Advanced search
Publication Cover
Molecular Simulation Volume 47, 2021 - Issue 10-11: Recent Developments in Molecular Simulation; Guest Editor: Jerome Delhommelle
Submit an article Journal homepage
9,386
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Finite-size effects of diffusion coefficients computed from molecular dynamics: a review of what we have learned so far

Alper T. Celebia Engineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
Seyed Hossein Jamalia Engineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-0901View further author information
ORCID Icon,
André Bardowb Energy & Process Systems Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zürich, SwitzerlandView further author information
,
Thijs J. H. Vlugta Engineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-8712View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Othonas A. Moultosa Engineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7477-9684View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 831-845 | Received 28 Jun 2020, Accepted 05 Aug 2020, Published online: 01 Sep 2020

References

  • Cussler EL. Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  • Basu S, Kumar N. Modelling and simulation of diffusive processes. 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2016.
  • Tyrrell HJV, Harris K. Diffusion in liquids: a theoretical and experimental study. 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1984.
  • Taylor R, Krishna R. Modelling reactive distillation. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:5183–5229.
  • Wilson ID. Encyclopedia of separation science. 1st ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 2000.
  • Liu X, Martín-Calvo A, McGarrity E, et al. Fick diffusion coefficients in ternary liquid systems from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:10247–10258.
  • Wesselingh J, Krishna R. Mass transfer in multicomponent mixtures. 1st ed. Delft: Delft University Press; 2000.
  • Bird RB. Transport phenomena. Appl Mech Rev. 2002;55:R1–R4.
  • Lyons WC, Plisga GJ. Standard handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015.
  • Liu X, Schnell SK, Simon J-M, et al. Fick diffusion coefficients of liquid mixtures directly obtained from equilibrium molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:12921–12929.
  • Taylor R, Krishna R. Multicomponent mass transfer. 1st ed. Vol. 2. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
  • Bird RB, Klingenberg DJ. Multicomponent diffusion– A brief review. Adv Water Resour. 2013;62:238–242.
  • Curtiss C, Bird RB. Multicomponent diffusion. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38:2515–2522.
  • Einstein A. On the motion required by the molecular kinetic theory of heat of small particles suspended in a stationary liquid. Ann Phys. 1905;17:549–560.
  • Bian X, Kim C, Karniadakis GE. 111 years of Brownian motion. Soft Matter. 2016;12:6331–6346.
  • Peters C, Wolff L, Vlugt TJH. Diffusion in liquids: experiments, molecular dynamics, and engineering models. In: Bedeaux D, Kjelstrup S, Sengers JV, editors. Experimental thermodynamics. Vol. X: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics with applications. 1st ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015. p. 78–104.
  • Cussler EL. Multicomponent diffusion. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013.
  • Graham TI. The Bakerian lecture. On the diffusion of liquids. Phil Trans R Soc London. 1850;140:1–46.
  • Fick AV. On liquid diffusion. Lond Edinb Dubl Phil Mag J Sci. 1855;10:30–39.
  • Bardow A, Kriesten E, Voda MA, et al. Prediction of multicomponent mutual diffusion in liquids: model discrimination using NMR data. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2009;278:27–35.
  • Peters C, Wolff L, Haase S, et al. Multicomponent diffusion coefficients from microfluidics using Raman microspectroscopy. Lab Chip. 2017;17:2768–2776.
  • Piszko M, Batz K, Rausch MH. Diffusivities of binary mixtures consisting of carbon dioxide, methane, and propane by dynamic light scattering. J Chem Eng Data. 2019;65(3):1068–1082.
  • Giraudet C, Knoll MS, Galvan Y, et al. Diffusion of gold nanoparticles in inverse opals probed by heterodyne dynamic light scattering. Transp Porous Media. 2020;131:723–737.
  • Zangi P, Rausch MH, Fröba AP. Binary diffusion coefficients for gas mixtures of propane with methane and carbon dioxide measured in a loschmidt cell combined with holographic interferometry. Int J Thermophys. 2019;40:18.
  • Wakeham WA, Nagashima A, Sengers JV. Measurement of the transport properties of fluids. Experimental thermodynamics. Vol. 3. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Commission on Thermodynamics. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1991.
  • Wolff L, Koß H-J, Bardow A. The optimal diffusion experiment. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;152:392–402.
  • Bardow A, Göke V, Koß H-J, et al. Concentration-dependent diffusion coefficients from a single experiment using model-based Raman spectroscopy. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2005;228:357–366.
  • Rausch MH, Heller A, Fröba AP. Binary diffusion coefficients of glycerol–water mixtures for temperatures from 323 to 448 K by dynamic light scattering. J Chem Eng Data. 2017;62:4364–4370.
  • Kriesten E, Voda M, Bardow A, et al. Direct determination of the concentration dependence of diffusivities using combined model-based Raman and NMR experiments. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2009;277:96–106.
  • Celebi AT, Vlugt TJH, Moultos OA. Structural, thermodynamic and transport properties of aqueous reline and ethaline solutions from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2019;123(51):11014–11025.
  • Edward JT. Molecular volumes and the Stokes-Einstein equation. J Chem Educ. 1970;47:261.
  • Wilke C, Chang P. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. AIChE J. 1955;1:264–270.
  • Hopp M, Mele J, Gross J. Self-diffusion coefficients from entropy scaling using the PCP-SAFT equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:12942–12950.
  • Mutoru JW, Leahy-Dios A, Firoozabadi A. Modeling infinite dilution and Fickian diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide in water. AIChE J. 2011;57:1617–1627.
  • Brokaw RS. Predicting transport properties of dilute gases. Ind Eng Chem Process Design Dev. 1969;8:240–253.
  • Frenkel D, Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2002.
  • Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. Computer simulation of liquids. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
  • Rapaport DC, Rapaport DCR. The art of molecular dynamics simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
  • Tuckerman M. Statistical mechanics: theory and molecular simulation. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  • Evans DJ, Morriss GP. Statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium liquids. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
  • Maginn EJ. Molecular simulation of ionic liquids: current status and future opportunities. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2009;21:373101.
  • Köddermann T, Paschek D, Ludwig R. Molecular dynamic simulations of ionic liquids: a reliable description of structure, thermodynamics and dynamics. Chem Phys Chem. 2007;8:2464–2470.
  • Li Y, Xu J, Li D. Molecular dynamics simulation of nanoscale liquid flows. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2010;9:1011–1031.
  • Todd B, Daivis PJ. Homogeneous non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of viscous flow: techniques and applications. Mol Simul. 2007;33:189–229.
  • Guevara-Carrion G, Janzen T, Muñoz-Muñoz YM, et al. Mutual diffusion of binary liquid mixtures containing methanol, ethanol, acetone, benzene, cyclohexane, toluene, and carbon tetrachloride. J Chem Phys. 2016;144:124501.
  • Jiang H, Mester Z, Moultos OA, et al. Thermodynamic and transport properties of H2O+NaCl from polarizable force fields. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:3802–3810.
  • Orozco GA, Moultos OA, Jiang H, et al. Molecular simulation of thermodynamic and transport properties for the H2O+NaCl system. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:234507.
  • Liu H, Maginn EJ. A molecular dynamics investigation of the structural and dynamic properties of the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide. J Chem Phys. 2011;135:124507.
  • Liu X, Schnell SK, Simon J-M, et al. Diffusion coefficients from molecular dynamics simulations in binary and ternary mixtures. Int J Thermophys. 2013;34:1169–1196.
  • Liu X, Vlugt TJH, Bardow A. Maxwell–Stefan diffusivities in liquid mixtures: using molecular dynamics for testing model predictions. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2011;301:110–117.
  • Guevara-Carrion G, Vrabec J, Hasse H. Prediction of self-diffusion coefficient and shear viscosity of water and its binary mixtures with methanol and ethanol by molecular simulation. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:074508.
  • Fernández G, Vrabec J, Hasse H. Self diffusion and binary Maxwell–Stefan diffusion in simple fluids with the Green–Kubo method. Int J Thermophys. 2004;25:175–186.
  • Fernández G, Vrabec J, Hasse H. Self-diffusion and binary Maxwell–Stefan diffusion coefficients of quadrupolar real fluids from molecular simulation. Int J Thermophys. 2005;26:1389–1407.
  • Janzen T, Zhang S, Mialdun A, et al. Mutual diffusion governed by kinetics and thermodynamics in the partially miscible mixture methanol+ cyclohexane. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:31856–31873.
  • Janzen T, Vrabec J. Diffusion coefficients of a highly nonideal ternary liquid mixture: Cyclohexane–Toluene–Methanol. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:16508–16517.
  • Jansen APJ. An introduction to kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of surface reactions. 1st ed. Vol. 856. Berlin: Springer; 2012.
  • Wheeler DR, Newman J. Molecular dynamics simulations of multicomponent diffusion. 1. Equilibrium method. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:18353–18361.
  • Wheeler DR, Newman J. Molecular dynamics simulations of multicomponent diffusion. 2. Nonequilibrium method. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:18362–18367.
  • Erpenbeck JJ. Comparison of Green-Kubo and nonequilibrium calculations of the self-diffusion constant of a Lennard-Jones fluid. Phys Rev A. 1987;35:218.
  • MacElroy J. Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of diffusion and flow in thin microporous membranes. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:5274–5280.
  • Chempath S, Krishna R, Snurr RQ. Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of diffusion of binary mixtures containing short n-alkanes in faujasite. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:13481–13491.
  • Tenney CM, Maginn EJ. Limitations and recommendations for the calculation of shear viscosity using reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2010;132:014103.
  • Kubo R. Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems. J Phys Soc Japan. 1957;12:570–586.
  • Green MS. Markoff random processes and the statistical mechanics of time-dependent phenomena. II. Irreversible processes in fluids. J Chem Phys. 1954;22:398–413.
  • Zhou Y, Miller GH. Green–Kubo formulas for mutual diffusion coefficients in multicomponent systems. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:5516–5524.
  • Zhang Y, Otani A, Maginn EJ. Reliable viscosity calculation from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations: a time decomposition method. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:3537–3546.
  • Heyes DM. Self-diffusion and shear viscosity of simple fluids. A molecular-dynamics study. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2: Mol Chem Phys. 1983;79:1741–1758.
  • Meier K, Laesecke A, Kabelac S. Transport coefficients of the Lennard-Jones model fluid. II self-diffusion. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:9526–9535.
  • Pranami G, Lamm MH. Estimating error in diffusion coefficients derived from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:4586–4592.
  • Alder B, Wainwright T. Velocity autocorrelations for hard spheres. Phys Rev Lett. 1967;18:988.
  • Liu H, Silva CM, Macedo EA. Unified approach to the self-diffusion coefficients of dense fluids over wide ranges of temperature and pressure– hard-sphere, square-well, Lennard-Jones and real substances. Chem Eng Sci. 1998;53:2403–2422.
  • Vaz RV, Magalhães AL, Fernandes DL, et al. Universal correlation of self-diffusion coefficients of model and real fluids based on residual entropy scaling law. Chem Eng Sci. 2012;79:153–162.
  • Ohtori N, Ishii Y. Explicit expressions of self-diffusion coefficient, shear viscosity, and the Stokes–Einstein relation for binary mixtures of Lennard-Jones liquids. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:164514.
  • Heyes DM, Cass M, Powles JG, et al. Self-diffusion coefficient of the hard-sphere fluid: system size dependence and empirical correlations. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:1455–1464.
  • Vaz RV, Magalhães AL, Silva CM. Improved Stokes–Einstein based models for diffusivities in supercritical CO 2. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45:1280–1284.
  • Raabe G, Sadus RJ. Molecular dynamics simulation of the effect of bond flexibility on the transport properties of water. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:104512.
  • Aimoli CG, Maginn EJ, Abreu CR. Transport properties of carbon dioxide and methane from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:134101.
  • Moultos OA, Zhang Y, Tsimpanogiannis IN, et al. System-size corrections for self-diffusion coefficients calculated from molecular dynamics simulations: the case of CO 2, n-alkanes, and poly (ethylene glycol) dimethyl ethers. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:074109.
  • Kowsari M, Alavi S, Ashrafizaadeh M, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of imidazolium-based ionic liquids. I. dynamics and diffusion coefficient. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:224508.
  • Perkins SL, Painter P, Colina CM. Experimental and computational studies of choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents. J Chem Eng Data. 2014;59:3652–3662.
  • Wang J, Hou T. Application of molecular dynamics simulations in molecular property prediction II: diffusion coefficient. J Comput Chem. 2011;32:3505–3519.
  • Bizzarri AR, Cannistraro S. Molecular dynamics simulation evidence of anomalous diffusion of protein hydration water. Phys Rev E. 1996;53:R3040.
  • Klein T, Lenahan FD, Kerscher M, et al. Characterization of long linear and branched alkanes and alcohols for temperatures up to 573.15 K by surface light scattering and molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2020;124:4146–4163.
  • Wolff L, Jamali SH, Becker TM, et al. Prediction of composition-dependent self-diffusion coefficients in binary liquid mixtures: the missing link for Darken-based models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:14784–14794.
  • Maginn EJ, Messerly RA, Carlson DJ, et al. Best practices for computing transport properties 1. Self-diffusivity and viscosity from equilibrium molecular dynamics [article v1. 0]. Liv J Comp Mol Sci. 2018;1:6324.
  • Moultos OA, Tsimpanogiannis IN, Panagiotopoulos AZ, et al. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of carbon dioxide diffusivity in n-hexane, n-decane, n-hexadecane, cyclohexane, and squalane. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:12890–12900.
  • Shah D, Mjalli FS. Effect of water on the thermo-physical properties of Reline: an experimental and molecular simulation based approach. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:23900–23907.
  • Baz J, Held C, Pleiss J, et al. Thermophysical properties of glyceline–water mixtures investigated by molecular modelling. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:6467–6476.
  • dos Santos TJ, Abreu CR, Horta BA, et al. Self-diffusion coefficients of methane/n-hexane mixtures at high pressures: an evaluation of the finite-size effect and a comparison of force fields. J Supercrit Fluids. 2020;155:104639.
  • Krishna R, Van Baten JM. The darken relation for multicomponent diffusion in liquid mixtures of linear alkanes: an investigation using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:6939–6947.
  • Guevara-Carrion G, Fingerhut R, Vrabec J. Fick diffusion coefficient matrix of a quaternary liquid mixture by molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2020;124:4527–4535.
  • Liu X, Bardow A, Vlugt TJH. Multicomponent Maxwell–Stefan diffusivities at infinite dilution. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:4776–4782.
  • Van De Ven-Lucassen IM, Thijs AJVT, Vlugt JH, et al. Using molecular dynamics to obtain Maxwell–Stefan diffusion coefficients in liquid systems. Mol Phys. 1998;94:495–503.
  • Krishna R, Wesselingh J. The Maxwell–Stefan approach to mass transfer. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52:861–911.
  • Par S, Guevara-Carrion G, Hasse H, et al. Mutual diffusion in the ternary mixture of water+ methanol+ ethanol and its binary subsystems. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:3985–4001.
  • Higgoda UA, Kankanamge CJ, Hellmann R, et al. Fick diffusion coefficients of binary fluid mixtures consisting of methane, carbon dioxide, and propane via molecular dynamics simulations based on simplified pair-specific ab initio-derived force fields. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2019;502:112257.
  • Jamali SH, van Westen T, Moultos OA, et al. Optimizing nonbonded interactions of the OPLS force field for aqueous solutions of carbohydrates: how to capture both thermodynamics and dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018;14:6690–6700.
  • Vella JR. Fick diffusion coefficients of the gaseous CH 4–CO 2 system from molecular dynamics simulations using traPPE force fields at 101.325, 506.625, 1013.25, 2533.12, and 5066.25 kPa. J Chem Eng Data. 2019;64:3672–3681.
  • Onsager L. Theories and problems of liquid diffusion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1945;46:241–265.
  • Krishna R, Van Baten JM. Onsager coefficients for binary mixture diffusion in nanopores. Chem Eng Sci. 2008;63:3120–3140.
  • Kjelstrup S, Schnell SK, Vlugt TJH, et al. Bridging scales with thermodynamics: from nano to macro. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;5:023002.
  • Schnell SK, Liu X, Simon J-M, et al. Calculating thermodynamic properties from fluctuations at small scales. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:10911–10918.
  • Fingerhut R, Herres G, Vrabec J. Thermodynamic factor of quaternary mixtures from Kirkwood–Buff integration. Mol Phys. 2020;118:e1643046.
  • Kirkwood JG, Buff FP. The statistical mechanical theory of solutions. I. J Chem Phys. 1951;19:774–777.
  • Dawass N, Krüger P, Schnell SK, et al. Kirkwood–Buff integrals using molecular simulation: estimation of surface effects. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:771.
  • Dawass N, Krüger P, Schnell SK, et al. Kirkwood–Buff integrals from molecular simulation. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2019;486:21–36.
  • Krüger P, Schnell SK, Bedeaux D, et al. Kirkwood–Buff integrals for finite volumes. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:235–238.
  • Hall D. Kirkwood–Buff theory of solutions. an alternative derivation of part of it and some applications. Trans Faraday Soc. 1971;67:2516–2524.
  • Dawass N, Krüger P, Simon J-M, et al. Kirkwood–Buff integrals of finite systems: shape effects. Mol Phys. 2018;116:1573–1580.
  • Schnell SK, Englebienne P, Simon J-M, et al. How to apply the Kirkwood–Buff theory to individual species in salt solutions. Chem Phys Lett. 2013;582:154–157.
  • Ben-Naim A. Molecular theory of solutions. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • Oseen CW. Neuere methoden und ergebnisse in der hydrodynamik. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft mb H; 1927.
  • Pratt LR, Hummer G. Simulation and theory of electrostatic interactions in solution: computational chemistry, biophysics and aqueous solutions, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 23–25 June 1999. 1st ed. New York (NY): American Institute of Physics; 1999.
  • Dünweg B, Kremer K. Molecular dynamics simulation of a polymer chain in solution. J Chem Phys. 1993;99:6983–6997.
  • Yeh I-C, Hummer G. System-size dependence of diffusion coefficients and viscosities from molecular dynamics simulations with periodic boundary conditions. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:15873–15879.
  • Simonnin P, Noetinger B, Nieto-Draghi C, et al. Diffusion under confinement: hydrodynamic finite-size effects in simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13:2881–2889.
  • Jamali SH, Bardow A, Vlugt TJH. A generalized form for finite-size corrections in mutual diffusion coefficients of multicomponent mixtures Obtained from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2020;16(6):3799–3806.
  • Dünweg B, Kremer K. Microscopic verification of dynamic scaling in dilute polymer solutions: a molecular-dynamics simulation. Phys Rev Lett. 1991;66:2996.
  • Young JM, Panagiotopoulos AZ. System-size dependence of electrolyte activity coefficients in molecular simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2018;122:3330–3338.
  • Sellan DP, Landry ES, Turney J, et al. Size effects in molecular dynamics thermal conductivity predictions. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:214305.
  • Klenk MJ, Lai W. Finite-size effects on the molecular dynamics simulation of fast-ion conductors: A case study of lithium garnet oxide Li 7La 3Zr 2O 1. Solid State Ionics. 2016;289:143–149.
  • Krüger P, Vlugt TJH. Size and shape dependence of finite-volume Kirkwood–Buff integrals. Phys Rev E. 2018;97:051301.
  • Dawass N, Krüger P, Schnell SK, et al. Finite-size effects of Kirkwood–Buff integrals from molecular simulations. Mol Simul. 2018;44:599–612.
  • Mondello M, Grest GS. Viscosity calculations of n-alkanes by equilibrium molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 1997;106:9327–9336.
  • Kim K-S, Kim C, Karniadakis GE, et al. Density-dependent finite system-size effects in equilibrium molecular dynamics estimation of shear viscosity: hydrodynamic and configurational study. J Chem Phys. 2019;151:104101.
  • Jamali SH, Hartkamp R, Bardas C, et al. Shear viscosity computed from the finite-Size effects of self-diffusivity in equilibrium molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018;14:5959–5968.
  • Tsimpanogiannis IN, Moultos OA, Franco LF, et al. Self-diffusion coefficient of bulk and confined water: a critical review of classical molecular simulation studies. Mol Simul. 2019;45:425–453.
  • Jamali SH, Wolff L, Becker TM, et al. Finite-size effects of binary mutual diffusion coefficients from molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018;14:2667–2677.
  • Cappelezzo M, Capellari C, Pezzin S, et al. Stokes–Einstein relation for pure simple fluids. J Chem Phys. 2007;126:224516.
  • Moultos OA, Tsimpanogiannis IN, Panagiotopoulos AZ. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of CO2 diffusivity in H2O for a wide range of temperatures and pressures. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:5532–5541.
  • Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys. 1995;117:1–19.
  • Berendsen HJ, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun. 1995;91:43–56.
  • Ramírez J, Sukumaran SK, Vorselaars B, et al. Efficient on the fly calculation of time correlation functions in computer simulations. J Chem Phys. 2010;133:154103.
  • Jamali SH, Wolff L, Becker TM, et al. A tool for on-the-fly calculation of transport properties of fluids with the order-n algorithm in LAMMPS. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59:1290–1294.
  • https://github.com/omoultosEthTuDelft/OCTP.
  • Dubbeldam D, Ford DC, Ellis DE, et al. A new perspective on the order-n algorithm for computing correlation functions. Mol Simul. 2009;35:1084–1097.
  • Humbert MT, Zhang Y, Maginn EJ. PyLAT: python LAMMPS analysis tools. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59:1301–1305.
  • Deublein S, Eckl B, Stoll J, et al. ms2: A molecular simulation tool for thermodynamic properties. Comput Phys Commun. 2011;182:2350–2367.
  • Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–935.
  • Kikugawa G, Ando S, Suzuki J, et al. Effect of the computational domain size and shape on the self-diffusion coefficient in a Lennard-Jones liquid. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:024503.
  • Hasimoto H. On the periodic fundamental solutions of the Stokes equations and their application to viscous flow past a cubic array of spheres. J Fluid Mech. 1959;5:317–328.
  • Tazi S, Boţan A, Salanne M, et al. Diffusion coefficient and shear viscosity of rigid water models. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2012;24:284117.
  • Erdõs M, Michalis F, Vlugt TJH, et al. Diffusivity of [ α]-, [ β]-, [ γ]-cyclodextrin and the inclusion complex of [ β]-cyclodextrin:Ibuprofen in aqueous solutions, a molecular dynamics simulation study. Submitted in Phase Equilibria; 2020.
  • Tsimpanogiannis IN, Jamali SH, Economou IG. On the validity of the Stokes–Einstein relation for various water force fields. Mol Phys. 2019;118:e1702729.
  • Mark P, Nilsson L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J Phys Chem A. 2001;105:9954–9960.
  • Enders S, Kahl H, Winkelmann J. Surface tension of the ternary system water+ acetone+ toluene. J Chem Eng Data. 2007;52:1072–1079.
  • Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:11225–11236.
  • Zhao L, Cheng T, Sun H. On the accuracy of predicting shear viscosity of molecular liquids using the periodic perturbation method. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:144501.
  • Berendsen H, Grigera J, Straatsma T. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem. 1987;91:6269–6271.
  • Bocquet L, Barrat J-L. Diffusive motion in confined fluids: mode-coupling results and molecular-dynamics calculations. Europhys Lett. 1995;31:455.
  • Lyklema J. Fundamentals of interface and colloid science: soft colloids. 1st ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 1995.
  • Karniadakis G, Beskok A, Aluru N. Microflows and nanoflows: fundamentals and simulation. 2nd ed. Vol. 29. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2005.
  • Erdõs M, Galteland O, Bedeaux D, et al. Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo simulation of fluids in confinement: relation between the differential and integral pressures. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:293.
  • Rauter MT, Galteland O, Erdõs M, et al. Two-phase equilibrium conditions in nanopores. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:608.
  • Hannaoui R, Galliero G, Hoang H, et al. Influence of confinement on thermodiffusion. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:114704.
  • Collell J, Galliero G. Determination of the thermodynamic correction factor of fluids confined in nano-metric slit pores from molecular simulation. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:194702.
  • Suk M, Aluru NR. Molecular and continuum hydrodynamics in graphene nanopores. RSC Adv. 2013;3:9365–9372.
  • Ghorbanian J, Celebi AT, Beskok A. A phenomenological continuum model for force-driven nano-channel liquid flows. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:184109.
  • Thomas JA, McGaughey AJ. Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2008;8:2788–2793.
  • Hoang H, Galliero G. Grand canonical-like molecular dynamics simulations: application to anisotropic mass diffusion in a nanoporous medium. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:184702.
  • Celebi AT, Barisik M, Beskok A. Electric field controlled transport of water in graphene nano-channels. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:164311.
  • Travis KP, Todd B, Evans DJ. Departure from Navier–Stokes hydrodynamics in confined liquids. Phys Rev E. 1997;55:4288.
  • Qiao R, Aluru NR. Ion concentrations and velocity profiles in nanochannel electroosmotic flows. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:4692–4701.
  • Celebi AT, Nguyen CT, Hartkamp R, et al. The role of water models on the prediction of slip length of water in graphene nanochannels. J Chem Phys. 2019;151:174705.
  • Bocquet L, Charlaix E. Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:1073–1095.
  • Hoang H, Galliero G. Local viscosity of a fluid confined in a narrow pore. Phys Rev E. 2012;86:021202.
  • Celebi AT, Barisik M, Beskok A. Surface charge-dependent transport of water in graphene nano-channels. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2018;22:7.
  • Giannakopoulos A, Sofos F, Karakasidis T, et al. Unified description of size effects of transport properties of liquids flowing in nanochannels. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:5087–5092.
  • Sofos F, Karakasidis TE, Liakopoulos A. How wall properties control diffusion in grooved nanochannels: a molecular dynamics study. Heat and Mass Transf. 2013;49:1081–1088.
  • Marry V, Rotenberg B, Turq P. Structure and dynamics of water at a clay surface from molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008;10:4802–4813.
  • Wei M-J, Zhang L, Lu L, et al. Molecular behavior of water in TiO 2 nano-slits with varying coverages of carbon: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:16536–16543.
  • Joseph S, Aluru NR. Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water? Nano Lett. 2008;8:452–458.
  • Guigas G, Weiss M. Size-dependent diffusion of membrane inclusions. Biophys J. 2006;91:2393–2398.
  • Bashardanesh Z, Elf J, Zhang H, et al. Rotational and translational diffusion of proteins as a function of concentration. ACS Omega. 2019;4:20654–20664.
  • Haridasan N, Kannam SK, Mogurampelly S, et al. Rotational diffusion of proteins in nanochannels. J Phys Chem B. 2019;123:4825–4832.
  • Linke M, Köfinger J, Hummer G. Fully anisotropic rotational diffusion tensor from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2018;122:5630–5639.
  • Linke M, Köfinger J, Hummer G. Rotational diffusion depends on box size in molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9:2874–2878.
  • Vögele M, Köfinger J, Hummer G. Finite-Size-Corrected rotational diffusion coefficients of membrane proteins and carbon nanotubes from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2019;123:5099–5106.
  • Taylor R, Kooijman HA. Composition derivatives of activity coefficient models (for the estimation of thermodynamic factors in diffusion). Chem Eng Commun. 1991;102:87–106.
  • Chen B, Potoff JJ, Siepmann JI. Monte Carlo calculations for alcohols and their mixtures with alkanes. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 5. United-atom description of primary, secondary, and tertiary alcohols. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:3093–3104.
  • Wick CD, Stubbs JM, Rai N, et al. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 7. Primary, secondary, and tertiary amines, nitroalkanes and nitrobenzene, nitriles, amides, pyridine, and pyrimidine. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:18974–18982.
  • Martin MG, Siepmann JI. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 1. United-atom description of n-alkanes. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:2569–2577.
  • Jorgensen WL, Madura JD, Swenson CJ. Optimized intermolecular potential functions for liquid hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc. 1984;106:6638–6646.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.