Effect of aluminium nanoparticles on rheology of AP based composite propellant: experimental study and mathematical modelling

References

• Trache D, Maggi F, Palmucci I, et al. Thermal behavior and decomposition kinetics of composite solid propellants in the presence of amide burning rate suppressants. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132:1601–1615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong X, Chen X, Xu JS, et al. The heat build-up of a polymer matrix composite under cyclic loading: experimental assessment and numerical simulation. Int J Fatigue. 2018;116:323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman K, Chakravarthy SR, Sarathi R. Quench collection of nano-aluminium agglomerates from combustion of sandwiches and propellants. Proc Combust Inst. 2011;33:1941–1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyon DM, Yaras P, Aral B, et al. Rheological behavior of a concentrated suspension: a solid rocket fuel simulant. J Rheol (N Y N Y). 1993;37:35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Pastor J, Franco P. Ramirez-Fernandez FJ. Rheological characterization of energetic materials by rotational testing techniques. ASME 2014 12th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers:V002T11A019–V002T11A019.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Pastor J, Franco P, Ramirez FJ, et al. Influence of rheological behaviour on extrusion parameters during non-continuous extrusion of multi-base propellants. Int J Mater Form. 2018;11:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü H. Comparison of rheological models for jet grout cement mixtures with various stabilizers. Constr Build Mater. 2016;127:220–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Lee S, Lee JW. Non-Newtonian behavior observed via dynamic rheology for various particle types in energetic materials and simulant composites. Korea-Aust Rheol J. 2017;29:9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyon DM, Yazici R, Jacob C, et al. Effects of air entrainment on the rheology of concentrated suspensions during continuous processing. Polym Eng Sci. 1991;31:1386–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanta Abhay K, Monika G, Pathak Devendra D. Empirical modeling of chemoviscosity of hydroxy terminated polybutadiene based solid composite propellant slurry. Malays Polym J. 2010;5:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyon DM, Lawal A, Yazici R, et al. Mathematical modeling and experimental studies of twin-screw extrusion of filled polymers. Polym Eng Sci. 1999;39:1139–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain M, Singh D, Balasubramanian K, et al. Studies on rheological behavior of composite propellant slurry on sequential incorporation of ingredients to predict qualitative mixing pattern. Adv Sci Eng Med. 2015;7:849–854.
   Google Scholar
• Muthiah RM, Krishnamurthy VN, Gupta BR. Rheology of HTPB propellant. I. effect of solid loading, oxidizer particle size, and aluminum content. J Appl Polym Sci. 1992;44:2043–2052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair CR, Prasad CD, Ninan KN. Effect of process parameters on the viscosity of AP/Al/HTPB based solid propellant slurry. J Energy Chem Eng. 2013;1:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Florczak B, Bednarczyk E, Maranda A. Studies of rheological properties of suspension of heterogeneous rocket propellant based on HTPB rubber. Chemik. 2015;69:136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohga M, Hagihara Y. Rheology of concentrated AP/HTPB suspensions prepared at the upper limit of AP content. Propellants, Explos, Pyrotech. 2000;25:199–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanta AK, Dharmsaktu I, Pattnayak PK. Rheological behaviour of HTPB-based composite propellant: effect of temperature and Pot Life on casting rate. Def Sci J. 2007;57:435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombe G, Jain M, Bhongale C, et al. Studies on effect of solid loading on slip flow behaviour of HTPB based propellant slurry by rotational rheometry. Adv Sci Eng Med. 2017;9:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K. An introduction to rheology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Adewale P, Christopher LP. Thermal and rheological properties of crude tall oil for use in biodiesel production. Processes. 2017;5:59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezger TG. The rheology handbook: for users of rotational and oscillatory rheometers. Hannover: Vincentz Network GmbH & Co KG; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Bobroff S, McCarthy KL. Rheological characterization of tomato concentrates and the effect on uniformity of processing. Chem Eng Commun. 2002;189:339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed J, Shivhare US, Singh P. Colour kinetics and rheology of coriander leaf puree and storage characteristics of the paste. Food Chem. 2004;84:605–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehdi M, Rahman MA. Estimating rheological properties of cement pastes using various rheological models for different test geometry, gap and surface friction. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34:1993–2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross MM. Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: a new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1965;20:417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes RD, Zamian JR, Resck IS. Sales MJ, dos Santos ML, da Cunha FR. Physicochemical and rheological properties of passion fruit oil and its polyol. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2010;112:1253–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo B, Figueiredo AA, Rao MA. Rheological properties of mesquite seed gum in steady and dynamic shear. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 1994;27:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lade R, Wasewar K, Sangtyani R, et al. Effect of aluminum nanoparticles on rheological behavior of HTPB-based composite rocket propellant. J Energ Mater. 2019;37(2):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade R, Wasewar K, Sangtyani R, et al. Dynamic shear rheology of nanocomposite propellant suspension. Emerg Mater Res. 2019;8(2):258–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade R, Wasewar K, Sangtyani R, et al. Influence of the addition of aluminium nanoparticles on thermo-rheological properties of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene-based composite propellant and empirical modelling. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138(1):211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahia A, Khayat KH. Analytical models for estimating yield stress of high-performance pseudoplastic grout. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31:731–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Namgung B, Ong PK, et al. Determination of rheological properties of whole blood with a scanning capillary-tube rheometer using constitutive models. J Mech Sci Technol. 2009;23:1718–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng WJ, Lin KC. Rheology and colloidal structure of aqueous TiO2 nanoparticle suspensions. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2003;355:186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SW. Determining the viscosity and yield surface of marine sediments using modified Bingham models. Geosci J. 2013;17:241–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G. Evaluation of time independent rheological models applicable to fresh self-compacting concrete. Appl Rheol. 2007;17:56244–57190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneyisi E, Gesoglu M, Naji N, et al. Evaluation of the rheological behavior of fresh self-compacting rubberized concrete by using the Herschel–Bulkley and modified Bingham models. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2016 Jan 1;16:9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade R, Wasewar K, Sangtyani R, et al. Rheological and wall-slip behaviour of composite propellant suspension containing Al-nanopowder. J Energ Mater. 2018;0:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyon DM. Apparent slip and viscoplasticity of concentrated suspensions. J Rheol (N Y N Y). 2005;49:621–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi S, Peretz A, Natan B. On shear rheology of gel propellants. Propellants, Explos, Pyrotech: An International Journal Dealing with Scientific and Technological Aspects of Energetic Materials. 2007;32:165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes HA. A handbook of elementary rheology.2000.
   Google Scholar