Bioenergy From Agriculture: Challenges for the Rural Development Program in Sweden

References

• Amon, B., V. Kryvoruchko, T. Amon, and S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern. 2006. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture Ecosystem & Environment 112:153–62. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, L. 2007. Bioenergi-från jordbruket: en växande resurs [Bioenergy from agriculture a growing resource]. SOU 2007:36.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S., A. Bolte, and M. Weih. 2012. Short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations provide additional habitats for vascular plant species in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Bioenergy Research 5:573–83. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9195-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., and S. Jacobsson. 2010. Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008. Energy Policy 38:1255–71. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A. 2013. Factors for Success in Swedish biogas—A study based on the Swedish agricultural sector. Degree Project, No. 803, Department of Economics. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Berndes, G., P. Börjesson, M. Ostwald, and M. Palm. 2008. Multifunctional biomass production systems: An overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2:16–25. doi:10.1002/bbb.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessou, C., F. Ferchaud, B. Gabrielle, and B. Mary. 2011. Biofuels, greenhouse gases and climate change: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31:1–79. doi:10.1051/agro/2009039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluemling, B., A. P. J. Mol, and Q. Tu. 2013. The social organization of agricultural biogas production and use. Energy Policy 63:10–17. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, P., and M. Berglund. 2007. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems – Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 31:326–44. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, P., and B. Mattiasson. 2007. Biogas as a resource-efficient vehicle fuel. Trends in Biotechnology 26:7–13. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrosio, G. 2013. Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Policies and organizational modes. Energy Policy 63:3–9. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–52. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Rio, P., and M. Burguillo. 2009. An empirical analysis of the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13:1314–25. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, I., and H. Rosenqvist. 2011. Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilisation of short rotation coppice for increased bioenergy production: Biological and economic potential. Biomass and Bioenergy 35:835–42. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J., N. Ward, P. Lowe, and D. Baldock. 2007. European rural development under the common agricultural policy’s ‘second pillar’: Institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies 7:873–88. doi:10.1080/00343400601142795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Communication from the commission to the European Council and the European Parliament. An energy policy for Europe COM (2007) 1 final 10.1.200. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, 16–62. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Commission staff working document. Executive summary of the impact assessment on indirect land-use change related to biofuels and bioliquids 17.10.2012, SWD. 2012. 344 final. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Regulation no 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., and C. Olofsson. 2011. The development of new ventures in farm businesses. In The handbook of research on entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development, G. A. Alsos, S. Carter, E. Ljunggren, and F. Welter 21–37. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fredga, K., K. Danell, H. Frank, D. Hedberg, and S. Kullander. 2008. Bioenergy, opportunities and constraints. Energy Committee Report, June. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, H., and R. Ferguson. 2011. Factors influencing the strategic decision to further develop dairy production: A study of farmers in central Sweden. Livestock Science 135:110–23. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helby, P., H. Rosenqvist, and A. Roos. 2006. Retreat from Salix: Swedish experience with energy crops in the 1990s. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:422–27. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immerzeel, D. J., P. A. Verweij, F. van der Hilst, and A. P. C Faaij. 2014. Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: A state-of-the-art review. GCB Bioenergy 6:183–209. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, S., and A. Anderson. 2002. The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing 17:467–87. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(01)00076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimming, M., C. Sundberg, Å. Nordberg, A. Baky, S. Bernesson, O. Norén, and P. A. Hansson. 2011. Life cycle assessment of energy self-sufficiency systems based on agricultural residues for organic arable farms. Bioresource Technology 102:2859–67. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, K., U. Gunnarsson-Östling, and E. Westholm. 2011. Environmental scenarios and local-global level of community engagement: Environmental justice, jams and institutions. Futures, special issue on Community Engagement for Sustainable Urban Futures 43:413–23. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linné, M., A. Ekstrand, R. Englesson, E. Persson, L. Björnsson, and M. Lantz. 2008. Den svenska biogaspotentialen från inhemska restprodukter [The Swedish biogas potential from domestic waste products]. Avfall Sverige, Svenska Biogasföreningen, Svenska Gasföreningen och Svenskt Vatten (Report in Swedish). http://www.avfallsverige.se/fileadmin/uploads/Rapporter/Utveckling/2008_02.pdf (accessed March 25, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Mangoyana, R. B., and T. F. Smith. 2011. Decentralised bioenergy systems: A review of opportunities and threats. Energy Policy 39:1286–95. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantino, F. 2010. Understanding delivery mechanisms in EU rural development policies: An institutional approach. Paper presented at the 118th Seminar of the EAAE, Ljubljana, Slovenia, August 25–27. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/157976/2/EAAE%20paper%20Ljubliana%20Mantino.pdf (accessed May 2015)
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., and T. Kåberger. 2007. Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass and Bioenergy 31:443–52. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurling, G. 2015. Utveckling i samarbete—Lantbrukarsamarbete inom biogasproduktion i Sverige (Development in collaboration—Farmers collaborating in biogas production in Sweden). Degree thesis, Department of Rural and Urban Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Milder, J. C., J. A. McNeely, S. A. Shames, and S. J. Scherr. 2008. Biofuels and ecoagriculture: Can bioenergy production enhance landscape-scale ecosystem conservation and rural livelihoods? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 6:105–21. doi:10.3763/ijas.2008.0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. O., A. Stämpfli, U. Dold, and T. Hammer. 2011. Energy autarky: A conceptual framework for sustainable regional development. Energy Policy 39:5800–10. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. J., B. Johansson, K. Åstrand, K. Ericsson, P. Svenningsson, P. Börjesson, and L. Neij. 2004. Seeing the wood for the trees: 25 Years of renewable energy policy in Sweden. Energy for Sustainable Development 8:67–81. doi:10.1016/s0973-0826(08)60392-0
   Google Scholar
• Pascucci, S., T. de-Magistris, L. Dries, F. Adinolfi, and F. Capitanio. 2013. Participation of Italian farmers in rural development policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40:605–31. doi:10.1093/erae/jbt005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsson, J. 2014. Produktion och anvåndning av biogas och rötrester år 2013 [Production and use of biogas and digestate, 2013]. Swedish Energy Agency, Eskilstuna, Sweden. (Report in Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels. 2010. RSB principles & criteria for sustainable biofuel production RSB-STD-01–001. http://rsb.org/pdfs/standards/Consultation-on-Version-1.1/10-09-06%20V1-1%20Principles%20&%20Criteria.pdf (accessed February 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Rytter, L., T. Johansson, A. Karacic, and M. Weih. 2011. Orienterande studie om ett svenskt forskningsprogram för poppel [Orienting study of Swedish research program for poplar]. Arbetsrapport/Skogforsk vol. 733, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden. (Report in Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T.-H. Yu. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–40. doi:10.1126/science.1151861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2010. Learning to love the landscapes of carbon-neutrality. Landscape Research 35:157–71. doi:10.1080/01426390903560414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25:217–26. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg, C. 2011. Environmental policy integration in bioenergy. Policy learning across sectors and levels. Department of Political Science, Research Report 2011: 1, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2013. Jordbruksekonomiska undersökningen, 2011 Slutlig statistik [The 2011 farm economic survey]. Report JO 40 SM 1301, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. M., K. Christensson, and L. Björnsson. 2005. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level: Is it economically feasible under conditions in Sweden? Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 28:139–48. doi:10.1007/s00449-005-0016-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. 2012. Energiläget 2012 [Energy situation 2012]. Swedish Energy Agency, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., R. Socolow, J. A. Foley, J. Hill, E. Larson, L. Lynd, S. Pacala, J. Reilly, T. Searchinger, C. Somerville, and R. Williams. 2009. Beneficial biofuels: The food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–71. doi:10.1126/science.1177970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trutnevyte, E., M. Stauffacher, and W. R. Scholz. 2011. Supporting energy initiatives in small communities by linking visions with energy scenarios and multi-criteria assessment. Energy Policy 39:7884–95. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voytenko, Y., and P. Peck. 2012. Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy systems in Sweden and Denmark. Biomass and Bioenergy 38:34–48. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., P. Sorensen, G. Velthof, B. Amon, M. Pinto, L. Rodhe, E. Salomon, N. Hutchings, P. Burczyk, and J. Reid 2013. An assessment of the variation of manure nitrogen efficiency throughout Europe and an appraisal of means to increase manure-N efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 119:371–442. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407247-3.00007-X.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, E., and K. B. Lindahl. 2012. The Nordic welfare model providing energy transition? A political geography approach to the EU RES Directive. Energy Policy 50:328–35. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A., D. Kirk, and J. Gradon. 2011. Analysis of small-scale biogas utilization systems on Ontario cattle farms. Renewable Energy 36:1019–25. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicke, B., P. Verweij, H. van Meijl, D. van Vuuren, and A. P. C. Faaij. 2012. Indirect land use change: Review of existing models and strategies for mitigation. Biofuels 3:87–100. doi:10.4155/bfs.11.154
   Google Scholar