Ship hull in-water cleaning and its effects on fouling-control coatings

References

• ASTM D4939–89. 2003. Standard test method for subjecting marine antifouling coating to biofouling and fluid shear forces in natural seawater (Reapproved 2003). West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5618. 1994. Measurement of barnacle adhesion strength in shear (Reapproved 2011). West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6990-05. 2005. Standard practice for evaluating biofouling resistance and physical performance of marine coating systems (Reapproved 2011). West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Beltaos S, Rajaratnam N. 1974. Impinging circular turbulent jets. ASCE J Hydraul Div. 100:1313–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Cassé F, Ribeiro E, Ekin A, Webster DC, Callow JA, Callow ME. 2007. Laboratory screening of coating libraries for algal adhesion. Biofouling. 23:267–276. doi:10.1080/08927010701288336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassé F, Swain GW. 2006. The development of microfouling on four commercial antifouling coatings under static and dynamic immersion. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 57:179–185. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel YK, Turan O, Incecik A. 2017. Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD. Appl Ocean Res. 62:100–118. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly B, Bedwell I, Dimas J, Scardino A, Tang Y, Sammut K. 2019. Effects of various antifouling coatings and fouling on marine sonar performance. Polymers. 11:614–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley PJ, Swope BL, Barbeau K, Bundy R, McDonald J. a, Rivera-Duarte I. 2014. Life cycle contributions of copper from vessel painting and maintenance activities. Biofouling. 30:51–68. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.841891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay JA, Callow ME, Schultz MP, Swain GW, Callow JA. 2002. Adhesion strength of settled spores of the green alga Enteromorpha. Biofouling. 18:251–256. doi:10.1080/08927010290029010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnie AA. 2006. Improved estimates of environmental copper release rates from antifouling products. Biofouling. 22:279–291. doi:10.1080/08927010600898862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Friedrichs G, Lachnit T. 2014. Fluorescence-based quasicontinuous and in situ monitoring of biofilm formation dynamics in natural marine environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 80:3721–3728. doi:10.1128/AEM.00298-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittens JE, Smith TJ, Suleiman R, Akid R. 2013. Current and emerging environmentally-friendly systems for fouling control in the marine environment. Biotechnol Adv. 31:1738–1753. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslbeck E, Ellor J. 2005. Investigating tests for antifoulants: variation between laboratory and in situ methods for determining copper release rates from navy-approved coatings. J Prot Coat Linings. 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hearin J, Hunsucker KZ, Swain G, Gardner H, Stephens A, Lieberman K. 2016. Analysis of mechanical grooming at various frequencies on a large scale test panel coated with a fouling-release coating. Biofouling. 32:561–569. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1167880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearin J, Hunsucker KZ, Swain G, Stephens A, Gardner H, Lieberman K, Harper M. 2015. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating. Biofouling. 31(8):625–638. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1081687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm ER, Haslbeck EG, Horinek AA. 2003. Evaluation of brushes for removal of fouling from fouling-release surfaces, using a hydraulic cleaning device. Biofouling. 19:297–305. doi:10.1080/0892701031000137512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D, Behrends B. 2006. A methodology for evaluating biocide release rate, surface roughness and leach layer formation in a TBT-free, self-polishing antifouling coating. Biofouling. 22:303–315. doi:10.1080/08927010600924304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Swain GW. 2016. In situ measurements of diatom adhesion to silicone-based ship hull coatings. J Appl Phycol. 28:269–277. doi:10.1007/s10811-015-0584-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Vora GJ, Hunsucker JT, Gardner H, Leary DH, Kim S, Lin B, Swain G. 2018. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating. Biofouling. 34:111–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMO. 2011. Guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimize the transfer of invasive aquatic species. In: Resolut MEPC207(62). London (UK); p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. Recommended procedures and guidelines - 1978 ITTC performance prediction method 7.5-02-03-01.4 (Revision 03). Copenhagen (Denmark).
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh CJ, Schultz MP, Swain GW, Stein J, Truby K, Wood CD. 2001. Variation in adhesion strength of Balanus eburneus, Crassostrea virginica and Hydroides dianthus to fouling-release coatings. Biofouling. 17:155–167. doi:10.1080/08927010109378474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett P, Mizzi K, Demirel YK, Turan O. 2015. Investigating the roughness effect of biofouling on propeller performance. In: International Conference on Shipping in Changing Climates, 2015–11-24 - 2015-11-26. Newcastle (UK): Technology and Innovation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kiil S, Yebra DM. 2009. Modelling the design and optimization of chemically active marine antifouling coatings. In: Hellio C, Yebra D, editors, Advances in marine antifouling coatings and technologies. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; p. 334–364.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerström M, Lindgren JF, Holmqvist A, Dahlström M, Ytreberg E. 2018. In situ release rates of Cu and Zn from commercial antifouling paints at different salinities. Mar Pollut Bull. 127:289–296. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson AI, Mattsson-Thorngren L, Granhag L, Berglin M. 2010. Fouling-release of barnacles from a boat hull with comparison to laboratory data of attachment strength. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 392:107–114. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2010.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejars M, Margaillan A, Bressy C. 2012. Fouling release coatings: a nontoxic alternative to biocidal antifouling coatings. Chem Rev. 112:4347–4390. doi:10.1021/cr200350v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholdt A, Dam-Johansen K, Olsen SM, Yebra DM, Kiil S. 2015. Effects of biofouling development on drag forces of hull coatings for ocean-going ships: a review. J Coat Technol Res. 12:415–444. doi:10.1007/s11998-014-9651-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholdt A, Dam-Johansen K, Yebra DM, Olsen SM, Kiil S. 2015. Estimation of long-term drag performance of fouling control coatings using an ocean-placed raft with multiple dynamic rotors. J Coat Technol Res. 12:975–995. doi:10.1007/s11998-015-9713-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone JA. 1980. Effects of hull foulants and cleaning/coating practices on ship performances and economics. Trans - Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 88:75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Menesses M, Belden J, Dickenson N, Bird J. 2017. Measuring a critical stress for continuous prevention of marine biofouling accumulation with aeration. Biofouling. 33:703–711. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1359574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. 2013. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisey D, Woods C. 2015. In-water cleaning technologies: review of information Prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisey D, Woods CMC, Bell A, Georgiades E. 2013. In-water cleaning of vessels: biosecurity and chemical contamination risks. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy EAK, Barros JM, Schultz MP, Flack KA, Steppe CN, Reidenbach MA. 2018. Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics. Biofouling. 34(9):976–988. DOI: doi:10.1080/08927014.2018.1517867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naval Sea Systems Command. 2006. Chapter 081 – Water-borne underwater hull cleaning of Navy ships. In: Nav Ship’s Tech Man. Washington (DC).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira D, Granhag L. 2016. Matching forces applied in underwater hull cleaning with adhesion strength of marine organisms. J Mar Sci Eng. 4:66–78. doi:10.3390/jmse4040066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira DR, Larsson L, Granhag L. 2019. Towards an absolute scale for adhesion strength of ship hull microfouling. Biofouling. 35:244–258. doi:10.1080/08927014.2019.1595602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Lee JH. 2018. Sea-trial verification of ultrasonic antifouling control. Biofouling. 34(1):98–110. DOI: doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1409347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez A, Yebra DM. 2009. Ageing tests and long-term performance of marine antifouling coatings. In: Hellio C, Yebra D, editors, Advances in marine antifouling coatings and technologies. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; p. 393–421.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff K, Diehl D, Valkirs A. 2004. Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels. Mar Pollut Bull. 48:371–377. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling. 23:331–341. doi:10.1080/08927010701461974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2000. A turbulent channel flow apparatus for the determination of the adhesion strength of microfouling organisms. Biofouling. 15:243–251. doi:10.1080/08927010009386315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scianni C, Georgiades E. 2019. Vessel in-water cleaning or treatment: identification of environmental risks and science needs for evidence-based decision making. Front Mar Sci. 6:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMHI. 2019. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute’s database of historical oceanographic observations: sea temperature and tides [Internet]. [cited 2019 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.smhi.se/klimatdata/oceanografi/ladda-ner-oceanografiska-observationer.
   Google Scholar
• Swain GW, Lund G. 2016. Dry-dock inspection methods for improved fouling control coating performance. J Sh Prod Des. 32:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain GW, Schultz MP. 1996. The testing and evaluation of non-toxic antifouling coatings. Biofouling. 10:187–197. doi:10.1080/08927019609386279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsin RL. 2012. A note on hull roughness measurement surveys. TQC [Internet]. [cited 2019 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.hull-roughness.com/a-note-on-hull-roughness-measurement-surveys.
   Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain G. 2017. The effects of grooming on a copper ablative coating: a six year study. Biofouling. 33:494–504. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1328596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain GW. 2010. The use of proactive in-water grooming to improve the performance of ship hull antifouling coatings. Biofouling. 26:47–56. doi:10.1080/08927010903290973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain GW. 2015. Grooming using rotating brushes as a proactive method to control ship hull fouling. Biofouling. 31:309–319. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1041021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermann BT, Daehne B, Sievers S, Dannenberg R, Overbeke JC, Klijnstra JW, Heemken O. 2005. Bioassays and selected chemical analysis of biocide-free antifouling coatings. Chemosphere. 60:1530–1541. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. 1952. Marine fouling and its prevention. Menasha (WI): George Banta Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2004. Antifouling technology - past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coat. 50:75–104. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargiel KA, Swain GW. 2014. Static vs dynamic settlement and adhesion of diatoms to ship hull coatings. Biofouling. 30:115–129. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.847927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar