Learning study - a model for practice-based research in a Swedish theatre classroom

References

• Ahlstrand, P. 2014. Att kunna lyssna med kroppen: En studie av gestaltande förmåga inom gymnasieskolans estetiska program, inriktning teater. Stockholm: Institutionen för etnologi, religionshistoria och genusvetenskap, Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlstrand, P. 2015. Learning study i dans. Venue. Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 4 (1): Article 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3384/venue.2001-788X.1545.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlstrand, P. 2018. Analysing the object of learning, using phenomenography. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 7 (3):184–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2016-0053.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlstrand, P. 2020. A method called action(re)call. How and why we use it. Ride-The Journal Of Applied Theatre And Performance 25 (4):505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, N. 2016a. Teacher’s conceptions of quality in dance education expressed through grade conferences. Journal of Pedagogy 7 (2):11–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2016-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, N. 2016b. Communication and shared understanding of assessment: A phenomenological study of assessment in Swedish upper secondary dance education [Diss.Luleå]. Luleå: Luleå tekniska univ.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, N., and C. Ferm Thorgersen. 2015. Bedömning av danskunnande - uttryck, respons och värdering inom ett estetiskt ämne. In Kunskapande i dans: Om estetiskt lärande och kommunikation, red. B.-M. Styrke, 171–187. Stockholm: Liber utbildning.
   Google Scholar
• Björkholm, E. 2015. Unpacking the object of learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 4 (3):194–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2014-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 2012. The learning study as an approach for ‘clinical’ subject matter didactic research. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (2):126–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211224172.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 2015. Kunskapskulturer och undervisningspraktiker. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 2019. The knowledge machinery and claims in learning study as paedeutical research. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 9 (1):18–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2019-0010.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 2020. Powerful knowns and powerful knowings. Journal of Curriculum Studies 52 (3):323–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1717634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., and G. Nyberg. 2015. Från ord till rörelser och dans [Elektronisk resurs] en analys av rörelsekunnandet i en dansuppgift. In Forskning om undervisning och lärande, 24–40. Hämtad från. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-17218
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., P. Ahlstrand, E. Björkholm, and G. Nyberg. 2015. The meaning of knowing what is to be known. Education et Didactique 9 (1):143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1996. Cognition and curriculum reconsidered. 2nd ed. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 2007. Assessment and evaluation in education and the arts. In International handbook of research in arts education, ed. L. Bresler, 423–26. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Enthoven, M., and E. de Bruijn. 2010. Beyond locality: The creation of public practice based knowledge through practitioner research in professional learning communities and communities of practice. A review of three books on practitioner research and professional communities. Educational Action Research 18 (2):289–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09650791003741822.
   Google Scholar
• Frohagen, J. 2016. Såga rakt och tillverka uttryck: En studie av hantverkskunnandet i slöjdämnet. Stockholms universitet Humanistiska fakulteten (utgivare). Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, A., and R. Yarrow. 2007. Improvisation in drama. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., red. 2007. Studio thinking: The real benefits of arts education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, P. Y. 2014. Learning study – The dual pocess of developing theory and practice. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 3 (3):272–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-07-2014-0019.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., A. Vikström, and U. Runesson. 2019. Mechanisms enabling knowledge production in learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 9 (1):78–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2018-0084.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., P. Mårtensson, and U. Runesson. 2016. What is to be learned? Teachers’ collective inquiry into the object of learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60 (3):309–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1119725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. 2012. Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Göteborg: Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., and F. Marton. 2012. Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (1):7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. Phenomenography – Describing the world around us. Instructional Science 10:177–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1994. Phenomenography. In The international encyclopedia of education, red. T. Husén, and T. N. Postlethwaite, Vol. 8, 2nd ed., S. 4424–S. 4429. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 2014. Necessary conditions of learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and M. L. Lo. 2007. Learning from the “learning study”. Journal of Research in Teacher Education 14 (1):31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and W. Y. Pong. 2005. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development 24 (4):335–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., and F. Marton. 2003. Beyond“lesson study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science 31 (3):175–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023280619632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. [1958] 1998. Personal knowledge. Towards a post- critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. [1967] 2009. The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny, eds. 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011. Läroplaner, ämnen och kurser. Ämne – Teater. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislavski, K. S., and H. I. Popper. 1983. Creating a role. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstedt, C. 2010. Att peka ut det osynliga i rörelse: En didaktisk studie av taktart i musik. Göteborg: Högskolan för scen och musik vid Göteborgs universitet.Serie: ArtMonitor.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. [1953] 1992. Filosofiska undersökningar. Stockholm: Thales.
   Google Scholar
• Zandén, O. 2010. Samtal om samspel. Kvalitetsuppfattningar i musiklärares dialoger om ensemblespel på gymnasiet. Göteborg: Högskolan för scen och musik, Konstnärliga fakulteten, Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Zandén, O. 2016. The birth of a Denkstil: Transformations of music teachers’ conceptions of quality in the face of new grading criteria. Nordisk Musikkpedagogisk Forskning 17:197–225.
   Google Scholar
• Zandén, O., and C. Ferm Thorgersen. 2015. Teaching for learning or teaching for documentation?: Music teachers’ perspectives on a Swedish curriculum reform. British Journal Of Music Education 32 (1):37–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051714000266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar