Social Network Analysis to Support Stakeholder Analysis in Participatory Forest Planning

References

• Ananda, J., and G. Herath. 2003. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: A value function approach. Ecological Economics 45(1):75–90. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettelini, D., M. G. Cantiani, and S. Mariotta. 2000. Experiences in participatory planning of designated areas: The Bavona Valley in Switzerland. Forestry 73:187–98. doi:10.1093/forestry/73.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., and B. I. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19:366–74. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and J. C. Johnson. 1996. Analyzing social networks. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brugha, R., and Z. Varvasovszky. 2000. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning 15(3):239–46. doi:10.1093/heapol/15.3.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchy, M., and S. Hoverman. 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: A review. Forest Policy and Economics 1:15–25. doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(00)00006-x
   Google Scholar
• Butts, C. T. 2010. Package ‘SNA.’ http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sna/sna.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cantiani, M. G. 2012. Forest planning and public participation: A possible methodological approach. iForest—Biogeosciences and Forestry 5:72–82. doi:10.3832/ifor0602-009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meo, I., M. G. Cantiani, F. Ferretti, and A. Paletto. 2011. Stakeholders' perception as support for forest landscape planning. International Journal of Ecology 1:1–8. doi:10.1155/2011/685708
   Google Scholar
• De Meo, I., F. Ferretti, M. Fratteggiani, C. Lora, and A. Paletto. 2013. Public participation GIS to support a bottom-up approach in forest landscape planning. iForest—Biogeosciences and Forestry 6:347–52. doi:10.3832/ifor0917-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. 1999. The future of public administration. Public Administration & Management 4(2):279–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ernstson, H., S. Sörlin, and T. Elmqvist. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services—The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13(2):39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1:215–39. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. M. 1994. Depletable externalities and Pigovian taxation. Journal of Management Studies 39:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grass, G., S. Biggs, and A. Kelly. 1997. Stakeholders, science and decision making for poverty-focused rural mechanization research and development. World Development 25(1):115–26. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00090-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimble, R., and K. Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55(2):173–93. doi:10.1016/s0308-521x(97)00006-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert, S., and M. König. 2012. Customers, employees, NGOs–Which stakeholders do really count? A holistic conceptual framework for stakeholder prioritization and expectation management. Münster, Germany: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Arbeitspapier 15–1.
   Google Scholar
• Hamersley Chambers, F., and T. Beckley. 2003. Public involvement in sustainable boreal forest management. In Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest, ed. P. J. Burton 113–54. Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada, NRC Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. 2010. Introductory textbook on social network analysis. Published as a PDF file. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/networks/nettext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. R., and M. E. Qureshi. 2000. Choice of stakeholder groups in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum 24:11–19. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00925.x
   Google Scholar
• Harshaw, H. W., and D. B. Tindall. 2005. Social structure, identities, and values: A network approach to understanding people's relationships to forests. Journal of Leisure Research 4:426–49.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10:328–37. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. 2007. IAP2 spectrum of public participation. http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/spectrum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, J., L. Hytönen, and T. Loikkanen. 2001. Integrating the AHP and HERO into the process of participatory natural resources planning. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in natural resources and environmental decision making. Managing Forest Ecosystems 3:131–47. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_9
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, A., S. Laukkanen, and J. Kangas. 2006. Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—A review. Forest Policy and Economics 9:77–92. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. 2002. Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks 24:407–22. doi:10.1016/s0378-8733(02)00016-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22:853–86. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlund, C. 2007. Identifying regular blocks in valued networks: A heuristic applied to the St. Marks carbon flow data, and international trade in cereal products. Social Networks 29:59–69. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overseas Development Administration. 1995. Guidance note on how to do stakeholder analysis of aid projects and programmes. London: Overseas Development Administration (ODA).
   Google Scholar
• Paletto, A., I. De Meo, and F. Ferretti. 2011. Participatory governance in forest landscape planning: An application in southern Italy. Silva Lusitana 19(2):149–63.
   Google Scholar
• Paletto, A., F. Ferretti, P. Cantiani, and I. De Meo. 2012a. Multi‐functional approach in forest landscape management planning: An application in southern Italy. Forest System 21:68–80. doi:10.5424/fs/2112211-11066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletto, A., F. Ferretti, and I. De Meo. 2012b. The role of social networks in forest landscape planning. Forest Policy and Economics 15:132–39. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J. 1996. Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix, potential strategic marketing tools. Journal of Market-Focused Management 1:209–29. doi:10.1007/bf00190039
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 22:501–18. doi:10.1080/08941920802199202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., and H. Ward. 2001. Social capital and the environment. World Development 29:209–27. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prugh, T., R. Costanza, J. Cumberland, H. E. Daly, R. Goodland, and R. B. Norgaard. 1999. Natural capital and human economic survival. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933–49. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo, N., and P. Hauselmann. 2004. Governance and multi-stakeholder processes. Pully, Switzerland: Paper of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
   Google Scholar
• Vennesland, B. 2004. Social capital and networks in forest-based rural economic development. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19(5):82–89. doi:10.1080/02827580410017889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., S. Tuler, and R. Krueger. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27(3):435–50. doi:10.1007/s002670010160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar