Perceptions of Success and the Question of Consensus in Natural Resource Collaboration: Lessons from an Inactive Collaborative Group

References

• Brunner , R. D. 2002 . Problems of governance . In Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West , ed. R. D. Brunner , C. H. Colburn , C. M. Cromley , R. A. Klein , and E. A. Olson , 1 – 47 . New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brunner , R. D. , T. A. Steelman , L. Coe-Juell , C. M. Cromley , C. M. Edwards , and D. W. Tucker . 2005 . Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy and decision-making . New York : Columbia University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Conley , A. , and M. A. Moote . 2003 . Evaluating collaborative natural resource management . Society Nat. Resources 16 : 371 – 386 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin , J. , and A. L. Strauss . 1990 . Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria . Qual. Sociol. 1 : 3 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d'Estree , T. P. , and B. G. Colby . 2004 . Braving the currents: Evaluating environmental conflict resolution in the river basins of the American West . Boston , MA : Kluwer Academic .
   Google Scholar
• Daniels , S. E. , and G. B. Walker . 2001 . Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach . Westport , CT : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Fendt , J. , and W. Sachs . 2008 . Grounded theory method in management research: Users’ perspectives . Organizational Research Methods 11 ( 3 ): 430 – 455 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Gimenez , M. E. , H. Ballard , and V. Sturtevant . 2008 . Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the Western USA . Ecol. Society 13 ( 2 ): 4 . http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art4 (accessed 21 December 2011) .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , R. , W. Ury , and B. Patton . 1991 . Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in, , 2nd ed. New York : Penguin Books .
   Google Scholar
• Forester , J. 2009 . Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes . Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gray , B. 1989 . Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems . San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard , M. , and J. Madsen . 2003 . Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the U.S. West . Society Nat. Resources 16 : 713 – 718 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes , J. E. , and D. E. Booher . 1999 . Consensus-building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning . Am. Plan. Assoc. J. 65 ( 4 ): 412 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes , J. E. , and D. E. Booher . 2010 . Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy . London , UK : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Kenney , D. 2000 . Arguing about consensus: Examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resource management . Boulder , CO : Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law .
   Google Scholar
• Koontz , T. M. , and C. W. Thomas . 2006 . What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Admin. Rev. 66 ( 6 ): 111 – 121 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane , M. B. 2003 . Participation, decentralization and civil society: Indigenous rights and democracy in environmental planning . J. Plan. Educ. Res. 22 : 360 – 373 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach , W. D. , N. W. Pelkey , and P. A. Sabatier . 2002 . Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington . J. Policy Anal. Manage. 21 ( 4 ): 645 – 670 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandarano , L. A. 2008 . Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: Restoring and protecting habitat and the New York–New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program . J. Plan. Educ. Res. 27 : 456 – 468 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandarano , L. A. 2009 . Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning . Society Nat. Resources 22 : 245 – 260 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge , J. J. 1980. Beyond adversary democracy . Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margerum , R. D. 2002 . Evaluating collaborative planning: Implications from an empirical analysis of growth management . J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 68 ( 2 ): 179 – 193 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy , J. 2005 . Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism . Environ. Plan. A 37 : 995 – 1014 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClosky , M. 1999 . Local communities and the management of public forests . Ecol. Law Q. 25 ( 4 ): 624 – 629 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney , M. , and P. Field . 2008 . Insights and applications: Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources . Society Nat. Resources 21 : 419 – 429 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote , M. A. 2008 . Collaborative forest management . In Forest community connections: Implications for research, management, and governance , ed. E. M. Donoghue and V. E. Sturtevant , 243 – 260 . Washington , DC : Resources for the Future .
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary , R. , and L. Bingham , eds. 2003 . The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution . Washington , DC : Resources for the Future .
   Google Scholar
• Pagdee , A. , Y.-S. Kim , and P. J. Daugherty . 2006 . What makes community forest management successful: Ameta-study from community forests throughout the world . Society Nat. Resources 19 : 33 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson , D. 1998 . Collaborative management of public rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in co-management . Prof. Geogr. 50 ( 3 ): 301 – 315 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson , M. N. , M. J. Peterson , and T. R. Peterson . 2005 . Conservation and the myth of consensus . Conserv. Biol. 19 ( 3 ): 762 – 767 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty , J. , and D. Smith . 2004 . Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management . Conserv. Biol. 18 ( 3 ): 631 – 638 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen , A. G. , and M. W. Brunson . 1996 . Strategies to manage conflicts among multiple users . Weed Technol. 10 : 447 – 450 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier , P. , W. Gocht , M. Lubell , Z. Trachtenberg , A. Vedlitz , and M. Matlock , eds. 2005 . Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schively , C. 2007 . A quantitative analysis of consensus building in local environmental review . J. Plan. Educ. Res. 27 : 82 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuett , M. A. , and S. Selin . 2002 . Profiling collaborative natural resource initiatives and active participants . North. J. Appl. For. 19 ( 4 ): 155 – 160 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks , H. , and S. B. Trinidad . 2007 . Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis and grounded theory . Qual. Health Res. 17 ( 10 ): 1372 – 1380 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman , T. A. 2010 . Implementing innovation: Fostering enduring change in environmental and natural resource governance . Washington , DC : Georgetown University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Straus , D. 2002 . How to make collaboration work: Powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems and make decisions . San Francisco , CA : Berrett-Koehler .
   Google Scholar
• Strauss , A. L. , and J. Corbin . 1998 . Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Susskind , L. , and J. Cruikshank . 1987 . Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes . New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Susskind , L. , S. McKearnan , and J. Thomas-Larmer . 1999 . Introduction . In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement , ed. L. Susskind , S. McKearnan , and J. Thomas-Larmer , xvii – xxii . London , UK : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , W. R. 2003 . Procedures for implementing consensus-based management in agency planning and operations . Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Interior Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance .
   Google Scholar
• Toker , C. W. 2004. Public participation or stakeholder frustration: An analysis of consensus-based participation in the Georgia Ports Authority's stakeholder evaluation group. In Communication and public participation in environmental decision-making , ed. S. P. Depoe , J. Delicath , and M.-F. A. Elsenbeer , 175–200. Albany , NY : State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner , C. L. , and M. E. Fernandez-Gimenez . 2008 . Does community-based collaboration increase social capital? Society Nat. Resources 21 : 324 – 344 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber , E. P. 2003 . Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck , J. M. , and S. L. Yaffee . 2000 . Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management . Washington DC : Island Press .
   Google Scholar