Who Lets the Dog In? Differential Effects of a Dog-Training Program for Incarcerated Adults

References

• Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profile. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. C. (2007). Assessing the human–animal bond: A compendium of actual measures. Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angle, R. L. (1994). Utilization of the pet bonding scale to examine the relation between the human/companion animal bond and self-esteem in pre-adolescence. ProQuest Dissertations database.
   Google Scholar
• Arseneault, C., Plourde, C., & Alain, M. (2016). Evaluating a prison-based intervention program: Approaches and challenges. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 31(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.307
   Google Scholar
• Aufderheide, C., & Renck Jalongo, M. (2019). Celebrating the achievements of prison dog programs. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 275–304). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beetz, A. (2017). Theories and possible processes of action in animal assisted interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1262263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human–animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, T., & Zoon, M. (2012). Wat werkt in multiprobleemgezinnen? https://jwdezeeuw.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/nji-2012-wat-werkt_multiprobleemgezinnen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A., Taxman, F. S., & Silverman, R. (2003). Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, S. M., Gross, D., Garvey, C. A., Hill, C., Fogg, L., & Resnick, B. (2010). Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M., & Button, A. (2005). Prison pups: Assessing the effects of dog training programs in correctional facilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 79–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v09n04_06
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, J. W., Coppola, E. C., Ferris, C. S., Conroy, N. L., Devlin, S. J., & Boc, J. A. (2019). Evaluation outcomes in a prison-based canine program: A mixed-method analysis of new leash on life. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 193–211). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. J. (2014). Bad to the bone?: The effects of dog training programs on factors related to desistance [Doctoral dissertation]. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. J. (2019). Exploring types of programs: Dog, rescue, rehabilitation and training. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 37–51). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. The Prison Journal, 96(6), 854–876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516671919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, N. (2008). A case study of incarcerated males participating in a canine training program. Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen. (2017). Tbs inzichtelijk. https://www.dji.nl/binaries/infographictbs_2017_tcm41-271323.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen. (2019). Gevangeniswezen. https://www.dji.nl/binaries/120687_03_dji_infosheet_gevangeniswezen_april_2019_V4_tcm41-352270.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Duindam, H. M., Asscher, J. J., Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Creemers, H. E. (2020). Are we barking up the right tree? A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of prison-based dog programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 749–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820909875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duindam, H. M., Creemers, H. E., Hoeve, M., & Asscher, J. J. (2021). A quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs on incarcerated youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(5), 644–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20983748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2015). Importance of program integrity outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders grant. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2005). Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the last two decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-004-6460-0
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., Combs, K. M., Gandenberger, J., Tedeschi, P., & Morris, K. N. (2020). Measuring the psychological impacts of prison-based dog training programs and in-prison outcomes for inmates. The Prison Journal, 100(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519894657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, A. (2016). Pen pals: An examination of human–animal interaction as an outlet for health masculinity in prison. In C. Blazina, & L. R. Kogan (Eds.), Men and their dogs (pp. 175–194). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, A., Geller, E., & Fortney, E. (2007). Human–animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i1.385
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, A., & Winston, L. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation of dog training and rehabilitation initiatives in correctional facilities. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 171–190). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Furst, G. (2019). The empirical evidence supporting dog training programs for incarcerated people. In M. R. Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 17–36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gearing, R. E., El-bassel, N., Ghesquiere, A., Baldwin, S., Gillies, J., & Ngeow, E. (2011). Major ingredients of fidelity: A review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grommon, E., Carson, D. C., & Kenney, L. (2018). An experimental trial of a dog-training program in a juvenile detention center. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 41(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9346-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L. B. (2018). Becoming the person your dog thinks you are: An assessment of Florida prison-based dog training programs on postrelease recidivism. Corrections, Policy, Practice, and Research, 5(3), 149–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1433564.
   Google Scholar
• Jasperson, R. A. (2010). Therapeutic interventions and animal assisted therapy with incarcerated females [Doctoral dissertation]. College of Social Work, University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., & Bruneau, L. (2019). Caring for and about dogs: Animal welfare considerations. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 79–98). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junger-Tas, J. (1997). Ethnic minorities and criminal justice in the Netherlands. Crime and Justice, 21(1997), 257–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/449252
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Strategies to improve the evidence base of animal-assisted interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1191952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, E., Maujean, A., Pepping, C. A., Downes, M., Lakhani, A., Byrne, J., & Macfarlane, K. (2015). A systematic review of the efficacy of equine-assisted interventions on psychological outcomes. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 17(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2014.996169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(10), 877–883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, K. A., Trachtenberg, S. W., & Serpell, J. A. (2004). Can animals help humans heal? Animal-assisted interventions in adolescent mental health. Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society (CIAS) and University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. J., Buchanan-Smith, H. M., McIvor, G., & Vick, S. J. (2017). “You think you’re helping them, but they’re helping you too”: Experiences of Scottish male young offenders participating in a dog training program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 945–972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2019). Rehabilitation programs for adult offenders: A meta-analysis in support of guidelines for effective practice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252504.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lösel, F. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In G. A. Bernfield, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 67–93). Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, M., Carlsson, P., Sjödahl, R., Theodorsson, E., & Levin, LÅ. (2017). Patient benefit of dog-assisted interventions in health care: A systematic review. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1844-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marino, L. (2012). Construct validity of animal-assisted therapy and activities: How important is the animal in AAT? Anthrozoös, 25(sup1), 139–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13353430377219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, P., Enders-Slegers, M.-J., & Walker, J. K. (2016). The emotional lives of companion animals: Attachment and subjective claims by owners of cats and dogs. Anthrozoös, 29(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1075299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maujean, A., Pepping, C. A., & Kendall, E. (2015). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of animal-assisted therapy on psychosocial outcomes. Anthrozoös, 28(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279315X14129350721812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menna, L. F., Santaniello, A., Todisco, M., Amato, A., Borrelli, L., Scandurra, C., & Fioretti, A. (2019). The human–animal relationship as the focus of animal-assisted interventions: A one health approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3660), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193660
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D., & Hall, S. (2014). Animal-assisted interventions: Making better use of the human–animal bond. Veterinary Record, 174(11), 269–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.g1929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton, C. A., Perez, P. R., & Miller, K. (2015). Voices from behind prison walls: The impact of training service dogs on women in prison. Society & Animals, 23(5), 484–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montori, V. M., & Guyatt, G. H. (2001). Intention-to-treat principle. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165(10), 1339–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, C. (2011). Companions on the inside: Pet ownership and the introduction of a prison dog program at darling downs correctional centre [Doctoral dissertation]. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, C., & McLaughlin, D. (2013). Is the tail wagging the dog? A review of the evidence for prison animal programs. Australian Psychologist, 48(5), 369–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimer, J., & Lundahl, B. (2007). Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös, 20(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307X224773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Haire, M. E. (2013). Animal-assisted intervention for autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1606–1622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1707-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Haire, M. E., Guérin, N. A., & Kirkham, A. C. (2015). Animal-assisted intervention for trauma: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. S. (2000). Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked? Anthrozoös, 13(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renck Jalongo, M. (2019). Introduction: Building a rationale for prison dog programs. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 1–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Renck Jalongo, M., Louden, M., & Estock, L. (2019). Planning and implementing a prison dog program. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 53–78). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson-Taylor, K., & Blanchette, K. (2001). Results of an evaluation of the pawsitive directions canine program at nova institution for women. Correctional Service of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Robino, A. E. (2019). The human–animal bond and attachment in animal-assisted interventions in counseling [Doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, G., Duindam, H. M., Creemers, H. E., Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Asscher, J. J. (2018). The effectiveness of Dutch cell dogs in correctional facilities in the Netherlands: A study protocol of a quasi-experimental trial. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1797-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serpell, J., McCune, S., Gee, N., & Griffin, J. A. (2017). Current challenges to research on animal-assisted interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 21(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1262775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, B., & Martens, P. (2020). Chinese companion animal caretakers’ attachment influences their attribution to their animals. Society & Animals, 1, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341550
   Google Scholar
• Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 173–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, W. G. (2007). The experience of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71(1), 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. M., & Stewart, L. A. (2014). Effectiveness of correctional programs with ethnically diverse offenders: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12469507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Helm, P., Beunk, L., Stams, G. J., & van der Laan, P. (2014). The relationship between detention length, living group climate, coping, and treatment motivation among juvenile delinquents in a youth correctional facility. The Prison Journal, 94(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885514524884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Langen, M., Stams, G., & Van Vugt, E. (2009). Dutch validation of the Basic Empathy Scale [Unpublished manuscript].
   Google Scholar
• Van Wormer, J., Kigerl, A., & Hamilton, Z. (2017). Digging deeper: Exploring the value of prison-based dog handler programs. Prison Journal, 97(4), 520–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517712481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, C. R., Goor, I. V. D., Stronks, K., & Garretsen, H. (2011). Evaluation of an assertive outreach intervention for problem families: Intervention methods and early outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 25(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00811.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, P. G., & Mertin, P. G. (1994). The training of pets as therapy dogs in a women’s prison: A pilot study. Anthrozoös, 7(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279394787002014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz, J. R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61(7), 671–689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegerinck, H., & Buijtels, B. (2017). Dutch cell dogs: Jaaverslag 2016. Bergeijk.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, Y., Ueno, M., Maruo, K., & Gosho, M. (2020). Multiple imputation for longitudinal data in the presence of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 30(1), 178–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2019.1632878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar