Effect of oxygen-containing functional groups of layered graphene oxide membrane on the removal of amoxicillin: a molecular dynamics study

References

• Moarefian A, Golestani HA, Bahmanpour H. Removal of amoxicillin from wastewater by self-made polyethersulfone membrane using nanofiltration. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12(1):127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phadunghus K, Wongrueng A, Rakruam P, Wattanachira S, Punyapalakul P. Efficiencies of nf and ro membranes on pharmaceutical removal and membrane fouling effects. Eng J. 2017;21(3):101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mompelat S, Le Bot B, Thomas O. Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutical products and by-products, from resource to drinking water. International Environ Int. 2009;35(5):803–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghiem LD, Schafer AI, Elimelech M. Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Science & Technology Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2005;39(19):7698–7705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Bao X, Wu J, Li C, Shi Y, Chen J, Lv B, Zhu B. Typical pharmaceutical molecule removal behavior from water by positively and negatively charged composite hollow fiber nanofiltration membranes. Advances RSC Adv. 2018;8(19):10396–10408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Galletti A, Petrovic M, Barceló D. Hospital effluent: investigation of the concentrations and distribution of pharmaceuticals and environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2012;430:109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang GH, Bao DD, Zhang DQ, Wang C, Qu LL, Li HT. Removal of antibiotics from water with an all-carbon 3D nanofiltration membrane. Research Letters Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13(1):146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batt AL, Bruce IB, Aga DS. Evaluating the vulnerability of surface waters to antibiotic contamination from varying wastewater treatment plant discharges. Environ Pollut. 2006;142(2):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri H, Carmona RJ, Gomis-Berenguer A, Souissi-Najar S, Ouederni A, Ania CO. Competitive adsorption of ibuprofen and amoxicillin mixtures from aqueous solution on activated carbons. Colloid and Interface Science J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;449:252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Chen G, Zhang J, Li H. Adsorption of sulfamethazine by multi-walled carbon nanotubes: effects of aqueous solution chemistry. Advances RSC Adv. 2015;5(32):25541–25549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu F, Ma J, Bi D. Enhanced adsorptive removal of selected pharmaceutical antibiotics from aqueous solution by activated graphene. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(6):4715–4724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Y, Yu F, Ma J, Chen J. Graphene as a template and structural scaffold for the synthesis of a 3D porous bio-adsorbent to remove antibiotics from water. RSC Adv. 2015;5(35):27964–27969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radjenovic J, Petrovic M, Ventura F, Barceló D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment. Water Res.. 2008;42(14):3601–3610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Tanugi D, Lin LC, Grossman JC. Multilayer nanoporous graphene membranes for water desalination. Nano Lett.. 2016;16(2):1027–1033. PMID: 26806020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cath TY, Elimelech M, McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Achilli A, Anastasio D, Brady AR, Childress AE, Farr IV, Hancock NT, Lampi J. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination. 2013;312:31–38. Recent Advances in Forward Osmosis; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916412003657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia | carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination. 2005;174(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaviska F, Drogui P, Grasmick A, Azais A, Héran M. Nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for removing pharmaceutical compounds. Membrane Science J Memb Sci. 2013;429:121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Ruparelia JP, Patel ML. A general review on advanced oxidation processes for waste water treatment. Nirma University International Conference, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. pp. 382–481. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen T. Concentration polarisation by natural organic matter (NOM) in NF and UF. J Memb Sci. 2004;233(1):79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang DE, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306(5696):666–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science. 2008;321(5887):385–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Letters Nano Lett.. 2008;8(3):902–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Huang H, Hu J, Shah SM, Su X. Adsorption and removal of tetracycline antibiotics from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;368(1):540–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Xu Z, Gao C. Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(29):3693–3700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science. 2012;335(6067):442–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi B. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science. 2014;343(6172):740–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu KH, Fathizadeh M, Yu M, Flora JR, Jang A, Jang M, Park CM, Yoo SS, Her N, Yoon Y. Evaluation of removal mechanisms in a graphene oxide-coated ceramic ultrafiltration membrane for retention of natural organic matter, pharmaceuticals, and inorganic salts. Applied Materials & Interfaces ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(46):40369–40377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Li M, Dong J, Sun C, Chen G. Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from municipal waste water with integrated membrane systems, MBR-RO/NF. Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Cui Y, Japip S, Thong Z, Chung TS. Graphene oxide (GO) laminar membranes for concentrating pharmaceuticals and food additives in organic solvents. Carbon. 2018;130:503-–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahamon D, Vega LF. Pharmaceutical removal from water effluents by adsorption on activated carbons: A monte carlo simulation study. Langmuir. 2017;33(42):11146–11155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahamon D, Vega LF. Molecular simulations of phenol and ibuprofen removal from water using multilayered graphene oxide membranes. Mol Phys. 2019;117(23–24):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CD, Carbone P, Siperstein FR. Computational characterisation of dried and hydrated graphene oxide membranes. Nanoscale. 2018;10:1946–1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerf A, He H, Forster M, Klinowski J. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102(23):4477–4482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Liu D, Zhao Y, Yang X, Lu J, Cui F. Molecular dynamics study of the aggregation process of graphene oxide in water. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119(47):26712–26718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CJ, Lin S, Sharma R, Strano MS, Blankschtein D. Understanding the ph-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: A comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir. 2012;28(1):235–241. PMID: 22039913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc.. 1996;118(45):11225–11236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. Chemical Physics J Chem Phys. 1983;79(2):926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. Chemical Physics J Chem Phys. 1995;103(19):8577–8593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Chen M, Mao Y, Liu G. Theoretical study on Janus graphene oxide membrane for water transport. Front Chem Sci Eng. 2020;15(4):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Cheng L, Liu G. Enhanced selective hydrogen permeation through graphdiyne membrane: A theoretical study. Membranes. 2020;10(10):286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahanayaka M, Liu B, Hu Z, Pei QX, Chen Z, Law AW, Zhou K. Graphene membranes with nanoslits for seawater desalination via forward osmosis. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(45):30551–30561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar