Avoiding non-equilibrium effects in adaptive biasing force calculations

References

• Shao Q, Yang L, Zhu W. Selective enhanced sampling in dihedral energy facilitating to overcome the dihedral energy increase in protein folding and accelerating the searching for protein native structure. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21(20):10423–10435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying J, Barnes CA, Louis JM, et al. Importance of time-ordered non-uniform sampling of multi-dimensional NMR spectra of Aβ1-42 peptide under aggregating conditions. J Biomol NMR. 2019;73(8-9):429–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhmatskaya E, Fernandez-Pendas M, Radivojevic T, et al. Adaptive splitting integrators for enhancing sampling efficiency of modified Hamiltonian monte carlo methods in molecular simulation. Langmuir. 2017;33(42):11530–11542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono H, Sakuraba S, Ishida H. Correction: free energy profiles for unwrapping the outer superhelical turn of nucleosomal DNA. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(10):e1007439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B L, Kuczera K. Simulating the free energy of passive membrane permeation for small molecules. Mol Simul. 2018;44(13-14):1147–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, McCammon JA. Unconstrained enhanced sampling for free energy calculations of biomolecules: a review. Mol Simul. 2016;42(13):1046–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Shao X, Chipot C, et al. Extended adaptive biasing force algorithm. an on-the-fly implementation for accurate free-energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016;12(8):3506–3513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto S, Sakae Y, Itoh Y, et al. Study of ligand binding selectivity of histone deacetylases by replica-exchange umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2016;110(3):544a–545a.
   Google Scholar
• Akhshi P, Wu G. Umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations reveal concerted ion movement through G-quadruplex DNA channels. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(18):11017–11025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Jana K, Ganguly B. Revealing the mechanistic pathway of cholinergic inhibition of Alzheimer’s disease by donepezil: a metadynamics simulation study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21(25):13578–13589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai Y, Kawaguchi A, Nagata K, et al. Analysis by metadynamics simulation of binding pathway of influenza virus M2 channel blockers. Microbiol Immunol. 2018;62(1):34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapelosa M. Free energy of binding and mechanism of interaction for the MEEVD-TPR2A peptide-protein complex. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13(9):4514–4523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Shao X, Cai W. Free-energy landscapes of the coupled conformational transition and inclusion processes of altro-cyclodextrins. Mol Simul. 2017;43(13-16):977–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hénin J, Pohorille A, Chipot C. Insights into the recognition and association of transmembrane a-helices. The free energy of alpha-helix dimerization in glycophorin A. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(23):8478–8484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gómez D, Darve E, Pohorille A. Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. J Chem Phys. 2004;120(8):3563–3578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Zhang H, Chen H, et al. Zooming across the free-energy landscape: shaving barriers, and flooding valleys. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9(16):4738–4745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou X, Liu Y, Chen Z, et al. Flow-induced beta-hairpin folding of the glycoprotein ib-alpha beta-switch. Biophys J. 2010;99(4):1182–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Shao X, Cai W. Solvent and structure effects on the shuttling in pillar[5]arene/triazole rotaxanes. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121(45):25547–25553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Shao X, Dehez F, et al. Modulation of membrane permeability by carbon dioxide. J Comput Chem. 2020;41(5):421–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comer J, Gumbart JC, Hénin J, et al. The adaptive biasing force method: everything you always wanted to know but were afraid to ask. J Phys Chem B. 2015;119(3):1129–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipot C, Hénin J. Exploring the free-energy landscape of a short peptide using an average force. J Chem Phys. 2005;123(24):244906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Zhang H, Shao X, et al. Tumbling of anisole units in calixarene promotes its shuttling in rotaxanes. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123(29):18050–18055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79(2):926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Chem Phys. 1998;102(18):3586–3616.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda JB, Venable RM, Freites JA, et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114(23):7830–7843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanommeslaeghe K, Hatcher E, Acharya C, et al. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(4):671–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman EP, Vanommeslaeghe K, Mackerell AD. Site-specific fragment identification guided by single-stepfree energy perturbation calculations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012;8(10):3513–3525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(9):1157–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics. 1996;14(1):33–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feller S E, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, et al. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the langevin piston method. J. Chem Phys. 1995;103(11):4613–4621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh ewald: an Nlog(N) method for ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98(12):10089–10092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckerman M, Berne BJ, Martyna GJ. Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 1992;97(3):1990–2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J Comput Chem. 1992;13(8):952–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Chem. 1977;23(3):327–341.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen HC. Rattle: A “velocity” version of the SHAKE algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J Comput Phys. 1983;52(1):24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Khalili-Araghi F, Tajkhorshid E, et al. Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski’s equality. J Chem Phys. 2003;119(6):3559–3566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel A, Chipot C, Gumbart JC. Thermodynamics of deca-alanine folding in water. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014;10(7):2836–2844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Shao X, Cai W, et al. Taming rugged free energy landscapes using an average force. Accounts Chem Res. 2019;52(11):3254–3264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian B, Martin K. Multidimensional adaptive umbrella sampling: applications to main chain and side chain peptide conformations. J Comput Chem. 1997;18(12):1450–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtas-Niziurski W, Meng Y, Roux B, et al. Self-learning adaptive umbrella sampling method for the determination of free energy landscapes in multiple dimensions. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9(4):1885–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100(2):020603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvalaglio M, Tiwary P, Maggioni G, et al. Overcoming time scale and finite size limitations to compute nucleation rates from small scale well tempered metadynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2016;145(21):211925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar