New Challenges for Managing Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: An Exploratory Study of the European Landscape Convention in Sweden

References

• Ahmed, T., J. Brown, A. Kothari, A. Phillips, and S. Stolton eds. 2008. Protected landscapes and agrobiodiversity values. Heidelberg, Germany: IUCN and GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 2006. Sustainable landscapes: Contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landscape and Urban Planning 75:187–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. R. 2007. Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research 10:141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, J., and H. Vejre eds. 2004. Multifunctional landscapes: Theory, values and history. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford eds. 2005. The protected landscape approach: Linking nature, culture and community. Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, R. 2012. Sustainable tourism: research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research 39(2):528–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. W. 1999. Sustainable tourism: A state‐of‐the‐art review. Tourism Geographies 1:7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. N., and G. H. Stankey. 1979. The recreation opportunity spectrum: A framework for planning, management, and research. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report (PNW-98). http://www.fs.fed.us/cdt/carrying_capacity/gtr098.pdf (accessed 3 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. European landscape convention. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed 22 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L., and P. J. Brown. 1978. The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioural information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: A rationale. In Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources: Proceedings of the workshop, January 1978, Tucson, Arizona, ed. H. G. Lund., 24–31. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report (RM-55). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles, P. F., and S. F. McCool. 2002. Tourism in national parks and protected areas: Planning and management. New York: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. R. 2005. The sustainability revolution: Portrait of a paradigm shift. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., L. Friberg, and L. Emmelin. 2006. Visitor surveys at Fulufjället—Before and after national park establishment. Östersund, Sweden: European Tourism Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., L. Hörnsten Friberg, and L. Emmelin. 2007. Increased visitation from National Park designation. Current Issues in Tourism 10:87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., and K. Sandell. 2009. Protect, preserve, present—The role of tourism in Swedish National Parks. In Tourism and national parks. International perspectives on development, histories and change. Contemporary geographies of leisure, tourism and mobility series, ed. F. Warwick and C. M. Hall 197–208. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., and M. Yuan. 2011. Primary economic impacts at three spatial levels: The case of Fulufjället National Park, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 11:74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, B., and D. A. Fennell. 2004. An analysis of whalewatching codes of conduct. Annals of Tourism Research 312:334–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodland, R. 1995. The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1961. Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32:148–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., and C. M. Hall. 2005. Tourism and global environmental change: Ecological, economic, social and political interrelationships. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, A., R. J. Beeton, and L. Pearson. 2002. Sustainable tourism: an overview of the concept and its position in relation to conceptualisations of tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 10:475–96.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, J., and O.-I. Vistad. 2011. Tourism in protected natural areas: The Nordic–Baltic context. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 11:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J., E. T. McMahon, and L. Propst. 1997. Balancing nature and commerce in gateway communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtala, M. 2007. Assessment of the local economic impacts of national park tourism: the case of Pallas-Ounastunturi National Park. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 81:223–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ishwaran, N., A. Persic, and N. H. Tri. 2008. Concept and practice: The case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 7:118–31.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. L., and P. B. Landres eds. 1998. Stewardship across boundaries. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., L. W. Stern, and J. C. Anderson. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal 36:1633–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laven, D., C. Ventriss, R. Manning, and N. Mitchell. 2010. Evaluating U.S. national heritage areas: Theory, methods, and application. Environmental Management 46:195–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2003. Sustainable tourism development: A critique. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 11:459–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lundmark, L., and O. Stjernström. 2009. Environmental protection: An instrument for regional development? National ambitions versus local realities in the case of tourism. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 9:387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maikhuri, R. K., S. Nautiyal, K. S. Rao, and K. G. Saxena. 2001. Conservation policy–people conflicts: A case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (a world heritage site), India. Forest Policy and Economics 2:355–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. 2007. Parks and carrying capacity: Commons without tragedy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., W. Valliere, L. Anderson, R. S. McCown, P. Pettengill, N. Reigner, S. Lawson, P. Newman, M. Budruk, D. Laven, J. Hallo, L. Park, J. Bacon, D. Abbe, C. van Riper, and K. Goonan. 2011. Defining, measuring, monitoring, and managing the sustainability of parks for outdoor recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 29:24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Matysek, K. A., E. Stratford, and L. K. Kriwoken. 2006. The UNESCO biosphere reserve program in Australia: Constraints and opportunities for localized sustainable development. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 50:85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., M. Muller, M. Woltering, J. Arnegger, and J. Hubert. 2010. The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 97:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., and R. N. Moisey. 2001. Tourism, recreation and sustainability: Linking culture and the environment. New York: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M., and S. Johnson. 2009. Working across boundaries: People, nature, and regions. Cambridge, UK: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mules, T. 2005. Economic impacts of national park tourism on gateway communities: The case of Kosciuszko National Park. Tourism Economics 11(2):247–59.
   Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. 2002. Fulufjällets Nationalpark: Skötselplan (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Management Plan of Fulufjället National Park). SNV Rapport 5246. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Om-Naturvardsverket/Publikationer/ISBN/5200/91-620-5246-6/ (accessed 3 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. 2004. Protect, preserve, present: A programme for better use and management of protected areas, 2005–2015. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5483. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Om-Naturvardsverket/Publikationer/ISBN/5400/91-620-5483-X/ (accessed 3 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. 2007. Nationalparksplan för Sverige. Utkast och remissversion. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, Z. 2001. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57:269–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., C. Folke, V. Galaz, T. Hahn, and L. Schultz. 2007. Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecology and Society 12:28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., C. Folke, and T. Hahn. 2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olwig, K. R. 2007. The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research 32:579–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2011. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. 2002. Management guidelines for IUCN Category V protected areas protected landscapes/seascapes: World Commission on Protected Areas best practice protected area guidelines series no. 9. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. 2003. Turning ideas on their head: The new paradigm for protected areas. George Wright Forum 20:8–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, R. M. 2004. Place-based governance for biosphere reserves. Environments: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 32:27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, S. 2011. Establishing the connections between the goals of sustainable development and creative tourism. Master's thesis, Department of Science and Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 2008/09:214. 2008. Hållbart skydd av naturområden, Regeringskansliet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, L., M. C. Tremblay, and A. Brousselle. 2013. Managing tensions between evaluation and research: Illustrative cases of developmental evaluation in the context of research. American Journal of Evaluation 35:45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddin, L. P. 2006. You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry 12:797–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saayman, M., and A. Saayman. 2006. Estimating the economic contribution of visitor spending in the Kruger National Park to the regional economy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 14:67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Schliep, R., and S. Stoll-Kleemann. 2010. Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe. Land Use Policy 27:917–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, M. S. 2001. See America first: Tourism and national identity, 1880–1940. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpley, R. 2000. Tourism and sustainable development: Exploring the theoretical divide. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G., D. Cole, R. Lucas, M. Peterson, S. Frissell, and Wasburne R. 1985. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-176. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann, S., and M. Welp. 2008. Participatory and integrated management of biosphere reserves: Lessons from case studies and a global survey. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 17:161–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stynes, D. J., D. B. Propst, W. Chang, and Y. Sun. 2000. Estimating national park visitor spending and economic impacts: The MGM2 model. Report to the National Park Service. East Lansing, MI: Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2003. Conservation and democratization: constituting citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Political Geography 22:715–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Writ. 2001/02:173. 2001. En samlad naturvårdspolitik. Stockholm, Sweden: The Government Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tumusiime, D. M., and P. Vedeld. 2012. False promise or false premise? Using tourism revenue sharing to promote conservation and poverty reduction in Uganda. Conservation and Society 10:15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wall-Reinius, S. 2009. A ticket to national parks? Tourism, railways and the establishment of national parks in Sweden. In Tourism and national parks. International perspectives on development, histories and change, ed. W. Frost and C. M. Hall 184–96. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wall-Reinius, S. 2012. Wilderness and culture: Tourist views and experiences in the Laponian World Heritage Area. Society & Natural Resources 25:621–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall-Reinius, S., and P. Fredman. 2007. Protected areas as attractions. Annals of Tourism Research 34:839–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, P. 2003. The “inside-out” process: A key approach for establishing Fulufjället National Park in Sweden. Mountain Research and Development 23:227–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, F., and C. M Hall. 2009. Tourism and national parks. International perspectives on development, histories and change. Contemporary geographies of leisure, tourism and mobility series. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wästfelt, A., K. Saltzman, E. G. Berg, and A. Dahlberg. 2012. Landscape care paradoxes: Swedish landscape care arrangements in a European context. Geoforum 43:1171–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1973. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences 4:127–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons learned from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, A., K. Sandell, P. Fredman, and K. Eckerberg. 2006. Tourism and protected areas: Motives, actors and processes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management 2:350–58.
   Google Scholar