Underwater shear-based grooming of marine biofouling using a non-contact Bernoulli pad device

References

• Abioye OP, Loto CA, Fayomi OSI. 2019. Evaluation of anti-biofouling progresses in marine application. J Bio- Tribo-Corrosion. 5:22.
   Google Scholar
• Breglia J. 2017. Hull coatings, maintenance, and repair. In Encyclopedia of Maritime and Offshore Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library; p. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118476406.emoe554
   Google Scholar
• Callow JA, Callow ME. 2011. Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat Commun. 2:244. doi:10.1038/ncomms1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callow ME, Callow JE. 2002. Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist (London, England). 49:10–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao S, Wang J, Chen H, Chen D. 2011. Progress of marine biofouling and antifouling technologies. Chin Sci Bull. 56:598–612. doi:10.1007/s11434-010-4158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetser SE, Cloete TE. 2005. Biofouling and biocorrosion in industrial water systems. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 31:213–232. doi:10.1080/10408410500304074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Taylor MD. 2004. A preliminary investigation of biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on merchant vessels in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 38:215–229. doi:10.1080/00288330.2004.9517232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxworth B. 2020. Aquatic robot crawls hulls to brush off barnacles. New Atlas; [accessed 2020 March 16] https://newatlas.com/marine/hullskater-hull-cleaning-robot/.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson I, Scianni C, Hewitt C, Everett R, Holm E, Tamburri M, Ruiz G. 2016. Mini-review: assessing the drivers of ship biofouling management-Aligning industry and biosecurity goals. Biofouling. 32:411–428. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1149572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickenson NC, Krumholz JS, Hunsucker KZ, Radicone M. 2017. Iodine-infused aeration for hull fouling prevention: a vessel-scale study. Biofouling. 33:955–969. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1393803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobretsov S, Rittschof D. 2020. Love at first taste: induction of larval settlement by marine microbes. IJMS. 21:731. doi:10.3390/ijms21030731
   Google Scholar
• Dobretsov S, Thomason J, Williams DN. 2014. Biofouling methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118336144
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldaas T, Pedersen R. 2019. Robot with magnetic wheels for cleaning ship hulls. World Intellectual Property Organization Patent No. WO2019170888A1.
   Google Scholar
• Galiazzo M, Baccini A. 2009. Bernoulli gripper. World Intellectual Property Organization Patent No. WO2010094343A1.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiades E, Growcott A, Kluza D. 2018. Technical guidance on biofouling management for vessels arriving to New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Gipperth L. 2009. The legal design of the international and European Union ban on tributyltin antifouling paint: direct and indirect effects. J Environ Manag. 90: S86–S95. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. 1959. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 24:95–112. doi:10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Lee HP, Teo SL, Khoo BC. 2012. Inhibition of barnacle cyprid settlement using low frequency and intensity ultrasound. Biofouling. 28:131–141. doi:10.1080/08927014.2012.658511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearin J, Hunsucker KZ, Swain G, Gardner H, Stephens A, Lieberman K. 2016. Analysis of mechanical grooming at various frequencies on a large scale test panel coated with a fouling-release coating. Biofouling. 32:561–569. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1167880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearin J, Hunsucker KZ, Swain G, Stephens A, Gardner H, Lieberman K, Harper M. 2015. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating. Biofouling. 31:625–638. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1081687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellio C, Yebra D. 2009. Advances in marine antifouling coatings and technologies. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heng L, Jun N, Wen-Jie H, Guibai L. 2009. Algae removal by ultrasonic irradiation–coagulation. Desalination. 239:191–197. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Braga C, Gardner H, Jongerius M, Hietbrink R, Salters B, Swain G. 2019a. Using ultraviolet light for improved antifouling performance on ship hull coatings. Biofouling. 35:658–688. doi:10.1080/08927014.2019.1642334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Ralston E, Gardner H, Swain G. 2019b. Specialized grooming as a mechanical method to prevent marine invasive species recruitment and transport on ship hulls. Impacts of invasive species on coastal environments. Cham: Springer; p. 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Vora GJ, Hunsucker JT, Gardner H, Leary DH, Kim S, Lin B, Swain G. 2018. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating. Biofouling. 34:162–172. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1417395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp 2019. Released IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• IMO 2001. International convention on the control of harmful anti-fouling systems on ships.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce PWS, Cuthbert RN, Kregting L, Crane K, Vong GYW, Cunningham EM, Dick JTA, Coughlan NE. 2019. Stay clean: direct steam exposure to manage biofouling risks. Marine Pollut Bull. 142:465–469. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamensky KM, Hellum AM, Mukherjee R. 2019. Power scaling of radial outflow: Bernoulli pads in equilibrium. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 141:101201. doi:10.1115/1.4043061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamensky KM. 2020. A new paradigm for generating surface-normal forces for hull-cleaning robots [PhD dissertation]. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kostenko VV, Bykanova AY, Tolstonogov AY. 2019. Underwater robotics complex for inspection and laser cleaning of ships from biofouling. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, volume 272.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Kagawa T. 2014. Theoretical and experimental study of factors affecting the suction force of a Bernoulli gripper. J Eng Mech. 140:04014066. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauchly JW. 1940. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann Math Statist. 11:204–209. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731915
   Google Scholar
• Menesses M, Belden J, Dickenson N, Bird J. 2017. Measuring a critical stress for continuous prevention of marine biofouling accumulation with aeration. Biofouling. 33:703–711. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1359574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehring S. 2001. After the TBT era: alternative anti-fouling paints and their ecological risks. Senckenbergiana Maritima. 31:341–351. doi:10.1007/BF03043043
   Google Scholar
• NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS). System-wide monitoring program. Data accessed from the NOAA NERRS Centralized Data Management Office website: http://cdmo.baruch.sc.edu/. accessed 12 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira D, Granhag L. 2016. Matching forces applied in underwater hull cleaning with adhesion strength of marine organisms. JMSE. 4:66. doi:10.3390/jmse4040066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira DR, Granhag L. 2020. Ship hull in-water cleaning and its effects on fouling-control coatings. Biofouling. 36:332–350. doi:10.1080/08927014.2020.1762079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira D, Larsson L, Granhag L. 2019. Towards an absolute scale for adhesion strength of ship hull microfouling. Biofouling. 35:244–258. doi:10.1080/08927014.2019.1595602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson RG, Williams EC. 1969. Contactless lifter. US Patent No. 3,438,668.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz M, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scianni C, Georgiades E. 2019. Vessel in-water cleaning or treatment: identification of environmental risks and science needs for evidence-based decision making. Front Mar Sci. 6:467. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Boyle J, Cunningham AB, Dodds I, Lappin-Scott HM, Lewandowski Z. 1999. Biofilm structure and influence on biofouling under laminar and turbulent flows. Special publication R Soc Chem. 242:13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain G. 2015. Grooming using rotating brushes as a proactive method to control ship hull fouling. Biofouling. 31:309–319. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1041021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigiani A. 2017. Ultrasonic algae control. US Patent No. 20170320756A1.
   Google Scholar
• Vietti, P. 2009. New hull coatings cut fuel use, protect environment. Currents. Fall:36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Welschmeyer NA. 1994. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr. 39:1985–1992. doi:10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar