Interference mechanism of cations on transport of lithium and magnesium inside COF nanofiltration membranes

References

• Service RF. Zinc aims to beat lithium batteries at storing energy. Science. 2021;372(6545):890–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarascon JM, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature. 2001;414(6861):359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse I. A dead battery dilemma. Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):780–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Sun W, Xu R, et al. Lithium extraction from water lithium resources through green electrochemical-battery approaches: a comprehensive review. J Clean Product. 2021;285:124905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubey PK, Kim M-S, Srivastava RR, et al. Advance review on the exploitation of the prominent energy-storage element: lithium. Part I: from mineral and brine resources. Miner Eng. 2016;89:119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabello J. Lithium brine production, reserves, resources and exploration in Chile: an updated review. Ore Geol Rev. 2021;128:103883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain B. Recovery and recycling of lithium: a review. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;172:388–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JC, Wang M, Dai Q, et al. Energy, greenhouse gas, and water life cycle analysis of lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide monohydrate from brine and ore resources and their use in lithium ion battery cathodes and lithium ion batteries. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;174:105762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somrani A, Hamzaoui AH, Pontie M. Study on lithium separation from salt lake brines by nanofiltration (NF) and low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO). Desalination. 2013;317:184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Song J, Bi Q, et al. Extraction of lithium from Chinese salt-lake brines by membranes: design and practice. J Membr Sci. 2021;635:119441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang L, Sun W, et al. Membrane technologies for Li+/Mg2+separation from salt-lake brines and seawater: a comprehensive review. J Indus Eng Chem. 2020;81:7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Mo Y, Qing W, et al. Membrane-based technologies for lithium recovery from water lithium resources: a review. J Membr Sci. 2019;591:117317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Lin Y, Feng W, et al. A novel nanofiltration membrane with [MimAP][Tf2N] ionic liquid for utilization of lithium from brines with high Mg2+/Li+ ratio. J Membr Sci. 2020;603:117997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awais Ashraf M, Li X, Wang J, et al. DiaNanofiltration-based process for effective separation of Li+ from the high Mg2+/Li+ ratio aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol. 2020;247:116965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Fang W, Wang Z, et al. Dual-skin layer nanofiltration membranes for highly selective Li+/Mg2+separation. J Membr Sci. 2021;620:118862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Wu Y, Ding L, et al. A lamellar MXene (Ti3C2Tx)/PSS composite membrane for fast and selective lithium-ion separation. Angewand Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(41):22265–22269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Wang W, Qian X, et al. Positive charged PEI-TMC composite nanofiltration membrane for separation of Li+ and Mg2+from brine with high Mg2+/Li+ ratio. Desalination. 2019;449:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Wei M, Zhang X, et al. Ion rejection in covalent organic frameworks: revealing the overlooked effect of in-pore transport. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(48):45246–45255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Molecular dynamics study of Mg2+/Li+ separation via biomimetic graphene-based nanopores: the role of dehydration in second shell. Langmuir. 2016;32(51):13778–13786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Ruan Y, Zhang Y, et al. Mg2+-channel-inspired nanopores for Mg2+/Li+ separation: the effect of coordination on the ionic hydration microstructures. Langmuir. 2017;33(36):9201–9210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yue X, Huang G, et al. Li+ selectivity of carboxylate graphene nanopores inspired by electric field and nanoconfinement. Small. 2021. 2006704. DOI:10.1002/smll.202006704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Dai L, Wu Y, et al. Li+/Mg2+separation by membrane separation: the role of the compensatory effect. J Membr Sci. 2021;636:119542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Wei M, Zhang X, et al. Effect of hydrophilicity on water transport through sub-nanometer pores. J Membr Sci. 2020;611:118297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wu Q, Guo X, et al. Laminated self-standing covalent organic framework membrane with uniformly distributed subnanopores for ionic and molecular sieving. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Li X, Zhu J, et al. Covalent organic frameworks for membrane separation. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(10):2665–2681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Wei M, Zhang X, et al. Fast desalination by multilayered covalent organic framework (COF) nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(18):16847–16854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Shi XS, Zhang Z, et al. Unidirectional diffusion synthesis of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) on polymeric substrates for dye separation. J Membr Sci. 2019 Sep;586:274–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong MM, Lan YS, Yang QY, et al. Exploring the structure-property relationships of covalent organic frameworks for noble gas separations. Chem Eng Sci. 2017;168:456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegbauer L, Hahn MW, Jentys A, et al. Tunable water and CO2 sorption properties in isostructural azine-based covalent organic frameworks through polarity engineering. Chem Mater. 2015;27(23):7874–7881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ZP, Zhi YF, Feng X, et al. An azine-linked covalent organic framework: synthesis, characterization and efficient gas storage. Chem Eur J. 2015;21(34):12079–12084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang ZX, Peng YW, Qian YH, et al. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising exfoliated 2D covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for efficient CO2 separation. Chem Mater. 2016;28(5):1277–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA. Dreiding – a generic force-field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem. 1990;94(26):8897–8909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LC, Choi JW, Grossman JC. Two-dimensional covalent triazine framework as an ultrathin-film nanoporous membrane for desalination. Chem Commun. 2015;51(80):14921–14924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong MM, Yang QY, Xiao YL, et al. Revealing the structure-property relationship of covalent organic frameworks for CO2 capture from postcombustion gas: a multi-scale computational study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16(29):15189–15198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joung IS, Cheatham TE. Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(30):9020–9041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Roberts BP, Chakravorty DK, et al. Rational design of particle Mesh Ewald compatible Lennard-Jones parameters for +2 metal cations in explicit solvent. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9(6):2733–2748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Jiang HF, Liu X, et al. Molecular insight into water desalination across multilayer graphene oxide membranes. Appl Mater Inter. 2017;9(27):22826–22836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiranian M, Farimani AB, Aluru NR. Water desalination with a single-layer MoS2 nanopore. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Tanugi D, Grossman JC. Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Letters. 2012;12(7):3602–3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry B. Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(5):1427–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler MH, Bordin JR, Barbosa MC. 2D nanoporous membrane for cation removal from water: effects of ionic valence, membrane hydrophobicity, and pore size. J Chem Phys. 2018;148:22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wei M, Xu F, et al. Thickness-dependent ion rejection in nanopores. J Membr Sci. 2020;601:117899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Wei M, Wang Y. Effect of hydrophilicity on ion rejection of sub-nanometer pores. Sep Purif Technol. 2021;257:117937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar