Combinatorial Auction Designs for Biodiversity Conservation

References

• An , N. , W. Elmaghraby , and P. Keskinocak . 2005 . Bidding strategies and their impact on revenues in combinatorial auctions . J. Revenue Pricing Manage. 3 ( 4 ): 337 – 357 .
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee , S. , J. S. Shortle , and A. M. Kwasnica . 2009 . The Agglomeration Vickrey Auction for the promotion of spatially contiguous habitat management: Theoretical foundations and numerical illustrations. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. Milwaukee , WI : Agricultural and Applied Economics Association .
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo , A. , D. Hellerstein , C. Nickerson , and C. Myers . 2006 . Balancing the multiple objectives of conservation programs. Economic research report number 19 . Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Agriculture .
   Google Scholar
• Chang , T.-S. 2009 . Decision support for truckload carriers in one-shot combinatorial auctions . Transport. Res. Part B Method. 43 ( 5 ): 522 – 541 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen , R. , A. Cattaneo , and R. Johansson . 2008 . Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice . Ecol. Econ. 65 ( 4 ): 737 – 752 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton , P. , Y. Shoham , and R. Steinberg . 2006 . Introduction to combinatorial auctions . In Combinatorial auctions , ed. P. Cramton , Y. Shoham , and R. Steinberg , 1 – 13 . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs , T. L. , and J. N. Pretty . 2004 . Agri-environmental stewardship schemes and “multifunctionality.” Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 26 ( 2 ): 220 .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Primary Industries. 2007 . Auction of marine aquaculture sites in Victoria: A review of concepts and practice. Evaluation report 10 . Melbourne : Department of Primary Industries, Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Eigenraam , M. , L. Strappazzon , N. Lansdell , A. Ha , C. Beverly , and J. Todd . 2006 . EcoTender: Auction for multiple environmental outcomes . Melbourne : Department of Primary Industries, Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Epstein , R. , L. Henriquez , J. Catalan , G. Y. Weintraub , C. Martinez , and F. Espejo . 2004. A combinatorial auction improves school meals in Chile: A case of OR in developing countries. Int. Trans. Operational Res. 11(6):593–612.
   Google Scholar
• Goeree , J. , C. A. Holt , and J. Ledyard . 2007 . An experimental comparison of flexible and tiered package bidding. Report to the FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau . Pasadena , CA : Federal Communications Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Gole , C. , M. Burton , K. J. Williams , H. Clayton , D. P. Faith , B. White , A. Huggett , and C. Margules . 2005 . Auction for Landscape Recovery: Final report . Sydney : WWF–Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz , S. 2009 . The evolution of Australia's natural resource management programs: Towards improved targeting and evaluation of investments . Land Use Policy 26 ( 2 ): 471 – 478 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz , S. , K. Collins , and A. Cattaneo . 2009 . Review of agri-environment indexes and stewardship payments . Environ. Manage. 43 ( 2 ): 221 – 236 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortacsu , A. , and S. L. Puller . 2008 . Understanding strategic bidding in multi unit auctions: A case study of the Texas electricity spot market . Rand J. Econ. 39 ( 1 ): 86 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iftekhar , M. S. , A. Hailu , and R. K. Lindner . 2009 . Auction designs for native biodiversity conservation on private lands . In Ecological restoration , ed. G. H. Pardue and T. K. Olvera , 1 – 45 . New York : Nova Science .
   Google Scholar
• Iftekhar , M. S. , A. Hailu , and R. K. Lindner . 2011 . Item price information feedback in multiple unit combinatorial auctions: Design issues . IMA J. Manage. Math. 22 ( 3 ): 271 – 289 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson , R. C. , and A. Cattaneo . 2006 . Indices for working land conservation: Form affects function . Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 28 ( 4 ): 567 .
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan , B. , R. N. Lubowski , and M. J. Roberts . 2005 . How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the conservation reserve program . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87 ( 5 ): 1239 – 1247 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann , U. , and S. Schilizzi . 2005 . Auctions for conservation contracts: A review of the theoretical & empirical literature. Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/02/21152441/0 (accessed 8 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer , D. , A. Claridge , D. Hazell , D. Michael , M. Crane , C. MacGregor , and R. Cunningham . 2003 . Wildlife on farms: How to conserve native animals . Collingwood , Victoria : Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) .
   Google Scholar
• Maier , L. , and M. Shobayashi . 2001 . Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework . Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Molsher , R. , A. Newsome , and C. Dickman . 1999 . Feeding ecology and population dynamics of the feral cat (Felis catus) in relation to the availability of prey in central-eastern New South Wales . Wildl. Res. 26 ( 5 ): 593 – 607 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes , V. , C. R. Plott , and G. Stoneham . 2008 . Electronic BushBroker exchange: Designing a combinatorial double auction for native vegetation offsets. http://expecon.gsu.edu/plott.pdf (accessed 8 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Randhir , T. O. , R. O'Connor , P. R. Penner , and D. W. Goodwin . 2001 . A watershed-based land prioritization model for water supply protection . For. Ecol. Manage. 143 ( 1–3 ): 47 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau , S. , and E. Moons . 2008 . The potential of auctioning contracts for conservation policy . Eur. J. For. Res. 127 ( 3 ): 183 – 194 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said , S. , and S. Thoyer . 2007 . Agri-environmental auctions with synergies. Documents de Recherche parus en 2007: DR n°2007–07. Montpellier, France: LAMETA, Laboratoire Montpellierain d'Economie Theorique et Appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Schreinemachers , P. , and T. Berger . 2011 . An agent-based simulation model of human-environment interactions in agricultural systems . Environ. Model. Software 26 ( 7 ): 845 – 859 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoneham , G. , V. Chaudhri , A. Ha , and L. Strappazzon . 2003 . Auctions for conservation contracts: An empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial . Austr. J. Agric. Resource Econ. 47 ( 4 ): 477 – 500 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran , L. T. , R. V. O'Neill , E. R. Smith , P. F. Wagner , and M. Mehaffey . 2008. Watershed-based self- and peer-appraisal indices for integrated environmental assessment with a case study of the Mid-Atlantic region. Ecol. Indicators 8(3):308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Agriculture. 2004 . FSA handbook—Agricultural resource conservation program . Washington , DC : USDA .
   Google Scholar
• Whitten , S. , A. Reeson , J. Windle , and J. Rolfe . 2008 . Barriers to and opportunities for increasing participation in conservation auctions. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/agsarec08/5973.htm (accessed 10 January 2012) .
   Google Scholar
• Windle , J. , and J. Rolfe . 2008 . Exploring the efficiencies of using competitive tenders over fixed price grants to protect biodiversity in Australian rangelands . Land Use Policy 25 ( 3 ): 388 – 398 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia , M. , G. J. Koehler , and A. B. Whinston . 2004 . Pricing combinatorial auctions . Eur. J. Operational Res. 154 ( 1 ): 251 – 270 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar