The role of molecular modelling and simulation in the discovery and deployment of metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separationFootnote^*

* Official contribution of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; not subject to copyright in the United States. Certain commercially available items may be identified in this paper. This identification does not imply recommendation by NIST, nor does it imply that it is the best available for the purposes described.

References

• Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O'Keeffe M, et al. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2013;341:1230444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farha OK, Eryazici I, Jeong NC, et al. Metal-organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit? J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:15016–15021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris RE, Wheatley PS. Gas storage in nanoporous materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4966–4981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J-R, Kuppler RJ, Zhou H-C. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1477–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK, et al. Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem Rev. 2012;112:1105–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Eddaoudi M, O'Keeffe M, et al. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature. 1999;402:276–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notman N. MOFs find a use. Chemistry World 2017 [cited 2019 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/mofs-find-a-use/2500508.article
   Google Scholar
• Hendon CH, Rieth AJ, Korzyński MD, et al. Grand challenges and future opportunities for metal-organic frameworks. ACS Cent Sci. 2017;3:554–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth AJ, Liu Y, Li P, et al. Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal-organic frameworks. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:15018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosi NL, Kim J, Eddaoudi M, et al. Rod packings and metal-organic frameworks constructed from rod-shaped secondary building units. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:1504–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui SS-Y, Lo SM-F, Charmant JP, et al. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu3(TMA)2(H2O)3]n. Science. 1999;283:1148–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddaoudi M, Kim J, Rosi N, et al. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science. 2002;295:469–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Kim J, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, et al. Computer-aided search for materials to store natural gas for vehicles. Front Young Minds. 2015;3:11.
   Google Scholar
• Chung YG, Camp J, Haranczyk M, et al. Computation-ready, experimental metal-organic frameworks: a tool to enable high-throughput screening of nanoporous crystals. Chem Mater. 2014;26:6185–6192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam PZ, Li A, Wiggin SB, et al. Development of a Cambridge structural database subset: a collection of metal-organic frameworks for past, present, and future. Chem Mater. 2017;29:2618–2625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock N, Biswas S. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites. Chem Rev. 2011;112:933–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova KE, Yaghi OM. The ‘folklore’ and reality of reticular chemistry. Mater Chem Front. 2017;1:1304–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoedel A, Ji Z, Yaghi OM. The role of metal-organic frameworks in a carbon-neutral energy cycle. Nat Energy. 2016;1:16034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JA, Veenstra M, Long JR. Evaluating metal-organic frameworks for natural gas storage. Chem Sci. 2014;5:32–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi SM, Chidambaram A, Talirz L, et al. Capturing chemical intuition in synthesis of metal-organic frameworks. Nat Commun. 2019;10:539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenaway RL, Santolini V, Bennison MJ, et al. High-throughput discovery of organic cages and catenanes using computational screening fused with robotic synthesis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner S, Wolf J, Glatzel S, et al. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science. 2019;363:eaav2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häse F, Roch LM, Aspuru-Guzik A. Next-generation experimentation with self-driving laboratories. Trends Chem. 2019;1:282–291.
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1:011002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd PG, Lee Y, Smit B. Computational development of the nanoporous materials genome. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2:17037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraux G, Chibani S, Coudert F-X. Modelling of framework materials at multiple scales: current practices and open questions. Philos Trans R Soc A. 2019;377:20180220.
   Google Scholar
• Colón YJ, Snurr RQ. High-throughput computational screening of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:5735–5749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappé AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, et al. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:10024–10035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard W. a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:8897–8909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MG, Siepmann JI. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 1. United-atom description of n-alkanes. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:2569–2577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoff JJ, Siepmann JI. Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE J. 2001;47:1676–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongari D, Boyd PG, Kadioglu O, et al. Evaluating charge equilibration methods to generate electrostatic fields in nanoporous materials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019;15:382–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Gomes JR, Jorge M. Computational approaches to study adsorption in MOFs with unsaturated metal sites. Mol Simul. 2014;40:537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li B, Krishna R, et al. Highly selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane in a MOF featuring the combination of open metal site and π-complexation. Chem Commun. 2015;51:2714–2717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida S, Kawamoto R, Tagami H, et al. Highly selective sorption of small unsaturated hydrocarbons by nonporous flexible framework with silver ion. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12370–12376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Gomes JR, Fröba M, et al. Modeling adsorption in metal-organic frameworks with open metal sites: propane/propylene separations. Langmuir. 2012;28:8537–8549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AR, Sholl DS. Screening of copper open metal site MOFs for olefin/paraffin separations using DFT-derived force fields. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:23044–23054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Kuchta B, Firlej L, et al. Accurate prediction of hydrogen adsorption in metal- organic frameworks with unsaturated metal sites via a combined density-functional theory and molecular mechanics approach. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:19116–19126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Hoffmann F, Fröba M. New microporous materials for acetylene storage and C2H2/CO2 separation: insights from molecular simulations. Chem Phys Chem. 2010;11:2220–2229.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Lan Y, Guo X, et al. Materials genomics-guided ab initio screening of MOFs with open copper sites for acetylene storage. AIChE J. 2018;64:1389–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Morrison CA, Düren T. Improving predictions of gas adsorption in metal-organic frameworks with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites: model potentials, ab initio parameterization, and GCMC simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:18899–18909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongari D, Tiana D, Stoneburner SJ, et al. Origin of the strong interaction between polar molecules and copper (II) Paddle-wheels in metal organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:15135–15144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh HS, Rana MK, Wong-Foy AG, et al. Predicting methane storage in open-metal-site metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:13451–13458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Gomes JR, Fischer M, et al. New model for predicting adsorption of polar molecules in metal-organic frameworks with unsaturated metal sites. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9:3544–3553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzubak AL, Lin L-C, Kim J, et al. Ab initio carbon capture in open-site metal-organic frameworks. Nat Chem. 2012;4:810–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercado R, Vlaisavljevich B, Lin L-C, et al. Force field development from periodic density functional theory calculations for gas separation applications using metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:12590–12604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Ferreiro-Rangel CA, Fischer M, et al. A transferable model for adsorption in MOFs with unsaturated metal sites. J Phys Chem C. 2016;121:441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel D, Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. Vol. 1. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cho EH, Lyu Q, Lin L-C. Computational discovery of nanoporous materials for energy-and environment-related applications. Mol Simul. 2019. doi:10.1080/08927022.2019.1626990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coudert F-X, Fuchs AH. Computational characterization and prediction of metal-organic framework properties. Coord Chem Rev. 2016;307:211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addicoat MA, Vankova N, Akter IF, et al. Extension of the universal force field to metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10:880–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureekaew S, Amirjalayer S, Tafipolsky M, et al. MOF-FF – a flexible first-principles derived force field for metal-organic frameworks. Phys Status Solidi (b). 2013;250:1128–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow JK, Tiana D, Walsh A. Transferable force field for metal-organic frameworks from first-principles: BTW-FF. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10:4644–4652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd PG, Moosavi SM, Witman M, et al. Force-field prediction of materials properties in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanduyfhuys L, Vandenbrande S, Verstraelen T, et al. QuickFF: a program for a quick and easy derivation of force fields for metal-organic frameworks from ab initio input. J Comput Chem. 2015;36:1015–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanduyfhuys L, Vandenbrande S, Wieme J, et al. Extension of the QuickFF force field protocol for an improved accuracy of structural, vibrational, mechanical and thermal properties of metal-organic frameworks. J Comput Chem. 2018;39:999–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen J, Dubbeldam D. On flexible force fields for metal-organic frameworks: recent developments and future prospects. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. 2018;8:e1363.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler KV, Hulvey Z, Forster PM. On the importance of a precise crystal structure for simulating gas adsorption in nanoporous materials. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:18904–18907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C-P, Du M. Role of solvents in coordination supramolecular systems. Chem Commun. 2011;47:5958–5972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian D, Camp JS, Chung YG, et al. Large-scale refinement of metal-organic framework structures using density functional theory. Chem Mater. 2017;29:2521–2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd PG, Woo TK. A generalized method for constructing hypothetical nanoporous materials of any net topology from graph theory. Cryst Eng Comm. 2016;18:3777–3792.
   Google Scholar
• Evans JD, Fraux G, Gaillac R, et al. Computational chemistry methods for nanoporous materials. Chem Mater. 2017;29:199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraux G, Coudert F-X. Recent advances in the computational chemistry of soft porous crystals. Chem Commun. 2017;53:7211–7221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijms H. Probability: a lively introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shell MS. Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics: an integrated approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos AZ. Direct determination of phase coexistence properties of fluids by Monte Carlo simulation in a new ensemble. Mol Phys. 1987;61:813–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos AZ. Adsorption and capillary condensation of fluids in cylindrical pores by Monte Carlo simulation in the Gibbs ensemble. Mol Phys. 1987;62:701–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis DE, et al. RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials. Mol Simul. 2016;42:81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbeldam D, Torres-Knoop A, Walton KS. On the inner workings of Monte Carlo codes. Mol Simul. 2013;39:1253–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffroy M, Fuchs AH, Boutin A. Structural changes in nanoporous solids due to fluid adsorption: thermodynamic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. Chem Commun. 2008;(28):3275–3277. doi:10.1039/b805117h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JA, Oktawiec J, Taylor MK, et al. Methane storage in flexible metal-organic frameworks with intrinsic thermal management. Nature. 2015;527:357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkisov L. Toward rational design of metal-organic frameworks for sensing applications: efficient calculation of adsorption characteristics in zero loading regime. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:3025–3033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholl DS. Understanding macroscopic diffusion of adsorbed molecules in crystalline nanoporous materials via atomistic simulations. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39:403–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbeldam D, Snurr RQ. Recent developments in the molecular modeling of diffusion in nanoporous materials. Mol Simul. 2007;33:305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar T, Piaggi PM, Perego C, et al. A cannibalistic approach to grand canonical crystal growth. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018;14:2678–2683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan A, Perego C, Salvalaglio M, et al. Concentration gradient driven molecular dynamics: a new method for simulations of membrane permeation and separation. Chem Sci. 2017;8:3858–3865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perego C, Salvalaglio M, Parrinello M. Molecular dynamics simulations of solutions at constant chemical potential. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:144113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkisov L, Monson PA. Hysteresis in Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations of adsorption in porous materials. Langmuir. 2000;16:9857–9860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düren T, Jakobtorweihen S, Keil FJ, et al. Grand canonical molecular dynamics simulations of transport diffusion in geometrically heterogeneous pores. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2003;5:369–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delle Site L, Krekeler C, Whittaker J, et al. Molecular dynamics of open systems: construction of a mean-field particle reservoir. Adv Theory Simul. 2019;2:1900014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam PZ, Rogge SM, Li A. Structure-mechanical stability relations of metal-organic frameworks via machine learning. Matter. 2019;1(1):219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoufi A, Maurin G. Hybrid Monte Carlo simulations combined with a phase mixture model to predict the structural transitions of a porous metal-organic framework material upon adsorption of guest molecules. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:6496–6502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer JC, Debenedetti PG. Computer simulation of water sorption on flexible protein crystals. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:2713–2718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge SMJ, Goeminne R, Demuynck R, et al. Modeling gas adsorption in flexible metal-organic frameworks via hybrid Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics schemes. Adv Theory Simul. 2019;2:1800177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon C, York AH, Sturluson A, et al. PorousMaterials.jl. 2018. Available from: https://github.com/SimonEnsemble/PorousMaterials.jl
   Google Scholar
• Gowers RJ, Farmahini AH, Friedrich D, et al. Automated analysis and benchmarking of GCMC simulation programs in application to gas adsorption. Mol Simul. 2018;44:309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossfield A, Patrone PN, Roe DR, et al. Best practices for quantification of uncertainty and sampling quality in molecular simulations [Article v1.0]. Living J Comput Mol Sci. 2019;1:5067.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmer CE, Farha OK, Bae Y-S, et al. Structure–property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:9849–9856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Kim J, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, et al. The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage. Energy Environ Sci. 2015;8:1190–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel D, Mooij GCAM, Smit B. Novel scheme to study structural and thermal properties of continuously deformable molecules. J Phys. 1992;4:3053–3076.
   Google Scholar
• Becker TM, Heinen J, Dubbeldam D, et al. Polarizable force fields for CO2 and CH4 adsorption in M-MOF-74. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:4659–4673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Snurr RQ. Computational study of water adsorption in the hydrophobic metal-organic framework ZIF-8: adsorption mechanism and acceleration of the simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:24000–24010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. The elements of statistical learning. Vol. 1. New York (NY): Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Willems TF, Rycroft CH, Kazi M, et al. Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012;149:134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CR, Gordon GJ, von Lilienfeld OA, et al. Constant size descriptors for accurate machine learning models of molecular properties. J Chem Phys. 2018;148:241718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M, Boyd PG, Daff TD, et al. Rapid and accurate machine learning recognition of high performing metal organic frameworks for CO2 capture. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5:3056–3060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Mercado R, Schnell SK, et al. What are the best materials to separate a xenon/krypton mixture? Chem Mater. 2015;27:4459–4475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucior BJ, Bobbitt NS, Islamoglu T, et al. Energy-based descriptors to rapidly predict hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Mol Syst Des Eng. 2019;4:162–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton AW, Simon CM, Kim J, et al. Materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits of physical hydrogen storage. Chem Mater. 2017;29:2844–2854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardakhti M, Moharreri E, Wanik D, et al. Machine learning using combined structural and chemical descriptors for prediction of methane adsorption performance of metal organic frameworks (MOFs). ACS Comb Sci. 2017;19:640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le T, Epa VC, Burden FR, et al. Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2889–2919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M, Woo TK, Wilmer CE, et al. Large-scale quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) analysis of methane storage in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:7681–7689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M, Trefiak NR, Woo TK. Atomic property weighted radial distribution functions descriptors of metal-organic frameworks for the prediction of gas uptake capacity. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:14095–14105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M, Barnard AS. Geometrical properties can predict CO2 and N2 adsorption performance of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) at low pressure. ACS Comb Sci. 2016;18:243–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borboudakis G, Stergiannakos T, Frysali M, et al. Chemically intuited, large-scale screening of MOFs by machine learning techniques. NPJ Comput Mater. 2017;3:40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Rodgers J, Argueta E, et al. Role of pore chemistry and topology in the CO2 capture capabilities of MOFs: from molecular simulation to machine learning. Chem Mater. 2018;30:6325–6337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsivion E, Long JR, Head-Gordon M. Hydrogen physisorption on metal-organic framework linkers and metalated linkers: a computational study of the factors that control binding strength. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:17827–17835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson G, Schweitzer B, Anderson R, et al. Attainable volumetric targets for adsorption-based hydrogen storage in porous crystals: molecular simulation and machine learning. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123:120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Xiang S, Su J. Understanding quantitative relationship between methane storage capacities and characteristic properties of metal organic frameworks based on machine learning. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123(14):8550–8559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh GB, Hodas NO, Vishnu A. Deep learning for computational chemistry. J Comput Chem. 2017;38:1291–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gen M, Lin L. Genetic algorithms. In: Wah BW, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of computer science and engineering. New York (NY): Wiley-Interscience; 2007. p. 1–15. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470050118.ecse169
   Google Scholar
• Collins SP, Daff TD, Piotrkowski SS, et al. Materials design by evolutionary optimization of functional groups in metal-organic frameworks. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1600954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung YG, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Li P, et al. In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO2 capture using a genetic algorithm. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1600909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Martin RL, Simon CM, et al. In silico discovery of high deliverable capacity metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavahan WA, Gaskell E, Bernstein BE. Epigenetic plasticity and the hallmarks of cancer. Science. 2017;357:eaal2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander ES. The heroes of CRISPR. Cell. 2016;164:18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, Soria E, et al. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36:244–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen R, Embden JDAV, Gaastra W, et al. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1565–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol. 2005;60:174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman L. Hypothesis-limited research. Genome Res. 1999;9:673–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gándara F, Bennett TD. Crystallography of metal-organic frameworks. IUCrJ. 2014;1:563–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris KDM, Tremayne M. Crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data. Chem Mater. 1996;8:2554–2570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker LB, Von Dreele RB, Cox DE. Rietveld refinement guidelines, et al. J Appl Crystallogr. 1999;32:36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld HM. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1969;2:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øien-Ødegaard S, Shearer GC, Wragg DS, et al. Pitfalls in metal-organic framework crystallography: towards more accurate crystal structures. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:4867–4876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. Deconstructing the crystal structures of metal-organic frameworks and related materials into their underlying nets. Chem Rev. 2012;112:675–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons S. Introduction to twinning. Acta Crystallogr Sect D. 2003;59:1995–2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma J, Tran LD, Matzger AJ. Toward topology prediction in Zr-based microporous coordination polymers: the role of linker geometry and flexibility. Cryst Growth Des. 2016;16:4148–4153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H-L, Makal TA, Zhou H-C. Interpenetration control in metal-organic frameworks for functional applications. Coord Chem Rev. 2013;257:2232–2249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshino M, Khutia A, Xing H, et al. The crystalline sponge method updated. IUCrJ. 2016;3:139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spek AL. PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. Acta Crystallogr Sect C. 2015;71:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston EB, Lowell PJ, Vacek J, et al. Dipolar molecular rotors in the metal-organic framework crystal IRMOF-2. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008;10:5188–5191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsaidi SK, Mohamed MH, Simon CM, et al. Effect of ring rotation upon gas adsorption in SIFSIX-3-M (M= Fe, Ni) pillared square grid networks. Chem Sci. 2017;8:2373–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris KDM, Tremayne M, Lightfoot P, et al. Crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data by Monte Carlo methods. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:3543–3547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David WI, Shankland K, van de Streek J, et al. DASH: a program for crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data. J Appl Crystallogr. 2006;39:910–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahiduzzaman M, Wang S, Sikora BJ, et al. Computational structure determination of novel metal-organic frameworks. Chem Commun. 2018;54:10812–10815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Vermeulen NA, Malliakas CD, et al. Bottom-up construction of a superstructure in a porous uranium-organic crystal. Science. 2017;356:624–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colón YJ, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Snurr RQ. Topologically guided, automated construction of metal-organic frameworks and their evaluation for energy-related applications. Cryst Growth Des. 2017;17:5801–5810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deria P, Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Bury W, et al. Ultraporous, water stable, and breathing zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks with ftw topology. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:13183–13190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Grunder S, Cordova KE, et al. Large-pore apertures in a series of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2012;336:1018–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddei M, Casati N, Steitz DA, et al. In situ high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction study of UiO-66 under synthesis conditions in a continuous-flow microwave reactor. Cryst Eng Comm. 2017;19:3206–3214.
   Google Scholar
• Park JH, Min Choi K, Joon Jeon H, et al. In-situ observation for growth of hierarchical metal-organic frameworks and their self-sequestering mechanism for gas storage. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Henke S, Kieslich G, et al. Time-resolved in situ X-ray diffraction reveals metal-dependent metal-organic framework formation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:14081–14084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill ED, Josey AA, Folmer JCW, et al. Experimental determination of the crystallization phase-boundary velocity in the halozeotype CZX-1. Chem Mater. 2013;25:3932–3940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien PA, Užarević K, Katsenis AD, et al. In situ monitoring and mechanism of the mechanochemical formation of a microporous MOF-74 framework. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:2929–2932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson VK, Southon PD, Halder GJ, et al. Guest adsorption in the nanoporous metal-organic framework Cu3(1,3,5-Benzenetricarboxylate)2: combined in situ x-ray diffraction and vapor sorption. Chem Mater. 2014;26:4712–4723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez MI, Mason JA, Bloch ED, et al. Structural characterization of framework–gas interactions in the metal-organic framework Co2(dobdc) by in situ single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Chem Sci. 2017;8:4387–4398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton RI, Munn AS, Guillou N, et al. Uptake of liquid alcohols by the flexible FeIII metal-organic framework MIL-53 observed by time-resolved in situ X-ray diffraction. Chem A Eur J. 2011;17:7069–7079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherb C, Koehn R, Bein T. Sorption behavior of an oriented surface-grown MOF-film studied by in situ X-ray diffraction. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:3046–3051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen FH. The Cambridge structural database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 2002;58:380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groom CR, Bruno IJ, Lightfoot MP, et al. The Cambridge structural database. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 2016;72:171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Edgington PR, et al. New software for searching the Cambridge structural database and visualizing crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 2002;58:389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno IJ, Groom CR. A crystallographic perspective on sharing data and knowledge. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014;28:1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batten SR, Champness NR, Chen X-M, et al. Coordination polymers, metal-organic frameworks and the need for terminology guidelines. Cryst Eng Comm. 2012;14:3001–3004.
   Google Scholar
• Seth S, Matzger AJ. Metal-organic frameworks: examples, counterexamples, and an actionable definition. Cryst Growth Des. 2017;17:4043–4048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockwig NW, Delgado-Friedrichs O, O'Keeffe M, et al. Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38:176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith J, Wong-Foy AG, Cafarella MJ, et al. Theoretical limits of hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks: opportunities and trade-offs. Chem Mater. 2013;25:3373–3382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farha OK, Hupp JT. Rational design, synthesis, purification, and activation of metal-organic framework materials. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43:1166–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth AJ, Peters AW, Vermeulen NA, et al. Best practices for the synthesis, activation, and characterization of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Mater. 2017;29:26–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock CR, McNutt NW, Keffer DJ, et al. Rotating phenyl rings as a guest-dependent switch in two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:671–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldoupis E, Nair S, Sholl DS. Efficient calculation of diffusion limitations in metal organic framework materials: a tool for identifying materials for kinetic separations. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:7528–7539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heest T, Teich-McGoldrick SL, Greathouse JA, et al. Identification of metal-organic framework materials for adsorption separation of rare gases: applicability of ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) and effects of inaccessible framework regions. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:13183–13195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panella B, Hirscher M, Roth S. Hydrogen adsorption in different carbon nanostructures. Carbon. 2005;43:2209–2214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandani S, Mangano E, Sarkisov LNet. excess and absolute adsorption and adsorption of helium. Adsorption. 2016;22:261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers AL, Monson PA. Physical adsorption of gases: the case for absolute adsorption as the basis for thermodynamic analysis. Adsorption. 2014;20:591–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Sholl DS. Accelerating applications of metal-organic frameworks for gas adsorption and separation by computational screening of materials. Langmuir. 2012;28:14114–14128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M, Martin RL, Rycroft CH, et al. High accuracy geometric analysis of crystalline porous materials. CrystEngComm. 2013;15:7531–7538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M, Martin RL, Rycroft CH, et al. Characterization and comparison of pore landscapes in crystalline porous materials. J Mol Graph Model. 2013;44:208–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Computation-ready, Experimental (CoRE) MOFs download link. Available from: http://gregchung.github.io/CoRE-MOFs/
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Manz TA, Sholl DS. Accurate treatment of electrostatics during molecular adsorption in nanoporous crystals without assigning point charges to framework atoms. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:4824–4836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton KS, Millward AR, Dubbeldam D, et al. Understanding inflections and steps in carbon dioxide adsorption isotherms in metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:406–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappé AK, Goddard III WA. Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem. 1991;95:3358–3363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortier WJ, Ghosh SK, Shankar S. Electronegativity-equalization method for the calculation of atomic charges in molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:4315–4320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran S, Lenz T, Skiff W, et al. Toward an understanding of zeolite Y as a cracking catalyst with the use of periodic charge equilibration. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:5898–5907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nistor RA, Polihronov JG, Müser MH, et al. A generalization of the charge equilibration method for nonmetallic materials. J Chem Phys. 2006;125:094108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda A, Takahashi O. Parameter determination for the charge equilibration method including third-and fourth-order terms applied to non-metallic compounds. Chem Phys Lett. 2010;495:155–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmer CE, Kim KC, Snurr RQ. An extended charge equilibration method. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:2506–2511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadantsev ES, Boyd PG, Daff TD, et al. Fast and accurate electrostatics in metal organic frameworks with a robust charge equilibration parameterization for high-throughput virtual screening of gas adsorption. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:3056–3061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells BA, De Bruin-Dickason C, Chaffee AL. Charge equilibration based on atomic ionization in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:456–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Noble GC, Reilley D, Rivas LM, et al. EQeq+ C: an empirical bond-order-corrected extended charge equilibration method. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:3364–3374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SP, Woo TK. Split-charge equilibration parameters for generating rapid partial atomic charges in metal-organic frameworks and porous polymer networks for high-throughput screening. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:903–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campañá C, Mussard B, Woo TK. Electrostatic potential derived atomic charges for periodic systems using a modified error functional. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5:2866–2878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz TA, Sholl DS. Chemically meaningful atomic charges that reproduce the electrostatic potential in periodic and nonperiodic materials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:2455–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian D, Camp JS, Sholl DS. A comprehensive set of high-quality point charges for simulations of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Mater. 2016;28:785–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupry DE, Addicoat MA, Heine T. Extension of the universal force field for metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016;12:5215–5225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horike S, Shimomura S, Kitagawa S. Soft porous crystals. Nat Chem. 2009;1:695–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel S, Alexandrov EV, Proserpio DM, et al. Distinguishing metal-organic frameworks. Cryst Growth Des. 2018;18:1738–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas C, Avci G, Daglar H, et al. An extensive comparative analysis of two MOF databases: high-throughput screening of computation-ready MOFs for CH4 and H2 adsorption. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7:9593–9608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarabadi-Poor P, Marek R. Comment on ‘Database for CO2 separation performances of MOFs based on computational materials screening’. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:16261–16265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas C, Velioglu S, Keskin S. Reply to comment on ‘Database for CO2 separation performances of MOFs based on computational materials screening’. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:16266–16271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks CS, Yaghi OM. The atom, the molecule, and the covalent organic framework. Science. 2017;355:eaal1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasell T, Cooper AI. Porous organic cages: soluble, modular and molecular pores. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong M, Lan Y, Yang Q, et al. Exploring the structure-property relationships of covalent organic frameworks for noble gas separations. Chem Eng Sci. 2017;168:456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong M, Lan Y, Qin Z, et al. Computation-ready, experimental covalent organic framework for methane delivery: screening and material design. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:13009–13016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklitz M, Jiang S, Clowes R, et al. Computational screening of porous organic molecules for xenon/krypton separation. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:15211–15222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturluson A, Huynh MT, York AHP, et al. Eigencages: learning a latent space of porous cage molecules. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4:1663–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerlocher C, McCusker LB. Database of zeolite structures [cited 2019 Apr 1]. Available from: http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/
   Google Scholar
• Barnett BR, Gonzalez MI, Long JR. Recent progress towards light hydrocarbon separations using metal-organic frameworks. Trends Chem. 2019;1(2):159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Getman RB, Miller JH, Wang K, et al. Metal alkoxide functionalization in metal-organic frameworks for enhanced ambient-temperature hydrogen storage. J Phys Chem C. 2010;115:2066–2075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston MH, Farha OK, Hauser BG, et al. Synthesis and metalation of catechol-functionalized porous organic polymers. Chem Mater. 2012;24:1292–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration, U. How much carbon dioxide is produced when different fuels are burned? [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=73&t=11
   Google Scholar
• Wang MQ, Huang HS. A full fuel-cycle analysis of energy and emissions impacts of transportation fuels produced from natural gas. Argonne National Laboratory Technical Report; 2000 [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2000/01/34988.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez RA, Pacala SW, Winebrake JJ, et al. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:6435–6440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, et al. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:8172–8176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SC, Diegel SW, Boundy RG. Transportation energy data book. Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2009 [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/pub31202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hasan MMF, Zheng AM, Karimi IA. Minimizing boil-off losses in liquefied natural gas transportation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:9571–9580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makal TA, Li J-R, Lu W, et al. Methane storage in advanced porous materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:7761–7779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy (ARPA-E), MOVE (Methane Opportunities for Vehicular Energy) Program Overview. 2012 [cited 2019 June 4]. Available from: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/MOVE_ProgramOverview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Deria P, Farha OK, et al. A thermodynamic tank model for studying the effect of higher hydrocarbons on natural gas storage in metal-organic frameworks. Energy Environ Sci. 2015;8:1501–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmer CE, Leaf M, Lee CY, et al. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. Nat Chem. 2012;4:83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Sun D, Simmons JM, et al. Metal-organic framework from an anthracene derivative containing nanoscopic cages exhibiting high methane uptake. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1012–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthelet K, Marrot J, Riou D, et al. A breathing hybrid organic-inorganic solid with very large pores and high magnetic characteristics. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Telepeni I, Blake AJ, et al. High capacity hydrogen adsorption in Cu(II) tetracarboxylate framework materials: the role of pore size, ligand functionalization, and exposed metal sites. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2159–2171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmer CE, Farha OK, Yildirim T, et al. Gram-scale, high-yield synthesis of a robust metal-organic framework for storing methane and other gases. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6:1158–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Gutov OV, Krungleviciute V, et al. Computational design of metal-organic frameworks based on stable zirconium building units for storage and delivery of methane. Chem Mater. 2014;26:5632–5639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhou W, Yildirim T. High-capacity methane storage in metal-organic frameworks M2(dhtp): the important role of open metal sites. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4995–5000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gándara F, Furukawa H, Lee S, et al. High methane storage capacity in aluminum metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:5271–5274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G, et al. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2004;29:1443–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakintuna B, Lamari-Darkrim F, Hirscher M. Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32:1121–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Sudik A, Wolverton C, et al. High capacity hydrogen storage materials: attributes for automotive applications and techniques for materials discovery. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:656–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Energy: Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Technical targets for onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty vehicles. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles
   Google Scholar
• Murray LJ, Dincă M, Long JR. Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1294–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Colón YJ, Zhang X, et al. Evaluating topologically diverse metal-organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage. Energy Environ Sci. 2016;9:3279–3289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Liu Y, Purewal J, et al. Balancing gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density in MOFs. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10:2459–2471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye SS, Dailly A, Yaghi OM, et al. Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn4O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)3 (MOF-5). J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14176–14177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM. Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1304–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denysenko D, Grzywa M, Tonigold M, et al. Elucidating gating effects for hydrogen sorption in MFU-4-type triazolate-based metal-organic frameworks featuring different pore sizes. Chem A Eur J. 2011;17:1837–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Holley P, Schweitzer B, Islamoglu T, et al. Benchmark study of hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks under temperature and pressure swing conditions. ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3:748–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Seth S, Purewal J, et al. Exceptional hydrogen storage achieved by screening nearly half a million metal-organic frameworks. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RL, Lin L-C, Jariwala K, et al. Mail-order metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): designing isoreticular MOF-5 analogues comprising commercially available organic molecules. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:12159–12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad TK, Suh MP. Control of interpenetration and gas-sorption properties of metal-organic frameworks by a simple change in ligand design. Chem A Eur J. 2012;18:8673–8680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankine D, Avellaneda A, Hill MR, et al. Control of framework interpenetration for in situ modified hydroxyl functionalised IRMOFs. Chem Commun. 2012;48:10328–10330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh K, Van Oosterhout JD, Roy S, et al. Exceptional surface area from coordination copolymers derived from two linear linkers of differing lengths. Chem Sci. 2012;3:2429–2432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller JK, Panos RJ, Krachman S, et al. Oxygen therapy for patients with COPD: current evidence and the long-term oxygen treatment trial. Chest. 2010;138:179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:788–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West EJ. Error analysis and calibration techniques to determine the measurement system requirements for an LD steelmaking dynamic control application. Meas Control. 1971;4:T96–T108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widlund D, Medvedev A, Gyllenram R. Towards model-based closed-loop control of the basic oxygen steelmaking process. IFAC Proc Vol. 1998;31:69–74.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern SJ, Yeigh Jr JH. FCC Regeneration. 1983; US Patent 4,370,222.
   Google Scholar
• DeCoste JB, Weston MH, Fuller PE, et al. Metal-organic frameworks for oxygen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:14092–14095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam PZ, Islamoglu T, Goswami S et al. Computer-aided discovery of a metal-organic framework with superior oxygen uptake. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávila M, Riccardo JL, Ramirez-Pastor AJ. Exact statistical thermodynamics of alkane binary mixtures in zeolites: new interpretation of the adsorption preference reversal phenomenon from multisite-occupancy theory. Chem Phys Lett. 2009;477:402–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholl DS, Lively RP. Seven chemical separations: to change the world: purifying mixtures without using heat would lower global energy use, emissions and pollution–and open up new routes to resources. Nature. 2016;532:435–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herm ZR, Bloch ED, Long JR. Hydrocarbon separations in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Mater. 2013;26:323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen M. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: a review. Energy Convers Manag. 2008;49:2178–2199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood DD, Patil SK. Chemistry of nuclear fuel reprocessing: current status. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 1996;203:547–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soelberg NR, Garn TG, Greenhalgh MR, et al. Radioactive iodine and krypton control for nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities. Sci Technol Nucl Install. 2013;2013:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Cairns AJ, Liu J, et al. Potential of metal-organic frameworks for separation of xenon and krypton. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Fernandez CA, Martin PF, et al. A two-column method for the separation of Kr and Xe from process off-gases. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:12893–12899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Simon CM, Elsaidi SK, et al. Xenon gas separation and storage using metal-organic frameworks. Chem. 2018;4:466–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Simon CM, Plonka AM, et al. Metal-organic framework with optimally selective xenon adsorption and separation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Zhang Z, Plonka AM, et al. A calcium coordination framework having permanent porosity and high CO2/N2 selectivity. Cryst Growth Des. 2012;12:2162–2165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikora BJ, Wilmer CE, Greenfield ML, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of Xe/Kr selectivity in over 137,000 hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. Chem Sci. 2012;3:2217–2223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan P, Farha OK, Broadbelt LJ, et al. Computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for xenon/krypton separation. AIChE J. 2011;57:1759–1766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroniadou-Anderjaska V, Figueiredo TH, Apland JP, et al. Primary brain targets of nerve agents: the role of the amygdala in comparison to the hippocampus. Neuro Toxicol. 2009;30:772–776.
   Google Scholar
• Milatović D, Jokanović M. Pyridinium oximes as cholinesterase reactivators in the treatment of OP poisoning. In: Gupta RC, editor. Handbook of toxicology of chemical warfare agents. San Diego: Academic Press; 2009. Chap. 65, p. 985–996.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal M, Gallis DFS, Greathouse JA, et al. How useful are common simulants of chemical warfare agents at predicting adsorption behavior? J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:26061–26069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo TH, Apland JP, Braga MFM, et al. Acute and long-term consequences of exposure to organophosphate nerve agents in humans. Epilepsia. 2018;59:92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barea E, Montoro C, Navarro JAR. Toxic gas removal – metal-organic frameworks for the capture and degradation of toxic gases and vapours. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:5419–5430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoste JB, Peterson GW. Metal-organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals. Chem Rev. 2014;114:5695–5727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matito-Martos I, Moghadam PZ, Li A, et al. Discovery of an optimal porous crystalline material for the capture of chemical warfare agents. Chem Mater. 2018;30:4571–4579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küsgens P, Rose M, Senkovska I, et al. Characterization of metal-organic frameworks by water adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009;120:325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo V, Galli S, Choi HJ, et al. High thermal and chemical stability in pyrazolate-bridged metal-organic frameworks with exposed metal sites. Chem Sci. 2011;2:1311–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smil V. Energy in the twentieth century: resources, conversions, costs, uses, and consequences. Ann Rev Energy Environ. 2000;25:21–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al., editors. Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013; Chap. 6; p. 465–570.
   Google Scholar
• Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J. Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al., editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Chap. 12, p. 1029–1136.
   Google Scholar
• US Energy Information Administration. How much of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are associated with electricity generation? 2019. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=77&t=11
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2007;363:815–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haszeldine RS. Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be? Science. 2009;325:1647–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumida K, Rogow DL, Mason JA, et al. Carbon dioxide capture in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev. 2012;112:724–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley D. A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput. 1994;4:65–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herm ZR, Swisher JA, Smit B, et al. Metal-organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:5664–5667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald TM, D'Alessandro DM, Krishna R, et al. Enhanced carbon dioxide capture upon incorporation of N, N′-dimethylethylenediamine in the metal-organic framework CuBTTri. Chem Sci. 2011;2:2022–2028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella WJ. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. New York (NY): Wiley Online Library; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Bai P, Guo X. Separation of xylene isomers: a review of recent advances in materials. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:14725–14753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez MI, Kapelewski MT, Bloch ED, et al. Separation of xylene isomers through multiple metal site interactions in metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:3412–3422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minceva M, Rodrigues AE. Understanding and revamping of industrial scale SMB units for p-xylene separation. AIChE J. 2007;53:138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moïse J-C, Bellat J-P. Effect of preadsorbed water on the adsorption of p-xylene and m-xylene mixtures on BaX and BaY zeolites. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:17239–17244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee JA, Zhang K, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Computational identification and experimental evaluation of metal-organic frameworks for xylene enrichment. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:12075–12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Cortes C, Burges CJC. The MNIST database of handwritten digits. 1998 [cited 2019 Apr 1]. Available from: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/
   Google Scholar
• Wan L, Zeiler M, Zhang S. Regularization of neural networks using dropconnect. Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Machine Learning; 2013 Jun 16–21; Atlanta (GA). ACM; 2013. p. 1058–1066.
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky A, Hinton G. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. University of Toronto Technical Report; 2009 [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/learning-features-2009-TR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bennett J, Lanning S. The netflix prize. Proceedings of the KDD Cup Workshop 2007. New York; 2007. p. 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bell RM, Koren Y. Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsletter. 2007;9:75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer. 2009;42:30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren Y. The bellkor solution to the netflix grand prize. Netflix Prize Documentation. 2009;81:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, et al. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis. 2015;115:211–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price SL. Control and prediction of the organic solid state: a challenge to theory and experiment. Proc R Soc A. 2018;474:20180351.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly AM, Cooper RI, Adjiman CS, et al. Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 2016;72:439–459.
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Feb 5]. Available from: https://adsorption.nist.gov/factlab
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HGT, Espinal L, van Zee RD, et al. A reference high-pressure CO2 adsorption isotherm for ammonium ZSM-5 zeolite: Results of an interlaboratory study. Adsorption. 2018;24:531–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siderius DW, Shen VK, Johnson III RD, editors, et al. NIST/ARPA-E database of novel and emerging adsorbent materials. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 20899; 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 14]. DOI:10.18434/T43882
   Google Scholar
• Heller SR, McNaught A, Pletnev I, et al. InChI, the IUPAC international chemical identifier. J Cheminform. 2015;7:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt D, Tranchemontagne D, Yaghi OM. Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:11623–11627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/688614?lang=en&region=US
   Google Scholar
• Siderius D, Shen V, editors. NIST registry of adsorbent materials. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 20899; 2017 [cited 2018 Dec 14]. DOI:10.18434/t4/1502644.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Howe JD, Sholl DS. How reproducible are isotherm measurements in metal-organic frameworks? Chem Mater. 2017;29:10487–10495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Smit B, Haranczyk M. pyIAST: ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) Python package. Comput Phys Commun. 2016;200:364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Smit B, Haranczyk M. Documentation for pyIAST. [cited 2019 Feb 1]. Available from: https://pyiast.readthedocs.io
   Google Scholar
• Colón YJ, Fairen-Jimenez D, Wilmer CE, et al. High-throughput screening of porous crystalline materials for hydrogen storage capacity near room temperature. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:5383–5389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Gualdrón DA, Wilmer CE, Farha OK, et al. Exploring the limits of methane storage and delivery in nanoporous materials. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:6941–6951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.fluidproperties.org
   Google Scholar
• Ross RB, Ahmad R, Brennan JK, et al. The seventh industrial fluid properties simulation challenge. Fluid Phase Equil. 2014;366:136–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross RB, Brennan JK, Frankel KA, et al. Perfluorohexane adsorption in BCR-704 Faujasite zeolite benchmark studies for the seventh industrial fluid properties simulation challenge. Fluid Phase Equil. 2014;366:141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz NE, Riaz A, Brennan JK, et al. The eighth industrial fluid properties simulation challenge. Adsorption Sci Tech. 2016;34:3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross RB, Aeschliman DB, Ahmad R, et al. Adsorption, X-ray diffraction, photoelectron, and atomic emission spectroscopy benchmark studies for the eighth industrial fluid properties simulation challenge. Adsorption Sci Tech. 2016;34:13–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K. Adsorption by powders and porous solids. London: Academic Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available form: https://adsorption.nist.gov/isodb/index.php#apis
   Google Scholar
• Hall SR, Allen FH, Brown ID. The crystallographic information file (CIF): a new standard archive file for crystallography. Acta Crystallogr Sect A. 1991;A47:655–685.
   Google Scholar
• Brown ID, McMahon B. CIF: the computer language of crystallography. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 2002;58:317–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtarolo S, Hart GL, Nardelli MB, et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat Mater. 2013;12:191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyzer-Knapp EO, Suh C, Gómez-Bombarelli R, et al. What is high-throughput virtual screening? A perspective from organic materials discovery. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2015;45:195–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Bombarelli R, Aguilera-Iparraguirre J, Hirzel TD, et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. Nat Mater. 2016;15:1120–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceder G. Opportunities and challenges for first-principles materials design and applications to Li battery materials. MRS Bull. 2010;35:693–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachmann J, Olivares-Amaya R, Atahan-Evrenk S, et al. The Harvard clean energy project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:2241–2251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørskov JK, Bligaard T, Rossmeisl J, et al. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat Chem. 2009;1:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeley J, Jaramillo TF, Bonde J, et al. Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nat Mater. 2006;5:909–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser P, Fan Q, Devenney M, et al. High throughput experimental and theoretical predictive screening of materials- A comparative study of search strategies for new fuel cell anode catalysts. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:11013–11021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:935–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Hagler A. Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery. Molecules. 2002;7:566–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaig RW, Osborn Popp TM, Fracaroli AM, et al. The chemistry of CO2 capture in an amine-functionalized metal-organic framework under dry and humid conditions. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:12125–12128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman J, Reed DA, Kapelewski MT, et al. Enabling alternative ethylene production through its selective adsorption in the metal-organic framework Mn2(m-dobdc). Energy Environ Sci. 2018;11:2423–2431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JG, Cohen SM. Moisture-resistant and superhydrophobic metal-organic frameworks obtained via postsynthetic modification. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4560–4561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poloni R, Lee K, Berger RF, et al. Understanding trends in CO2 adsorption in metal-organic frameworks with open-metal sites. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5:861–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coudert F-X. Responsive metal-organic frameworks and framework materials: under pressure, taking the heat, in the spotlight, with friends. Chem Mater. 2015;27:1905–1916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieme J, Lejaeghere K, Kresse G, et al. Tuning the balance between dispersion and entropy to design temperature-responsive flexible metal-organic frameworks. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coudert F-X. Reproducible research in computational chemistry of materials. Chem Mater. 2017;29:2615–2617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greathouse JA, Kinnibrugh TL, Allendorf MD. Adsorption and separation of noble gases by IRMOF-1: grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:3425–3431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin A, Springuel-Huet M-A, Nossov A, et al. Breathing transitions in MIL-53 (Al) metal-organic framework upon xenon adsorption. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:8464–8467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Nelson A, Coudert F-X, van der Veen M. Rotational dynamics of linkers in metal-organic frameworks. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano L, Naumov P. Exploiting rotational motion in molecular crystals. Cryst Eng Comm. 2018;20:5872–5883.
   Google Scholar
• Witman M, Ling S, Jawahery S, et al. The influence of intrinsic framework flexibility on adsorption in nanoporous materials. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:5547–5557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause S, Evans JD, Bon V, et al. Towards general network architecture design criteria for negative gas adsorption transitions in ultraporous frameworks. ChemRxiv. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.7796543
   Google Scholar
• Evans JD, Bocquet L, Coudert F-X. Origins of negative gas adsorption. Chem. 2016;1:873–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause S, Bon V, Senkovska I, et al. A pressure-amplifying framework material with negative gas adsorption transitions. Nature. 2016;532:348–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Poloni R, Kim J. Probing gas adsorption in MOFs using an efficient ab initio widom insertion Monte Carlo method. J Comput Chem. 2016;37:2808–2815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetisov EO, Shah MS, Long JR, et al. First principles Monte Carlo simulations of unary and binary adsorption: CO2, N2, and H2O in Mg-MOF-74. Chem Commun. 2018;54:10816–10819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Grajciar L, Nachtigall P, et al. Accurate prediction of methane adsorption in a metal-organic framework with unsaturated metal sites by direct implementation of an ab initio derived potential energy surface in GCMC simulation. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:23074–23080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:5179–5197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:1657–1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel JG, Li S, Tylianakis E, et al. Evaluation of force field performance for high-throughput screening of gas uptake in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:3143–3152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeziorski B, Moszynski R, Szalewicz K. Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waals complexes. Chem Rev. 1994;94:1887–1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokur D, Keskin S. Effects of force field selection on the computational ranking of MOFs for CO2 separations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:2298–2309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behler J, Parrinello M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:146401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JS, Isayev O, Roitberg AE. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem Sci. 2017;8:3192–3203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behler J. Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:17930–17955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütt KT, Arbabzadah F, Chmiela S, et al. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat Commun. 2017;8:13890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartók AP, Payne MC, Kondor R, et al. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104:136403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 1989;2:359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, et al. Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density. Boston; Kluwer; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Zhong C. A general approach for estimating framework charges in metal- organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:5035–5042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argueta E, Shaji J, Gopalan A, et al. Molecular building block-based electronic charges for high-throughput screening of metal-organic frameworks for adsorption applications. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;14:365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breneman CM, Wiberg KB. Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J Comput Chem. 1990;11:361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett TD, Cheetham AK, Fuchs AH, et al. Interplay between defects, disorder and flexibility in metal-organic frameworks. Nat Chem. 2017;9:11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholl DS, Lively RP. Defects in metal-organic frameworks: challenge or opportunity? J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:3437–3444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavka JH, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, et al. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13850–13851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Chua YS, Krungleviciute V, et al. Unusual and highly tunable missing-linker defects in zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 and their important effects on gas adsorption. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:10525–10532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh P, Colón YJ, Snurr RQ. Water adsorption in UiO-66: the importance of defects. Chem Commun. 2014;50:11329–11331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton AW, Babarao R, Jain A, et al. Defects in metal-organic frameworks: a compromise between adsorption and stability? Dalton Trans. 2016;45:4352–4359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow JK, Svane KL, Tiana D, et al. Free energy of ligand removal in the metal-organic framework UiO-66. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:9276–9281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Han C, Sholl DS, et al. Computational characterization of defects in metal-organic frameworks: spontaneous and water-induced point defects in ZIF-8. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7:459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C, Verploegh RJ, Sholl DS. Assessing the impact of point defects on molecular diffusion in ZIF-8 using molecular simulations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9:4037–4044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunger A. Beware of plausible predictions of fantasy materials. Nature. 2019;566:447–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu DC, McGrail BP, Glezakou V-A. Formation mechanism of the secondary building unit in a chromium terephthalate metal-organic framework. Chem Mater. 2014;26:6401–6409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoneya M, Tsuzuki S, Aoyagi M. Simulation of metal-organic framework self-assembly. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:8649–8652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswal D, Kusalik PG. Probing molecular mechanisms of self-assembly in metal-organic frameworks. ACS Nano. 2017;11:258–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswal D, Kusalik PG. Molecular simulations of self-assembly processes in metal-organic frameworks: model dependence. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:044702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colón YJ, Guo AZ, Antony LW, et al. Free energy of metal-organic framework self-assembly. J Chem Phys. 2019;150:104502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollias L, Cantu DC, Tubbs MA, et al. Molecular level understanding of the free energy landscape in early stages of metal-organic framework nucleation. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:6073–6081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greathouse JA, Allendorf MD. The interaction of water with MOF-5 simulated by molecular dynamics. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:10678–10679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellarosa L, Castillo JM, Vlugt T, et al. On the mechanism behind the instability of isoreticular metal-organic frameworks (IRMOFs) in humid environments. Chem A Eur J. 2012;18:12260–12266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C, Zhang C, Tymińska N, et al. Insights into the stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks in humid acidic environments from first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:4339–4348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge SMJ, Waroquier M, Van Speybroeck V. Reliably modeling the mechanical stability of rigid and flexible metal-organic frameworks. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan AK, Avila AM, Rajendran A. Do adsorbent screening metrics predict process performance? A process optimisation based study for post-combustion capture of CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;46:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First EL, Hasan MMF, Floudas CA. Discovery of novel zeolites for natural gas purification through combined material screening and process optimization. AIChE J. 2014;60:1767–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmahini AH, Krishnamurthy S, Friedrich D, et al. From crystal to adsorption column: challenges in multiscale computational screening of materials for adsorption separation processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:15491–15511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullumbi P, Brandani F, Brandani S. Gas separation by adsorption: technological drivers and opportunities for improvement. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2019;24:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna R. Methodologies for screening and selection of crystalline microporous materials in mixture separations. Sep Purif Technol. 2018;194:281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leperi K, Chung YG, You F, et al. Development of a general evaluation metric for rapid screening of adsorbent materials for post-combustion CO2 capture. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:11529–11539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar