Revisiting the Languages of Love: An Empirical Test of the Validity Assumptions Underlying Chapman’s (2015) Five Love Languages Typology

References

• Aknin, L. B., & Human, L. J. (2015). Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50(9), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027570.80468.a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bunt, S., & Hazelwood, Z. (2017). Walking the walk, talking the talk: Love languages, self-regulation, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099309359913
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. D. (1992). The 5 love languages: How to express heartfelt commitment to your mate (1st ed.). Northfield Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. D. (2015). The 5 love languages: The secret to love that lasts (5th ed.). Northfield Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. D. (2017). The 5 love languages singles edition: The secret that will revolutionize your relationships. Moody Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, J., & Veksler, A. E. (2016). Relational maintenance in the digital age: Implicit rules and multiple modalities. Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, N., & Polk, D. (2006). Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s (1992) five love languages. Communication Research Reports, 23(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17464090500535822
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J. (2019). The all-or-nothing marriage: How the best marriages work. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2006). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606649
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2018). Affectionate communication in close relationships. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653510
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2021). Interpersonal communication (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., & Morman, M. T. (1998). The measurement of affectionate communication. Communication Quarterly, 46(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379809370092
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., Morman, M. T., Maré, J., & Holmes, E. (2021). How Americans communicate affection: Findings from a representative national sample. Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.1951794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, G. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2020). Close encounters: Communication in relationships (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Tost, J., & Koenig, B. L. (2012). Sex differences and personality correlates of spontaneously generated reasons to give gifts. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 181–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099216
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. J. (1971). Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031643
   Google Scholar
• Marston, P. J., Hecht, M. L., & Robers, T. (1987). `True Love Ways’: The subjective experience and communication of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407587044001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolsky, B., & Monk, J. (2018). Maintaining relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 523–537). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.040
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224269
   Google Scholar
• Polk, D. M., & Egbert, N. (2013). Speaking the language of love: On whether Chapman’s (1992) claims stand up to empirical testing. The Open Communication Journal, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874916X20130423001
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1536794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376512
   Google Scholar
• Strayed, C. (2013). Tiny beautiful things: Advice on love and life from someone who’s been there. Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2018). A phronetic iterative approach to data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 19(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.22284/qr.2018.19.2.61
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (2020). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters (9th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar