Self-diffusion coefficient of bulk and confined water: a critical review of classical molecular simulation studies

References

• Bellissent-Funel MC, Hassanali A, Havenith M, et al. Water determines the structure and dynamics of proteins. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7673–7697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agmon N, Bakker HJ, Campen RK, et al. Protons and hydroxide ions in aqueous systems. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7642–7672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björneholm O, Hansen MH, Hodgson A, et al. Water at interfaces. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7698–7726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega C, Abascal JLF. Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:19663–19688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega C. Water: one molecule, two surfaces, one mistake. Mol Phys. 2015;113:1145–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo P, Amann-Winkel K, Angell CA, et al. Water: a tale of two liquids. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7463–7500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2018 May 21]. Available from: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/anmlies.html.
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel D, Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys. 1995;117:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model. 2001;7:306–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debenedetti PG, Stillinger Frank H. Supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Nature. 2001;410:259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley HE, Kumar P, Franzese G, et al. Liquid polyamorphism: possible relation to the anomalous behaviour of water. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2008;161:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley HE, Kumar P, Han S, et al. Heterogeneities in confined water and protein hydration water. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:504105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley HE, Buldyrev SV, Franzese G, et al. Liquid polymorphism: water in nanoconfined and biological environments. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010;22:284101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels-Rausch T, Bergeron V, Cartwright JHE, et al. Ice structures, patterns, and processes: a view across the icefields. Rev Mod Phys. 2012;84:885–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallqvist A, Mountain RD. Molecular models of water: derivation and description. Rev Comput Chem. 2007;13:183–247.
   Google Scholar
• Striolo A, Michaelides A, Joly L. The carbon-water interface: modeling challenges and opportunities for the water-energy nexus. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2016;7:533–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillan MJ, Alfè D, Michaelides A. Perspective: how good is DFT for water? J Chem Phys. 2016;144:130901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros GA, Wikfeldt KT, Ojamäe L, et al. Modeling molecular interactions in water: from pairwise to many-body potential energy functions. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7501–7528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceriotti M, Fang W, Kusalik PG, et al. Nuclear quantum effects in water and aqueous systems: experiment, theory, and current challenges. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7529–7550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson T, Harada Y, Kosugi N, et al. X-ray and electron spectroscopy of water. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7551–7569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann-Winkel K, Bellissent-Funel M-C, Bove LE, et al. X-ray and neutron scattering of water. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7570–7589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perakis F, De Marco L, Shalit A, et al. Vibrational spectroscopy and dynamics of water. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7590–7607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerveny S, Mallamace F, Swenson J, et al. Confined water as model of supercooled water. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7608–7625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Macedo EA. Accurate correlations for the self-diffusion coefficients of CO2, CH4, C2H4, H2O, and D2O over wide ranges of temperature and pressure. J Supercrit Fluids. 1995;8:310–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna R, Van Baten JM. The darken relation for multicomponent diffusion in liquid mixtures of linear alkanes: an investigation using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:6939–6947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Stillinger FH. Molecular dynamics study of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1971;55:3336–3359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillinger FH, Rahman A. Improved simulation of liquid water by molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 1974;60:1545–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Stillinger FH, Lemberg HL. Study of a central force model for liquid water by molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 1975;63:5223–5230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillinger FH, Rahman A. Revised central force potentials for water. J Chem Phys. 1978;68:666–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impey RW, Madden PA, McDonald IR. Spectroscopic and transport properties of water. Mol Phys. 1982;46:513–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancsǒ G, Bopp P, Heinzinger K. Molecular dynamics study of high-density liquid water using a modified central-force potential. Chem Phys. 1984;85:377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario M, Tani A. A molecular dynamics study of the TIP4P model of water. Chem Phys Lett. 1985;121:182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie G, Clementi E. Molecular-dynamics simulation of liquid water with an ab initio flexible water-water interaction potential. Phys Rev A. 1986;33:2679–2693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann M. Dielectric relaxation in water. Computer simulations with the TIP4P potential. J Chem Phys. 1986;85:1567–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik M, Clementi E. Single molecule dynamics of three body water. J Chem Phys. 1986;85:3544–3549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson J, Ullo J, Yip S. Molecular dynamics simulation of dielectric properties of water. J Chem Phys. 1987;87:1726–1732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem. 1987;91:6269–6271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy MR, Berkowitz M. Structure and dynamics of high-pressure TIP4P water. J Chem Phys. 1987;87:6682–6686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teleman O, Jönsson B, Engström S. A molecular dynamics simulation of a water model with intramolecular degrees of freedom. Mol Phys. 1987;60:193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlström P, Wallqvist A, Engström S, et al. A molecular dynamics study of polarizable water. Mol Phys. 1989;68:563–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K, Klein ML. Effective pair potentials and the properties of water. Chem Phys. 1989;131:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell J, Kollman PA, Dang LX. Implementation of nonadditive intermolecular potentials by use of molecular dynamics: development of a water-water potential and water-ion cluster interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:9144–9147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallqvist A, Ahlstrom P, Karlstroms G. A new intermolecular energy calculation scheme: applications to potentlal surface and liquid properties of water. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:1649–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff I, Diestler DJ. Isothermal-isobaric molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1990;93:2032–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprik M, Klein ML, Watanabe K. Solvent polarization and hydration of the chlorine anion. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:6483–6488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straatsma TP, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations with interaction potentials including polarization development of a noniterative method and application to water. Mol Simul. 1990;5:181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrat JL, McDonald IR. The role of molecular flexibility in simulations of water. Mol Phys. 1990;70:535–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodholt J, Wood B. Molecular dynamics of water at high temperatures and pressures. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1990;54:2611–2616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattini R, Ricci MA, Ruocco G, et al. Temperature evolution of single particle correlation functions of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1990;92:2540–2547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprik M. Hydrogen bonding and the static dielectric constant in liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1991;95:6762–6769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Singh S, Robinson GW, et al. A new flexible/polarizable water model. J Chem Phys. 1991;95:2791–2799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu SB, Yao S, Zhu JB, et al. A flexible/polarizable simple point charge water model. J Phys Chem. 1991;95:6211–6217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallqvist A, Teleman O. Properties of flexible water models. Mol Phys. 1991;74:515–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DE, Haymet ADJ. Structure and dynamics of water and aqueous solutions: the role of flexibility. J Chem Phys. 1992;96:8450–8459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle D, Froeyen M, Lippens G, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of polarizable water by an extended lagrangian method. Mol Phys. 1992;77:239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciortino F, Geiger A, Stanley HE. Network defects and molecular mobility in liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1992;96:3857–3865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guissani Y, Guillot B. A computer simulation study of the liquid–vapor coexistence curve of water. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:8221–8235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick SW, Stuart SJ, Berne BJ. Dynamical fluctuating charge force fields: application to liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:6141–6156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DE, Dang LX. Computer simulations of NaCl association in polarizable water. J Chem Phys. 1994;100:3757–3766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svishchev IM, Kusalik P. Dynamics in liquid H2O, D2O, and T2O: a comparative simulation study. J Phys Chem. 1994;98:728–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padro JA, Marti J, Guardia E. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water at 523K. J Phys Condens Matt. 1994;6:2283–2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Báez LA, Clancy P. Existence of a density maximum in extended simple point charge water. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:9837–9840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åstrand PO, Linse P, Karlström G. Molecular dynamics study of water adopting a potential function with explicit atomic dipole moments and anisotropic polarizabilities. Chem Phys. 1995;191:195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soetens JC, Millot C. Effect of distributing multipoles and polarizabilities on molecular dynamics simulations of water. Chem Phys Lett. 1995;235:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Z, Møller N, Weare JH. Molecular dynamics simulation of water properties using RWK2 potential: from clusters to bulk water. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1995;59:3273–3283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain RD. Comparison of a fixed-charge and a polarizable water model. J Chem Phys. 1995;103:3084–3090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodholt J, Sampoli M, Vallauri R. Parameterizing a polarizable intermolecular potential for water. Mol Phys. 1995;86:149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svishchev IM, Kusalik PG, Wang J, et al. Polarizable point-charge model for water: results under normal and extreme conditions. J Chem Phys. 1996;105:4742–4750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo P, Sciortino F, Tartaglia P, et al. Slow dynamics of water molecules in supercooled states. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;76:2730–2733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciortino F, Gallo P, Tartaglia P, et al. Supercooled water and the kinetic glass transition. Phys Rev E. 1996;54:6331–6343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Dang LX, Garrett BC. Molecular dynamics simulations of the liquid/vapor interface of SPC/E water. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:11720–11725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagchi K, Balasubramanian S, Klein ML. The effects of pressure on structural and dynamical properties of associated liquids: molecular dynamics calculations for the extended simple point charge model of water. J Chem Phys. 1997;107:8561–8567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang LX, Chang TM. Molecular dynamics study of water clusters, liquid, and liquid-vapor interface of water with many-body potentials. J Chem Phys. 1997;106:8149–8159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, et al. Calibration and testing of a water model for simulation of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:5051–5061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobaugh J, Voth GA. A quantum model for water: equilibrium and dynamical properties. J Chem Phys. 1997;106:2400–2410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw N, Parker S. Molecular-dynamics simulation of MgO surfaces in liquid water using a shell-model potential for water. Phys Rev B. 1998;58:13901–13908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr FW, Sciortino F, Stanley HE. Dynamics of simulated water under pressure. Phys Rev B. 1999;60:6757–6768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svishchev IM, Zassetsky AY. Self-diffusion process in water: spatial picture of single-particle density fluctuations. J Chem Phys. 2000;113:7432–7436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nymand TM, Linse P. Molecular dynamics simulations of polarizable water at different boundary conditions. J Chem Phys. 2000;112:6386–6395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo G-J, Zhang Y-G. Equilibrium molecular dynamics calculation of the bulk viscosity of liquid water. Mol Phys. 2001;99:283–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney MW, Jorgensen WL. Diffusion constant of the TIP5P model of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2001;114:363–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern HA, Rittner F, Berne BJ, et al. Combined fluctuating charge and polarizable dipole models: application to a five-site water potential function. J Chem Phys. 2001;115:2237–2251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Maaren PJ, van der Spoel D. Molecular dynamics simulations of water with novel shell-model potentials. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:2618–2626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefohn AE, Ovchinnikov M, Voth GA. A multistate empirical valence bond approach to a polarizable and flexible water model. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:6628–6637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillot B, Guissani Y. How to build a better pair potential for water. J Chem Phys. 2001;114:6720–6733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington J, Debenedetti P. Relationship between structural order and the anomalies of liquid water. Nature. 2001;409:318–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham CJ, Xantheas SS. Development of transferable interaction models for water. III. reparametrization of an all-atom polarizable rigid model (TTM2–R) from first principles. J Chem Phys. 2002;116:1500–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo G-J, Zhang Y-G, Refson K, et al. Viscosity and stress autocorrelation function in supercooled water: a molecular dynamics study. Mol Phys. 2002;100:2617–2627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English NJ, MacElroy JMD. Atomistic simulations of liquid water using Lekner electrostatics. Mol Phys. 2002;100:3753–3769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto-Draghi C, Bonet Avalos J, Rousseau B. Dynamic and structural behavior of different rigid nonpolarizable models of water. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:7954–7964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi T, Chong S-H, Hirata F. Theoretical study of the molecular motion of liquid water under high pressure. J Chem Phys. 2003;119:1021–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan ML, Fischer JT, Chandra A, et al. A temperature of maximum density in soft sticky dipole water. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;376:646–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Hansson T, van Gunsteren WF. Development of a simple, self-consistent polarizable model for liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon J, Lefohn AE, Voth GA. An improved polarflex water model. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:7504–7518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English NJ, MacElroy JMD. Hydrogen bonding and molecular mobility in liquid water in external electromagnetic fields. J Chem Phys. 2003;119:11806–11813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren P, Ponder JW. Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:5933–5947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spångberg D, Hermansson K. Effective three-body potentials for Li+ (aq) and Mg2+ (aq). J Chem Phys. 2003;119:7263–7281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amira S, Spångberg D, Hermansson K. Derivation and evaluation of a flexible SPC model for liquid water. Chem Phys. 2004;303:327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn HW, Swope WC, Pitera JW, et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:9665–9678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh IC, Hummer G. System-size dependence of diffusion coefficients and viscosities from molecular dynamics simulations with periodic boundary conditions. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:15873–15879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren P, Ponder JW. Temperature and pressure dependence of the AMOEBA water model. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:13427–13437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin H, Hernández-Cobos J, Ortega-Blake I. Water models based on a single potential energy surface and different molecular degrees of freedom. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:224509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abascal JLF, Vega C. A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:234505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Kumar P, Buldyrev SV, et al. Relation between the Widom line and the dynamic crossover in systems with a liquid–liquid phase transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16558–16562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux G, Harder E, Vorobyov I, et al. A polarizable model of water for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Chem Phys Lett. 2006;418:245–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Tepper HL, Voth GA. Flexible simple point-charge water model with improved liquid-state properties. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:024503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paesani F, Zhang W, Case DA, et al. An accurate and simple quantum model for liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2006;125:184507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanourgakis GS, Xantheas SS. The flexible, polarizable, Thole-type interaction potential for water (TTM2-F) revisited. J Phys Chem A. 2006;110:4100–4106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchev AG, Galkin NG, Illarionov AA, et al. Water properties from first principles: simulations by a general-purpose quantum mechanical polarizable force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8613–8617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal J, Errington JR, Truskett TM. Quantitative link between single-particle dynamics and static structure of supercooled liquids. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:18147–18150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Matubayasi N, Nakahara M. Self-diffusion of supercritical water in extremely low-density region. J Chem Phys. 2006;125:074307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann DWM, Kuleshova L, D’Aguanno B. A new reactive potential for the molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water. Chem Phys Lett. 2007;448:138–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defusco A, Schofield DP, Jordan KD. Comparison of models with distributed polarizable sites for describing water clusters. Mol Phys. 2007;105:2681–2696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Matubayasi N, Nakahara M. Solvation shell dynamics studied by molecular dynamics simulation in relation to the translational and rotational dynamics of supercritical water and benzene. J Chem Phys. 2007;127:174509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Buldyrev SV, Becker SR, et al. Relation between the Widom line and the breakdown of the Stokes-Einstein relation in supercooled water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9575–9579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolafa J. A polarizable three-site water model with intramolecular polarizability. Collect Czechoslov Chem Commun. 2008;73:507–517.
   Google Scholar
• Mankoo PK, Keyes T. POLIR: polarizable, flexible, transferable water potential optimized for IR spectroscopy. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:034504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem SY, Popelier PLA. Properties and 3D structure of liquid water: a perspective from a high-rank multipolar electrostatic potential. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4:353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Skinner JL. Water simulation model with explicit three-molecule interactions. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:8311–8318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin-Ojo O, Song Y, Wang F. Developing ab initio quality force fields from condensed phase quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations through the adaptive force matching method. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:064108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega C, Abascal JLF, Conde MM, et al. What ice can teach us about water interactions: a critical comparison of the performance of different water models. Faraday Discuss. 2009;141:251–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh TR, Liang T. A multipole-based water potential with implicit polarization for biomolecular simulations. J Comput Chem. 2009;30:893–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer BA, Warren GL, Patel S. Incorporating phase-dependent polarizability in nonadditive electrostatic models for molecular dynamics simulations of the aqueous liquid vapor interface. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5:359–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer BA, Patel S. Properties of water along the liquid-vapor coexistence curve via molecular dynamics simulations using the polarizable TIP4P-QDP-LJ water model. J Chem Phys. 2009;131:084709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Miller WH, Paesani F, et al. Quantum dynamical effects in liquid water: a semiclassical study on the diffusion and the infrared absorption spectrum. J Chem Phys. 2009;131:164509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz A-PE, van Gunsteren WF. Development of a nonlinear classical polarization model for liquid water and aqueous solutions: COS/D. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:11570–11579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin-Ojo O, Wang F. Improving the point-charge description of hydrogen bonds by adaptive force matching. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:1237–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinero V, Moore EB. Water modeled as an intermediate element between carbon and silicon. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:4008–4016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi HL, Aragones JL, Vega C, et al. Anomalies in water as obtained from computer simulations of the TIP4P/2005 model: density maxima, and density, isothermal compressibility and heat capacity minima. Mol Phys. 2009;107:365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te JA, Ichiye T. Temperature and pressure dependence of the optimized soft-sticky dipole-quadrupole-octupole water model. J Chem Phys. 2010;132:114511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaik MS, Liem SY, Popelier PLA. Properties of liquid water from a systematic refinement of a high-rank multipolar electrostatic potential. J Chem Phys. 2010;132:174504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu S, Scott HL, Jakobsson E. A coarse-grained model based on morse potential for water and n -alkanes. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:851–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamertzanis PG, Raiteri P, Galindo A. The use of anisotropic potentials in modeling water and free energies of hydration. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:1590–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darre L, Machado MR, Dans PD, et al. Another coarse grain model for aqueous solvation: WAT FOUR? J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:3793–3807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmans M, Sanders BP, Marrink SJ, et al. Effects of bundling on the properties of the SPC water model. Theor Chem Acc. 2010;125:335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra R, Truskett TM, Errington JR. On the use of excess entropy scaling to describe single-molecule and collective dynamic properties of hydrocarbon isomer fluids. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:16487–16493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara-Carrion G, Vrabec J, Hasse H. Prediction of self-diffusion coefficient and shear viscosity of water and its binary mixtures with methanol and ethanol by molecular simulation. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:074508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainter CJ, Pieniazek PA, Lin YS, et al. Robust three-body water simulation model. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:184501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González MA, Abascal JLF. A flexible model for water based on TIP4P/2005. J Chem Phys. 2011;135:224516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa T, Tanimura Y. A polarizable water model for intramolecular and intermolecular vibrational spectroscopies. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:5545–5553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alejandre J, Chapela GA, Saint-Martin H, et al. A non-polarizable model of water that yields the dielectric constant and the density anomalies of the liquid: TIP4Q. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:19728–19740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viererblová L, Kolafa J. A classical polarizable model for simulations of water and ice. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:19925–19935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi M, Essex JW. The ELBA force field for coarse-grain modeling of lipid membranes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Hou T. Application of molecular dynamics simulations in molecular property prediction II: diffusion coefficient. J Comput Chem. 2011;32:3505–3519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist J, Schober H, Halle B. Structural dynamics of supercooled water from quasielastic neutron scattering and molecular simulations. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:144508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe G, Sadus RJ. Molecular dynamics simulation of the effect of bond flexibility on the transport properties of water. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:104512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontyev I V, Stuchebrukhov AA. Polarizable mean-field model of water for biological simulations with AMBER and CHARMM force fields. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012;8:3207–3216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darré L, Tek A, Baaden M, et al. Mixing atomistic and coarse grain solvation models for MD simulations: let WT4 handle the bulk. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012;8:3880–3894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin V, Medders GR, Paesani F. Toward a universal water model: first principles simulations from the dimer to the liquid phase. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:3765–3769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazi S, Boan A, Salanne M, et al. Diffusion coefficient and shear viscosity of rigid water models. J Phys Condens Matter. 2012;24:284117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo P, Rovere M. Mode coupling and fragile to strong transition in supercooled TIP4P water. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:164503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozmanov D, Kusalik PG. Transport coefficients of the TIP4P-2005 water model. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:044507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlenko D V. Computing the self-diffusion coefficient for TIP4P water. Biophysics (Oxf). 2012;57:127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH. Temperature dependence on structure and self-diffusion of water: a molecular dynamics simulation study using SPC/E model. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2013;34:3800–3804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li AH, Wang Y, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of liquid water structure and diffusivity. Chinese J Phys. 2013;51:1218–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin-Ojo O, Szalewicz K. How well can polarization models of pairwise nonadditive forces describe liquid water? J Chem Phys. 2013;138:024316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Lopes PEM, Roux B, et al. Six-site polarizable model of water based on the classical drude oscillator. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:034508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss PT, Baranyai A. A systematic development of a polarizable potential of water. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:204507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsetti F, Artacho E, Soler JM, et al. Room temperature compressibility and diffusivity of liquid water from first principles. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:194502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Mazack MJM, Zhang P, et al. Quantum mechanical force field for water with explicit electronic polarization. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:054503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CM, Best RB. Matching of additive and polarizable force fields for multiscale condensed phase simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:2826–2837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan A, Junghans C, Matysiak S. Multiscale simulation of liquid water using a four-to-one mapping for coarse-graining. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:5168–5175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukan MR, Asmadi A, Abdallah W. Bulk properties of SWM4-NDP water model at elevated temperature and pressure. J Mol Liq. 2013;180:65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröster P, Lorenzen K, Schwörer M, et al. Polarizable water models from mixed computational and empirical optimization. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:9486–9500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L-P, Head-Gordon T, Ponder JW, et al. Systematic improvement of a classical molecular model of water. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:9956–9972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arismendi-Arrieta D, Medina JS, Fanourgakis GS, et al. Simulating liquid water for determining its structural and transport properties. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;83:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun D, Boresch S, Steinhauser O. Transport and dielectric properties of water and the influence of coarse-graining: transport and dielectric properties of water and the influence of coarse-graining: comparing BMW, SPC/E, and TIP3P models. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:064107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann SJ, Van Gunsteren WF. An improved simple polarisable water model for use in biomolecular simulation. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:22D515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Azcatl R, Alejandre J. Non-polarizable force field of water based on the dielectric constant: TIP4P/ε. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:1263–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröster P, Lorenzen K, Tavan P. Polarizable six-point water models from computational and empirical optimization. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:1589–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moultos OA, Tsimpanogiannis IN, Panagiotopoulos AZ, et al. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of CO2 diffusivity in H2O for a wide range of temperatures and pressures. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:5532–5541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadi S, Anandakrishnan R, Onufriev A V. Building water models: a different approach. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5:3863–3871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spura T, John C, Habershon S, et al. Nuclear quantum effects in liquid water from path-integral simulations using an ab initio force-matching approach. Mol Phys. 2015;113:808–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi M. Comparative assessment of the ELBA coarse-grained model for water. Mol Phys. 2014;112:1566–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann SJ, Van Gunsteren WF. On the compatibility of polarisable and non-polarisable models for liquid water. Mol Phys. 2014;112:2761–2780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medders GR, Babin V, Paesani F. Development of a “first-principles” water potential with flexible monomers. III. Liquid phase properties. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10:2906–2910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss PT, Baranyai A. Anomalous properties of water predicted by the BK3 model. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:154505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa JR, Sanz E, Valeriani C, et al. Homogeneous ice nucleation evaluated for several water models. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:18C529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvab I, Sadus RJ. Thermodynamic properties and diffusion of water + methane binary mixtures. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:104505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo P, Corradini D, Rovere M. Widom line and dynamical crossovers as routes to understand supercritical water. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainter CJ, Shi L, Skinner JL. Reparametrized E3B (explicit three-body) water model using the TIP4P/2005 model as a reference. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:2268–2277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobanova O, Avendaño C, Lafitte T, et al. SAFT-γ force field for the simulation of molecular fluids: 4. A single-site coarse-grained model of water applicable over a wide temperature range. Mol Phys. 2015;113:1228–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DK, Yoon B-W, Lee SH. Transport properties of super-cooled water: a molecular dynamics simulation study using SPC/E model. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2015;36:492–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Azcatl R, Mendoza N, Alejandre J. Improved SPC force field of water based on the dielectric constant: SPC/ε. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl. 2015;420:116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvab I, Sadus RJ. Thermophysical properties of supercritical water and bond flexibility. Phys Rev E. 2015;92:012124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini D, Rovere M, Gallo P. The Widom line and dynamical crossover in supercritical water: popular water models versus experiments. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:114502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran KN, Tan M, Ichiye T. A single-site multipole model for liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:034501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Moultos OA, Economou IG, et al. Hydrogen-bonding polarizable intermolecular potential model for water. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:12358–12370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding W, Palaiokostas M, Orsi M. Stress testing the ELBA water model. Mol Simul. 2016;42:337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köster A, Spura T, Rutkai G, et al. Assessing the accuracy of improved force-matched water models derived from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2016;37:1828–1838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhabal D, Chakravarty C, Molinero V, et al. Comparison of liquid-state anomalies in stillinger-weber models of water, silicon, and germanium. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:214502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaud E, Merabia S, de Ligny D, et al. Decoupling of viscosity and relaxation processes in supercooled water: a molecular dynamics study with the TIP4P/2005f model. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:2124–2130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbaspour M, Akbarzadeh H, Salemi S, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water and ice nanoclusters using a new effective HFD-like model. J Comput Chem. 2018;39:269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrieli A, Sant M, Izadi S, et al. High-temperature dynamic behavior in bulk liquid water: a molecular dynamics simulation study using the OPC and TIP4P-Ew potentials. Front Phys. 2018;13:138203–138215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handle PH, Sciortino F. The Adam – Gibbs relation and the TIP4P/2005 model of water. Mol Phys. 2018; In press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striolo A. The mechanism of water diffusion in narrow carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2006;6:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striolo A. Water self-diffusion through narrow oxygenated carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology. 2007;18:475704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie GX, Wang Y, Huang JP. Shape effect of nanochannels on water mobility. Front Phys. 2016;11:114702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Ye H, Zhang Z, et al. Water diffusion inside carbon nanotubes: mutual effects of surface and confinement. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:964–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiavazzo E, Fasano M, Asinari P, et al. Scaling behaviour for the water transport in nanoconfined geometries. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Gordillo MC. Microscopic dynamics of confined supercritical water. Chem Phys Lett. 2002;354:227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barati Farimani A, Aluru NR. Spatial diffusion of water in carbon nanotubes: from fickian to ballistic motion. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:12145–12149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang Q. Transport behavior of water confined in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:085420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirunsit P, Balbuena PB. Effects of confinement on water structure and dynamics: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:1709–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanghi T, Aluru NR. A combined quasi-continuum/Langevin equation approach to study the self-diffusion dynamics of confined fluids. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:124109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffari F. A molecular dynamics simulation study of the effect of water–graphene interaction on the properties of confined water. Mol Simul. 2016;42:1475–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscatello J, Jaeger F, Matar OK, et al. Optimizing water transport through graphene-based membranes: insights from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:12330–12336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendner C, Horinek D, Bocquet L, et al. Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion. Langmuir. 2009;25:10768–10781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TX, Bhatia SK. Some anomalies in the self-diffusion of water in disordered carbons. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:3667–3676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diallo SO, Vlcek L, Mamontov E, et al. Translational diffusion of water inside hydrophobic carbon micropores studied by neutron spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Rev E. 2015;91:022124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo MC, Martí J. High temperature behavior of water inside flat graphite nanochannels. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:085406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Sala J, Guàrdia E. Molecular dynamics simulations of water confined in graphene nanochannels: from ambient to supercritical environments. J Mol Liq. 2010;153:72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Sala J, Guàrdia E, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of supercritical water confined within a carbon-slit pore. Phys Rev E. 2009;79:031606.
   Google Scholar
• Tahat A, Martí J. Proton transfer in liquid water confined inside graphene slabs. Phys Rev E – Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2015;92:032402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Nagy G, Guàrdia E, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water confined inside graphite channels: dielectric and dynamical properties. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:23987–23994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosaddeghi H, Alavi S, Kowsari MH, et al. Simulations of structural and dynamic anisotropy in nano-confined water between parallel graphite plates. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:184703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spera MBM, Taketa TB, Beppu MM. Roughness dynamic in surface growth: layer-by-layer thin films of carboxymethyl cellulose/chitosan for biomedical applications. Biointerphases. 2017;12:04E401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MJ, Zhou J, Lu X, et al. Diffusion of water molecules confined in slits of rutile TiO2(110) and graphite(0001). Fluid Phase Equilib. 2011;302:316–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury N, Pettitt BM. Dynamics of water trapped between hydrophobic solutes. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:6422–6429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Choi JS, Lee MJ, et al. Between scylla and charybdis: hydrophobic graphene-guided water diffusion on hydrophilic substrates. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr E, Hartnig C, Gallo P, et al. Water in porous glasses. A computer simulation study. J Mol Liq. 1999;80:165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Cummings PT. Hydration structure of water confined between mica surfaces. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porion P, Michot LJ, Faugère AM, et al. Structural and dynamical properties of the water molecules confined in dense clay sediments: a study combining 2H NMR spectroscopy and multiscale numerical modeling. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:5441–5453.
   Google Scholar
• Ou X, Li J, Lin Z. Dynamic behavior of interfacial water on Mg(OH)2 (001) surface: a molecular dynamics simulation work. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:29887–29895.
   Google Scholar
• De Li T, Gao J, Szoszkiewicz R, et al. Structured and viscous water in subnanometer gaps. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:115415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerisit S, Liu C. Molecular simulations of water and ion diffusion in nanosized mineral fractures. Env Sci Technol. 2009;43:777–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutisya SM, Kirch A, De Almeida JM, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of water confined in calcite slit pores: an NMR spin relaxation and hydrogen bond analysis. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:6674–6684.
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Harder E, Berne BJ. On the calculation of diffusion coefficients in confined fluids and interfaces with an application to the liquid-vapor interface of water. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:6595–6602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash M, Lemaire T, Caruel M, et al. Anisotropic diffusion of water molecules in hydroxyapatite nanopores. Phys Chem Miner. 2017;44:509–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash M, Lemaire T, Di Tommaso D, et al. Transport properties of water molecules confined between hydroxyapaptite surfaces: a molecular dynamics simulation approach. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;418:296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham TT, Lemaire T, Capiez-Lernout E, et al. Properties of water confined in hydroxyapatite nanopores as derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Theor Chem Acc. 2015;134:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Předota M, Cummings PT, Wesolowski DJ. Electric double layer at the rutile (110) surface. 3. Inhomogeneous viscosity and diffusivity measurement by computer simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:3071–3079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solveyra EG, de la Llave E, Molinero V, et al. Structure, dynamics, and phase behavior of water in TiO2 nanopores. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:3330–3342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Lu L, Huang L, et al. Molecular behavior of water on titanium dioxide nanotubes: a molecular dynamics simulation study. J Chem Eng Data. 2016;61:4131–4138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chan K-Y, Quirke N. Molecular dynamics simulation of water confined in a nanopore of amorphous silica. Mol Simul. 2009;35:1215–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renou R, Szymczyk A, Ghoufi A. Influence of the pore length on the properties of water confined in a silica nanopore. Mol Phys. 2014;112:2275–2281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey AN, Stevens MJ. Site-dipole field and vortices in confined water. Phys Rev E. 2012;86:051601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa S, Sakuma H, Tsuchiya N. Self–diffusion of water molecules confined between quartz surfaces at elevated temperatures by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mineral Petrol Sci. 2016;111:297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Patsahan T, Holovko M. Computer simulation study of the diffusion of water molecules confined in silica gel. Condens Matter Phys. 2004;7:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Siboulet B, Molina J, Coasne B, et al. Water self-diffusion at the surface of silica glasses: effect of hydrophilic to hydrophobic transition. Mol Phys. 2013;111:3410–3417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karzar Jeddi M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S. Dynamics of water monolayers confined by chemically heterogeneous surfaces: observation of surface-induced anisotropic diffusion. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:9666–9675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerbret A, Lelong G, Mason PE, et al. Water confined in cylindrical pores: a molecular dynamics study. Food Biophys. 2011;6:233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qomi MJA, Bauchy M, Ulm FJ, et al. Anomalous composition-dependent dynamics of nanoconfined water in the interlayer of disordered calcium-silicates. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:054515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou D, Lu C, Zhao T, et al. Structural, dynamic and mechanical evolution of water confined in the nanopores of disordered calcium silicate sheets. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2015;19:1309–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou D, Li Z, Zhao T, et al. Water transport in the nano-pore of the calcium silicate phase: reactivity, structure and dynamics. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:1411–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou D, Li D, Zhao T, et al. Confined water dissociation in disordered silicate nanometer-channels at elevated temperatures: mechanism, dynamics and impact on substrates. Langmuir. 2016;32:4153–4168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Zhao W, Hou D, et al. Molecular dynamics study on the chemical bound, physical adsorbed and ultra-confined water molecules in the nano-pore of calcium silicate hydrate. Constr Build Mater. 2017;151:563–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boek ES. Molecular dynamics simulations of interlayer structure and mobility in hydrated Li-, Na- and K-montmorillonite clays. Mol Phys. 2014;112:1472–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boţan A, Rotenberg B, Marry V, et al. Hydrodynamics in clay nanopores. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:16109–16115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao Q, Xiang Y, Leng Y. Molecular simulations on the structure and dynamics of water-methane fluids between Na-montmorillonite clay surfaces at elevated temperature and pressure. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:14061–14069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Lu X, Boek ES. Confined water in tunnel nanopores of sepiolite: insights from molecular simulations. Am Mineral. 2016;101:713–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov KS, Bougeard D. A molecular dynamics study of structure and short-time dynamics of water in kaolinite. J Phys Chem B. 1999;103:5266–5273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michot LJ, Ferrage E, Jiménez-Ruiz M, et al. Anisotropic features of water and ion dynamics in synthetic Na- and Ca-smectites with tetrahedral layer charge. A combined quasi-elastic neutron-scattering and molecular dynamics simulations study. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:16619–16633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley HE, Kumar P, Franzese G, et al. Liquid polyamorphism: some unsolved puzzles of water in bulk, nanoconfined, and biological environments. AIP Conf Proc. 2008;982:251–271.
   Google Scholar
• Sega M, Vallauri R, Melchionna S. Diffusion of water in confined geometry: the case of a multilamellar bilayer. Phys Rev E. 2005;72:041201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell MT, Greeley DA, Kit KM, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of hydration effects on solvation, diffusivity, and permeability in Chitosan/Chitin films. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:8997–9010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua L, Huang X, Zhou R, et al. Dynamics of water confined in the interdomain region of a multidomain protein. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:3704–3711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrod Q, Hanot S, Guillermo A, et al. Water sub-diffusion in membranes for fuel cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavazzoni C, Giovambattista N, Netz PA, et al. Structure and mobility of water confined in AlPO 4 -54 nanotubes. J Chem Phys. 2017;146:234509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding M, Szymczyk A, Goujon F, et al. Structure and dynamics of water confined in a polyamide reverse-osmosis membrane: a molecular-simulation study. J Membrane Sci. 2014;458:236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won CY, Aluru NR. Structure and dynamics of water confined in a boron nitride nanotube. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:1812–1818.
   Google Scholar
• Di Napoli S, Gamba Z. Structural and dynamical properties of water confined between two hydrophilic surfaces. Phys B. 2009;404:2883–2886.
   Google Scholar
• Beckstein O, Sansom MSP. Liquid-vapor oscillations of water in hydrophobic nanopores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:7063–7068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brovchenko I, Geiger A, Oleinikova A, et al. Phase coexistence and dynamic properties of water in nanopores. Eur Phys J E. 2003;12:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui ST. Molecular self-diffusion in nanoscale cylindrical pores and classical Fick’s law predictions. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:4–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita K, Daiguji H. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of capillary evaporation of water confined in hydrophilic mesopores. Mol Phys. 2016;114:884–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler MH, Bordin JR, da Silva LB, et al. Breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein water transport through narrow hydrophobic nanotubes. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:12921–12927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Buldyrev SV, Starr FW, et al. Thermodynamics, structure, and dynamics of water confined between hydrophobic plates. Phys Rev E – Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2005;72:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Han S, Stanley HE. Anomalies of water and hydrogen bond dynamics in hydrophobic nanoconfinement. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:504108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai J, Zeng XC. Polymorphism and polyamorphism in bilayer water confined to slit nanopore under high pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:21240–21245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury N. Effect of surface hydrophobicity on the dynamics of water at the nanoscale confinement: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Chem Phys. 2013;421:68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer BA, Ou S, Patel S, et al. Dynamics and energetics of hydrophobically confined water. Phys Rev E. 2012;85:051506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S, Choi MY, Kumar P, et al. Phase transitions in confined water nanofilms. Nat Phys. 2010;6:685–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marañón Di Leo J, Marañón J. Confined water in nanotube. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM. 2003;623:159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han KN, Bernardi S, Wang L, et al. Water structure and transport in zeolites with pores in one or three dimensions from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:381–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirono K, Daiguji H. Dipole moments of water molecules confined in Na-LSX zeolites – molecular dynamics simulations including polarization of water. Chem Phys Lett. 2006;417:251–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju SP, Chang JG, Sen LJ, et al. The effects of confinement on the behavior of water molecules between parallel Au plates of (001) planes. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JMD, Chandross M, Stevens MJ, et al. Water in nanoconfinement between hydrophilic self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir. 2008;24:5209–5212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franco LFM, Castier M, Economou IG. Diffusion in homogeneous and in inhomogeneous media: a new unified approach. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016;12:5247–5255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco LFM, Castier M, Economou IG. Anisotropic parallel self-diffusion coefficients near the calcite surface: a molecular dynamics study. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:084702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal J, Truskett TM, Errington JR, et al. Layering and position-dependent diffusive dynamics of confined fluids. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:145901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hansen Y, Gekle S, Netz RR. Anomalous anisotropic diffusion dynamics of hydration water at lipid membranes. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;111:118103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmer J, Van Swol F, Truskett TM. Note: position-dependent and pair diffusivity profiles from steady-state solutions of color reaction-counterdiffusion problems. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:046101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonnin P, Noetinger B, Nieto-Draghi C, et al. Diffusion under confinement: hydrodynamic finite-size effects in simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13:2881–2889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills R. Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1–45°. J Phys Chem. 1973;77:685–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas J, DeFries T, Wilbur DJ. Molecular motions in compressed liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1976;65:582–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krynicki K, Green CD, Sawyer DW. Pressure and temperature dependence of self-diffusion in water. Faraday Discuss Chem Soc. 1978;66:199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb WJ, Hoffman GA, Jonas J. Self-diffusion in compressed supercritical water. J Chem Phys. 1981;74:6875–6880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prielmeier FX, Lang EW, Speedy RJ, et al. Diffusion in supercooled water to 300MPa. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;59:1128–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prielmeier FX, Lang EW, Speedy RJ, et al. The pressure dependence of self-diffusion in supercooled light and heavy water. Ber Bunsen-Ges Phys Chem. 1988;92:1111–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunsolo A, Orecchini A, Petrillo C, et al. Quasielastic neutron scattering investigation of the pressure dependence of molecular motions in liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:084503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Matubayasi N, Nakahara M. Self-diffusion coefficients for water and organic solvents at high temperatures along the coexistence curve. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:214501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz S, Strassle T, Bove LE. Quasi-elastic neutron scattering in the multi-GPa range and its application to liquid water. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103:193504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove LE, Klotz S, Strässle T, et al. Translational and rotational diffusion in water in the gigapascal range. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;111:185901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Iglesias O, Medina I, de los Ángeles Sanz M, et al. Self-diffusion in molecular fluids and noble gases: available data. J Chem Eng Data. 2015;60:2757–2817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engkvist O, Åstrand PO, Karlström G. Accurate intermolecular potentials obtained from molecular wave functions: bridging the gap between quantum chemistry and molecular simulations. Chem Rev. 2000;100:4087–4108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasonen K, Sprik M, Parrinello M, et al. “Ab initio” liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1993;99:9080–9089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprik M, Hutter J, Parrinello M. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water: comparison of three gradient-corrected density functionals. J Chem Phys. 1996;105:1142–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestrelli PL, Parrinello M. Structural, electronic, and bonding properties of liquid water from first principles. J Chem Phys. 1999;111:3572–3580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izvekov S, Voth GA. Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water: new results. J Chem Phys. 2002;116:10372–10376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izvekov S, Parrinello M, Burnham CJ, et al. Effective force fields for condensed phase systems from ab initio molecular dynamics simulation: a new method for force-matching. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:10896–10913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allesch M, Schwegler E, Gygi F, et al. A first principles simulation of rigid water. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:5192–5198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krallafa A, Adda A, Seddiki A, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of water in the low temperature region. AIP Conf Proc. 2012;1456:215–222.
   Google Scholar
• Jonchiere R, Seitsonen AP, Ferlat G, et al. Van der Waals effects in ab initio water at ambient and supercritical conditions. J Chem Phys. 2011;135:154503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xantheas SS. Interaction potentials for water from accurate cluster calculations. Struct Bond. 2005;116:119–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:6665–6670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthagiri D, Pratt LR, Kress JD. Free energy of liquid water on the basis of quasichemical theory and ab initio molecular dynamics. Phys Rev E. 2003;68:041505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman JC, Schwegler E, Draeger EW, et al. Towards an assessment of the accuracy of density functional theory for first principles simulations of water. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwegler E, Grossman JC, Gygi F, et al. Towards an assessment of the accuracy of density functional theory for first principles simulations of water. II. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:5400–5409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Femández-Serra MV, Artacho E. Network equilibration and first-principles liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:11136–11144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo IFW, Mundy CJ, McGrath MJ, et al. Liquid water from first principles: investigation of different sampling approaches. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:12990–12998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeVondele J, Mohamed F, Krack M, et al. The influence of temperature and density functional models in ab initio molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:014515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sit PH-L, Marzari N. Static and dynamical properties of heavy water at ambient conditions from first-principles molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:204510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Serra MV, Ferlat G, Artacho E. Two exchange-correlation functionals compared for first-principles liquid water. Mol Simul. 2005;31:361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorova T, Seitsonen AP, Hutter J, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water: hybrid density functionals. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:3685–3691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H-S, Tuckerman ME. Structure of liquid water at ambient temperature from ab initio molecular dynamics performed in the complete basis set limit. J Chem Phys. 2006;125:154507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H-S, Tuckerman ME. Dynamical properties of liquid water from ab initio molecular dynamics performed in the complete basis set limit. J Chem Phys. 2007;126:164501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidon M, Schiffmann F, Hutter J, et al. Ab initio molecular dynamics using hybrid density functionals. J Chem Phys. 2008;128:214104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo S, Zeng XC, Xantheas SS. On the phase diagram of water with density functional theory potentials: the melting temperature of ice Ih with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof and Becke–Lee–Yang–Parr functionals. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:221102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhne TD, Krack M, Parrinello M. Static and dynamical properties of liquid water from first principles by a novel car-parrinello-like approach. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5:235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Zhang Y, Tuckerman ME. Ab initio molecular dynamics study of water at constant pressure using converged basis sets and empirical dispersion corrections. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:044506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin IC, Seitsonen AP, Tavernelli I, et al. Structure and dynamics of liquid water from ab initio molecular dynamics—comparison of BLYP, PBE, and revPBE density functionals with and without van der waals corrections. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012;8:3902–3910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distasio RA, Santra B, Li Z, et al. The individual and collective effects of exact exchange and dispersion interactions on the ab initio structure of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:084502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankura A, Karmakar A, Carnevale V, et al. Structure, dynamics, and spectral diffusion of water from first-principles molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:29401–29411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Ben M, Hutter J, VandeVondele J. Probing the structural and dynamical properties of liquid water with models including non-local electron correlation. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:054506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio F, Miceli G, Pasquarello A. Structural, dynamical, and electronic properties of liquid water: a hybrid functional study. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:7456–7470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galib M, Duignan TT, Misteli Y, et al. Mass density fluctuations in quantum and classical descriptions of liquid water. J Chem Phys. 2017;146:244501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Ko H, Remsing RC, et al. Ab initio theory and modeling of water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:10846–10851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar A, Chandra A. Water under supercritical conditions: hydrogen bonds, polarity, and vibrational frequency fluctuations from Ab initio simulations with a dispersion corrected density functional. ACS Omega. 2018;3:3453–3462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson W, Gygi F. Equilibration and analysis of first-principles molecular dynamics simulations of water. J Chem Phys. 2018;148:124501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Chen M, Sun Z, et al. Structural, electronic, and dynamical properties of liquid water by ab initio molecular dynamics based on SCAN functional within the canonical ensemble. J Chem Phys. 2018;148:164505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar A, Chandra A. Dynamics of vibrational spectral diffusion in water: effects of dispersion interactions, temperature, density, system size and fictitious orbital mass. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano H, Zhang W, Raju M, et al. Benchmark of ReaxFF force field for subcritical and supercritical water. J Chem Phys. 2018;148:234503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, et al. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A. 2001;105:9396–9409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty JC, Aktulga HM, Grama AY, et al. A reactive molecular dynamics simulation of the silica-water interface. J Chem Phys. 2010;132:174704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal TA, Scharf D, Jung Y, et al. On the absolute thermodynamics of water from computer simulations: A comparison of first-principles molecular dynamics, reactive and empirical force fields. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:244507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimsza JM, Yeon J, van Duin ACT, et al. Water interactions with nanoporous silica: comparison of ReaxFF and ab initio based molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:24803–24816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, van Duin ACT. Second-generation ReaxFF water force field: improvements in the description of water density and OH-anion diffusion. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:6021–6032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teleman O, Wallqvist A. Ewald sumation retards translational motion in molecular dynamic simulations of water. Int J Quantum Chem. 1990;38:245–249.
   Google Scholar
• Teleman O. An efficient way to conserve the total energy in molecular dynamics simulations; boundary effects on energy conservation and dynamic properties. Mol Sim. 1988;1:345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dünweg B, Kremer K. Molecular dynamics simulation of a polymer chain in solution. J Chem Phys. 1993;99:6983–6997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moultos OA, Zhang Y, Tsimpanogiannis IN, et al. System-size corrections for self-diffusion coefficients calculated from molecular dynamics simulations: the case of CO2, n -alkanes, and poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ethers. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:074109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali SH, Wolff L, Becker TM, et al. Finite-size effects of binary mutual diffusion coefficients from molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018;14:2667–2677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, et al. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Pullman B, editor. Intermolecular forces. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1981. p. 331–342.
   Google Scholar
• Pranami G, Lamm MH. Estimating error in diffusion coefficients derived from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:4586–4592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Kuo J, Bae SC, et al. When Brownian diffusion is not Gaussian. Nat Mater. 2012;11:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casalegno M, Raos G, Appetecchi GB, et al. From nanoscale to microscale: crossover in the diffusion dynamics within two pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:5196–5202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux G, MacKerell AD, Roux B. A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators. J Chem Phys. 2003;119:5185–5197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habershon S, Markland TE, Manolopoulos DE. Competing quantum effects in the dynamics of a flexible water model. J Chem Phys. 2009;131:024501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Naim A, Stillinger FH. Aspects of the statistical-mechanical theory of water. In: RA Horne, editor. Structure and transport processes in water and aqueous solutions. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1972. p. 295–330.
   Google Scholar
• Stillinger FH, Rahman A. Molecular dynamics study of temperature effects on water structure and kinetics. J Chem Phys. 1972;57:1281–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka O, Clementi E, Yoshimine M. CI study of the water dimer potential surface. J Chem Phys. 1976;64:1351–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL. Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 10. transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. application to liquid water. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:335–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang LX, Pettitt BM. Simple intramolecular model potentials for water. J Phys Chem. 1987;91:3349–3354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney MW, Jorgensen WL. A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions. J Chem Phys. 2000;112:8910–8922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillot B. A reappraisal of what we have learnt during three decades of computer simulations on water. J Mol Liq. 2002;101:219–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieniazek PA, Tainter CJ, Skinner JL. Interpretation of the water surface vibrational sum-frequency spectrum. J Chem Phys. 2011;135:044701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Madura JD. Temperature and size dependence for monte carlo simulations of TIP4P water. Mol Phys. 1985;56:1381–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick SW. A reoptimization of the five-site water potential (TIP5P) for use with Ewald sums. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:6085–6093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes PEM, Roux B, MacKerell AD. Molecular modeling and dynamics studies with explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability: theory and applications. Theor Chem Acc. 2009;124:11–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer M, Breitenfeld B, Tröster P, et al. Coupling density functional theory to polarizable force fields for efficient and accurate Hamiltonian molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:244103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi R, Wang LP, Wang Q, et al. United polarizable multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:014504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Van Gunsteren WF. Charge-on-spring polarizable water models revisited: from water clusters to liquid water to ice. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:9549–9564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paricaud P, Předota M, Chialvo AA, et al. From dimer to condensed phases at extreme conditions: accurate predictions of the properties of water by a Gaussian charge polarizable model. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:244511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orozco GA, Moultos OA, Jiang H, et al. Molecular simulation of thermodynamic and transport properties for the H2O + NaCl system. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:234507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Mester Z, Moultos OA, et al. Thermodynamic and transport properties of H2O + NaCl from polarizable force fields. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:3802–3810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Hardy D, Phillips J, et al. High-performance scalable molecular dynamics simulations of a polarizable force field based on classical Drude oscillators in NAMD. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi IG, Brunne RM, Van Gunsteren WF. On the relative merits of flexible versus rigid models for use in computer simulations of molecular liquids. Chem Phys Lett. 1996;250:19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemberg HL, Stillinger FH. Central-force model for liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1975;62:1677–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bopp P, Jansco G, Heinzinger K. An improved potential for non-rigid water molecules in the liquid phase. Chem Phys Lett. 1983;98:129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers JR, Watts RO, Klein ML. Intermolecular potential functions and the properties of water. Chem Phys. 1982;64:95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Guàrdia E, Padró JA. Dielectric properties and infrared spectra of liquid water: influence of the dynamic cross correlations. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:10883–10891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Padro JA, Guàrdia E. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water along the coexistence curve: hydrogen bonds and vibrational spectra. J Chem Phys. 1996;105:639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toukan K, Rahman A. Molecular-dynamics study of atomic motions in water. Phys Rev B. 1985;31:2643–2648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess B, Saint-Martin H, Berendsen HJC. Flexible constraints: an adiabatic treatment of quantum degrees of freedom, with application to the flexible and polarizable mobile charge densities in harmonic oscillators model for water. J Chem Phys. 2002;116:9602–9610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin H, Hernández-Cobos J, Bernal-Uruchurtu MI, et al. A mobile charge densities in harmonic oscillators (MCDHO) molecular model for numerical simulations: the water–water interaction. J Chem Phys. 2000;113:10899–10912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niesar U, Corongiu G, Clementi E, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of liquid water using the NCC ab initio potential. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:7949–7956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin V, Leforestier C, Paesani F. Development of a “first principles” water potential with flexible monomers: dimer potential energy surface, VRT spectrum, and second virial coefficient. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:5395–5403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin V, Medders GR, Paesani F. Development of a “first principles” water potential with flexible monomers. II: trimer potential energy surface, third virial coefficient, and small clusters. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10:1599–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speedy RJ, Angell CA. Isothermal compressibility of supercooled water and evidence for a thermodynamic singularity at -45°C. J Chem Phys. 1976;65:851–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price WS, Ide H, Arata Y. Self-diffusion of supercooled water to 238K using PGSE NMR diffusion measurements. J Phys Chem A. 1999;103:448–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz M, Heil SR, Sacco A. Temperature-dependent self-diffusion coefficients of water and six selected molecular liquids for calibration in accurate 1H NMR PFG measurements. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2000;2:4740–4742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-L, Merker T, Heilig M, et al. Molecular modeling and simulation of vapor-liquid equilibria of ethylene oxide, ethylen glycol, and water as well as their binary mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:7428–7440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishima O, Stanley HE. The relationship between liquid, supercooled and glassy water. Nature. 1998;396:329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Mallamace F, Yan Z, et al. Appearance of a fractional Stokes–Einstein relation in water and a structural interpretation of its onset. Nat Phys. 2009;5:565–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell CA, Ito K, Moynihan CT. Thermodynamic determination of fragility in liquids and a fragile-to-strong liquid transition in water. Nature. 1999;398:492–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallamace F, Corsaro C, Stanley HE. A singular thermodynamically consistent temperature at the origin of the anomalous behavior of liquid water. Sci Rep. 2012;2:993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scala A, Starr FW, La Nave E, et al. Configurational entropy and diffusivity of supercooled water. Nature. 2000;406:166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld Y. A quasi-universal scaling law for atomic transport in simple fluids. J Phys: Condens Matter. 1999;11:5415–5427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington JR, Truskett TM, Mittal J. Excess-entropy-based anomalies for a waterlike fluid. J Chem Phys. 2006;125:244502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal M, Singh M, Sharma R, et al. Relationship between structure, entropy, and diffusivity in water and water-like liquids. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:6995–7001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra R, Truskett TM, Errington JR. On the use of excess entropy scaling to describe the dynamic properties of water. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:10558–10566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Buldyrev SV, Stanley HE. Relation of water anomalies to the excess entropy. Phys Rev E. 2008;78:051201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar