“Commenting” on Animal Cruelty: A Content Analysis of Social Media Discourse on Animal Law Enforcement in Australia

References

• Allen, M., Hunstone, M., Waerstad, J., Foy, E., Hobbins, T., Wikner, B., & Wirrel, J. (2002). Human-to-animal similarity and participant mood influence punishment recommendations for animal abusers. Society & Animals, 10(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853002320770074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arluke, A., Frost, R., Patronek, G., Luke, C., Messner, E., Nathanson, J., & Papazian, M. (2002). Press reports of animal hoarding. Society & Animals, 10(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853002320292282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, S. B., & Wolen, A. R. (2008). The benefits of human–companion animal interaction: A review. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 35(4), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.35.4.487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, M. (2010). Whose issue? Representations of human–elephant conflict in Indian and international media. Science Communication, 32(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009353177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. M., Anderson, J., & Blaney, R. J. P. (2002). Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 15(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015036617385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, S., Athreya, V., Grenyer, R., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). Understanding the role of representations of human–leopard conflict in Mumbai through media-content analysis. Conservation Biology, 27(3), 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, B. L. (2004). More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackenridge, S., Zottarelli, L. K., Rider, E., & Carlsen-Landy, B. (2012). Dimensions of the human–animal bond and evacuation decisions among pet owners during Hurricane Ike. Anthrozoös, 25(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13316289505503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. M. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bregant, J., Shaw, A., & Kinzler, K. D. (2016). Intuitive jurisprudence: Early reasoning about the functions of punishment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(4), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (2009). A retrospective and prospective look at media effects. In R. Nabi, & M. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 9–17). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication & Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, D. (2015). Animal law in Australia (2nd ed.). Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M., & Ng, Y. M. M. (2017). Nasty online comments anger you more than me, but nice ones make me as happy as you. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, J. B., Young, I., Lambert, K., Dysart, L., Nogueira Borden, L., & Rajić, A. (2014a). A scoping review of published research on the relinquishment of companion animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.899910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014b). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Creyke, R., Geddes, R., & Hamer, D. (2009). Case law and precedent. In Laying down the law (7th ed., pp. 57–93). LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1–79). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/652198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGue, S., & DiLillo, D. (2009). Is animal cruelty a “red flag” for family violence? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 1036–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508319362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakulich, K. M., & Kirk, E. M. (2016). Public opinion and criminal justice reform: Framing matters. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., Mackuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escamilla-Castillo, M. (2010). The purposes of legal punishment. Ratio Juris, 23(4), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00465.x
   Google Scholar
• Febres, J., Brasfield, H., Shorey, R. C., Elmquist, J., Ninnemann, A., Schonbrun, Y. C., Temple, J. R., Recupero, P. R., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). Adulthood animal abuse among men arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 20(9), 1059–1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214549641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, C. P. (2011). Examining the links between animal abuse and human violence. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(5), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9297-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A. (2010). Beyond public opinion polls: Punitive public sentiment and criminal justice policy. Sociology Compass, 4(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00269.x
   Google Scholar
• Geysen, T.-L., Weick, J., & White, S. (2010). Companion animal cruelty and neglect in Queensland: Penalties, sentencing and “community expectations”. Australian Animal Protection Law Journal, 4, 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Glanville, C., Ford, J., Cook, R., & Coleman, G. J. (2021). Community attitudes reflect reporting rates and prevalence of animal mistreatment. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.666727
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Hoffman, L. H. (2012). All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grugan, S. T. (2019). Capturing cruelty: A content analysis of companion animal cruelty in the news media. Society & Animals, 2019(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341530
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. O., Jones, B., & McGreevy, P. D. (2020). Social license and animal welfare: Developments from the past decade in Australia. Animals, 10(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilverda, F., & Kuttschreuter, M. (2018). Online information sharing about risks: The case of organic food. Risk Analysis, 38(9), 1904–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilverda, M.-S. D., Kuttschreuter, M., & Giebels, E. (2018). The effect of online social proof regarding organic food: Comments and likes on Facebook. Frontiers in Communication, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00030
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., & Park, A. (2002). How malleable are attitudes to crime and punishment? Findings from a British deliberative poll. In J. V. Roberts & M. Hough (Eds.), Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (pp. 163–183). Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843924272-17
   Google Scholar
• Indermaur, D., Roberts, L., Spiranovic, C., Mackenzie, G., & Gelb, K. (2012). A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society, 14(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511434430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. V., Phua, J., & Lee, K. M. (2015). Telling stories about breastfeeding through Facebook: The impact of user-generated content (UGC) on pro-breastfeeding attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095317
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. J., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2016). Power of consumers using social media: Examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijn, E. A., Veldhuis, J., & Plaisier, X. S. (2013). YouTube as a research tool: Three approaches. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(9), 695–701. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuttschreuter, M., & Hilverda, F. M. D. (2019). Risk and benefit perceptions of human enhancement technologies: The effects of Facebook comments on the acceptance of nanodesigned food. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.177
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., & Yoon Jae, J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37(6), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, L., Hoffer, T. A., & Loper, A. B. (2016). Criminal histories of a subsample of animal cruelty offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 30, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. (2006). Capturing the sustainability agenda: Organic foods and media discourses on food scares, environment, genetic engineering, and health. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur Clark, J., Clifford, P., Jarrett, W., & Pekow, C. (2019). Communicating about animal research with the public. ILAR Journal, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macias-Mayo, A. R. (2018). The link between animal abuse and child abuse. American Journal of Family Law, 32(3), 130.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, H. (2002). Animal welfare verification in Canada: A discussion paper. George Morris Centre. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.18123
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, R., Hebart, M. L., Ankeny, R. A., & Whittaker, A. L. (2022a). An investigation into “community expectations” surrounding animal welfare law enforcement in Australia. Frontiers in Animal Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.991042
   Google Scholar
• Morton, R., Hebart, M. L., Ankeny, R. A., & Whittaker, A. L. (2022b). Portraying animal cruelty: A thematic analysis of Australian news media reports on penalties for animal cruelty. Animals, 12(21), https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212918
   Google Scholar
• Morton, R., Hebart, M. L., & Whittaker, A. L. (2018). Increasing maximum penalties for animal welfare offences in South Australia—Has it caused penal change? Animals, 8(12), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8120236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, R., Hebart, M. L., & Whittaker, A. L. (2020). Explaining the gap between the ambitious goals and practical reality of animal welfare law enforcement: A review of the enforcement gap in Australia. Animals, 10(3), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muter, B. A., Gore, M. L., Gledhill, K. S., Lamont, C., & Huveneers, C. (2013). Australian and US news media portrayal of sharks and their conservation. Conservation Biology, 27(1), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01952.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. (Updated July 2018). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Australian Government. https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry, M. (2017). Pets in danger: Exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurse, A. (2016). Beyond the property debate: Animal welfare as a public good. Contemporary Justice Review, 19(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2016.1169699
   Google Scholar
• Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl, F., & van der Staay, F. J. (2012). Animal welfare: At the interface between science and society. The Veterinary Journal, 192(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, C., Rossmann, C., & Keyling, T. (2014). Exemplification 2.0: Roles of direct and indirect social information in conveying health messages through social network sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., Mancini, C., Mears, D. P., & Gertz, M. (2015). Public (mis)understanding of crime policy: The effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(5), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414526228
   Google Scholar
• Quattrociocchi, W., Caldarelli, G., & Scala, A. (2014). Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: Media competition and social influence. Scientific Reports, 4(1), 4938–4938. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04938
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, J., Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Gerber, M. M. (2012). Public opinion towards the lay magistracy and the sentencing council guidelines: The effects of information on attitudes. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadath, N., Kleinschmit, D., & Giessen, L. (2013). Framing the tiger: A biodiversity concern in national and international media reporting. Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, S. (2005). Sentencing animal cruelty. In S. Hart (Ed.), Cruelty to animals: A human problem—Proceedings of the 2005 RSPCA Australia Scientific Seminar (pp. 41–45). RSPCA Australia. https://www.rspca.org.au/sites/default/files/website/The-facts/Science/Scientific-Seminar/2005/SciSem2005-Proceedings.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M., Lee, N. Y., Hötzel, M. J., de Luna, M. C., Sharma, A., Idris, M., Derkley, T., Li, C., Islam, M. A., Iyasere, O. S., Navarro, G., Ahmed, A. A., Khruapradab, C., Curry, M., Burns, G. L., & Marchant, J. N. (2022). International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Frontiers in Animal Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.960379
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvia, R. (2016). Corporate criminals and punishment theory. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 29(1), 97–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2016.4
   Google Scholar
• Synnott, J., Coulias, A., & Ioannou, M. (2017). Online trolling: The case of Madeleine McCann. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2005). Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785594342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2009). Lock ‘em up and throw away the key? Community opinions regarding current animal abuse penalties. Australian Animal Protection Law Journal, 3, 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Thielo, A. J., Cullen, F. T., Cohen, D. M., & Chouhy, C. (2016). Rehabilitation in a red state: Public support for correctional reform in Texas. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(1), 137–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, Y., Pauselli, G., & Adinolfi, F. (2020). Exploring attitudes toward animal welfare through the lens of subjectivity—An application of Q-methodology. Animals, 10(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bock, B., & Roe, E. (2008). European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113(4), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volant, A. M., Johnson, J. A., Gullone, E., & Coleman, G. J. (2008). The relationship between domestic violence and animal abuse: An Australian study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1277–1295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton-Moss, B., Manganello, J., Frye, V., & Campbell, J. (2005). Risk factors for intimate partner violence and associated injury among urban women. The Publication for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 30(5), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-005-5518-x
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, J. B., Olufuwote, R. D., Cravens-Pickens, J. D., & Witting, A. B. (2019). Online blaming and intimate partner violence: A content analysis of social media comments. Qualitative Report, 24(1), 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Brückner, C., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). They came, they liked, they commented: Social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(8), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J., & Hensley, C. (2003). From animal cruelty to serial murder: Applying the graduation hypothesis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X02239276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A., Khalil, K. A., & Wharton, J. (2018). Empathy for animals: A review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaibert, L. (2012). Beyond bad: Punishment theory meets the problem of evil. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 36(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2012.00236.x
   Google Scholar