References
- APHA. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
- Asif MB, Ren B, Li C, Maqbool T, Zhang X, Zhang Z. 2020. Powdered activated carbon – membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR): impacts of high PAC concentration on micropollutant removal and microbial communities. Sci Total Environ. 745:141090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141090
- Aslam A, Khan SJ, Shahzad HMA. 2022. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) for municipal wastewater treatment- potential benefits, constraints, and future perspectives: an updated review. Sci Total Environ. 802:149612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149612
- Ayed L, Asses N, Chammem N, ben Othman N, Hamdi M. 2017. Advanced oxidation process and biological treatments for table olive processing wastewaters: constraints and a novel approach to integrated recycling process: a review. Biodegradation. 28:125–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-017-9782-0
- Chu H, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Dong B. 2013. Bio-enhanced powder-activated carbon dynamic membrane reactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci. 433:126–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.030
- Chu H, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Zhao Y, Dong B, Zhang H. 2014. Dynamic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: operation, critical flux, and dynamic membrane structure. J Membr Sci. 450:265–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.045
- Damayanti A, Ujang Z, Salim MR. 2011. The influenced of PAC, zeolite, and Moringa oleifera as biofouling reducer (BFR) on hybrid membrane bioreactor of palm oil mill effluent (POME). Bioresour Technol. 102:4341–4346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.061
- Etemadi H, Yegani R. 2019. Effect of aeration rate on the anti-biofouling properties of cellulose acetate nanocomposite membranes in a membrane bioreactor system for the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Biofouling. 35:618–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2019.1637858
- Fang HHP, Shi X, Zhang T. 2006. Effect of activated carbon on fouling of activated sludge filtration. Desalination. 189:193–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.087
- Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA, Gupta BB. 1995. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J Membr Sci. 100:259–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00265-Z
- Holloway TG, Williams JB, Ouelhadj D, Yang G. 2021. Dynamic resilience for biological wastewater treatment processes: interpreting data for process management and the potential for knowledge discovery. J Water Process Eng. 42:102170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102170
- Hu J, Shang R, Deng H, Heijman SGJ, Rietveld LC. 2014. Effect of PAC dosage in a pilot-scale PAC-MBR treating micro-polluted surface water. Bioresour Technol. 154:290–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.075
- Hu Y, Wang XC, Tian W, Ngo HH, Chen R. 2016. Towards stable operation of a dynamic membrane bioreactor (DMBR): operational process, behavior and retention effect of dynamic membrane. J Membr Sci. 498:20–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.009
- Hu Y, Yang Y, Wang XC, Hao Ngo H, Sun Q, Li S, Tang J, Yu Z. 2017. Effects of powdered activated carbon addition on filtration performance and dynamic membrane layer properties in a hybrid DMBR process. Chem Eng J. 327:39–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.072
- Iorhemen O, Hamza R, Tay J. 2016. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: membrane fouling. Membranes. 6:33. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6020033
- Jamal Khan S, Ilyas S, Javid S, Visvanathan C, Jegatheesan V. 2011. Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 102:5331–5336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.100
- Jiang Y, Liu Y, Shi D, Fu W, Sun P-F, Li J, Shao S. 2020. Membrane fouling in a powdered activated carbon – membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) for micro-polluted water purification: fouling characteristics and the roles of PAC. J Cleaner Prod. 277:122341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122341
- Ko D. 2018. Conceptual design optimization of an integrated membrane bioreactor system for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Res Des. 132:385–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.01.030
- Kozak M, Cirik K, Başak S. 2021. Treatment of textile wastewater using combined anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor and powdered activated carbon-aerobic membrane reactor. J Environ Chem Eng. 9:105596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105596
- Kulesha O, Maletskyi Z, Ratnaweera H. 2018. State-of-the-art of membrane flux enhancement in membrane bioreactor. Cogent Eng. 5:1489700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1489700
- Lee J, Ahn W-Y, Lee C-H. 2001. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 35:2435–2445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00524-8
- Lee K, Choo K-H, Ng HY, Lee C-H. 2020. Preparation of a mesoporous silica quorum quenching medium for wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor. Biofouling. 36:369–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2020.1749601
- Lee W-N, Yeon K-M, Hwang B-K, Lee C-H, Chang I-S. 2010. Effect of PAC addition on the physicochemical characteristics of bio-cake in a membrane bioreactor. Sep Sci Technol. 45:896–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01496391003666999
- Liébana R, Arregui L, Belda I, Gamella L, Santos A, Marquina D, Serrano S. 2015. Membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plants reveal diverse yeast and protist communities of potential significance in biofouling. Biofouling. 31:71–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.998206
- Liu L, Chen Z, Zhang J, Shan D, Wu Y, Bai L, Wang B. 2021. Treatment of industrial dye wastewater and pharmaceutical residue wastewater by advanced oxidation processes and its combination with nanocatalysts: a review. J Water Process Eng. 42:102122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102122
- Loderer C, Gahleitner B, Steinbacher K, Stelzer C, Fuchs W. 2013. Dynamic filtration – a novel approach for critical flux determination using different textiles. Sep Purif Technol. 120:410–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.013
- Mafirad S, Mehrnia MR, Azami H, Sarrafzadeh MH. 2011. Effects of biofilm formation on membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. Biofouling. 27:477–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2011.584619
- Mohan SM, Nagalakshmi S. 2020. A review on aerobic self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor: formation, performance, fouling and cleaning. J Water Process Eng. 37:101541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101541
- Mororó RR, Borges CP, Kronemberger F de A. 2018. New modules for membrane bioreactors: improving fouling control. Chem Eng Res Des. 136:295–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.05.035
- Najmi M, Mehrnia MR, Tashauoei HR, Iranpoury A, Alivand MS. 2020. Removal of personal care products (PCPs) from greywater using a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR): the effect of hydraulic retention time. J Environ Chem Eng. 8:104432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104432
- Pidou M, Avery L, Stephenson T, Jeffrey P, Parsons SA, Liu S, Memon FA, Jefferson B. 2008. Chemical solutions for greywater recycling. Chemosphere. 71:147–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.046
- Poostchi AA, Bayat M, Rezaei M, Amini E, Mehrnia MR. 2015. Formation of pre-coating dynamic membrane on mesh filter by cross-flow filtration of PAC–water suspension in a bioreactor: experimental and modeling. Desalin Water Treat. 55:17–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.911118
- Poostchi AA, Mehrnia MR, Rezvani F, Sarrafzadeh MH. 2012. Low-cost monofilament mesh filter used in membrane bioreactor process: filtration characteristics and resistance analysis. Desalination. 286:429–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.002
- Poostchi AA, Mehrnia MR, Sarrafzadeh MH. 2010. Removal of dissolved organic carbon by multi-walled carbon nanotubes, powdered activated carbon and granular activated carbon. Res J Chem Environ. 14:59–66.
- Prathapar SA, Ahmed M, al Adawi S, al Sidiari S. 2006. Design, construction and evaluation of an ablution water treatment unit in Oman: a case study. Int J Environ Stud. 63:283–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230600773257
- Qureshi N, Annous BA, Ezeji TC, Karcher P, Maddox IS. 2005. Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microb Cell Fact. 4:24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-4-24
- Remy M, van der Marel P, Zwijnenburg A, Rulkens W, Temmink H. 2009. Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 43:345–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.033
- Rezaei M, Mehrnia MR. 2014. The influence of zeolite (clinoptilolite) on the performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 158:25–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.138
- Rezvani F, Mehrnia MR, Poostchi AA. 2014. Optimal operating strategies of SFDM formation for MBR application. Sep Purif Technol. 124:124–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.028
- Sabaghian M, Mehrnia MR, Esmaieli M, Noormohammadi D. 2018. Formation and performance of self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) in membrane bioreactor (MBR) for treating low-strength wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 78:904–912. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.368
- Sagbo O, Sun Y, Hao A, Gu P. 2008. Effect of PAC addition on MBR process for drinking water treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 58:320–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.003
- Sari Erkan H, Çağlak A, Soysaloglu A, Takatas B, Onkal Engin G. 2020. Performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor and moving bed membrane bioreactor for synthetic textile wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng. 38:101631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101631
- Sokhandan F, Homayoonfal M, Davar F. 2020. Application of zinc oxide and sodium alginate for biofouling mitigation in a membrane bioreactor treating urban wastewater. Biofouling. 36:660–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2020.1798934
- Vergine P, Salerno C, Berardi G, Pollice A. 2018. Sludge cake and biofilm formation as valuable tools in wastewater treatment by coupling Integrated Fixed-film Activated Sludge (IFAS) with Self Forming Dynamic Membrane BioReactors (SFD-MBR). Bioresour Technol. 268:121–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.120
- Vergine P, Salerno C, Berardi G, Pollice A. 2021. Self-Forming Dynamic Membrane BioReactors (SFD MBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: relevance of solids retention time and biological process stability. Sep Purif Technol. 255:117735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117735
- Xiang S, Han Y, Jiang C, Li M, Wei L, Fu J, Zhu L. 2021. Composite biologically active filter (BAF) with zeolite, granular activated carbon, and suspended biological carrier for treating algae-laden raw water. J Water Process Eng. 42:102188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102188
- Yang S, Zhang Q, Lei Z, Wen W, Huang X, Chen R. 2019. Comparing powdered and granular activated carbon addition on membrane fouling control through evaluating the impacts on mixed liquor and cake layer properties in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 294:122137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122137
- Yang W, Paetkau M, Cicek N. 2010. Effects of powdered activated carbon dosing on sludge characteristics and estrogen removal in membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol. 61:2193–2198. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.111
- Ye M, Zhang H, Wei Q, Lei H, Yang F, Zhang X. 2006. Study on the suitable thickness of a PAC-precoated dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination. 194:108–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.11.005
- Yu Z, Hu Y, Dzakpasu M, Wang XC, Ngo HH. 2019. Dynamic membrane bioreactor performance enhancement by powdered activated carbon addition: evaluation of sludge morphological, aggregative and microbial properties. J Environ Sci (China). 75:73–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.003
- Yuniarto A, Noor ZZ, Ujang Z, Olsson G, Aris A, Hadibarata T. 2013. Bio-fouling reducers for improving the performance of an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Desalination. 316:146–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.002
- Yurtsever A, Basaran E, Ucar D, Sahinkaya E. 2021. Self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor for textile industry wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 751:141572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141572
- Zhou L, Zhang Z, Jiang W, Guo W, Ngo H-H, Meng X, Fan J, Zhao J, Xia S. 2014. Effects of low-concentration Cr(VI) on the performance and the membrane fouling of a submerged membrane bioreactor in the treatment of municipal wastewater. Biofouling. 30:105–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2013.847925