Unconstrained enhanced sampling for free energy calculations of biomolecules: a review

References

• McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature. 1977;267:585–590.10.1038/267585a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002;9:646–652.10.1038/nsb0902-646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miao Y, Yi Z, Cantrell C, Glass Dennis C, Baudry J, Jain N, Smith Jeremy C. Coupled flexibility change in cytochrome P450cam substrate binding determined by neutron scattering, NMR, and molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys. J. 2012;103:2167–2176.10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Klepeis JL, Arkin IT, Jensen MO, Xu H, Trbovic N, Friesner RA, Iii AG, Shaw DE. Microsecond molecular dynamics simulation shows effect of slow loop dynamics on backbone amide order parameters of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:6155–6158. doi:10.1021/jp077018h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Salmon L. A-Hashimi HM. Measuring similarity between dynamic ensembles of biomolecules. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:552–554. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Kuczera K, Karplus M. Dynamics of myoglobin: comparison of simulation results with neutron scattering spectra. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1990;87:1601–1605. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.4.1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao YL, Yi Z, Glass DC, Hong L, Tyagi M, Baudry J, Jain NT, Smith JC. Temperature-dependent dynamical transitions of different classes of amino acid residue in a globular protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:19576–19579. doi:10.1021/ja3097898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KY, Trabuco LG, Schreiner E, Schulten K. Cryo-electron microscopy modeling by the molecular dynamics flexible fitting method. Biopolymers. 2012;134:678–686. doi:10.1002/bip.22042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabuco LG, Villa E, Mitra K, Frank J, Schulten K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure. 2008;97:673–683. doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science. 2011;334:517–520. doi:10.1126/science.1208351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunger AT, Kuriyan J, Karplus M. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science. 1987;235:458–460. doi:10.1126/science.235.4787.458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreevy R, Singharoy A, Li Q, Zhang J, Xu D, Perozo E, Schulten K. xMDFF: molecular dynamics flexible fitting of low-resolution X-ray structures. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2014;70:2344–2355.10.1107/S1399004714013856
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torda AE, van Gunsteren WF. The refinement of NMR structures by molecular dynamics simulation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1991;62:289–296.10.1016/0010-4655(91)90101-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtivarjo J, Tuppurainen K, Hassinen T, Laatikainen R, Perakyla M. Combining NMR ensembles and molecular dynamics simulations provides more realistic models of protein structures in solution and leads to better chemical shift prediction. J. Biomol. NMR. 2012;52:257–267. doi:10.1007/s10858-012-9609-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman P. Free energy calculations: applications to chemical and biochemical phenomena. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:2395–2417.10.1021/cr00023a004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden-Eijnden E. Some recent techniques for free energy calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:1737–1747.10.1002/jcc.v30:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ CD, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: a review. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:1569–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohorille A, Jarzynski C, Chipot C. Good practices in free-energy calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:10235–10253. doi:10.1021/jp102971x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston JM, Filizola M. Showcasing modern molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins through G protein-coupled receptors. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011;21:552–558.10.1016/j.sbi.2011.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature. 2007;450:964–972.10.1038/nature06522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski JR, Halse ME, Blackledge M, Emsley L. Direct observation of hierarchical protein dynamics. Science. 2015;348:578–581. doi:10.1126/science.aaa6111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams C, Bussi G. Enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics using metadynamics, replica-exchange, and temperature-acceleration. Entropy. 2014;16:163–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiwok V, Sucur Z, Hosek P. Enhanced sampling techniques in biomolecular simulations. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015;33:1130–1140. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellago C, Bolhuis PG. Transition path sampling and other advanced simulation techniques for rare events. Adv. Comput. Simul. Approach. Soft Matter Sci. III. 2009;221:167–233.10.1007/978-3-540-87706-6
   Google Scholar
• Gao YQ, Yang LJ, Fan YB, Shao Q. Thermodynamics and kinetics simulations of multi-time-scale processes for complex systems. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008;27:201–227. doi:10.1080/01442350801920334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. Computational techniques for efficient conformational sampling of proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008;18:134–139. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen M, van Gunsteren WF. On searching in, sampling of, and dynamically moving through conformational space of biomolecular systems: a review. J. Comput. Chem. 2008;29:157–166.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-987X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kästner J. Umbrella sampling. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011;1:932–942.10.1002/wcms.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrie GM, Valleau JP. Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J. Comput. Phys. 1977;23:187–199.10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccotti G, Kapral R, Vanden-Eijnden E. Blue moon sampling, vectorial reaction coordinates, and unbiased constrained dynamics. ChemPhysChem. 2005;6:1809–1814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darve E, Rodriguez-Gomez D, Pohorille A. Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;128:144120.10.1063/1.2829861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darve E, Pohorille A. Calculating free energies using average force. J. Chem. Phys. 2001;115:9169–9183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laio A, Parrinello M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2002;99:12562–12566.10.1073/pnas.202427399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laio A, Gervasio FL. Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008;71:126601.10.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubmüller H. Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: conformational flooding. Phys. Rev. E. 1995;52:2893–2906.10.1103/PhysRevE.52.2893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G. String method in collective variables: minimum free energy paths and isocommittor surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2006;125:024106.10.1063/1.2212942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan AC, Sezer D, Roux B. Finding transition pathways using the string method with swarms of trajectories. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:3432–3440.10.1021/jp0777059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight JL, Brooks CL. λ-Dynamics free energy simulation methods. J. Comput. Chem.2009;30:1692–1700.10.1002/jcc.v30:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso L, Tuckerman ME. An adiabatic molecular dynamics method for the calculation of free energy profiles. Mol. Simul. 2002;28:91–112.10.1080/08927020211977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams CF, Vanden-Eijnden E. Large-scale conformational sampling of proteins using temperature-accelerated molecular dynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:4961–4966.10.1073/pnas.0914540107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlitter J, Engels M, Kruger P, Jacoby E, Wollmer A. Targeted molecular dynamics simulation of conformational change-application to the T ↔ R transition in insulin. Mol. Simul. 1993;10:291–308.10.1080/08927029308022170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara P, Apostolakis J, Caflisch A. Targeted molecular dynamics simulations of protein unfolding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:4511–4518.10.1021/jp9943878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlitter J, Engels M, Kruger P. Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. J. Mol. Graphics. 1994;12:84–89.10.1016/0263-7855(94)80072-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng LQ, Chen MG, Yang W. Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:20227–20232.10.1073/pnas.0810631106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng LQ, Chen MG, Yang W. Simultaneous escaping of explicit and hidden free energy barriers: application of the orthogonal space random walk strategy in generalized ensemble based conformational sampling. J. Chem. Phys. 2009;130:234105.10.1063/1.3153841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999;314:141–151.10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01123-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto Y. Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2004;22:425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann UHE. Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997;281:140–150.10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01198-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Wang S. Crossing the time scale of protein folding through self-guided molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1998;16:290–290.
   Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Wang SM. Self-guided molecular dynamics simulation for efficient conformational search. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:7238–7250.10.1021/jp9817372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Brooks BR. Self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003;381:512–518.10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Brooks BR, Vanden-Eijnden E. Self-guided Langevin dynamics via generalized Langevin equation. J. Comput. Chem. 2015;. doi:10.1002/jcc.24015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Min D, Liu Y, Yang W. Essential energy space random walk via energy space metadynamics method to accelerate molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;127:094101.10.1063/1.2769356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng LQ, Yang W. Essential energy space random walks to accelerate molecular dynamics simulations: convergence improvements via an adaptive-length self-healing strategy. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;129:014105.10.1063/1.2949815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv C, Zheng LQ, Yang W. Generalized essential energy space random walks to more effectively accelerate solute sampling in aqueous environment. J. Chem. Phys. 2012;136:044103.10.1063/1.3678220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA. Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2004;120:11919–11929.10.1063/1.1755656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Feher VA, McCammon JA. Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015;11:3584–3595.10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinari E, Parisi G. Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhys. Lett. 1992;19:451–458.10.1209/0295-5075/19/6/002
   Google Scholar
• Lyubartsev AP, Martsinovski AA, Shevkunov SV, Vorontsovvelyaminov PN. New approach to Monte Carlo calculation of the free energy: method of expanded ensembles. J. Chem. Phys. 1992;96:1776–1783.10.1063/1.462133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg BA, Neuhaus T. Multicanonical algorithms for first order phase transitions. Phys. Lett. B. 1991;267:249–253.10.1016/0370-2693(91)91256-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange multicanonical algorithm and multicanonical replica-exchange method for simulating systems with rough energy landscape. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;329:261–270.10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00999-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange multicanonical and multicanonical replica-exchange Monte Carlo simulations of peptides. I. Formulation and benchmark test. J. Chem. Phys. 2003;118:6664–6675.10.1063/1.1555847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange simulated tempering method for simulations of frustrated systems. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;332:131–138.10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01262-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa Y, Sugita Y, Nishikawa T, Okamoto Y. Ab initio replica-exchange Monte Carlo method for cluster studies. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001;333:199–206.10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01342-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Kitao A, Okamoto Y. Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;113:6042–6051.10.1063/1.1308516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata K, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Molecular dynamics simulations of DNA dimers based on replica-exchange umbrella sampling. I. Test of sampling efficiency. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2005;4:411–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curuksu J, Zacharias M. Enhanced conformational sampling of nucleic acids by a new Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2009;130:104110.10.1063/1.3086832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meli M, Colombo G. A Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics (MD) method for the study of folding, based on the analysis of the stabilization determinants of proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:12157–12169.10.3390/ijms140612157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa T, Ohtsuka H, Sugita Y, Mikami M, Okamoto Y. Replica – exchange Monte Carlo method for Ar fluid. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 2000:270–271.10.1143/PTPS.138.270
   Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange multicanonical and multicanonical replica-exchange Monte Carlo simulations of peptides. II. Application to a more complex system. J. Chem. Phys. 2003;118:6676–6688.10.1063/1.1555849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Penna G, Mitsutake A, Masuya M, Okamoto Y. Molecular dynamics of C-peptide of ribonuclease A studied by replica-exchange Monte Carlo method and diffusion theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003;380:609–619.10.1016/j.cplett.2003.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitera JW, Swope W. Understanding folding and design: replica-exchange simulations of ‘Trp-cage’ miniproteins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2003;100:7587–7592.10.1073/pnas.1330954100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. An analysis on protein folding problem by replica-exchange method. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 2000:402–403.10.1143/PTPS.138.402
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen PH, Stock G, Mittag E, Hu CK, Li MS. Free energy landscape and folding mechanism of a β-hairpin in explicit water: a replica exchange molecular dynamics study. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2005;61:795–808.10.1002/prot.20696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan S, Zacharias M. Application of biasing-potential replica-exchange simulations for loop modeling and refinement of proteins in explicit solvent. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2010;78:2809–2819.10.1002/prot.v78:13
   Google Scholar
• Murata K, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Free energy calculations for DNA base stacking by replica-exchange umbrella sampling. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004;385:1–7.10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange extensions of simulated tempering method. J. Chem. Phys. 2004;121:2491–2504.10.1063/1.1766015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Damjanovic A, Brooks BR. Efficient and unbiased sampling of biomolecular systems in the canonical ensemble: a review of self-guided Langevin dynamics. Adv. Chem. Phys. 2012;150:255–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Brooks BR. Force-momentum-based self-guided Langevin dynamics: a rapid sampling method that approaches the canonical ensemble. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;135:204101.10.1063/1.3662489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng YB, wang W, Chen P. Adsorption of an ionic complementary peptide on the hydrophobic graphite surface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:454–459.10.1021/jp908629g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Subramaniam S, Case DA, Wu KW, Brooks BR. Targeted conformational search with map-restrained self-guided Langevin dynamics: application to flexible fitting into electron microscopic density maps. J. Struct. Biol. 2013;183:429–440.10.1016/j.jsb.2013.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran V, Lee CJ, Lin P, Duke RE, Pedersen LG. A computational modeling and molecular dynamics study of the Michaelis complex of human protein Z-dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI) and factor Xa (FXa). J. Mol. Model. 2009;15:897–911.10.1007/s00894-008-0444-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CY, Nikolovska-Coleska Z, Li P, Roller P, Wang SM. Solution conformations of wild-type and mutated Bak BH3 peptides via dynamical conformational sampling and implication to their binding to antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108:1467–1477.10.1021/jp036009f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady J, Wu XW, Wang SM. Competitive and reversible binding of a guest molecule to its host in aqueous solution through molecular dynamics simulation: benzyl alcohol/β-cyclodextrin system. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:4863–4872.10.1021/jp0131469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary D, Clancy P. Application of accelerated molecular dynamics schemes to the production of amorphous silicon. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122:154509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelberg D, de Oliveira CAF ,McCammon JA. Sampling of slow diffusive conformational transitions with accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;127:155102.10.1063/1.2789432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwick PRL, McCammon JA. Studying functional dynamics in bio-molecules using accelerated molecular dynamics. PCCP. 2011;13:20053–20065.10.1039/c1cp22100k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinko W, de Oliveira CAF ,Pierce LCT, McCammon JA. Protecting high energy barriers: a new equation to regulate boost energy in accelerated molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:17–23.10.1021/ct200615k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwick PRL, Pierce LCT, Goodin DB, McCammon JA. Adaptive accelerated molecular dynamics (Ad-AMD) revealing the molecular plasticity of P450cam. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:158–164.10.1021/jz101462n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi U, Hamelberg D. Improved statistical sampling and accuracy with accelerated molecular dynamics on rotatable torsions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:4004–4012.10.1021/ct3004194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wereszczynski J, McCammon JA. Using selectively applied accelerated molecular dynamics to enhance free energy calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010;6:3285–3292.10.1021/ct100322t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira CAF, Hamelberg D, McCammon JA. Coupling accelerated molecular dynamics methods with thermodynamic integration simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008;4:1516–1525.10.1021/ct800160q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajer M, Hamelberg D, McCammon JA. Replica-exchange accelerated molecular dynamics (REXAMD) applied to thermodynamic integration. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008;4:1565–1569.10.1021/ct800250m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajer M, Swift RV, McCammon JA. Using multistate free energy techniques to improve the efficiency of replica exchange accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:1719–1725.10.1002/jcc.v30:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrar M, de Oliveira CAF, Fajer M, Sinko W, McCammon JA. w-REXAMD: a Hamiltonian replica exchange approach to improve free energy calculations for systems with kinetically trapped conformations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013;9:18–23.10.1021/ct300896h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SL, de Oliveira CAF, McCammon JA. Coupling constant pH molecular dynamics with accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010;6:560–568.10.1021/ct9005294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher D, Pierce LCT, McCammon JA, Markwick PRL. On the use of accelerated molecular dynamics to enhance configurational sampling in Ab Initio simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:890–897.10.1021/ct100605v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce LCT, Markwick PRL, McCammon JA, Doltsinis NL. Accelerating chemical reactions: exploring reactive free-energy surfaces using accelerated ab initio molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;134:174107.10.1063/1.3581093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelberg D, Shen T, McCammon JA. Phosphorylation effects on cis/trans isomerization and the backbone conformation of serine−proline motifs: accelerated molecular dynamics analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:1969–1974.10.1021/ja0446707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira CAF, Hamelberg D, McCammon JA. Estimating kinetic rates from accelerated molecular dynamics simulations: alanine dipeptide in explicit solvent as a case study. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;127:175105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Markwick PRL, de Oliveira CAF, McCammon JA. Enhanced lipid diffusion and mixing in accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:3199–3207.10.1021/ct200430c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron R, Wong SE, de Oliveira CAF, McCammon JA. E9-Im9 colicin DNase-immunity protein biomolecular association in water: a multiple-copy and accelerated molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:16802–16814.10.1021/jp8061543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant BJ, Gorfe AA, McCammon JA. Ras conformational switching: simulating nucleotide-dependent conformational transitions with accelerated molecular dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009;5:e1000325.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher D, Grant BJ, Markwick PR, McCammon JA. Accessing a hidden conformation of the maltose binding protein using accelerated molecular dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002034.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira CAF, Grant BJ, Zhou M, McCammon JA Large-scale conformational changes of trypanosoma cruzi proline racemase predicted by accelerated molecular dynamics simulation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002178.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi U, Hamelberg D. Achieving rigorous accelerated conformational sampling in explicit solvent. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5:1217–1224.10.1021/jz500179a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Feixas F, Eun C, McCammon JA. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding. J. Comput. Chem. 2015;36:1536–1549.10.1002/jcc.v36.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel K, Miao Y, McCammon JA. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of ligand binding to a muscarinic G-protein coupled receptor. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2015;48:479–487. doi:10.1017/S0033583515000153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce LCT, Salomon-Ferrer R, de Oliveira CAF, McCammon JA, Walker RC. Routine access to millisecond time scale events with accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:2997–3002.10.1021/ct300284c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Nichols SE, Gasper PM, Metzger VT, McCammon JA. Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:10982–10987.10.1073/pnas.1309755110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Nichols SE, McCammon JA. Free energy landscape of G-protein coupled receptors, explored by accelerated molecular dynamics. PCCP. 2014;16:6398–6406.10.1039/c3cp53962h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Caliman AD, McCammon JA. Allosteric effects of sodium ion binding on activation of the M3 muscarinic G-protein coupled receptor. Biophys. J. 2015;108:1796–1806.10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen TY, Hamelberg D. A statistical analysis of the precision of reweighting-based simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2008:034103.10.1063/1.2944250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinko W, Miao Y, de Oliveira CAF, McCammon JA. Population based reweighting of scaled molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2013;117:12759–12768.10.1021/jp401587e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Sinko W, Pierce L, Bucher D, McCammon JA. Improved reweighting of accelerated molecular dynamics simulations for free energy calculation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014;10:2677–2689.10.1021/ct500090q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussi G, Gervasio FL, Laio A, Parrinello M. Free-energy landscape for β hairpin folding from combined parallel tempering and metadynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:13435–13441.10.1021/ja062463w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzynski C. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;78:2690–2693.10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore J, Ritort F, Bustamante C. Bias and error in estimates of equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2003;100:12564–12569.10.1073/pnas.1635159100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar