Publication Cover
Anthrozoös
A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions between people and other animals
Volume 31, 2018 - Issue 2
890
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEWS AND RESEARCH REPORTS

Visitor Perceptions of Nature Conservation at Helsinki Zoo

&

References

  • Anderson, K. (1995). Culture and nature at the Adelaide Zoo: At the frontiers of “human” geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 20, 275–294. doi:10.2307/622652.
  • Anderson, K. (1998). Animals, science, and spectacle in the city. In J. R. Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies. Place, politics and identity in the nature–culture borderlands (pp. 25–50). London: Verso.
  • Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13, 367–383. doi: 10.1080/13504620701430604.
  • Baratay, E., & Hardouin-Fugier, E. (2003). Zoo: A history of zoological gardens in the West. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Barongi, R., Fisken, F., Parker, M., & Gusset, M. (2015). Committing to conservation: The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. Gland: World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) Executive Office.
  • Bayma, T. (2012). Rational myth making and environment shaping: The transformation of the zoo. The Sociological Quarterly, 53, 116–141. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01228.x.
  • Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (2001). The wild animal in late modernity. The case of the Disneyization of zoos. Tourist Studies, 1, 83–104. doi:10.1177/146879760100100105q_1ME228.
  • Braverman, I. (2012). Zooland: The institution of captivity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Braverman, I. (2014). Conservation without nature: The trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum, 51, 47–57. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.018.
  • Braverman, I. (2015). Wild life: The institution of nature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Broad, S., & Weiler, B. (1998). Captive animals and interpretation: A tale of two tiger exhibits. Journal of Tourism Studies, 9, 14–27.
  • Bruni, C. M., Fraser, J. F., & Schultz, P. W. (2008). The value of zoo experiences for connecting people with nature. Visitor Studies, 1, 139–150. doi: 10.1080/10645570802355489
  • Calver, S. J., & Page, S. J. (2013). Enlightened hedonism: Exploring the relationship of service value, visitor knowledge and interest, to visitor enjoyment at heritage attractions. Tourism Management, 39, 23–36. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.03.008.
  • Carr, N., & Cohen, S. (2011). The public face of zoos: Images of entertainment, education and conservation. Anthrozoös, 24, 175–189. doi:10.2752/175303711X12998632257620.
  • Chalmin-Pui, L. S., & Perkins, R. (2016). How do visitors relate to biodiversity conservation? An analysis of London Zoo’s “BUGS” exhibit. Environmental Education Research, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1259395.
  • City of Helsinki. (n.d.). Main attractions of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.visithelsinki.fi/en/see-and-experience/sights-and-attractions/main-attractions-in-helsinki#/?listing_id=52354&mode=list.
  • Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Saunders, C. D. (2009), Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28, 377–397. doi:10.1002/zoo.20186.
  • Coe, J. (1985). Design and perception: Making the zoo experience real. Zoo Biology, 4, 197–208. doi: 10.1002/zoo.1430040211.
  • Cohen, E., & Fennell, D. (2016). The elimination of Marius, the giraffe: Humanitarian act or callous management decision? Tourism Recreation Research, 41, 168–176. doi:10.1080/02508281.2016.1147211.
  • Davey, G. (2006). Visitor behavior in zoos: A review. Anthrozoös, 19, 143–157. doi: 10.2752/089279306785593838
  • Dickie, L. A., Bonner, J. P., & West, C. D. (2007). In situ and ex situ conservation: Blurring the boundaries between zoos and the wild. In A. Zimmermann, M. Hatchwell, L. Dickie, & C. West, (Eds.), Zoos in the 21st century: Catalysts for conservation? (pp. 220–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • EAZA Council. (2015). EAZA guidelines on the definition of a direct contribution to conservation. EAZA. Retrieved from http://www.eaza.net/assets/Uploads/Guidelines/Contribution-to-conservation-definition-2015-04-Revisions.pdf
  • Falk, J. H., Heimlich, J. E., Vernon, C. L., & Bronnenkant, K. (2010). Critique of a critique: Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? Society & Animals, 18, 415–419. doi:10.1163/156853010X524361.
  • Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., & Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2013). Contesting the zoo as a setting for ecotourism, and the design of a first principle. Journal of Ecotourism, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1080/14724049.2012.737796.
  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). The art of science. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Frost, W., & Laing, J. (2011). Up close and personal: Rethinking zoos and the experience economy. In W. Frost (Ed.), Zoos and tourism: Conservation, education, entertainment? (pp. 133–142). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Gusset, M., & Dick, G. (2010). “Building a future for wildlife”? Evaluating the contribution of the world zoo and aquarium community to in situ conservation. International Zoo Yearbook, 44, 183–191. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.2009.00101.x.
  • Gusset, M., & Dick, G. (2011). The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology, 30, 566–569. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20369
  • Helsinki Zoo. (2015). Korkeasaaren arvot (Values of Helsinki Zoo). Retrieved from http://www.korkeasaari.fi/suojelutyo/korkeasaaren_arvot/.
  • Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M., & Monroe, M. (2015). Conservation education and outreach techniques (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kisling, V. N. (Ed.). (2000). Zoo and aquarium history: Ancient animal collections to zoological gardens. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
  • Lorimer, J. (2006). What about the nematodes? Taxonomic partialities in the scope of UK biodiversity conservation. Social & Cultural Geography, 7, 539–558. doi:10.1080/14649360600825687.
  • Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 25, 911–932. doi:10.1068/d71j.
  • Luebke, J. F., & Matiasek, J. (2013). An exploratory study of zoo visitors’ exhibit experiences and reactions. Zoo Biology, 32, 407–416. doi:10.1002/zoo.21071.
  • Marino, L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Malamud, R., Nobis, N., & Broglio, R. (2010). Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study. Society & Animals, 18, 126–138. doi:10.1163/156853010X491980.
  • Marseille, M. M., Elands, B. H., & van den Brink, M. L. (2012). Experiencing polar bears in the zoo: Feelings and cognitions in relation to a visitor’s conservation attitude. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17, 29–43. doi:10.1080/10871209.2012.631208.
  • McPhee, M. E., Foster, J. S., Sevenich, M., & Saunders, C. D. (1988). Public perceptions of behavioral enrichment: Assumptions gone awry. Zoo Biology, 17, 525–534. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:6<525::AID-ZOO6>3.0.CO;2-W
  • Miller, I. J. (2013). The nature of the beasts: Empire and exhibition at the Tokyo Imperial Zoo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Mony, P. R., & Heimlich, J. E. (2008). Talking to visitors about conservation: Exploring message communication through docent–visitor interactions at zoos. Visitor Studies, 11, 151–162. doi:10.1080/10645570802355513.
  • Moss, A., & Esson, M. (2013). The educational claims of zoos: Where do we go from here? Zoo Biology, 32, 13–18. doi:10.1002/zoo.21025.
  • Moss, A., & Esson, M. (2014). Zoo education: Outputs, outcomes, and measuring the unexpected. Waza Magazine, 15, 2–5.
  • Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2014a). Conservation: Zoo visits boost biodiversity literacy. Nature, 508, 186–186. doi: 10.1038/508186d
  • Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2014b). A global evaluation of biodiversity literacy in zoo and aquarium visitors. (No. 2). Gland: WAZA Executive Office.
  • Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2015). Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Conservation Biology, 29, 537–544. doi:10.1111/cobi.12383.
  • Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2016). Probing the link between biodiversity-related knowledge and self-reported proconservation behavior in a global survey of zoo visitors. Conservation Letters, 1–8. doi: 10.1111/conl.12233.
  • Nieminen, J. (2015). Hirviä ja ihmisiä. Hirven yhteiskunnallisen läsnäolon hallinta 2000-luvun alussa [Of Moose and Men—The social presence and the governance of the moose at the turn of the millennium] (Doctoral dissertation). School of Management, University of Tampere.
  • Nygren, N. V., & Ojalammi, S. (2018). Conservation education in zoos—A literature review. Trace, 4, 1–15.
  • Patrick, P. G., Matthews, C. E., Ayers, D. F., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Conservation and education: Prominent themes in zoo mission statements. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 53–60. doi:10.3200/JOEE.38.3.53-60.
  • Pearson, E. L., Dorrian, J., & Litchfield, C. A. (2013). Measuring zoo visitor learning and understanding about orangutans: evaluation to enhance learning outcomes and to foster conservation action. Environmental Education Research, 19, 823–843. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.763112.
  • Pearson, E. L., Lowry, R., Dorrian, J., & Litchfield, C. A. (2014). Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: “Don’t Palm Us Off” for orang-utan conservation. Zoo Biology, 33, 184–196, doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.763112. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21120
  • Powell, D. M., & Bullock, E. V. (2014). Evaluation of factors affecting emotional responses in zoo visitors and the impact of emotion on conservation mindedness. Anthrozoös, 27, 389–405. doi: 10.2752/175303714X13903827488042
  • Reade, L. S., & Waran, L. K. (1996). The modern zoo: How do people perceive zoo animals? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47, 109–118. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01014-9
  • Roe, K., & McConney, A. (2015). Do zoo visitors come to learn? An internationally comparative, mixed-methods study. Environmental Education Research, 21, 865–884. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.940282.
  • Roe, K., McConney, A., & Mansfield, C. F. (2014). The role of zoos in modern society—A comparison of zoos’ reported priorities and what visitors believe they should be. Anthrozoös, 27, 529–541. doi: 10.2752/089279314X14072268687808.
  • Sattler, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Short-and long-term outreach at the zoo: cognitive learning about marine ecological and conservational issues. Environmental Education Research, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1144173.
  • Schultz, J. G., & Joordens, S. (2014). The effect of visitor motivation on the success of environmental education at the Toronto Zoo. Environmental Education Research, 20, 753–775. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.843646.
  • Skibins, J. C., & Powell, R. B. (2013). Conservation caring: Measuring the influence of zoo visitors’ connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors. Zoo Biology, 32, 528–540. doi:10.1002/zoo.21086.
  • Skibins, J. C., Powell, R. B., & Hallo, J. C. (2013). Charisma and conservation: Charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 959–982. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z.
  • Smith, L., & Broad, S. (2007). Do zoo visitors attend to conservation messages? A case study of an elephant exhibit. Tourism Review International, 11, 225–235. doi:10.3727/154427207783948810.
  • Smith, A., & Sutton, S. (2008). The role of flagship species in the formation of conservation intentions. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 127–140. doi: 10.1080/10871200701883408
  • Soulé, M. (2014). The “New Conservation”. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the wild (pp. 66–80). Washington, DC: The Foundation for Deep Ecology; Island Press.
  • Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23, 63–74. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1188058.
  • Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., Van Vuuren, D. P., Den Elzen, M. G., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change, 95, 83–102. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6
  • Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 26–31. doi: 10.1080/00958960009598648
  • Taloustutkimus Oy. (2014). Vapaa-ajankeskusten yrityskuvat. [Company Images of Finnish leisure centers.]. Unpublished manuscript.
  • WAZA. (n.d.). History. Retrieved from http://www.waza.org/en/site/about-waza/history.
  • WAZA. (2005). Building a future for wildlife: The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. Bern: WAZA Executive Office.
  • Wijeratne, A. J., Van Dijk, P. A., Kirk-Brown, A., & Frost, L. (2014). Rules of engagement: The role of emotional display rules in delivering conservation interpretation in a zoo-based tourism context. Tourism Management, 42, 149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.012
  • Yle. (2016, August 28). Särkänniemi dolphins leave Finland for Greece. Yle News. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/sarkanniemi_dolphins_leave_finland_for_greece/9125941.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.