Walking with the words: Student motivation toward reading and studying Shakespeare’s plays through rehearsal room practices

References

• Ajayi, L. 2015. Innovative approaches in english language arts: How two teachers teach high school students to use multimodal resources for interpretation of Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth. Journal of Literacy and Technology 16 (1):65–106.
   Google Scholar
• Almansouri, O., A. S. Balian, and J. Sawdy. 2009. Student voices: How has performing Shakespeare helped you appreciate his work? The English Journal 99 (1):35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. 2005. Literacy on the edge: How close are we to closing the literacy achievement gap. Voices from the Middle 13 (1):8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H. 2003. Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students’ sense of school belonging. The Journal of Experimental Education 72 (1):5–22. doi:10.1080/00220970309600877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H., and C. Midgley (1998). Motivation and middle school students. ERIC Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. S. 2007. When reading it wrong is getting it right: Shared evaluation pedagogy among struggling fifth grade readers. Research in the Teaching of English 42: 56–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, C. 2001. Text in action. London: Virgin.
   Google Scholar
• Crumpler, T. P. 2006. Educational drama as response to literature: Possibilities for young learners. In Process drama and multiple literacies: Addressing social, cultural, and ethical issues, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., and B. K. Lee. 2018. Drama-based pedagogy: Activating learning across the curriculum. Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Ryan. 2008a. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology 49:14–23. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Ryan. 2008b. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology 49 (3):182–85. doi:10.1037/a0012801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, B., and A. McKibben. 2011. Shakespeare, rehearsal approaches, and dramatic inquiry: Literacy education for life. English in Education 45 (1):91–106. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01088.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, B., and Enciso P. 2002 Reflections and refractions of meaning: Dialogic approaches to classroom drama and reading. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire & J. Jensen (Eds.) The handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. 868–880. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Enciso, P. 1996. Why engagement in reading matters to Molly. Reading and Writing Quarterly. 12 (2), 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gallas, K., and P. Smagorinsky. 2002. Approaching texts in school. The Reading Teacher 56 (1):54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartside, R. 2013. Training with the Royal Shakespeare company, June, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, C. L., and K. Hinchman. 2009. Reimagining our inexperienced adolescent readers: From struggling, striving, marginalized, and reluctant to thriving. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53 (1):4–13. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3/4):381–91. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., A. Solomon, and J. M. Rinehart. 1997. Literacy issues in focus: Engagement in reading for young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 40 (6):438–46. doi:10.2307/40015517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselhuhn, C. W., R. Al-Mabuk, A. Gabriele, M. Groen, and S. Galloway. 2007. Promoting positive achievement in the middle school: A look at teachers’ motivational knowledge, beliefs, and teaching practices. RMLE Online 30 (9):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hyungshim, J., J. Reeve, and E. L. Deci. 2010. Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (3):588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. 2013. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., and P. H. Johnston. 2013. Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly 48 (3):255–75. doi:10.1002/rrq.46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C. A. M., and L. Wright. 1986. Does cretaive drama benefit elementary school students: A meta-analysis. Youth Theatre Journal 1:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. 2011. The mantle of Macbeth. English in Education 45 (1):72–85. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01083.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, T. J. B. 2005. Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. K., E. A. Patall, S. W. Cawthon, and R. R. Steingut. 2015. The effect of drama-based pedagogy on prek–16 outcomes: A meta-analysis of research from 1985 to 2012. Review of Educational Research 85 (1):3–49. doi:10.3102/0034654314540477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillet, G. 2013. Learning by playing: Performance games and the teaching of Shakespeare. In N. Miller (Ed.), Reimagining Shakespeare for Children and Young Adults (pp. 269-278). NY: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. 2015. NAEP reading framework. National Assessment Governing Board. Accessed February 19, 2016. http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading/about?grade=4.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2016. 2015 reading score not significantly compared to 2013. Accessed February 21, 2017. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_g12_2015/#reading
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, C. 1995. Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, C. B., and R. Land. 2007. A cognitive approach to reading and writing instruction for English language learners in secondary school. Research in the Teaching of English 41 (3):269–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podlozny, A. 2000. Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama. Journal of Aesthetic Education 34 (3/4):239–75. doi:10.2307/3333644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., and A. Goodwin. 2016. Supporting students reading complex texts: Evidence for motivational scaffolding. AERA Open 2:4. doi:10.1177/2332858416680353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, S. S., and S. M. Watts. 1997. Students with learning difficulties meet Shakespeare: Using a scaffolded reading experience. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 40 (7):532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Shakespeare Company. 2011. The RSC Shakespeare toolkit for teachers: An active approach to bringing Shakespeare’s plays alive in the classroom with DVD. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Sbrocco, R. 2009. Student academic engagement and the academic achievement gap between black and white middle school students: Does engagement increase student achievement? Ed.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, G. C. 2013. Reimagining Shakespeare through film. In Reimagining Shakespeare for children and young adults, ed. N. Miller. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W. 2001. The tragedy of Macbeth, Vol. 2. Classic Books Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shannahan, T., D. Fisher, and N. Frey. 2016. The challenge of challenging text. In On developing readers: Readings from Educational leadership (EL Essentials), 100.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P., and J. Coppock. 1995. Reading through the lines: An exploration of drama as a response to literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly 11:4. doi:10.1080/1057356950110404.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim, O. J. 2011. The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology 32 (1):1–27. doi:10.1080/02702710903256601.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2009. Attitude to Shakespeare among Y10 students: Final report to the Royal Shakespeare Company on the Learning and Performance Network student survey 2007–2009. The University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. 2010. Unmooring the moor: Researching and teaching on Youtube. Shakespeare Quarterly 61 (3):337–56. doi:10.1353/shq.2010.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, B. J. 1998. Educational drama and language arts: What research shows. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. 2004. Motivation for reading during the early adolescent and adolescent years. Bridging the Literacy Achievement Gap, Grades 4 (12):56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. & Enciso, P. 1994. Multiple selves in literary interpretation: Engagement and the language of drama. In C.K. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.) Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory and practice: Forty-Third National Reading Conference Yearbook. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference. 351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, R. L., and T. A. Whittaker. 2006. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist 34 (6):806–38. doi:10.1177/0011000006288127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar