: A primer for policymakers. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87014
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Huang, R., Chang, T.-W., and Khribi, M. (2020). Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), doi:10.1186/s40561-019-0113-2.
   Google Scholar