Indigenous Peoples' Expectations for Forestry in New Brunswick: Are Rights Enough?

References

• Agrawal, A. 2007. Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its contributions. Int. J. Commons 1(1):111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. B. 1997. Corporate/indigenous partnerships in economic development: The first nations in Canada. World Dev. 25(9):1483–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, W., and B. Anderson. 2005. New Brunswick's ‘Jaakko Poyry’ report: Perceptions of senior forestry officials about its influence on forest policy. For. Chron. 81(1):81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Assembly of First Nations' Chiefs in New Brunswick. 2010. Statement on policy for the Wabanaki Forest. Fredericton, NB, Canada: AFNCNB.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philidelphia: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeney, S. 2003. Aboriginal forestry in New Brunswick: Conflicting paradigms. Environments 31(1):61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. L., and N. W. Skelton. 2011. ‘There is a conflict right there’: Integrating indigenous community values into commercial forestry in the Tl' Azt'en First Nation. Society Nat. Resources 24:368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campese, J., T. C. H. Sunderland, T. Greiber, and G. Oviedo eds. 2009. Rights-based approaches: Exploring issues and opportunities for conservation. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
   Google Scholar
• Curran, D., and M. M'gonigle. 1999. Aboriginal forestry: Community management as opportunity and imperative. Osgoode Hall Law J. 37(4):711–774.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P. C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, P. P., C. Dieperink, F. van Laerhoven, H. A. Runhaar, and W. J. Vermeulen. 2012. Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance–experiences from the Netherlands. Environ. Policy Governance 22(3):143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Stewardship Council. 2012. FSC international standard: Principles and criteria for forest stewardship. FSC-Std-01–001 (V5–0) En. https://ca.fsc.org/download.fsc-principles-and-criteria-v5.129.pdf (accessed 1 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Government of New Brunswick. n.d. Chapter 38.1 Crown Lands and Forests Act. Fredericton, NB, Canada: Government of New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation. 1989. ILO Convention 169 of June 27, 1989: Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal peoples in independent countries. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169 (accessed 1 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, T. 2012. Aboriginal law: Commentary and Analysis. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Purich Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, S., and D. Brubacher. 2008. Aboriginal expectations and perceived effectiveness of forest management practices and forest certification in Ontario. For. Chron. 84(3):378–391.
   Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. 2013. The politics of rights-based approaches in conservation. Land Use Policy 31:613–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, M. 2012. Living up to expectations: Evaluating harvesting agreements as a governance arrangement for common pool resource management in New Brunswick. Thesis submitted for master of sustainable development. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Coperernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Lambini, C. K., and T. T. Nguyen. 2014. A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: Evidence from Ghana and Vietnam. For. Policy Econ. 38:178–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., D. Barry, and G. Ram Dahal. 2010. New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. Int. For. Rev. 12(1):78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lescuyer, G., and S. A. Mvondo. 2012. Logging concessions and local livelihoods in Cameroon: From indifference to alliance? Ecol. Society 17(1): article 7.
   Google Scholar
• Montréal Process Working Group 2009. Technical notes on implementation of the Montréal Process criteria and indicators, Criteria 1–7: Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. http://www.montrealprocess.org/documents/publications/techreports/2009p_2.pdf. (accessed 1 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Natcher, D. C., and C. G. Hickey. 2009. Implicatons of tenure insecurity for aboriginal land use in Canada. Hum. Organization 68(3):245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources. 2011. 2010–2011 Annual report. Frederickton, NB, Canada: NBDNR.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. G. 2009. The duty to consult: New relationships with Aboriginal peoples. Purich's Aboriginal Issues Series. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Purich Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and H. Nagendra. 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(51):19224–19231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parotta, J. A., and R. Trosper eds. 2011. Traditional forest knowledge: Sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. C., and N. L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociol. 68(2):153–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. M., and P. Smith. 2002. Accommodation of Aboriginal rights: The need for an Aboriginal forest tenure (Synthesis report). Edmonton, AB, Canada: Sustainable Forest Management Network, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Rynard, P. 2000. “Welcome in, but check in your rights at the door”: The James Bay and Nisga'a agreements in Canada. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 33(2):211–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Econ. 68(3):249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. G., and J. Webb. 2003. Just another stakeholder? First Nations and sustainable forest management in Canada's boreal forest. In Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest, ed. P. Burton C. Messier D. W. Smith and W. L. Adamowicz 65–112. Ottawa, ON, Canada: NRC Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, L., and I. Røpke. 2010. Power and contestation in collaborative ecosystem-based management: The case of Haida Gwaii. Ecol. Econ. 70(2):178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehan, M., L. Palmer, M. Langton, and O. Mazel. 2006. Sharing land and resources: Modern agreements and treaties with Indigenous people in settler states. In Settling with Indigenous people, ed. M. Langton O. Mazel L. Palmer K. Shain and M. Tehan 1–18. Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trosper, R., H. Nelson, G. Hoberg, P. Smith, and W. Nikolakis. 2008. Institutional determinants of successful commercial forestry enterprises among First Nations in Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 38(2):226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf (accessed 1 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Van Laerhoven, F. 2010. Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas—A large-N perspective. Global Environ. Change 20(3):539–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laerhoven, F., and C. Barnes. 2014. Communities and commons: The role of community development support in sustaining the commons. Commun. Dev. J. 49(suppl 1):i118–i132.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., J. F. Fortier, M. Natcher, A. Smith, and M. Hébert. 2013. Collaboration between aboriginal peoples and the Canadian forest sector: A typology of arrangements for establishing control and determining benefits of forestlands. J. Environ. Manage. 115(1):21–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar