The interplay between the clustering of transmembrane proteins and coupling of anchored membrane proteins

References

• SimonsK, ToomreD. Lipid raft and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarmorMD, JuliusM. The function of GPI–anchored proteins in T cell development, activation and regulation of homeostasis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2000;14:99–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaarmaM. GDNF – a stranger in the TGF-β superfamiliy. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:6968–6971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WangY. The role and regulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor gene expression in cancer invasion and metastasis. Med Res Rev. 2001;21:146–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StefanovaI, HorejsiV, AnsoteguiIJ, KnappW, StockingerH. GPI-anchored cell-surface molecules complexed to protein tyrosine kinases. Science. 1991;254:1016–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KusumiA, Koyama-HondaI, SuzukiK. Molecular dynamics and interactions for creation of stimulation-induced stabilized rafts from small unstable steady-state rafts. Traffic. 2004;5:213–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimonsK, IkonenE. Functional rafts in cell membrane. Nature. 1997;387:569–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YueT, ZhangX. Signal transduction across cellular membranes can be mediated by coupling of the clustering of anchored proteins in both leaflets. Phys Rev E. 2012;85:011917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KillianJA. Hydrophobic mismatch between proteins and lipids in membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1376:401–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetracheHI, ZuckermanDM, WoolfTB. Hydrophobic matching mechanism investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Langmuir. 2002;18:1340–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JensenMO, MouritsenOG. Lipids do influence protein function – the hydrophobic matching hypothesis revised. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1666:205–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshD. Energetics of hydrophobic matching in lipid–protein interactions. Biophys J. 2008;94:3996–4013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda-EspinozaH, BermanA, DanN, PincusP, SafranS. Protein attraction in membranes induced by lipid fluctuations. Biophys J. 1996;71:648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrounTA, HellerWT, WeissTM, YangL, HuangHW. Theoretical analysis of hydrophobic matching and membrane-mediated interactions in lipid bilayers containing gramicidin. Biophys J. 1999;76:937–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BotelhoAV, HuberT, SakmarTP, BrownMF. Curvature and hydrophobic forces drive oligomerization and modulate activity of rhodopsin in membranes. Biophys J. 2006;91:4464–4477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrageSL, KeleshianAM, TurdzeladzeT, BattleAR, TayWC, MayRP, HoltSA, ConteraSA, HaertleinM, MoulinM, PalP, RohdePR, ForsythVT, WattsA, HuangKC, UlrichAS, MartinacB. Bilayer-mediated clustering and functional interaction of MscL channels. Biophys J. 2011;100:1252–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MouJ, CzajkowskyDM, ShaoZ. Gramicidin A aggregation in supported gel state phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry. 1996;35:3222–3226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtU, GuigasG, WeissM. Cluster formation of transmembrane proteins due to hydrophobic mismatch. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101:128104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtU, WeissM. Hydrophobic mismatch-induced clustering as a primer for protein sorting in the secretory pathway. Biophys Chem. 2010;151:34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorozovaD, GuigasG, WeissM. Dynamic structure formation of peripheral membrane proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiS, ZhangX, WangW. Cluster formation of anchored proteins induced by membrane-mediated interaction. Biophys J. 2010;98:2554–2563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YueT, LiS, ZhangX, WangW. The relationship between membrane curvature generation and clustering of anchored proteins: a computer simulation study. Soft Matter. 2010;6:6109–6118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PartonDL, KlingelhoeferJW, SansomMSP. Aggregation of model membrane proteins, modulated by hydrophobic mismatch, membrane curvature, and protein class. Biophys J. 2011;101:691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de MeyerFJ, VenturoliM, SmitB. Molecular simulations of lipid-mediated protein–protein interactions. Biophys J. 2008;95:1851–1865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de MeyerFJ, RodgersJM, WillemsTF, SmitB. Molecular simulation of the effect of cholesterol on lipid-mediated protein–protein interactions. Biophys J. 2010;99:3629–3638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YiannourakouM, MarsellaL, de MeyerFJ, SmitB. Towards an understanding of membrane-mediated protein–protein interactions. Faraday Discuss. 2010;144:359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoogerbruggePJ, KoelmanJMVA. Simulating microscipic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys Lett. 1992;19:155–160.
   Google Scholar
• EspañolP, WarrenP. Statistical mechanics of dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys Lett. 1995;30:191–196.
   Google Scholar
• GrootRD, WarrenPB. Dissipative particle dynamics: bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. J Chem Phys. 1997;107:4423–4435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShillcockJC, LipowskyR. Tension-induced fusion of bilayer membranes and vesicles. Nat Mater. 2005;4:225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangK, MaYQ. Computer simulation of the translocation of nanoparticles with different shapes across a lipid bilayer. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:579–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YueT, ZhangX. Molecular understanding of receptor-mediated membrane responses to ligand-coated nanoparticles. Soft Matter. 2011;7:9104–9112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrootRD, RaboneKL. Mesoscopic simulation of cell membrane damage, morphology change and rupture by nonionic surfactants. Biophys J. 2001;81:725–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JakobsenAF, MouritsenOG, WeissM. Close-up view on the modifications of fluid membranes due to phospholipase A2. J Phys Condens Matter. 2005;17:S4015–S4024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenturoliM, SperottoMM, KranenburgM, SmitB. Mesoscopic models of biological membranes. Phys Rep. 2006;437:1–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KranenburgM, SmitB. Phase behavior of model lipid bilayers. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:6553–6563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YueT, ZhangX. Cooperative effect in receptor-mediated endocytosis of multiple nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2012;6:3196–3205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiY, YueT, YangK, ZhangX. Molecular modeling of the relationship between nanoparticle shape anisotropy and endocytosis kinetics. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4965–4973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HongB, QiuF, ZhangH, YangY. Budding dynamics of individual domains in multicomponent membranes simulated by N-varied dissipative particle dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:5837–5849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangK, MaYQ. Computer simulations of fusion, fission and shape deformation in lipid membranes. Soft Matter. 2012;8:606–618.
   Google Scholar