In vitro biofilm models to study dental caries: a systematic review

References

• Angker L, Swain MV, Wong L, Sissons C. 2011. The effects of fluoride and mineralising treatments on plaque microcosm Ca, P and F, pH responses and cariogenicity. N Z Dent J. 107:12–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arthur RA, Waeiss RA, Hara AT, Lippert F, Eckert GJ, Zero DT. 2013. A defined-multispecies microbial model for studying enamel caries development. Caries Res. 47(4):318–324. doi: 10.1159/00034705010.1159/000347050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo MS, van de Sande FH, Maske TT, Signori C, Romano AR, Cenci MS. 2014. Correlation between the cariogenic response in biofilms generated from saliva of mother/child pairs. Biofouling. 30:903–909. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2014.94886810.1080/08927014.2014.948868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo MS, van de Sande FH, Romano AR, Cenci MS. 2011. Microcosm biofilms originating from children with different caries experience have similar cariogenicity under successive sucrose challenges. Caries Res. 45(6):510–517. doi: 10.1159/00033121010.1159/000331210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD. 1994. Effect of sugar alcohols on the composition and metabolism of a mixed culture of oral bacteria grown in a chemostat. Caries Res. 28:251–256. doi: 10.1159/00026197710.1159/000261977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD. 1998. Analysis of pH–driven disruption of oral microbial communities in vitro. Caries Res. 32:456–462. doi: 10.1159/00001648710.1159/000016487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw DJ, McKee AS, Marsh PD. 1989. Effects of carbohydrate pulses and ph on population shifts within oral microbial communities in vitro. J Dent Res 68:1298–1302. doi: 10.1177/0022034589068009010110.1177/00220345890680090101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD, Hodgson RJ, Visser JM. 2002. Effects of glucose and fluoride on competition and metabolism within in vitro dental bacterial communities and biofilms. Caries Res. 36:81–86. doi: 10.1159/00005786410.1159/000057864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD, Schilling KM, Cummins D. 1996 Feb. A modified chemostat system to study the ecology of oral biofilms. J Appl Bacteriol. 80:124–130. doi: 10.1111/jam.1996.80.issue-210.1111/jam.1996.80.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. 2000. Community structure and co-operation in biofilms. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 25–36. doi: 10.1017/CBO978051175481410.1017/CBO9780511754814
   Google Scholar
• Buzalaf MA, Charone S, Tjäderhane L. 2015. Role of host-derived proteinases in dentine caries and erosion. Caries Res. 49(1):30–37. doi: 10.1159/00038088510.1159/000380885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti YW, Bertolini MM, da Silva WJ, Del-Bel-Cury AA, Tenuta LM, Cury JA. 2014. A three-species biofilm model for the evaluation of enamel and dentin demineralization. Biofouling. 30:579–588. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2014.90554710.1080/08927014.2014.905547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Cury JA. 2010. S. mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization. Braz Oral Res. 24:135–141. doi: 10.1590/S1806-8324201000020000210.1590/S1806-83242010000200002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cury JA, Ten Cate JM. 2009. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res. 43:97–102. doi: 10.1159/00020934110.1159/000209341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury JA, Rebelo MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Derbyshire MT, Tabchoury CP. 2000. Biochemical composition and cariogenicity of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose or glucose and fructose. Caries Res. 34:491–497. doi: 10.1159/00001662910.1159/000016629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutress TW, Sissons CH, Pearce EI, Wong L, Anderssén K, Angmar-Månsson B. 1995. Effects of fluoride-supplemented sucrose on experimental dental caries and dental plaque PH. Adv Dent Res. 9:14–20. doi: 10.1177/0895937495009001010110.1177/08959374950090010101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davey ME, O'toole GA. 2000. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 64:847–867. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.847-867.200010.1128/MMBR.64.4.847-867.2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng DM, Ten Cate JM. 2004. Demineralization of dentin by Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown in the constant depth film fermentor. Caries Res. 38:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng DM, Buijs MJ, Ten Cate JM. 2004. The effects of substratum on the pH response of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and on the susceptibility to 0.2% chlorhexidine. Eur J Oral Sci. 112:42–47. doi: 10.1111/eos.2004.112.issue-110.1111/eos.2004.112.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng DM, van Maele C, Ten Cate JM. 2005. Caries-preventive agents induce remineralization of dentin in a biofilm model. Caries Res. 39:216–223. doi: 10.1159/00008480110.1159/000084801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, Lakshmanan A, Wade WG. 2010. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 192:5002–5017. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-1010.1128/JB.00542-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercke K, Lussi A, Kersten T, Seemann R. 2009. Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model. Clin Oral Investig. 13:439–444. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0250-z10.1007/s00784-009-0250-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue HD, Perrons CJ. 1991. Effect of nutrients on defined bacterial plaques and Streptococcus mutans C67-1 implantation in a model mouth. Caries Res. 25:108–115. doi: 10.1159/00026135210.1159/000261352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund A, Yang Y, Hall AP, Guo L, Lux R, He X, Nelson KE, Nealson KH, Yooseph S, Shi W, et al. 2013. An in vitro biofilm model system maintaining a highly reproducible species and metabolic diversity approaching that of the human oral microbiome. Microbiome. 1:1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias S, Banin E. 2012. Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 36:990–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00325.x10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00325.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exterkate RA, Crielaard W, Ten Cate JM. 2010. Different response to amine fluoride by Streptococcus mutans and polymicrobial biofilms in a novel high-throughput active attachment model. Caries Res. 44:372–379. doi: 10.1159/00031654110.1159/000316541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández CE, Giacaman RA, Tenuta LM, Cury JA. 2015. Effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus LB21 on the cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans UA159 in a dual-species biofilm model. Caries Res. 49:583–590. doi: 10.1159/00043931510.1159/000439315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández CE, Tenuta LMA, Cury JA. 2016. Validation of a cariogenic biofilm model to evaluate the effect of fluoride on enamel and root dentine demineralization. PLoS ONE. 11:e0146478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.014647810.1371/journal.pone.0146478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filoche SK, Anderson SA, Sissons CH. 2004. Biofilm growth of Lactobacillus species is promoted by Actinomyces species and Streptococcus mutans. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 19:322–326. doi: 10.1111/omi.2004.19.issue-510.1111/omi.2004.19.issue-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Filoche SK, Soma KJ, Sissons CH. 2007. Caries-related plaque microcosm biofilms developed in microplates. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 22:73–79. doi: 10.1111/omi.2007.22.issue-210.1111/omi.2007.22.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Gregory RL, Noblitt TW, Li Y, Park KK, Stookey GK. 1996. An in vitro microbial model for studying secondary caries formation. Caries Res. 30:112–118. doi: 10.1159/00026214610.1159/000262146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana M, Buller TL, Dunipace AJ, Stookey GK, Gregory RL. 2000. An In vitro microbial-caries model used to study the efficacy of antibodies to Streptococcus mutans surface proteins in preventing dental caries. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 7:49–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fontana M, González-Cabezas C, Haider A, Stookey GK. 2002. Inhibition of secondary caries lesion progression using fluoride varnish. Caries Res. 36:129–135. doi: 10.1159/00005787110.1159/000057871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana M, Haider A, González-Cabezas C. 2004. Caries lesion development and biofilm composition responses to varying demineralization times and sucrose exposures. Biofilms. 1:229–237. doi: 10.1017/S147905050400147410.1017/S1479050504001474
   Google Scholar
• Giacaman RA, Campos P, Muñoz-Sandoval C, Castro RJ. 2013. Cariogenic potential of commercial sweeteners in an experimental biofilm caries model on enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 58:1116–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.03.00510.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacaman RA, Muñoz MJ, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Muñoz-Sandoval C, Cury JA. 2012. Effect of fluoridated milk on enamel and root dentin demineralization evaluated by a biofilm caries model. Caries Res. 46:460–466. doi: 10.1159/00033942810.1159/000339428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacaman RA, Jobet-Vila P, Muñoz-Sandoval C. 2015. Fatty acid effect on sucrose-induced enamel demineralization and cariogenicity of an experimental biofilm–caries model. Odontology. 103:169–176. doi: 10.1007/s10266-014-0154-510.1007/s10266-014-0154-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giertsen E, Arthur RA, Guggenheim B. 2011. Effects of xylitol on survival of mutans streptococci in mixed-six-species in vitro biofilms modelling supragingival plaque. Caries Res. 45:31–39. doi: 10.1159/00032264610.1159/000322646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeres DM, Loetterle LR, Hamilton MA, Murga R, Kirby DW, Donlan RM. 2005. Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiology. 151:757–762. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27709-010.1099/mic.0.27709-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schupbach P, Shapiro S. 2001. Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res. 80:363–370. doi: 10.1177/0022034501080001120110.1177/00220345010800011201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson RJ, Lynch RJ, Watson GK, Labarbe R, Treloar R, Allison C. 2001. A continuous culture biofilm model of cariogenic responses. J Appl Microbiol. 90:440–448. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01263.x10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01263.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. 2015. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 94:650–658. doi: 10.1177/002203451557327210.1177/0022034515573272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keijser BJ, Zaura E, Huse SM, van der Vossen JM, Schuren FH, Montijn RC, Ten Cate JM, Crielaard W. 2008. Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults. J Dent Res. 87:1016–1020. doi: 10.1177/15440591080870110410.1177/154405910808701104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimek J, Hellwig E, Ahrens G. 1982. Effect of plaque on fluoride stability in the enamel after amine fluoride application in the artificial mouth. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 37:836–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuper NK, van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, de Soet JJ, Cenci MS, Huysmans MC. 2015. Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model. J Dent Res. 94:62–68. doi: 10.1177/002203451455324510.1177/0022034514553245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee VA, Karthikeyan R, Rawls HR, Amaechi BT. 2010. Anti-cariogenic effect of a cetylpyridinium chloride-containing nanoemulsion. J Dent. 38:742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.00110.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leme AF, Koo H, Bellato CM, Bedi G, Cury JA. 2006. The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation – new insight. J Dent Res. 85:878–887. doi: 10.1177/15440591060850100210.1177/154405910608501002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YH, Bowden GH. 1994. The effect of environmental pH and fluoride from the substratum on the development of biofilms of selected oral bacteria. J Dent Res. 73:1615–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Carrera C, Chen R, Li J, Lenton P, Rudney JD, Jones RS, Aparicio C, Fok A. 2014. Degradation in the dentin-composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges. Acta Biomater. 10:375–383. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.03410.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 6:e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.100010010.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindh L, Aroonsang W, Sotres J, Arnebrant T. 2014. Salivary pellicles. Monogr Oral Sci. 24:30–39. doi: 10.1159/00035878210.1159/000358782
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch RJ, Ten Cate JM. 2006a. The effect of adjacent dentine blocks on the demineralisation and remineralisation of enamel in vitro. Caries Res. 40:38–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch RJ, Ten Cate JM. 2006b. Effect of calcium glycerophosphate on demineralization in an in vitro biofilm model. Caries Res. 40:142–147. doi: 10.1159/00009106110.1159/000091061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltz M, Beighton D. 2012. Multidisciplinary research agenda for novel antimicrobial agents for caries prevention and treatment. Adv Dent Res. 24:133–136. doi: 10.1177/002203451245304910.1177/0022034512453049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh PD. 2006. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 6(Suppl 1):S14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S1410.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maske TT, Brauner KV, Nakanishi L, Arthur RA, van de Sande FH, Cenci MS. 2016. An in vitro dynamic microcosm biofilm model for caries lesion development and antimicrobial dose-response studies. Biofouling. 32:339–348. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.113082410.1080/08927014.2015.1130824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maske TT, Isolan CP, van de Sande FH, Peixoto AC, Faria-e-Silva AL, Cenci MS, Moraes RR. 2015. A biofilm cariogenic challenge model for dentin demineralization and dentin bonding analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 19:1047–1053. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1331-110.1007/s00784-014-1331-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBain AJ. 2009. Chapter 4: In vitro biofilm models: an overview. Adv Appl Microbiol. 69:99–132. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(09)69004-310.1016/S0065-2164(09)69004-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG, Gilbert P. 2003a. Effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate-containing mouthwash on the vitality and antimicrobial susceptibility of in vitro oral bacterial ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69:4770–4776. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4770-4776.200310.1128/AEM.69.8.4770-4776.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG, Gilbert P. 2003b. Effects of triclosan-containing rinse on the dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility of in vitro plaque ecosystems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:3531–3538. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3531-3538.200310.1128/AAC.47.11.3531-3538.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBain AJ, Bartolo RG, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau D, Ledder RG, Gilbert P. 2003c. Growth and molecular characterization of dental plaque microcosms. J Appl Microbiol. 94:655–664. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01876.x10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01876.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei ML, Chu CH, Lo ECM, Samaranayake LP. 2013. Preventing root caries development under oral biofilm challenge in an artificial mouth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 18:e557–e563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei ML, Li Q-L, Chu C-H, Lo EC-M, Samaranayake LP. 2013. Antibacterial effects of silver diamine fluoride on multi-species cariogenic biofilm on caries. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 12:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-410.1186/1476-0711-12-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Sandoval C, Muñoz-Cifuentes MJ, Giacaman RA, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Cury JA. 2012. Effect of bovine milk on Streptococcus mutans biofilm cariogenic properties and enamel and dentin demineralization. Pediatr Dent. 34:e197–e201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nassar HM, González-Cabezas C. 2011. Effect of gap geometry on secondary caries wall lesion development. Caries Res. 45:346–352. doi: 10.1159/00032938410.1159/000329384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick A, Szilard L. 1950. Description of the chemostat. Science. 112:715–716. doi: 10.1126/science.112.2920.71510.1126/science.112.2920.715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyvad B, Crielaard W, Mira A, Takahashi N, Beighton D. 2013. Dental caries from a molecular microbiological perspective. Caries Res. 47:89–102. doi: 10.1159/00034536710.1159/000345367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisotto TM, Steiner-Oliveira C, Duque C, Peres RC, Rodrigues LK, Nobre-dos-Santos M. 2010. Relationship among microbiological composition and presence of dental plaque, sugar exposure, social factors and different stages of early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 55:365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.03.00510.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce EIF, Sissons CH, Coleman M, Wang X, Anderson SA, Wong L. 2002. The effect of sucrose application frequency and basal nutrient conditions on the calcium and phosphate content of experimental dental plaque. Caries Res. 36:87–92. doi: 10.1159/00005786510.1159/000057865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peixoto A, Bicalho A, Isolan C, Maske T, Moraes R, Cenci M, Soares C, Faria-e-Silva ESA. 2015. Bonding of adhesive luting agents to caries-affected dentin induced by a microcosm biofilm model. Oper Dent. 40:E102–E111. doi: 10.2341/14-169-L10.2341/14-169-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrons CJ, Donoghue HD. 1990. Colonization resistance of defined bacterial plaques to Streptococcus mutans implantation on teeth in a model mouth. J Dent Res. 69:483–488. doi: 10.1177/0022034590069002130110.1177/00220345900690021301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters AC, Wimpenny JW. 1988. A constant-depth laboratory model film fermentor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 32:263–270. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-029010.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg JR, Guggenheim B. 2004. Deletion of gtfC of Streptococcus mutans has no influence on the composition of a mixed-species in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. Eur J Oral Sci. 112:433–438. doi: 10.1111/eos.2004.112.issue-510.1111/eos.2004.112.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratten J, Wilson M. 1999. Antimicrobial susceptibility and composition of microcosm dental plaques supplemented with sucrose. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 43:1595–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro CCC, Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Carmo CD, Alves CMC, Leitão TJ, Vidotti LR, Cury JA. 2012. The effect of iron on Streptococcus mutans biofilm and on enamel demineralization. Braz Oral Res. 26:300–305. doi: 10.1590/S1806-8324201200040000310.1590/S1806-83242012000400003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudney JD, Chen R, Lenton P, Li J, Li Y, Jones RS, Reilly C, Fok AS, Aparicio C. 2012. A reproducible oral microcosm biofilm model for testing dental materials. J Appl Microbiol. 113:1540–1553. doi: 10.1111/jam.2012.113.issue-610.1111/jam.2012.113.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salli KM, Ouwehand AC. 2015. The use of in vitro model systems to study dental biofilms associated with caries: a short review. J Oral Microbiol. 7:26149. doi: 10.3402/jom.v7.2614910.3402/jom.v7.26149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sande FH, Azevedo MS, Lund RG, Huysmans MC, Cenci MS. 2011. An in vitro biofilm model for enamel demineralization and antimicrobial dose-response studies. Biofouling. 27:1057–1063. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2011.62547310.1080/08927014.2011.625473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. 2014. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 39:E31–E44. doi: 10.2341/13-070-LIT10.2341/13-070-LIT
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Lynch CD, Fleming PS, Pereira-Cenci T, Moher D. 2015. Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. J Dent. 43:397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.00610.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Dörfer C, Kneist S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. 2014. Cariogenic effects of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in a dental biofilm model. Caries Res. 48:186–192. doi: 10.1159/00035590710.1159/000355907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Horb K, Kneist S, Dörfer C, Paris S. 2014. Effects of heat-inactivated Bifidobacterium BB12 on cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 59:1384–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.08.01210.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Eggers K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Dörfer C, Kovalev A, Gorb S, Paris S. 2015. In vitro induction of residual caries lesions in dentin: comparative mineral loss and nano-hardness analysis. Caries Res. 49:259–265. doi: 10.1159/00037189710.1159/000371897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann R, Bizhang M, Klück I, Loth J, Roulet JF. 2005. A novel in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries formation – development and initial testing. Caries Res. 39:185–190. doi: 10.1159/00008479610.1159/000084796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann R, Klück I, Bizhang M, Roulet JF. 2005. Secondary caries-like lesions at fissure sealings with Xeno III and Delton – an in vitro study. J Dent. 33:443–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.00810.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann R, Klück I, Kage A. 2006. An in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries-preventive agents. Acta Odontol Scand. 64:27–30. doi: 10.1080/0001635050033109610.1080/00016350500331096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. 2007. Dental caries. Lancet. 369:51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-210.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu M, Wong L, Miller JH, Sissons CH. 2000. Development of multi-species consortia biofilms of oral bacteria as an enamel and root caries model system. Arch of Oral Biol. 45:27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00111-910.1016/S0003-9969(99)00111-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shunmugaperumal T. 2010. Biofilm eradication and prevention: a pharmaceutical approach to medical devices infections. p. 116–151. Hoboken (US): Wiley. doi: 10.1002/978047064046310.1002/9780470640463
   Google Scholar
• Signori C, van de Sande FH, Maske TT, de Oliveira EF, Cenci MS. 2016. Influence of the inoculum source on the cariogenicity of in vitro microcosm iobfilms. Caries Res. 50:97–103. doi: 10.1159/00044353710.1159/000443537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim CP, Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. 2016. Oral microbial biofilm models and their application to the testing of anticariogenic agents. J Dent. 50:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.01010.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH. 1997. Artificial dental plaque biofilm model systems. Adv Dent Res. 11:110–126. doi: 10.1177/0895937497011001020110.1177/08959374970110010201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sissons CH, Cutress TW. 1987. In-vitro urea-dependent pH-changes by human salivary bacteria and dispersed, artificial-mouth, bacterial plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 32:181–189.doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(87)90132-410.1016/0003-9969(87)90132-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Pearce EI. 1985. Kinetics and product stoichiometry of ureolysis by human salivary bacteria and artificial mouth plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 30:781–790. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(85)90132-310.1016/0003-9969(85)90132-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Hoffman MP, Wakefield JSJ. 1991. A multi-station dental plaque microcosm (artificial mouth) for the study of plaque growth, metabolism, pH, and mineralization. J Dent Res. 70:1409–1416. doi: 10.1177/0022034591070011030110.1177/00220345910700110301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Faulds G, Wong L. 1992. pH Responses to sucrose and the formation of pH gradients in thick ‘artificial mouth’ microcosm plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 37:913–922. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(92)90062-D10.1016/0003-9969(92)90062-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Hancock EM, Cutress TW. 1988. The source of variation in ureolysis in artificial plaques cultured from human salivary bacteria. Arch Oral Biol. 33:721–726. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(88)90005-210.1016/0003-9969(88)90005-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Wong L, Hancock EM, Cutress TW. 1994a. pH gradients induced by urea metabolism in ‘artificial mouth’ microcosm plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 39:507–511. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90147-310.1016/0003-9969(94)90147-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Wong L, Hancock EM, Cutress TW. 1994b. The pH response to urea and the effect of liquid flow in ‘artificial mouth’ microcosm plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 39:497–505. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90146-510.1016/0003-9969(94)90146-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Wong L, Cutress TW. 1995. Patterns and rates of growth of microcosm dental plaque biofilms. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 10:160–167. doi: 10.1111/omi.1995.10.issue-310.1111/omi.1995.10.issue-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sissons CH, Wong L, Cutress TW. 1996. Inhibition by ethanol of the growth of biofilm and dispersed microcosm dental plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 41:27–34. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00103-410.1016/0003-9969(95)00103-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Anderson SA, Wong L, Coleman MJ, White DC. 2007. Microbiota of plaque microcosm biofilms: effect of three times daily sucrose pulses in different simulated oral environments. Caries Res. 41:413–422. doi: 10.1159/00010480110.1159/000104801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissons CH, Wong L, Shu M. 1998. Factors affecting the resting pH of in vitro human microcosm dental plaque and Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Arch Oral Biol. 43:93–102. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9969(97)00113-110.1016/S0003-9969(97)00113-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smullen J, Finney M, Storey DM, Foster HA. 2012. Prevention of artificial dental plaque formation in vitro by plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol. 113:964–973. doi: 10.1111/jam.2012.113.issue-410.1111/jam.2012.113.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorvari R, Spets-Happonen S, Luoma H. 1994. Efficacy of chlorhexidine solution with fluoride varnishing in preventing enamel softening by Streptococcus mutans in an artificial mouth. Scand J Dent Res. 102:206–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi N. 2015. Oral microbiome metabolism:from “Who are they?” to “What are they doing?”. J Dent Res. 94:1628–1637. doi: 10.1177/002203451560604510.1177/0022034515606045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang G, Yip HK, Cutress TW, Samaranayake LP. 2003. Artificial mouth model systems and their contribution to caries research: a review. J Dent. 31:161–171. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00009-510.1016/S0300-5712(03)00009-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thneibat A, Fontana M, Cochran MA, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Moore BK, Matis BA, Lund MR. 2008. Anticariogenic and antibacterial properties of a copper varnish using an in vitro Microbial Caries Model. Oper Dent. 33:142–148. doi: 10.2341/07-5010.2341/07-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnheer T, van der Ploeg JR, Giertsen E, Guggenheim B. 2006. Effects of Streptococcus mutans gtfC deficiency on mixed oral biofilms in vitro. Caries Res. 40:163–171. doi: 10.1159/00009106510.1159/000091065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totiam P, González-Cabezas C, Fontana MR, Zero DT. 2007. A new in vitro model to study the relationship of gap size and secondary caries. Caries Res. 41:467–473. doi: 10.1159/00010793410.1159/000107934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanni R, Waldner-Tomic NM, Belibasakis GN, Attin T, Schmidlin PR, Thurnheer T. 2015. Antibacterial efficacy of a propolis toothpaste and mouthrinse against a supragingival multispecies biofilm. Oral Health Prev Dent. 13:531–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L, Sissions CH. 2001. A comparison of human dental plaque microcosm biofilms grown in an undefined medium and a chemically defined artificial saliva. Arch Oral Biol. 46:477–486. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9969(01)00016-410.1016/S0003-9969(01)00016-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L, Sissons CH, Cutress TW. 1994. Control of a multiple dental plaque culture system and long-term, continuous, plaque pH measurement using labview(r). Binary. 6:173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Li J, Zhou X. 2008. Anticaries effect of compounds extracted from Galla chinensis in a multispecies biofilm model. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 23:459–465. doi: 10.1111/omi.2008.23.issue-610.1111/omi.2008.23.issue-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yip HK, Guo J, Wong WH. 2007. Protection offered by root-surface restorative materials against biofilm challenge. J Dent Res. 86:431–435. doi: 10.1177/15440591070860050810.1177/154405910708600508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampatti O, Roques C, Michel G. 1994. An in vitro mouth model to test antiplaque agents: preliminary studies using a toothpaste containing chlorhexidine. Caries Res. 28:35–42. doi: 10.1159/00026161810.1159/000261618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanin IC, Goncalves RB, Junior AB, Hope CK, Pratten J. 2005. Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 56:324–330. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki23210.1093/jac/dki232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaura E, Buijs MJ, Hoogenkamp MA, Ciric L, Papetti A, Signoretto C, Stauder M, Lingstrom P, Pratten J, Spratt DA, et al. 2011. The effects of fractions from shiitake mushroom on composition and cariogenicity of dental plaque microcosms in an in vitro caries model. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011:135034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaura E, Buijs MJ, ten Cate JM. 2002. The effects of the solubility of artificial fissures on plaque pH. J Dent Res. 81:567–571. doi: 10.1177/15440591020810081310.1177/154405910208100813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zero DT, Fontana M, Martínez-Mier EA, Ferreira-Zandoná A, Ando M, González-Cabezas C, Bayne S. 2009. The biology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental caries: scientific advances in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 140(Suppl 1):25s–34s. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.035510.14219/jada.archive.2009.0355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar