The effect of cleaning and repainting on the ship drag penalty

References

• Bandyopadhyay PR. 1987. Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers in the transition regime. J Fluid Mech. 180:231–266. doi:10.1017/S0022112087001794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan L, MacDonald M, Chung D, Hutchins N, Ooi A. 2015. A systematic investigation of roughness height and wavelength in turbulent pipe flow in the transitionally rough regime. J Fluid Mech. 771:743–777. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung D, Hutchins N, Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2021. Predicting the drag of rough surfaces. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 53:439–471. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-062520-115127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauser FH. 1954. Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J Aeronaut Sci. 21:91–108. doi:10.2514/8.2938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauser FH. 1956. The turbulent boundary layers. Adv Appl Mech. 4:1–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cobert JJ, Fisbeck PS, Pandis SN. 1999. Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. J Geophys Res. 104:3457–3470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook CF, White CM. 1937. Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes. Phil Trans R Soc London Ser A. 16:367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz P. 2010. Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime. J Fluids Eng. 132:041203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP, Barros JM, Kim YC. 2016. Skin-friction behavior in the transitionally-rough regime. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 61:21–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP, Connelly JS. 2007. Examination of a critical roughness height for outer layer similarity. Phys Fluids. 19:095104. doi:10.1063/1.2757708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP, Shapiro TA. 2005. Experimental support for Townsend’s Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough wall. Phys Fluids. 17:035102. doi:10.1063/1.1843135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forooghi P, Stroh A, Magagnato F, Jakirlić S, Frohnapfel B. 2017. Toward a universal roughness correlation. J Fluids Eng. 139: 121201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuya Y, Miyata M, Fujita H. 1976. Turbulent boundary layer and flow resistance on plates roughened by wires. J Fluids Eng. 98:635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granville PS. 1958. The frictional resistance and turbulent boundary layer of rough plates. Technical Report 1024. Navy Department.
   Google Scholar
• Grigson C. 1985. The drag at ship scale of planes having any quality of roughness. J Ship Res. 29:94–104. doi:10.5957/jsr.1985.29.2.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigson C. 1987. The full-scale viscous drag of actual ship surfaces and the effect of quality roughness on predicted power. J Ship Res. 31:189–206. doi:10.5957/jsr.1987.31.3.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigson C. 1992. Drag losses of new ships caused by hull finish. J Ship Res. 36:182–196. doi:10.5957/jsr.1992.36.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hama FR. 1954. Boundary-layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 62:333–358.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop JA. 1977. Statistical analysis of performance test results. Int Shipbuild Prog. 24:23–28. doi:10.3233/ISP-1977-2427001
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop JA. 1984. Statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. Int Shipbuild Prog. 31:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J, Mennen GGJ. 1978. A statistical power prediction method. Int Shipbuild Prog. 25:253–256. doi:10.3233/ISP-1978-2529001
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J, Mennen GGJ. 1982. An approximate power prediction method. Int Shipbuild Prog. 29:166–170. doi:10.3233/ISP-1982-2933501
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins N, Nickels TB, Marusic I, Chong MS. 2009. Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 635:103–136. doi:10.1017/S0022112009007721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins N, Monty JP, Ganapathisubramani B, Nugroho B, Utama IKAP. 2016. Turbulent boundary layers developing over rough surfaces: from the laboratory to full-scale systems. In 20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC). Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines - 1978 ITTC performance prediction method 7.5-02-03-01.4 (Revision 03).
   Google Scholar
• Jelly T, Busse A. 2018. Reynolds and dispersive shear stress contributions above highly skewed roughness. J Fluid Mech. 852:710–724. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez J. 2004. Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 36:173–196. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takahashi T, Kawashima H. 2000. Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 21:582–588. doi:10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00048-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackenby H. 1962. Resistance of ships, with special reference to skin friction and hull surface condition. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 176:981–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Ligrani PM, Bradshaw P. 1987. Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wires probes. Exp Fluids. 5:407–417. doi:10.1007/BF00264405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic I, Chauhan KA, Kulandaivelu V, Hutchins N. 2015. Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions. J Fluid Mech. 783:379–411. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic I, Chauhan KA, Kulandaivelu V, Hutchins N. 2016. Study of the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers to high Reynolds numbers. In Whither turbulence and big data in the 21st century? 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Marusic I, Monty JP, Hultmark M, Smits AJ. 2013. On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 716: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA, Utama IKAP. 2014. Reducing ship emissions: a review of potential practical improvements in the propulsive efficiency of future ships. Trans R Inst Naval Archit Part A. 156:175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Monty JP, Allen JJ, Lien K, Chong MS. 2011. Modification of the large-scale features of high Reynolds number wall turbulence by passive surface obtrusions. Exp Fluids. 51:1755–1763. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1190-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monty JP, Dogan E, Hanson R, Scardion AJ, Ganapathisubramani G, Hutchins N. 2016. An assessment of the ship drag penalty arising from light calcareous tubeworm fouling. Biofouling. 32:451–464. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1148140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill-Winter C, Squire DT, Klewicki JC, Hutchins N, Schultz MP, Marusic I. 2017. Reynolds number and roughness effects on turbulent stresses in sandpaper roughness boundary layers. Phys Rev Fluids. 2:054608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikuradse J. 1933. Stromungsgesetze in rauhen rohren. VDI-Forsch 361.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho B, Hutchins N, Monty JP. 2013. Large-scale spanwise periodicity in a turbulent boundary layer induced by highly ordered and directional surface roughness. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 41:90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho B, Monty JP, Utama IKAP, Ganapathisubramani B, Hutchins N. 2021. Non k-type behaviour of roughness when1 in-plane wavelength approaches the boundary layer thickness. J Fluid Mech. 911:A1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho B, Baidya B, Nurrohman MN, Yusim Ak, Prasetyo Fa, Yusuf M, Suastika IK, Utama IKAP, Monty Jp, Hutchins N, Ganapathisubramani B. 2017. In-situ turbulent boundary layer measurements over freshly cleaned ship-hull under steady cruising. Royal Institution of Naval Architects (RINA) Conference, International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology (ICSOT). Jakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho B, Gnanamanickam EP, Kevin Monty JP, Hutchins N. 2014. Roll-modes generated in turbulent boundary layers with passive surface modifications. AIAA paper. doi:10.2514/6.2014-0197
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho B, Utama IKAP, Monty JP, Hutchins N, Ganapathisubramani B. 2018. The influence of in-plane roughness wavelength relative to the boundary layer thickness. 12th International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements (ETMM). Montpellier, France
   Google Scholar
• Perry AE. 1982. Hot-wire anemometry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry AE, Joubert PN. 1963. Rough-wall boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech. 17:193–211. doi:10.1017/S0022112063001245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry AE, Li JD. 1990. Experimental support for the attached-eddy hypothesis in zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 218:405–438. doi:10.1017/S0022112090001057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry AE, Morrison GL. 1971. A study of the constant temperature hot-wire anemometer. J Fluid Mech. 47:577–599. doi:10.1017/S0022112071001241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry AE, Schofield WH, Joubert PN. 1969. Rough wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 37:383–413. doi:10.1017/S0022112069000619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandtl L, Schlichting H. 1955. The resistance law for rough plates. Technical Report 258. Navy Dept. Translated by P. Granville.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin DI, Hutchins N, Chung D. 2017. Turbulent flow over a long flat plate with uniform roughness. Phys Rev Fluids. 2:082601(R).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani A, Nugroho B, Monty JP, Hutchins N, Busse A, Jelly TO. 2020. The effect of anisotropic surface roughness on turbulent boundary-layer flow. In 22nd Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC). Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2002. The relationship between frictional resistance and roughness for surfaces smoothed by sanding. J Fluids Eng. 124:492–499. doi:10.1115/1.1459073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2004. Frictional resistance of antifouling coating systems. J Fluids Eng. 126:1039–1047. doi:10.1115/1.1845552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling. 23:331–341. doi:10.1080/08927010701461974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2005. Outer layer similarity in fully rough turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids. 38:328–340. doi:10.1007/s00348-004-0903-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2007. The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J. Fluid Mech. 580:381–405. doi:10.1017/S0022112007005502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz P, Walker J, Steppe CN, Flack KA. 2015. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings. Biofouling. 31:759–773. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1108407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockling MA, Allen JJ, Smits AJ. 2006. Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech. 564:267–285. doi:10.1017/S0022112006001467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire DT, Morrill-Winter C, Hutchins N, Marusic I, Schultz MP, Klewicki JC. 2016a. Smooth- and rough-wall boundary layer structure from high spatial range particle image velocimetry. Phy Rev Fluids. 1:064402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire DT, Morrill-Winter C, Hutchins N, Schultz MP, Klewicki JC, Marusic I. 2016b. Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech. 795:210–240. doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluru KM, Kulandaivelu V, Hutchins N, Marusic I. 2014. A calibration technique to correct sensor drift issues in hot-wire anemometry. Mes Sci Tech. 25:105304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar M, Busse A, Sandham N. 2018. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow over a surrogate for Nikuradse-type roughness. J Fluid Mech. 837:R1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend AA. 1976. The structure of turbulent shear flow. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsin RL. 2003. The ship hull fouling penalty. Biofouling. 19:9–15. doi:10.1080/0892701031000088535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsin RL, Byrne D, Milne A, Svensen T. 1980. Speed, power and roughness: the economics of outer bottom maintenance. Nav Archit. (6):459–483.
   Google Scholar
• Townsin RL, Byrne D, Svensen TE, Milne A. 1981. Estimating the techical and economic penalties of hull and propeller roughness. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Engrs. 89:295–318.
   Google Scholar
• Winebrake JJ, Corbett JJ, Green EH, Lauer A, Erying V. 2009. Mitigating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: An assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates. Environ Sci Technol. 43:4776–4782. doi:10.1021/es803224q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Christensen KT. 2007. Outer-layer similarity in the presence of a practical rough wall topography. Phys Fluids. 19:085108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar