Metacognitive Inoculation Reduces the Persuasiveness of Sarcastic Attack Messages

References

• Anderson, A. A., & Becker, A. B. (2018). Not just funny after all: Sarcasm as a catalyst for public engagement with climate change. Science Communication, 40(4), 524–540. doi:10.1177/1075547018786560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)000770-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averbeck, J. M. (2013). Comparisons of ironic and sarcastic arguments in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness in personal relationships. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50(1), 47–57. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821809
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 184–207. doi:10.1111/hcre.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Richards, A. S. (2017). Apprehension or motivation to defend attitudes? Exploring the underlying threat mechanism in inoculation-induced resistance to persuasion. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 164–178. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1307999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 215–236. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2010.532757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & McKnight, J. (2015). Climate as comedy: The effects of satirical television news on climate change perceptions. Science Communication, 37(5), 635–657. doi:10.1177/1075547015597911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Miller, M. D., Cohen, M., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5(1), 27–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x
   Google Scholar
• Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 25–45. doi:10.1080/01638539709544980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A. (2004). Late night political comedy, candidate image, and inoculation: A unique test of inoculation theory ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma. Retrieved from https://shareok.org/handle/11244/768
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A. (2018). Inoculation against/with political humor. In J. C. Baumgartner & A. B. Becker (Eds.), Political humor in a changing media landscape (pp. 95–114). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12(5), e0175799. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, R., & Pelletier, S. (2008). Assessing student learning: A work in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(4), 14–19. doi:10.3200/CHNG.40.4.14-19
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2017). Assumptions about science in satirical news and late-night comedy. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication (pp. 321–332). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.35
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. doi:10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Izett, C. (2004). Irony as persuasive communication. In H. Colston & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 131–151). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis. Humor, 12(4), 425–436. doi:10.1515/humr.1999.12.4.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutz-Flamenbaum, R. V. (2014). Humor and social movements. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 294–304. doi:10.1111/soc4.12138
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. J., & Katz, A. N. (1998). The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(1), 1–15. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1301_1
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Kwak, N. (2014). The affect effect of political satire: Sarcastic humor, negative emotions, and political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 307–328. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggitt, J. S., & Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 1–24. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp2901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S., & Ki, E. (2007). Resistance to ethically suspicious parody video on YouTube: A test of inoculation theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 713–728. doi:10.1177/107769900708400404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyttle, J. (2001). The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. The Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 206–216. doi:10.1080/00221300109598908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion. Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of metacognition in social judgment. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 254–284). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1977). Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 645–655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Banas, J., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., … Underhill, J. (2010). Role and impact of involvement and enhanced threat in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/01463370903520307
   Google Scholar
• Polk, J., Young, D. G., & Holbert, R. L. (2009). Humor complexity and political influence: An elaboration likelihood approach to the effects of humor type in the daily show with Jon Stewart. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17(4), 202–219. doi:10.1080/15456870903210055
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2015). Inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(5), 451–460. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.867005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2018). The opposing mediational effects of apprehensive threat and motivational threat when inoculating against reactance to health promotion. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 245–255. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2018.1498909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495. doi:10.1023/A:1005120109296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, H. C., & Bullock, O. M. (2019). Using metacognitive cues to amplify message content: A new direction in strategic communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(1), 24–39. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1570472
   Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., Clarkson, J. J., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Resisting persuasion by the skin of one’s teeth: The hidden success of resisted persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 423–435. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., & Jost, P. B. (2016). Not funny? The effects of factual versus sarcastic journalistic responses to uncivil user comments. Communication Research, 009365021667185. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650216671854
   Google Scholar