Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor in which granular sludge and dynamic filtration are integrated

References

• Adamberg K, Tomson K, Talve T, Pudova K, Puurand M, Visnapuu T, Alamäe T, Adamberg S. 2015. Levan enhances associated growth of Bacteroides, Escherichia, Streptococcus and Faecalibacterium in fecal microbiota. PLOS One. 10:e0144042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibardi L, Cossu R, Saleem M, Spagni A. 2014. Development and permeability of a dynamic membrane for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 161:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An Y, Wang Z, Wu Z, Yang D, Zhou Q. 2009. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 155:709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino SF, Stuckey DC. 2008. Integrated model of the production of soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in anaerobic chemostats during transient conditions. Biochem Eng J. 38:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae J, Shin C, Lee E, Kim J, McCarty PL. 2014. Anaerobic treatment of low-strength wastewater: a comparison between single and staged anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 165:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaked RK, Singh P, Singh L. 2010. Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions. Waste Manage (Oxford). 30:2490–2496. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Q, Parker W, Dagnew M. 2015. Impact of FeCl3 dosing on AnMBR treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 80:281–293. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kreuk M, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM. 2005. Simultaneous COD, nitrogen, and phosphate removal by aerobic granular sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng. 90:761–769. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ozturk I, Roest K, van Lier JB. 2012. A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 122:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Tao Y, van Lier JB. 2014. Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 48:420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Robledo M, Morgan-Sagastume JM, Noyola A. 2010. Biofouling and pollutant removal during long-term operation of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Biofouling. 26:23–30. doi: 10.1080/08927010903243923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeison D, Díaz I, van Lier JB. 2008. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: are membranes really necessary? Electron J Biotechnol. 11:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeison D, Telkamp P, Van Lier J. 2009. Thermophilic sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactors: the shear rate dilemma. Water Environ Res. 81:2372–2380. doi: 10.2175/106143009X426040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeison D, van Lier JB. 2006. Cake layer formation in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci. 284:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeison D, van Lier JB. 2007. Cake formation and consolidation: main factors governing the applicable flux in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) treating acidified wastewaters. Sep Purif Technol. 56:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen PD, Yap SD, Boyle-Gotla A, Janoschka J, Carney C, Pidou M, Batstone DJ. 2015. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors enable high rate treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Biochem Eng J. 97:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2015.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BH, Park HS, Kim HJ, Kim GT, Chang IS, Lee J, Phung NT. 2004. Enrichment of microbial community generating electricity using a fuel-cell-type electrochemical cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 63:672–681. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1412-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D-H, Lee M-K, Moon C, Yun Y-M, Lee W, Oh S-E, Kim M-S. 2014. Effect of hydraulic retention time on lactic acid production and granulation in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresour Technol. 165:158–161. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Kang H-J, Lee YH, Lee TJ, Han K, Choi Y, Park H-D. 2012. Monitoring bacterial community structure and variability in time scale in full-scale anaerobic digesters. J Environ Monit. 14:1893–1905. doi: 10.1039/c2em10958a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Xu X, Shao B, Zhang S, Yang F. 2014. Anammox granules formation and performance in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J. 254:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Yang C, Pu W, Zhang J. 2009. Formation mechanism and structure of dynamic membrane in the dynamic membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J. 148:290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE, Murano C, Scott K, Gray ND, Head IM. 2005. Electricity generation from cysteine in a microbial fuel cell. Water Res. 39:942–952. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Chae S-R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H-S, Yang F. 2009. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 43:1489–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam MA, Satoh H, Mino T. 2002. Effect of important operational parameters on performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol. 46:229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosquera-Corral A, de Kreuk MK, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM. 2005. Effects of oxygen concentration on N-removal in an aerobic granular sludge reactor. Water Res. 39:2676–2686. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KK, Shi X, Ng HY. 2015. Evaluation of system performance and microbial communities of abioaugmented anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating pharmaceutical wastewater. Water Res. 81:311–324. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguera DR, Araki N, Rittmann BE. 1994. Soluble microbial products (SMP) in anaeorbic chemistats. Biotechnol Bioeng. 44:1040–1047. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuchdang S, Khemkhao M, Techkarnjanaruk S, Phalakornkule C. 2015. Comparative biochemical methane potential of paragrass using an unacclimated and an acclimated microbial consortium. Bioresour Technol. 183:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgun H, Tao Y, Ersahin ME, Zhou Z, Gimenez JB, Spanjers H, van Lier JB. 2015. Impact of temperature on feed-flow characteristics and filtration performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket coupled ultrafiltration membrane treating municipal wastewater. Water Res. 83:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos C, Garcia A, Diez V. 2014. Performance of an AnMBR pilot plant treating high-strength lipid wastewater: biological and filtration processes. Water Res. 67:203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy M, Potier V, Temmink H, Rulkens W. 2010. Why low powdered activated carbon addition reduces membrane fouling in MBRs. Water Res. 44:861–867. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice EW, Bridgewater L, Association APH, Association AWW, Federation WE. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi Y, Yamada T, Hanada S, Ohashi A, Harada H, Kamagata Y. 2003. Anaerolinea thermophila gen. nov., sp. nov. and Caldilinea aerophila gen. nov., sp. nov., novel filamentous thermophiles that represent a previously uncultured lineage of the domain Bacteria at the subphylum level. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 53:1843–1851. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02699-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu D, He Y, Yue H, Wang Q. 2015. Microbial structures and community functions of anaerobic sludge in six full-scale wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing. Bioresour Technol. 186:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Wang Y, Tang W, Lei Y. 2015. Archaeal community diversity in municipal waste landfill sites. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 99:6125–6137. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6493-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey DC. 2012. Recent developments in anaerobic membrane reactors. Bioresour Technol. 122:137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo CW, Wong PCY. 2014. Enzyme augmentation of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating sewage containing organic particulates. Water Res. 48:335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Spanjers H, Jeison D, Van Lier JB. 2013. Impact of Na+ on biological wastewater treatment and the potential of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 43:2722–2746. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2012.694335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JX, Vedantam S, Spanjers H, Nopens I, van Lier JB. 2012. Analysis of mass transfer characteristics in a tubular membrane using CFD modeling. Water Res. 46:4705–4712. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Guo J-S, Shen Y, Yan P, Chen Y-P, Wang H, Yang J-X, Fang F, Li C. 2015. Microbial communities, extracellular proteomics and polysaccharides: a comparative investigation on biofilm and suspended sludge. Bioresour Technol. 190:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Lu F, Tong J, Zang L. 2010. Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 165:175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Wei T, Lu F, Tong J, Mai S. 2011. Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem. 46:1538–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi-Guo M, Feng-lin Y, Xing-wen Z. 2005. MBR focus: do nonwovens offer a cheaper option? Filtr Sep. 42:28–30. doi: 10.1016/S0015-1882(05)70558-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar