Biofilm development and the dynamics of preferential flow paths in porous media

References

• AllisonDG, RuizB, SanjoseC, JaspeA, GilbertP. 1998. Extracellular products as mediators of the formation and detachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 167: 179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ApplegateDH, BryersJD. 1991. Effects of carbon and oxygen limitations and calcium concentrations on biofilm removal processes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 37: 17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerJS, DudleyLY. 1998. Biofouling in membrane systems – a review. Desalination. 118: 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BölM, MohleRB, HaesnerM, NeuTR, HornH, KrullR. 2009. 3D finite element model of biofilm detachment using real biofilm structures from CLSM data. Biotechnol Bioeng. 103: 177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BowerAF. 2010. Applied mechanics of solids. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• CoufortC, DerlonN, Ochoa-ChavesJ, LinéA, PaulE. 2007. Cohesion and detachment in biofilm systems for different electron acceptors and donors. Water Sci Technol. 55: 421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CunninghamAB, CharacklisWG, AbedeenF, CrawfordD. 1991. Influence of biofilm accumulation on porous media hydrodynamics. Environ Sci Technol. 25: 1305–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CunninghamAB, SharpRR, HiebertR, JamesG. 2003. Subsurface biofilm barriers for the containment and remediation of contaminated groundwater. Bioremed J. 7: 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• CusackF, SinghS, McCarthyC, GriecoJ, De RoccoM, NguyenD, Lappin-ScottH, CostertonJW. 1992. Enhanced oil recovery – three-dimensional sandpack simulation of ultramicrobacteria resuscitation in reservoir formation. J Gen Microbiol. 138: 647–655.
   Google Scholar
• DaviesDG, MarquesCNH. 2009. A fatty acid messenger is responsible for inducing dispersion in microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol. 191: 1393–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DudduR, ChoppDL, MoranB. 2009. A two-dimensional continuum model of biofilm growth incorporating fluid flow and shear stress based detachment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 103: 92–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FowlerJD, RobertsonCR. 1991. Hydraulic permeability of immobilized bacterial cell aggregates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 57: 102–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GerlachR, CunninghamAB. 2010. Influence of biofilms on porous media hydrodynamics. In: VafaiK, ed. Porous media: applications in biological systems and biotehnology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group, 173–230.
   Google Scholar
• Graf von der SchulenburgDA, PintelonTR, PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMCM, JohnsML. 2009. Three-dimensional simulations of biofilm growth in porous media. AIChE J. 55: 494–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HentzerM, RiedelK, RasmussenTB, HeydornA, AndersenJB, ParsekMR, RiceSA, EberlL, MolinS, HoibyN, et al. 2002. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound. Microbiol SGM. 148: 87–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenzeM, GujerW, MinoT, van LoosdrechtMCM. 2000. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. In: HenzeM, GujerW, MinoT, van LoosdrechtMCM, eds. IWA task group on mathematical modelling for design and operation of biological wastewater treatment. IWA scientific & technical report. London: IWA, 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• HuntSM, WernerEM, HuangB, HamiltonMA, StewartPS. 2004. Hypothesis for the role of nutrient starvation in biofilm detachment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70: 7418–7425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaoCM, ChenSC, LiuJK. 2001. Development of a biobarrier for the remediation of PCE-contaminated aquifer. Chemosphere. 43: 1071–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KapellosGE, AlexiouTS, PayatakesAC. 2007. Hierarchical simulator of biofilm growth and dynamics in granular porous materials. Adv Water Resour. 30: 1648–1667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimG, LeeS, KimY. 2006. Subsurface biobarrier formation by microorganism injection for contaminant plume control. J Biosci Bioeng. 101: 142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnutsonCE, WerthCJ, ValocchiAJ. 2005. Pore-scale simulation of biomass growth along the transverse mixing zone of a model two-dimensional porous medium. Water Resour Res. 41: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KomlosJ, CunninghamAB, KamperAK, SharpRR. 2004. Biofilm barriers to contain and degrade dissolved trichloroethylene. Environ Prog. 23: 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• LappanRE, FoglerHS. 1992. Effects of bacterial polysaccharide production on formation damage. SPE Prod Eng. 7: 167–171.
   Google Scholar
• LappanRE, FoglerHS. 1996. Reduction of porous media permeability from in situ Leuconostoc mesenteroides growth and dextran production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 50: 6–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappin-ScottHM, CusackF, CostertonJW. 1988. Nutrient resuscitation and growth of starved cells in sandstone cores: a novel approach to enhanced oil recovery. Appl Environ Microbiol. 54: 1373–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeodFA, Lappin-ScottHM, CostertonJW. 1988. Plugging of a model rock system by using starved bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 54: 1365–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitchellAC, PhillipsAJ, HiebertR, GerlachR, SpanglerLH, CunninghamAB. 2009. Biofilm enhanced geologic sequestration of supercritical CO2. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 3: 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MöhleRB, LangemannT, HaesnerM, AugustinW, SchollS, NeuTR, HempelDC, HornH. 2007. Structure and shear strength of microbial biofilms as determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluid dynamic gauging using a novel rotating disc biofilm reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 98: 747–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhashiA, HaradaH. 1996. A novel concept for evaluation of biofilm adhesion strength by applying tensile force and shear force. Water Sci Technol. 34: 201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhashiA, KoyamaT, SyutsuboK, HaradaH. 1999. A novel method for evaluation of biofilm tensile strength resisting erosion. Water Sci Technol. 39: 261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaulsenJE, OppenE, BakkeR. 1997. Biofilm morphology in porous media, a study with microscopic and image techniques. Water Sci Technol. 36: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PicioreanuC, KreftJU, KlausenM, HaagensenJAJ, Tolker-NielsenT, MolinS. 2007. Microbial motility involvement in biofilm structure formation – a 3D modelling study. Water Sci Technol. 55: 337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMCM, HeijnenJJ. 1998. A new combined differential-discrete cellular automaton approach for biofilm modeling: application for growth in gel beads. Biotechnol Bioeng. 57: 718–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMCM, HeijnenJJ. 2000. Effect of diffusive and convective substrate transport on biofilm structure formation: a two-dimensional modeling study. Biotechnol Bioeng. 69: 504–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMCM, HeijnenJJ. 2001. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. Biotechnol Bioeng. 72: 205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PicioreanuC, VrouwenvelderJS, van LoosdrechtMCM. 2009. Three-dimensional modeling of biofouling and fluid dynamics in feed spacer channels of membrane devices. J Membr Sci. 345: 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PintelonTR, Graf von der SchulenburgDA, JohnsML. 2009. Towards optimum permeability reduction in porous media using biofilm growth simulations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 103: 767–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PintelonTR, PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMC, JohnsML. 2012. The effect of biofilm permeability on bio-clogging of porous media. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 1031–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PizarroGE, GarciaC, MorenoR, SepulvedaME. 2004. Two-dimensional cellular automaton model for mixed-culture biofilm. Water Sci Technol. 49: 193–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PoppeleEH, HozalskiRM. 2003. Micro-cantilever method for measuring the tensile strength of biofilms and microbial flocs. J Microbiol Methods. 55: 607–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaduAI, VrouwenvelderJS, van LoosdrechtMCM, PicioreanuC. 2010. Modeling the effect of biofilm formation on reverse osmosis performance: flux, feed channel pressure drop and solute passage. J Membr Sci. 365: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SawyerLK, HermanowiczSW. 2000. Detachment of Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa due to variations in nutrient supply. Water Sci Technol. 41: 139–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharpRR, CunninghamAB, KomlosJ, BillmayerJ. 1999. Observation of thick biofilm accumulation and structure in porous media and corresponding hydrodynamic and mass transfer effects. Water Sci Technol. 39: 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharpRR, StoodleyP, AdgieM, GerlachR, CunninghamA. 2005. Visualization and characterization of dynamic patterns of flow, growth and activity of Vibrio fischeri biofilms growing in porous media. Water Sci Technol. 52: 85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StewartTL, FoglerHS. 2001. Biomass plug development and propagation in porous media. Biotechnol Bioeng. 72: 353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StewartTL, FoglerHS. 2002. Pore-scale investigation of biomass plug development and propagation in porous media. Biotechnol Bioeng. 77: 577–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StewartTL, KimDS. 2004. Modeling of biomass-plug development and propagation in porous media. Biochem Eng J. 17: 107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoodleyP, CargoR, RuppCJ, WilsonS, KlapperI. 2002. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 29: 361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThormannKM, SavilleR, ShuklaS, SpormannAM. 2005. Induction of rapid detachment in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. J Bacteriol. 187: 1014–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van LoosdrechtMCM, EikelboomD, GjaltemaA, MulderA, TijhuisL, HeijnenJJ. 1995. Biofilm structures. Water Sci Technol. 32: 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VrouwenvelderJS, HinrichsC, van der MeerWGJ, van LoosdrechtMCM, KruithofJC. 2009. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction. Biofouling. 25: 543–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaybrantKR, BlowesDW, PtacekCJ. 1998. Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. Environ Sci Technol. 32: 1972–1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WebbJS, ThompsonLS, JamesS, CharltonT, Tolker-NielsenT, KochB, GivskovM, KjellebergS. 2003. Cell death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 185: 4585–4592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XavierJB, PicioreanuC, Abdul RaniS, van LoosdrechtMCM, StewartPS. 2005. Biofilm-control strategies based on enzymic disruption of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix – a modelling study. Microbiol SGM. 151: 3817–3832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XavierJB, PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtMCM. 2005. A general description of detachment for multidimensional modelling of biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng. 91: 651–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar