An experimental test of stationary lay-up periods and simulated transit on biofouling accumulation and transfer on ships

References

• Abbott A, Abel PD, Arnold DW, Milne A. 2000. Cost-benefit analysis of the use of TBT: the case for a treatment approach. Sci Total Environ. 258:5–19. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00505-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Atlar M, Callow M, Candries M, Milne A, Townsin RL. 2003. The development of foul-release coatings for seagoing vessels. J Marine Design Operat. B4:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton GV, Davidson IC, Geller J, Ruiz GM. 2016. Disentangling the biogeography of ship biofouling: barnacles in the Northeast Pacific. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 25:739–750. doi:10.1111/geb.12450
   Google Scholar
• Brown C, Dobroski N, Nedelcheva R, Scianni C, Thompson J. 2017. 2017 biennial report on the California marine invasive species program. California State Lands Commission, Marine Invasive Species Program, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• California State Lands Commission. 2017. Guidance document for: biofouling management regulations to minimize the transfer of nonindigenous species from vessels arriving at California ports. California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 2298.1 et seq. California State Lands Commission, Marine Invasive Species Program, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Callow JA, Callow ME. 2011. Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat Commun. 2:244. doi:10.1038/ncomms1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke Murray C, Therriault TW, Martone PT. 2012. Adapted for invasion? Comparing attachment, drag and dislodgment of native and nonindigenous hull fouling species. Biol Invasions. 14:1651–1663. doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0178-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Piola RF, Hewitt CL, Connell SD, Gardner J. 2010. Effect of vessel voyage speed on survival of biofouling organisms: implications for translocation of non-indigenous marine species. Biofouling. 26:1–13. doi:10.1080/08927010903174599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Piola RF, Taylor MD, Hewitt CL, Gardner J. 2010. The effect of vessel speed on the survivorship of biofouling organisms at different hull locations. Biofouling. 26:539–553. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.492469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Taylor MD. 2004. A preliminary investigation of biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on merchant vessels in New Zealand. NZ J Mar FW Res. 38:215–229. doi:10.1080/00288330.2004.9517232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafforn KA, Lewis JA, Johnston EL. 2011. Antifouling strategies: history and regulation, ecological impacts and mitigation. Mar Pollut Bull. 62:453–465. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson I, Brown CW, Sytsma MD, Ruiz GM. 2009. The role of containerships as transfer mechanisms of marine biofouling species. Biofouling. 25:645–655. doi:10.1080/08927010903046268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson IC, McCann LD, Fofonoff PW, Sytsma MD, Ruiz GM. 2008. The potential for hull-mediated species transfers by obsolete ships on their final voyages. Divers Distrib. 14:518–529. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson IC, McCann LD, Sytsma MD, Ruiz GM. 2008. Interrupting a multi-species bioinvasion vector: the efficacy of in-water cleaning for removing biofouling on obsolete vessels. Mar Pollut Bull. 56:1538–1544. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson I, Scianni C, Hewitt C, Everett R, Holm E, Tamburri M, Ruiz G. 2016. Mini-review: assessing the drivers of ship biofouling management-aligning industry and biosecurity goals. Biofouling. 32:411–428. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1149572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson IC, Scianni C, Minton MS, Ruiz G. 2018. A history of ship specialization and consequences for marine invasions, management and policy. J Appl Ecol. 55:1799–1811. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge LG, Carlton JT. 2002. Hawaiian marine bioinvasions: a preliminary assessment. Pac Sci. 56:211–212. doi:10.1353/psc.2002.0012
   Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Coutts A. 2009. Potential ramifications of the global economic crisis on human-mediated dispersal of marine non-indigenous species. Mar Pollut Bull. 58:1595–1598. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandison C, Piola R, Fletcher L. 2011. A review of marine growth protection system (MGPS) options for the Royal Australian Navy. DSTO-TR-2631. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt CL, Campbell M. 2010. The relative contribution of vectors to the introduction and translocation of marine invasive species. Report to the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton DR, Gage SA. 1979. Biology in ships. Trans Inst Mar Eng. 91:189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsucker JT, Hunsucker KZ, Gardner H, Swain G. 2016. Influence of hydrodynamic stress on the frictional drag of biofouling communities. Biofouling. 32:1209–1221. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1242724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis GJ, Floerl O, Ahyong S, Cox S, Unwin M, Ponder-Sutton A, Seaward K, Kospartov M, Read G, Gordon D, et al. 2010. The biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on international vessels arriving in New Zealand: summary of the patterns and predictors of fouling. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2011. International Maritime Organization: guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimize the transfer of invasive aquatic species. Marine Environment Protection Committee. Annex 26, Resolution MEPC.207 (62). International Maritime Organization, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis PN, Bergstrom DM, Whinam J. 2006. Barging in: a temperate marine community travels to the Sub-Antarctic. Biol Invasions. 8:787–795. doi:10.1007/s10530-005-3837-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis PN, Riddle MJ, Hewitt CL. 2004. Management of exogenous threats to Antarctica and the sub-Antarctic Islands: balancing risks from TBT and non-indigenous marine organisms. Mar Pollut Bull. 49:999–1005. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. 2014. Craft risk management standards: biofouling on vessels arriving to New Zealand. New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. 2018. Guidance document for the craft risk management standard for biofouling. GD CRMS-Biofoul. New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Piola RF, Johnston EL. 2006. Differential tolerance to metals among populations of the introduced bryozoan Bugula neritina. Mar Biol. 148:997–1010. doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0156-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piola RF, Johnston EL. 2009. Comparing differential tolerance of native and non-indigenous marine species to metal pollution using novel assay techniques. Environ Pollut. 157:2853–2864. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Steves B, Foss SF, Shiba SN. 2011. Marine invasion history and vector analysis of California: a hotspot for western North America. Divers Dist. 17:362–373. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00742.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scianni C, Georgiades E. 2019. Vessel in-water cleaning or treatment: identification of environmental risks and science needs for evidence-based decision making. Front Mar Sci. 6:647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scianni C, Ceballos Osuna L, Dobroski N, Falkner M, Thompson J, Nedelcheva R. 2019. 2019 biennial report on the California marine invasive species program. California State Lands Commission, Marine Invasive Species Program, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester F, Kalaci O, Leung B, Lacoursiere-Roussel A, Clarke-Murray C, Choi FM, Bravo MA, Therriault TW, MacIsaac HJ. 2011. Hull fouling as an invasion vector: can simple models explain a complex problem? J Appl Ecol. 48:415–423. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01957.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JC. 2010. Fouling and shipping: data-mining the world’s largest antifouling archive. In: Durr S, Thomason JC, editors. Biofouling. Oxford: Blackwell; p. 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Townsin RL. 2003. The ship hull fouling penalty. Biofouling. 19:9–15. doi:10.1080/0892701031000088535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher JP. 1928. Nature and extent of fouling of ships’ bottoms. Bullet Bur Fish. 43:193–252.
   Google Scholar