Climate Change, Nuclear Power, and Nuclear Proliferation: Magnitude Matters

NOTES AND REFERENCES

• Williams , R. H. and Feiveson , H. A. 1990 . Diversion-Resistance Criteria for Future Nuclear Power . Energy Policy , July/August : 543
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson , H. 2004 . “ Nuclear Proliferation and Diversion ” . In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Energy 4 , Amsterdam : Elsevier, Acad. Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schneider , E. and Sailor , W. C. 2006 . Nuclear Fission . Science & Global Security , 14 : 183
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson , H. , Glaser , A. , Miller , M. and Scheinman , L. July 2008 . “Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant?,” . CISSM Working Paper, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland, University of Maryland .
   Google Scholar
• Socolow , R. H. and Glaser , A. 2009 . Balancing Risks: Nuclear Energy & Climate Change,” . Daedalus , Fall
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson , A. 2010 . “ Civilian Nuclear Power in a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World ” . In Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty , Edited by: Blechman , B. M. and Bollfrass , A. K. Washington, D.C. : Henry L. Stimson Center .
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds , J. , Wilson , T. , Wise , M. and Weynant , J. 2006 . Electrification of the Economy and CO2 Emissions Mitigation . Environmental Economics and Policy Studies , 7 : 175
   Google Scholar
• Clarke , L. , Edmonds , J. , Krey , V. , Richels , R. , Rose , S. and Tavoni , M. 2009 . International Climate Policy Architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios . Energy Economics , : 31 – S64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ One model appeared to have a miscalibration, providing results for year 2000 electricity production low by more than by a factor of three, and was not included (accessed 7 December 2009) ” .
   Google Scholar
• Blanford , J. B. , Richels , R. G. and Rutherford , T. E. 2009 . Feasible Climate Targets: The Roles of Economic Growth, Coalition Development and Expectations . Energy Economics , 31 : S82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin , K. , Edmonds , J. , Bond-Lamberty , B. , Clarke , L. , Kim , S. H. , Kyle , P. , Smith , S. J. , Thomson , A. and Wise , M. 2009 . Limiting Climate Change to 450 ppm CO2 Equivalent in the 21st Century . Energy Economics , 31 : S107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin , K. , Patel , P. , Fawcett , A. , Clarke , L. , Fisher-Vanden , K. , Edmonds , J. , Kim , S. H. , Sands , R. and Wise , M. 2009 . The Distribution and Magnitude of Emissions Mitigation Costs in Climate Stabilization under Less Than Perfect International Cooperation: SGM Results . Energy Economics , 31 : S187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney , A. , Ahammad , H. and Ford , M. 2009 . The Economics of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Insights from Illustrative Global Abatement Modelling . Energy Economics , 31 : S174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krey , V. and Riahi , K. 2009 . Implications of Delayed Participation and Technology Failure for the Feasibility, Costs, and Likelihood of Staying Below Temperature Targets—Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Scenarios for the 21st Century . Energy Economics , 31 : S94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loulou , R. , Labriet , M. and Kanudia , A. 2009 . Deterministics and Stochastic Analysis of Alternative Climate Targets under Differentiated Cooperation Regimes . Energy Economics , 31 : S131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ , P. and van Ierland , T. 2009 . Insights on Different Participation Schemes to Meet Climate Goals . Energy Economics , 31 : S163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet , J. , den Elzen , M. G. J. and van Vuuren , D. P. 2009 . Meeting Radiative Forcing Targets under Delayed Participation . Energy Economics , 31 : S152
   Google Scholar
• Kim , S. H. and Edmonds , J. 2007 . “ The Challenges and Potential of Nuclear Energy for Addressing Climate Change ” . Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-17037 . S. H. Kim and J. Edmonds, “The Potential of Nuclear Energy for Addressing Climate Change,” GNEP-SYSA-PMO-MI-DV-2008-000179 (2008)
   Google Scholar
• “ MiniCam has now been renamed GCAM ” . http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/models/minicam/
   Google Scholar
• 2010 . “ An electric power equivalent of nuclear production of hydrogen is included in this total value for a very few of the models. The contribution is small relative to the nuclear electricity produced even in those cases; personal communication, L. E. Clarke ” .
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme . “ IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft ” . WMO; United Nations Environment Programme . http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• “ Note that “Mt” in this paper denotes millions of metric tons, not to be confused with “MT,” which is often used in the U.S. fission literature to denote metric tons. “Gt” here denotes billions, 109s, of metric tonnes ” .
   Google Scholar
• “ Using the 3-reservoir model in the RICE-99 spreadsheet ” . http://www.econ.yale.edu/%7Enordhaus/homepage/dice_section_V.html (accessed on 25 January 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2007 . Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2007 . op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Clarke , L. , Kyle , P. Wise , M. 2008 . “ CO2 Emissions Mitigation and Technological Advance: An Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios (Scenarios Updated January 2009) ” . Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-18075 .
   Google Scholar
• “ The on-line appendix to “Climate Change, Nuclear Power and Nuclear Proliferation: Magnitude Matters” can be found at ” . http://www.princeton.edu/sgs/publications/sgs/archive
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology . 2007 . “The Future of Coal,” .
   Google Scholar
• Socolow , R. H. 2005 . “Can We Bury Global Warming?,” . Scientific American , July : 33 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2007 . Climate Change 2007 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2007 . op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology . 2006 . “The Future of Geothermal Energy,” .
   Google Scholar
• Traube , J. , Hansen , L. , Palmintier , B. and Levine , J. 2008 . Spatial and Temporal Interactions of Wind and Solar in the Next Generation Utility . Presented at WINDPOWER 2008 Conference and Exhibition . 3, June 2008 , Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy . “ 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply ” . DOE/G0-102008-3567 (July 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Reeves , A. and Beck , F. “ Wind Energy for Electric Power ” . Renewable Energy Policy Project (July 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Clarke , L. , Kyle , P. Wise , M. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• DESERTEC Foundation . http://www.desertec.org
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency . 2005b . “ Thorium Fuel cycle–Potential Benefits and Challenges, IAEA-TECDOC-1450 (May 2005) ” .
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson , H. 2004 . Nuclear Proliferation and Diversion . op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson , H. , Glaser , A. , Miller , M. and Scheinman , L. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• “ Ibid ” .
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, and International Atomic Energy Agency . 2008 . Uranium 2007: Resources, Production and Demand , Paris : Nuclear Energy Agency .
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, and International Atomic Energy Agency . 2006 . Forty Years of Uranium Resources, Production and Demand in Perspective: “The Red Book Retrospective” , Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Deffeyes , K. S. and MacGregor , L. D. 1980 . World Uranium Resources . Scientific American , January : 66
   Google Scholar
• Schneider , E. A. and Sailor , W. C. 2008 . Long-Term Uranium Supply Estimates . Nuclear Technology , 162 : 379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seko , N. , Katakai , A. , Hasegawa , S. , Tamada , M. , Kasai , N. , Takeda , H. , Sugo , T. and Saito , K. 2003 . Aquaculture of Uranium in Seawater by a Fabric-adsorbent Submerged System . Nuclear Technology , 144 : 274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright , D. and Barbour , L. 1999 . “Separated Neptunium 237 and Americium,” . In The Challenges of Fissile Material Control , Edited by: Albright , D. and O’Neill , K. Institute of Science and International Security Reports .
   Google Scholar
• Gen IV International Forum, The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Expert Group of the Generation IV International Forum . “ Methodology for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection, Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems ” . GIF/PRPPWF/2006/005 (2006)
   Google Scholar
• “ The 61 nations are: Albania, Algeria, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Chile, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Georgia, Ghana, Gulf states, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Libya, Malaysia, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Venezuela, Vietnam, and Yemen ” .
   Google Scholar
• “ International Atomic Energy Agency, “International Status and Prospects of Nuclear Power, Report by the Director General,” GOV/INF/2010/12-GC(54)/INF/5 (2 September 2010) ” .
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency . 2002 . IAEA Safeguards Glossary , International Nuclear Verification Series, No. 3, 2001 Edition 19 Vienna : IAEA .
   Google Scholar
• “Reactor-grade” plutonium that emerges with a mixture of plutonium isotopes from LWRs is considered by the IAEA to be adequate for the production of nuclear explosives. Only mixtures with greater than 80 percent Plutonium-238 are excluded, and since plutonium is dominantly produced and transmuted by neutron capture starting from Uranium-238, little Plutonium-238 is available in the nuclear fuel cycle ” .
   Google Scholar
• Benedict , M. , Pigford , T. and Levi , H. W. 1981 . Nuclear Chemical Engineering , 667 New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Gilinsky , V. , Miller , M. and Hubbard , H. 2004 . “ A Fresh Examination of the Proliferation Dangers of Light Water Reactors ” . The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center .
   Google Scholar
• Glaser , A. 2008 . Characteristics of Gas Centrifuges for Uranium Enrichment and Their Relevance for Nuclear Weapon Proliferation . Science & Global Security , 16 : 1
   Google Scholar
• Gilinsky , V. , Miller , M. and Hubbard , H. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Socolow , R. H. and Glaser , A. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Glaser , A. 2010 . “The Civilian Nuclear Fuel Cycle in a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: Challenges and Opportunities,” . In Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty , Edited by: Blechman , B. M. and Bollfrass , A. K. Washington, D.C. : Henry L. Stimson Center .
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy . Safeguards Glossary . op. cit , 43
   Google Scholar
• Bari , R. “ Framework for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection for Nonproliferation Impact Assessments ” . Brookhaven National Laboratory Formal Report, BNL-80083 (March 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Gen IV International Forum . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security . December 2008 . “Draft Nonproliferation Impact Assessment for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Alternatives,” .
   Google Scholar
• Mark , J. C. 1993 . Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium . Science & Global Security , 4 : 111
   Google Scholar
• National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security . op. cit ,
   Google Scholar
• Garwin , R. L. 26 August 1998 . “Reactor-Grade Plutonium Can be Used to Make Powerful and Reliable Nuclear Weapons: Separated Plutonium in the Fuel Cycle Must be Protected as if it Were Nuclear Weapons,” . The Garwin Archive, Federation of American Scientists .
   Google Scholar
• Gilinsky , V. , Miller , M. and Hubbard , H. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy . 1987 . Final Nonproliferation and Arms Control Assessment of Weapons-usable Fissile Material Storage and Excess Plutonium Disposition Alternatives , Washington, DC : U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation .
   Google Scholar
• Sigal , L. V. and Wit , J. 2009 . “North Korea's Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons,” . In Unblocking the Read to Zero , Edited by: Blechman , B. Washington, D.C. : Henry L. Stimson Center .
   Google Scholar
• Ehteshami , A. 2009 . “Iranian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons,” . In Unblocking the Read to Zero , Edited by: Blechman , B. Washington, D.C. : Henry L. Stimson Center .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Office of Fuel Cycle Management . December 2006 . “ Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Strategic Plan ” . GNEP-167312 . http://www.westgov.org/wieb/meetings/hlwsprg2007/briefing/GNEPsplan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency . 22 February 2005 . “ Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Expert Group Report Submitted to the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency ” . INFCIRC 640 .
   Google Scholar
• “ The maximum energy loss, ΔEn, in an elastic collision of a neutron with a nucleus in the coolant is given by ΔEn/En = 4A/(A+1)2, where A is the atomic number of the target nucleus. For A ≫ 1 this becomes small. The hydrogen in water is very effective at reducing neutron energy ” .
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology . 2010 . “The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Summary Report,” .
   Google Scholar
• Generation IV International Forum . 2009 . http://www.gen-4.org
   Google Scholar
• Piet , S. M. , Dixon , B. W , Jacobson , J. J. , Matthern , G. E. and Shropshire , D. E. 2009 . Lessons Learned from Dynamic Simulations of Advanced Fuel Cycles . Proceedings of Global 2009, The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives . 6–11, September 2009 , Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman , E. A. , Yang , W. S. and Hill , R. N. 29 September 2006 . “ Preliminary Core Design Studies for the Advanced Burner Reactor over a Wide Range of Conversion Ratios ” . Argonne National Laboratory, ANL-AFCI-177 .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology . May 2005 . “Report to Congress–Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative: Objectives, Approach, and Technology Summary,” .
   Google Scholar
• Dixon , B. , Halsey , B. , Kim , S. , Matthern , G. , Piet , S. and Shropshire , D. December 2008 . “ Dynamic Systems Analysis Report for Nuclear Fuel Recycle ” . Idaho National Laboratory, AFCI-SYSA-AI-SS-RT-2009-000053 .
   Google Scholar
• Piet , S. M. , Dixon , B. W. and Jacobson , J. J. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Wigeland , R. A. , Bauer , T. H. , Fanning , T. H. and Morris , E. E. 2006 . Separations and Transmutation Criteria to Improve Utilization of a Geologic Repository . Nuclear Technology , 154 : 95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency . 2003 . Scientific and Technical Basis for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes , 6 Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency .
   Google Scholar
• Piet , S. , Bjornard , T. , Dixon , B. , Gombert , D. , Laws , C. and Matthern , G. 2007 . “Which Elements Should be Recycled for a Comprehensive Fuel Cycle?,” . Proceedings of Global 2007 Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Systems . 9–13, September 2007 , Boise, Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Piet , S. M. , Dixon , B. W. , Jacobson , J. J. , Matthern , G. E. and Shropshire , D. E. op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency . op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on Fissile Materials . 2009 . “ Global Fissile Material Report 2009 ” . N.J. : Princeton .
   Google Scholar
• Kang , J. and von Hippel , F. 2005 . “Limited Proliferation-Resistance Benefits from Recycling Unseparated Transuranics and Lanthanides from Light-Water Reactor Spent Fuel,” . Science & Global Security , 13 : 169
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy . Safeguards Glossary . op. cit. , 43
   Google Scholar
• Nutall , W. J. September 2008 . “Fusion as an Energy Source: Challenges and Opportunities,” . Institute of Physics Report .
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel , F. and Goldston , R. J. “ Nuclear Energy, Fusion in Global Energy Assessment, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis ” . in press
   Google Scholar
• Hawryluk , R. J. 2002 . Review of DT Experiments Relevant to Burning Plasma Issues . Journal of Plasma Fusion Research SERIES , 5 : 12
   Google Scholar
• Moyer , M. 2010 . Fusion's False Dawn . Scientific American , March : 52
   Google Scholar
• Hazeltine , R. , Porkolab , M. , Prager , S. and Stambaugh , R. 2010 . Letter to the Editor . Scientific American , July
   Google Scholar
• Maisonnier , D. , Cook , I. , Sardain , P. , Boccaccini , L. , Bogusch , E. , Brodin , K. , Di Pace , L. , Forrest , R. , Luciano , G. , Hermsmeyer , S. , Nardi , C. , Norajitra , P. , Pizzuto , A. , Taylor , N. and Ward , D. 2005 . The European Power Plant Conceptual Study . Fusion Engineering and Design , 75–79 : 1173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najmabadi , F. and the ARIES Team . 2006 . The ARIES-AT Advanced Tokamak, Advanced Technology Fusion Power Plant . Fusion Engineering and Design , 80 : 3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee . March 2003 . “A Plan for the Development of Fusion Energy, Final Report to FESAC,” .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Burning Plasma Organization . 8–12 June 2009 . “ Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences, Report of the Research Needs Workshop (ReNeW) ” . Bethesda, Maryland
   Google Scholar
• Goldston , R. J. , Glaser , A. and Ross , A. F. 2009 . Proliferation Risks of Fusion Energy: Clandestine Production, Covert Production, and Breakout . 9th IAEA Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety . 15–17, July 2009 , Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski , M. B. and Colschen , L. C. 1995 . International Control of Tritium to Prevent Horizontal Proliferation and to Foster Nuclear Disarmament . Science and Global Security , 5 : 131
   Google Scholar
• R. , E and Rowberg, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress . “ The Department of Energy's Tritium Production Program ” . RL30425 (8 November 2001)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Department . 19 December 1995 . “The National Ignition Facility (NIF) and the Issue of Nonproliferation,” . U.S. Energy Department Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, DOE/NN-96007377 . http://www.osti.gov/news/docs/nif/front.htm
   Google Scholar
• Goldston , R. J. and Glaser , A. Inertial Confinement Fusion Energy R&D and Nuclear Proliferation: The Need for Direct and Transparent Review . Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , 87 (2011):59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidberg , J. and Finck , P. 30 January 2010 . “Research Needs for Fusion-Fission Hybrids, Report of the Research Needs Workshop (ReNeW),” . http://web.mit.edu/fusion-fission/
   Google Scholar
• Stacey , W. M. 2009 . Georgia Tech Studies of Sub-Critical Advanced Burner Reactors with a D-T Fusion Tokamak Neutron Source for the Transmutation of Spent Nuclear Fuel . Journal of Fusion Energy , 28 : 328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar