Influences on Stakeholder Participation in Water Negotiations: A Case Study from the Klamath Basin

References

• Australian, and New Zealand Environment, and Conservation Council, and Agriculture, and Resource Management Council of Australia, and New Zealand. 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/53cda9ea-7ec2-49d4-af29-d1dde09e96ef/files/nwqms-guidelines-4-vol1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K. A., and E. Mollard eds. 2010. Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, G., and L. Bourget. 2011. Considering convener, stakeholder, and decision-maker issues. In Converging waters: Integrating collaborative modeling with participatory processes to make water resources decisions, ed. L. Bourget, 155–166. Alexandria, VA: IWR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I. C. 2014. Lessons learned from public participation in water quality improvement planning: A study from Australia. Society & Natural Resources 28 (2):180–96. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.941446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, R. D. 2002. Problems in governance. In Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West, ed. R. D. Brunner C. H. Colburn C. M. Cromley R. A. Klein, and E. A. Olson, 1–47. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, J. L. 2004. Designing effective public participation programs: A U.S. perspective. Water International 29 (3):384–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Priscoli, J. 2004. What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Water International 29(2):221–27. doi:10.1080/02508060408691771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Priscoli, J., and A. T. Wolf. 2009. Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doremus, H. D., and A. D. Tarlock. 2008. Water war in the Klamath Basin: Macho law, combat biology, and dirty politics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Estrée, T. P., and B. G. Colby. 2004. Braving the currents: Evaluating environmental conflict resolution in the river basins of the American West. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, E. F. 2004. What we know about environmental conflict resolution: An analysis based on research. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22 (1–2):191–20. doi:10.1002/crq.98
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Public involvement policy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 233-B-03–002. http://www.epa.gov/publicinvolvement/pdf/policy2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2000.327.01.0001.01.ENG
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, T. T., P. Esteves, B. Durham, and M. Esteves. 2010. Participation of the Timbisha Shoshone tribe in land and water resource management decisions in Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada, US. In Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives, ed. K. A. Berry, and E. Mollard, 3–22. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, T. 2007. Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24 (4):485–504.
   Google Scholar
• Forline, L., and E. Assis. 2010. For whom the turbines turn: Indigenous citizens as legitimate stakeholders in the Brazilian amazon. In Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives, ed. K. A. Berry, and E. Mollard, 23–43. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., and E. C. Kelly. 2010. Peace on the river? Social-ecological restoration and large dam removal in the Klamath Basin, USA. Water Alternatives 3:362–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hoverman, S., H. Ross, T. Chan, and B. Powell. 2011. Social learning through participatory integrated catchment risk assessment in the Solomon Islands. Ecology and Society 16 (2). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art17/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KBRA. 2010. Klamath basin restoration agreement. http://klamathrestoration.gov/home
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, D. S. 1999. Historical and sociopolitical context of the Western watersheds movement. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35 (3):493–503. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03606.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KHSA. 2010. Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement. http://klamathrestoration.gov/home
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P. R., S. F. McCool, and M. E. Patterson. 2003. Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a “messy” world. Society & Natural Resources 16 (6):473–90. doi:10.1080/08941920309151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127 (6):378–85. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepage, L., and N. Milot. 2010. From a participative framework in communities’ realities: The challenges of implementing stakeholder involvement in Québec watershed management, Canada. In Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives, ed. K. A. Berry, and E. Mollard. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. 2004. Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal 32 (3):341–61. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, E., H. Nelson, and D. A. Mazmanian. 2012. Industry influence in stakeholder-driven state climate change planning efforts. Policy Studies Journal 40 (2):234–55. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, S. 2006. River of renewal. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2008. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12434/public-participation-in-environmental-assessment-and-decision-making.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2009. Bounded spaces in a ‘borderless world’: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power 2 (2):213–34.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, K., P. Baldwin, H. E. Buck, and B. A. Cody. 2005. Klamath River Basin issues and activities—An overview. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141 (10):2417–31. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (1):3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2004. Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (4):512–57. doi:10.1177/0162243903259197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, T. J., and M. Moldoveanu. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review 28 (2):204–19. doi:10.2307/30040709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudeen, A. K., M. E. Fernandez-Gimenez, J. L. Thompson, and P. Meiman. 2012. Perceptions of success and the question of consensus in natural resource collaboration: Lessons from an inactive collaborative group. Society & Natural Resources 25 (10):1012–27. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.653518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., W. Focht, M. Lubell, A. Vedlitz, Z. Trachtenberg, and M. Matlock, eds. 2005. Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., and W. A. Blomquist. 2008. Embracing watershed politics. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Smutko, L. S., S. H. Klimek, C. A. Perrin, and L. E. Danielson. 2002. Involving watershed stakeholders: An issue attribute approach to determine willingness and need. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (4):995–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L. 2013. Water and democracy: New roles for civil society in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development 29 (4):666–77. doi:10.1080/07900627.2013.781914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuler, S., T. Webler, I. Shockey, and P. C. Stern. 2002. Factors Influencing the participation of local governmental officials in the national estuary program. Coastal Management 30 (1):101–120. doi:10.1080/08920750252692643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Korff, Y., K. A. Daniell, S. Moellenkamp, P. Bots, and R. M. Bijlsma. 2012. Implementing participatory water management: Recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation. Ecology and Society 17 (1). doi:10.5751/es-04733-170130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. 2005. Multi-stakeholder platforms: Integrating society in water resource management? Ambiente & Sociedade 8 (2):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P. 2003. Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Z., and S. R. Perret. 2010. Participation in water resource and services governance in South Africa: Caught in the acts. In Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives, ed. K. A. Berry, and E. Mollard. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K. 2011. Conceptualizing borders in cross-border regions: Case studies of the Barents and Ireland–Wales supranational regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 26(2):211–29. doi:10.1080/08865655.2011.641322
   Google Scholar